Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

8one6 posted:

Related to replicator chat:


Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eighties ZomCom
Sep 10, 2008




HopperUK posted:

I noticed the Cardassian teenager Rugal who was being raised by a Bajoran family wore the earring too, which suggests they're raising him as a full Bajoran, despite the rumours of abuse by that one suspiciously-convenient bystander. Mind you, do we ever see any Bajorans without the earring once it was established? Maybe it started as religious and now it's a cultural thing.

Thinking about Keevan. Sure he was a bastard but at least he realised 'wait this is all bullshit' and found a way out. And then the Ferengi ruined everything, but he tried.

IIRC the Bajoran earrings aren't strictly religious. They're used to identify which family and probably which caste the wearer comes from.

Zaroff
Nov 10, 2009

Nothing in the world can stop me now!

Epicurius posted:

I kind of agree with Takei there. Retconning Sulu as gat because Takei is gay seems to be on its face a tribute, but it also fits into the stereotype that gay actors can't play straight characters. Also, i don't think he threw a shitfit. He said he was unhappy with the decision, and if Star Trek wanted to honor him and recognize gay people, they should create an original gay character, which they've finally done in Discovery.

The difference here is that John Cho’s Sulu is not the same person as George Takei’s Sulu. Just like how Spock and Uhura were in a relationship when they weren’t before. Or how the history Kirk’s Starfleet career changed.

Clearly Nimoy didn’t mind the changes to Spock and he accepted it as a different version of his character. Takei’s complaints came off as disingenuous, especially given how you’d think he’d be happy with a lead character being allowed to be gay since in the 60s it would have never happened. Maybe it’s sour grapes that this Sulu can be gay when his never could.

Then again these days when I see Takei or his husband online, it’s usually promoting T-shirts on Amazon, lovely clickbait articles stolen from r/amitheasshole or ‘political’ articles which can be summed up as ‘Biden can do no wrong!’ or ‘Look a dumb Republican getting humiliated by a Democrat!’ A damned shame, since before he got Team Takei to handle his social media, it was a lot more interesting to follow him!

Kibayasu
Mar 28, 2010


“Some kind of…” was actually pretty obvious on its face but I wasn’t expecting that many of those.

Also “don’t you understand” is a spiritual addition I think.

John Wick of Dogs
Mar 4, 2017

A real hellraiser


Zaroff posted:

The difference here is that John Cho’s Sulu is not the same person as George Takei’s Sulu. Just like how Spock and Uhura were in a relationship when they weren’t before. Or how the history Kirk’s Starfleet career changed.


Wait so the Kelvin blowing up made Sulu gay? That's a hell of a butterfly effect.

HopperUK
Apr 29, 2007

Why would an ambulance be leaving the hospital?

Eighties ZomCom posted:

IIRC the Bajoran earrings aren't strictly religious. They're used to identify which family and probably which caste the wearer comes from.

Ah thanks and to everyone else. I was sure I was missing something.

Spock and Uhura totally should have been going out before. There's occasional chemistry there.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.

HopperUK posted:

Ah thanks and to everyone else. I was sure I was missing something.

Spock and Uhura totally should have been going out before. There's occasional chemistry there.

They're co-workers, and he's her superior officer. Let's not.

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007
No intrapersonal allowed conflict in Trek, therefore a relationship between crew and commanding officers is actually totally fine since they dodge all of the obvious intrapersonal conflicts that would arise from such a situation :v:

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Mandatory relationship counseling.

Troi leans forward, drunk and leering. "Ssso tell me allll about your SEX LIFE hahaha oh you're uncomfortable 😘"

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

HopperUK posted:

Ah thanks and to everyone else. I was sure I was missing something.

Spock and Uhura totally should have been going out before. There's occasional chemistry there.

Spock’s work girlfriend is Chapel. Him and Uhura are just buds

Arglebargle III
Feb 21, 2006

I didn't realize DS9's writing team had a tic. Voyager had a ton!

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

John Wick of Dogs posted:

Wait so the Kelvin blowing up made Sulu gay? That's a hell of a butterfly effect.

Sounds like sexuality IS a choice

Marx Headroom
May 10, 2007

AT LAST! A show with nonono commercials!
Fallen Rib

Lemniscate Blue posted:

They're co-workers, and he's her superior officer. Let's not.

Hard disagree. Let them gently caress. That goes for everyone in the future.

BonHair
Apr 28, 2007

Marx Headroom posted:

Hard disagree. Let them gently caress. That goes for everyone in the future.

:Rikersay:

Anyway, I just watched the Union episode of DS9. Holy poo poo it's not subtle in any way. I don't know how they were allowed to air it back then, but it sure as hell wouldn't have flown today. Good stuff!

Bullbar
Apr 18, 2007

The Aristocrats!
TV shows, and especially Trek, love to have prisoners in tiny cells with only a bench and no visible toilet or anything.

Always makes me wonder what kind of hosed up holo prison/torture situations Section 31 is running in their black sites

Tighclops
Jan 23, 2008

Unable to deal with it


Grimey Drawer

BonHair posted:

:Rikersay:

Anyway, I just watched the Union episode of DS9. Holy poo poo it's not subtle in any way. I don't know how they were allowed to air it back then, but it sure as hell wouldn't have flown today. Good stuff!

