|
one punch man is monarchist
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:16 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 22:23 |
|
https://twitter.com/IGN/status/1410629552087445505?s=19
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:21 |
|
^ please nomazzi Chart Czar posted:An algorithm recommended me something that I didn't want know about. the algorithms are very complicated in how they're put together but the effects are usually very straightforward, because all the fancy AI stuff works by demonstrating what the intended effects are. and all these stupid internet sites just want you to click things because that's a hard, trackable metric that looks good on a graph. so the algorithm probably recommended whatever it was because it thought, absent any other concern, that you'd click it.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:38 |
|
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:40 |
|
josh04 posted:the algorithms are very complicated in how they're put together but the effects are usually very straightforward, because all the fancy AI stuff works by demonstrating what the intended effects are. and all these stupid internet sites just want you to click things because that's a hard, trackable metric that looks good on a graph. so the algorithm probably recommended whatever it was because it thought, absent any other concern, that you'd click it. And honestly, I almost clicked it, out of morbid curiosity.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:40 |
|
that's how they get you!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:42 |
|
josh04 posted:that's how they get you! [Screams Internally/Externally/Cosmically forever.]
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:47 |
|
mazzi Chart Czar posted:In a lot of fiction there are secret kings, what are you talking about, all these characters spent a good portion of their lives learning and practicing poo poo and except for Jesus all had setbacks/failures or earned their poo poo on merit, it’s not in any way comparable to Potter and quidditch. I mean Bard the bowman’s name is Bard the bowman and he was captain of archers he didn’t just pick up a bow for the first time and happen to kill Smaug
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 18:59 |
|
jesus definitely had setbacks, the disciples were hosed with a lot in the gospels
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 19:13 |
|
indigi posted:what are you talking about, all these characters spent a good portion of their lives learning and practicing poo poo and except for Jesus all had setbacks/failures or earned their poo poo on merit, it’s not in any way comparable to Potter and quidditch. I mean Bard the bowman’s name is Bard the bowman and he was captain of archers he didn’t just pick up a bow for the first time and happen to kill Smaug The problem with royal lineages (irl or fantasy) isn't the capabilities or skills or "likability" or experiences of the individual persons, but the unjust power and violence inherent to the system
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 19:27 |
|
indigi posted:what are you talking about, all these characters spent a good portion of their lives learning and practicing poo poo and except for Jesus all had setbacks/failures or earned their poo poo on merit, it’s not in any way comparable to Potter and quidditch. I mean Bard the bowman’s name is Bard the bowman and he was captain of archers he didn’t just pick up a bow for the first time and happen to kill Smaug "Secret king" were poorly chosen words. Characters who were born special, and are better then everybody else. I think it's more like a scale. Harry Potter is way more on the side of "he's just good at everything." (Worked Really Hard ----------------Just Naturally Good) Only Bard could kill smug because he was a king. A normal archer couldn't do that action. Hercules has trails, and at the end, over-comes everything by being a god. He was born a demi-god He started off better than everybody from birth, as a baby in a crib he strangled a snake. If he wasn't special he wouldn't have had the challenges at all, and then made greater by challenges. King Author I'm sort of vague on. I listened to Malory, Thomas - Le Morte D'Arthur Volume 1 It was a brain numbing amount of endless of slewing / killing. For Jesus, in its most extreme "good at everything," the suffering and dying was part of the plan to win in the end. mazzi Chart Czar has issued a correction as of 00:57 on Jul 2, 2021 |
# ? Jul 1, 2021 19:38 |
i say swears online posted:jesus definitely had setbacks, the disciples were hosed with a lot in the gospels it's also pretty clearly ex post facto inserted into the narrative of his life that he knew he was going to die. he pretty clearly wanted to lead an actual, on earth revolt against the romans (like a bunch of other messianic figures at the same time did) and when he had that big, final, uh setback, there was a whole lot of "no wait it is actually a good thing that our savior died in an exceptionally brutal and public way"
|
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 19:51 |
|
I thought Jesus was more about creating a separate community away from the Romans and traditional Jewish authorities. The people who kept the Dead Sea Scrolls were pretty much doing that at the same time.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 19:58 |
|
edit: double post
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 19:58 |
|
Azathoth posted:he pretty clearly wanted to lead an actual, on earth revolt against the romans he explicitly did not want to do this
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 20:04 |
Atrocious Joe posted:I thought Jesus was more about creating a separate community away from the Romans and traditional Jewish authorities. The people who kept the Dead Sea Scrolls were pretty much doing that at the same time. It's a matter of interpretation, but I can personally see an evolution from Mark through Luke and Matthew and into John where he starts being real up in everyone's face and it shifts towards inner pursuits by the end. Essentially going from "sell your cloak and buy a sword" to "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" as a matter of emphasis. Jesus, whatever your opinions about his historicity, was explicitly within biblical text challenging Roman authority. A critical reading of the text makes it clear that he was definitely going for his heavenly kingdom on earth. Or, at a minimum, his followers believed that and he was content to let them believe that. And that's clearly what his followers believed as well. Look at Paul's letters. One of the first things he has to assure a congregation about is that the Kingdom of God is still coming, even though Jesus died. They all expected him to usher in an earthly Kingdom of God, and it's only in the aftermath of the crucifixion that they shifted to "what Jesus actually meant..." Some of that assumes a certain writing order that is by no means academically settled either, so don't take what I'm saying as anything more than my dumbass opinion. Azathoth has issued a correction as of 20:16 on Jul 1, 2021 |
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 20:12 |
|
if Jesus’ followers believed he was supposed to lead a revolt they wouldn’t have let a few centurions punk them in the garden or the house of the high priest. not to mention he denies it in Mark
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 20:26 |
the easy arrest/death of Jesus, collapse of the disciples, and 2,000 years of not shutting the gently caress up make a lot more sense in the context of modern anarchistic commune behavior
|
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 20:41 |
|
Paul was the DeRay of his time
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 20:48 |
|
Paul honestly sucks poo poo like bro you weren’t even there bro you’ve admitted to having an epileptic seizure in print
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 20:51 |
|
Once upon a time in Hollywood is tarantinos worst and most pretentious piece of poo poo film by far. It's a reactionary borderline fascist revenge fantasy on the generation he views as "ruining" Hollywood in a transparent attempt to win the Oscars. Also its incredibly dull and just plain poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 21:09 |
|
thatfatkid posted:Once upon a time in Hollywood is tarantinos worst and most pretentious piece of poo poo film by far. the hippies were, in fact, bad
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 21:14 |
|
thatfatkid posted:Once upon a time in Hollywood is tarantinos worst and most pretentious piece of poo poo film by far. all Tarantino is garbage except inglorious bastards OP
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 21:19 |
|
wow some guy doesn't respect the old hollywood guard in here!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 21:21 |
|
thatfatkid posted:Once upon a time in Hollywood is tarantinos worst and most pretentious piece of poo poo film by far. what I found more weird about it is that it's a movie about how tarantino's imaginary friends would totes save sharon tate from being murdered and be pals with her and hang out like it's one thing to fantasize about killing hitler, but this is just hosed up. and of course in this imaginary world where she survives there's an unnecessarily long scene displaying her feet, like cmon dude
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 21:40 |
|
grate deceiver posted:what I found more weird about it is that it's a movie about how tarantino's imaginary friends would totes save sharon tate from being murdered and be pals with her and hang out It's better than the Hilary Duff movie, but that's a pretty low bar to get over
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 21:56 |
|
it never ceases to amaze me that in a Hollywood filled with rapists and pedophiles there exists such a large group that wants to cancel Tarantino for having one of the most benign kinks imaginable. it’s downright Puritan.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 22:09 |
|
Dr. Killjoy posted:oh boy more Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Bruce Lee discourse lawl: quote:On the other hand, when Seagal was asked about the incident, he directly denied the allegations, calling LeBell a "sick, pathological scumbag liar," and offered the name of a witness who could prove Lebell had fabricated this rumor.[22] The claim garnered a heated response from LeBell's trainee Ronda Rousey, who assured Seagal was the one lying and said: "If [Seagal] says anything bad about Gene to my face, I'd have to make him crap his pants a second time."[23] she'd do it too
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 22:09 |
|
Even inglorious bastards is boring. I fell asleep half way through and have had no desire to ever finish it. On paper it has everything you'd think you want to watch in a movie but it just felt pornographic to me. All the chuddest people I knew in college loved inglorious bastards because ultimately it's a shallow film that elevates piety, revenge obsessed individuals. And that makes sense to me since fascist readily cannibalize their own.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 22:10 |
|
galagazombie posted:it never ceases to amaze me that in a Hollywood filled with rapists and pedophiles there exists such a large group that wants to cancel Tarantino for having one of the most benign kinks imaginable. it’s downright Puritan. He's just having too much fun, Jan!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 22:14 |
|
Tarantino should have made the movie be about a stuntman who kills Jolly West
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 22:15 |
|
i say swears online posted:one punch man is monarchist Saitama posted:"Human beings are strong because we have the ability to change ourselves. 100 push-ups, 100 sit-ups, 100 squats, and a 10km run EVERY SINGLE DAY!!!"
|
# ? Jul 1, 2021 22:28 |
|
grate deceiver posted:what I found more weird about it is that it's a movie about how tarantino's imaginary friends would totes save sharon tate from being murdered and be pals with her and hang out its a movie op
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:15 |
|
*watching roman polanski usher dicaprio through the gates of heaven* what the freaking heck? is this real????
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:20 |
|
tarantino seems like hes personally an annoying weirdo but his movies are good
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:30 |
|
once upon a time is good you nerds tho it was funny watching it the teather outside the US. everyone else in the audience was clearly extremely confused
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:30 |
|
tarentinos dialogue is Kevin Smith tier
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:31 |
|
indigi posted:tarentinos dialogue is Kevin Smith tier the quentin tarantino scene from pulp fiction but instead of dropping hard rs hes just repeating the kevin smith tweet over and over again
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:36 |
|
the new ridley scott movie has produced the best set photos I've seen in ages
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:37 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 22:23 |
|
that tweet is probably the best art produced during the Obama administration
|
# ? Jul 2, 2021 01:37 |