Babylon 5 also had a good labour rights episode that would never have been made now

Eighties ZomCom
Sep 10, 2008




Bullbar posted:

TV shows, and especially Trek, love to have prisoners in tiny cells with only a bench and no visible toilet or anything.

Always makes me wonder what kind of hosed up holo prison/torture situations Section 31 is running in their black sites

That's because the toilet extends out of the wall at the push of a button. :pseudo:

Bullbar
Apr 18, 2007

The Aristocrats!
I'm watching Waltz and I feel like it would be a stronger episode without us actually seeing the people Dukat is talking to

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



John Wick of Dogs posted:

Wait so the Kelvin blowing up made Sulu gay? That's a hell of a butterfly effect.
Yeah this makes me see where Takei is coming from.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

John Wick of Dogs posted:

Wait so the Kelvin blowing up made Sulu gay? That's a hell of a butterfly effect.

We never saw who Sulu married in the prime timeline, we just know he had a kid, which is something gay people can still do through various means :ssh: (as evidenced by Demora also being present in the Kelvinverse).

Unkempt
May 24, 2003

...perfect spiral, scientists are still figuring it out...

And a hot egg.

Axe-man
Apr 16, 2005

The product of hundreds of hours of scientific investigation and research.

The perfect meatball.
Clapping Larry

John Wick of Dogs posted:

Wait so the Kelvin blowing up made Sulu gay? That's a hell of a butterfly effect.

Sorry, we need a new star trek show to have some explain this, or can we just use Michael Burnham for this too?

thotsky
Jun 7, 2005

hot to trot

Bullbar posted:

TV shows, and especially Trek, love to have prisoners in tiny cells with only a bench and no visible toilet or anything.

they just transport the poop and stuff out of them and into space

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Enterprise aliens would always throw them in like, a basement with scrap metal sorta gently covering the window

Eimi
Nov 23, 2013

I will never log offshut up.


nine-gear crow posted:

We never saw who Sulu married in the prime timeline, we just know he had a kid, which is something gay people can still do through various means :ssh: (as evidenced by Demora also being present in the Kelvinverse).

Yeah I was gonna say I don't remember we ever had on screen confirmation of him having a wife. And even if he did...he could be bi? :gaysper:

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

nine-gear crow posted:

We never saw who Sulu married in the prime timeline, we just know he had a kid, which is something gay people can still do through various means :ssh: (as evidenced by Demora also being present in the Kelvinverse).

hosed up thing to do to a partner IMO if you're talking being in the closet

Epicurius
Apr 10, 2010
College Slice
If you're curious, Sulu doesn't have a lot of romantic stuff in TOS (probably for various reasons....the problems that the film and tv industry had with Asians/Asian-American men as romantic figures, and also because Takei was filming the Green Beret in the summer of 1967, which reduced the amount of time he had on the Star Trek set), but he does take two showgirls off the annoyed Spock's hands in Shore Leave, and he falls in love with one of the space hippies in The Way to Eden. In TOS, at least, Sulu is intended to be heterosexual.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



So what you're saying is Sulu Fucks

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Lemniscate Blue posted:

They're co-workers, and he's her superior officer. Let's not.

Hold up.

At the time the relationship begins, they aren't assigned to the same ship. He's higher in rank, but not her superior.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.

A.o.D. posted:

Hold up.

At the time the relationship begins, they aren't assigned to the same ship. He's higher in rank, but not her superior.

The original assertion was about the original versions of the characters in TOS.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Lemniscate Blue posted:

The original assertion was about the original versions of the characters in TOS.

Got it.

Although I will say TOS Spock was almost perfectly asexual. Sure, he experienced the biological urge of Pon-farr, but he never seemed to pursue a romantic relationship, and was completely uninterested in his arranged marriage except for the fact that it was his duty to complete it.


Although yeah, Uhura definitely was making eyes at Spock whenever she thought she could get away with it, and a few other times as well.

A.o.D. fucked around with this message at 01:59 on Jun 14, 2021

Marx Headroom
May 10, 2007

AT LAST! A show with nonono commercials!
Fallen Rib

A.o.D. posted:

Although I will say TOS Spock was almost perfectly asexual. Sure, he experienced the biological urge of Pon-farr, but he never seemed to pursue a romantic relationship, and was completely uninterested in his arranged marriage except for the fact that it was his duty to complete it.

What about the cave lady in All Our Yesterdays? That groovy chick on the trippy spores planet? The Romulan commander in The Enterprise Incident?

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



Kirk in the turbolift in And The Children Shall Lead?

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Marx Headroom posted:

What about the cave lady in All Our Yesterdays? That groovy chick on the trippy spores planet? The Romulan commander in The Enterprise Incident?

1. Really bad writing plus the script somehow made the excuse that the time travel was causing Spock's brain to regress to a more primitive state which makes absolutely no sense I any level of examination.

2. The drugs made him do it.

3. Wasn't Spock manipulating her?

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



A.o.D. posted:

2. The drugs made him do it.

3. Wasn't Spock manipulating her?

Eh. I think you're mistaking Vulcan control of emotions for no emotions at all. I think he had a legitimate attraction to the Leila Kalomi and the Romulan Commander. The spores only brought out the feelings he was repressing.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

Eh. I think you're mistaking Vulcan control of emotions for no emotions at all. I think he had a legitimate attraction to the Leila Kalomi and the Romulan Commander. The spores only brought out the feelings he was repressing.

Oh no, I'm very aware that Vulcans are intensely emotional creatures. I love it when the authors recognize that.

I don't think the spores simply removed Spock's inhibitions. In the Naked Time he got infected by that star drunkenness, and he didn't try to get his freak on. He loses control of his emotions, but he's still who he is. Under the influence of the spores, he gets romantic and blatantly refuses orders. The spores don't just remove inhibitions, they alter personalities on a dramatic scale. Part of the evidence of this is that everyone infected by the spores acts the same way, and the plants engage in a poorly explained symbiosis to affect a change in the behavior of their hosts. So yeah, Spock tries to get his freak on, but that's not really Spock making the decisions there. That's not his mind, but uninhibited.

Hard disagree on The Enterprise Incident. The entire episode is a Federation Black Op from the start. Are you forgetting the "Vulcan Death Grip" Spock applies to convince the Romulans that he betrayed his captain?

At least we agree that All Our Yesterdays was Bad.

Farmer Crack-Ass
Jan 2, 2001

this is me posting irl

John Wick of Dogs posted:

Wait so the Kelvin blowing up made Sulu gay? That's a hell of a butterfly effect.

I can't remember who originally posted this:

"It's an alternate universe until you point out a continuity error, at which point it's a re-imagining until you point out the lack of imagination, at which point it's an alternate universe."

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



A.o.D. posted:

I don't think the spores simply removed Spock's inhibitions. In the Naked Time he got infected by that star drunkenness, and he didn't try to get his freak on. He loses control of his emotions, but he's still who he is. Under the influence of the spores, he gets romantic and blatantly refuses orders. The spores don't just remove inhibitions, they alter personalities on a dramatic scale. Part of the evidence of this is that everyone infected by the spores acts the same way, and the plants engage in a poorly explained symbiosis to affect a change in the behavior of their hosts. So yeah, Spock tries to get his freak on, but that's not really Spock making the decisions there. That's not his mind, but uninhibited.

I had never thought of it that way, but I see where you're coming from. The symbiosis is explained as giving the host "peace of mind" and "perfect health"; not specifically controlling their minds.

Incidentally, as a leftist adult my take on that episode is different than when I watched it as a kid. Ten year old me agreed with Kirk's argument that man "stagnates without a challenge". Adult me thinks that Kirk is the villain of the episode, because despite the spores' influence, the colonists had created a perfect, peaceful world. He tore them away from that.

quote:

Hard disagree on The Enterprise Incident. The entire episode is a Federation Black Op from the start. Are you forgetting the "Vulcan Death Grip" Spock applies to convince the Romulans that he betrayed his captain?

True, but it's possible he felt a spark there too. It didn't seem that TOS Spock interacted with people of his own species that much (I know Romulans are a different species, but they're an offshoot of the Vulcans).

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

I had never thought of it that way, but I see where you're coming from. The symbiosis is explained as giving the host "peace of mind" and "perfect health"; not specifically controlling their minds.

Incidentally, as a leftist adult my take on that episode is different than when I watched it as a kid. Ten year old me agreed with Kirk's argument that man "stagnates without a challenge". Adult me thinks that Kirk is the villain of the episode, because despite the spores' influence, the colonists had created a perfect, peaceful world. He tore them away from that.

True, but it's possible he felt a spark there too. It didn't seem that TOS Spock interacted with people of his own species that much (I know Romulans are a different species, but they're an offshoot of the Vulcans).

Spock had a REALLY rough childhood. If you accept what TAS has to say on the subject, and what The Final Frontier implies, he never found acceptance among his own people as a half-Vulcan. T'Pring had no problem getting her freak on with a side piece while Spock only met her once as a child.

Also, I still agree with Kirk. The happiness those plants offer isn't significantly different than the happiness of a morphine drip. There's no achievement, satisfaction, actualization, or companionship causing those feelings.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



A.o.D. posted:

Spock had a REALLY rough childhood. If you accept what TAS has to say on the subject, and what The Final Frontier implies, he never found acceptance among his own people as a half-Vulcan. T'Pring had no problem getting her freak on with a side piece while Spock only met her once as a child.

Also, I still agree with Kirk. The happiness those plants offer isn't significantly different than the happiness of a morphine drip. There's no achievement, satisfaction, actualization, or companionship causing those feelings.

Those feelings wouldn't come from the spores, though, but from living in peace on the colony. Sandoval told Kirk that they "had everything they need[ed]". They already had the achievement of setting up a farming colony on a planet that was arguably on the edge of habitability thanks to the berthold rays.

To my ears, Kirk's arguments are similar to people who think that a living wage or a UBI mean that nobody has an "incentive to work". I don't agree because when your basic needs are met, that's an incentive to work harder and better.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply