Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Slavvy posted:

Sorry, I misunderstood the thrust of your post! I got it confused with this kind of thinking:

Ask yourself what basis you have for thinking this.

Ask yourself how one would go about determining what is and isn't marginally useful and who gets to be that person.

There is always work to be done, it may not be profitable or count up to 40 hours a week, but it exists. The ideal is everyone benefit and for that to happen, there is a certain loss of freedom.
I have no problem with bureaucracy, gosplan etc. To be clear I am not a anarchist/left communist/orthodox Marxist or a syndicalist etc.

If guys want to jack off and will die to defend that right, there can be a dormitory for them.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 23:51 on Oct 17, 2021

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

Xi needs to send all the posters in this thread to work in the countryside

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Atrocious Joe posted:

Xi needs to send all the posters in this thread to work in the countryside

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

Posting Xi Jinping thought is the most necessary and productive form of work

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Atrocious Joe posted:

Xi needs to send all the posters in this thread to work in the countryside

Chairman xi, thank you for moving my posting from an urban environment to the countryside.

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

https://twitter.com/RecceGen/status/1449688830970376198

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
broke: horse paste

woke: horse respirators

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

that whole bit in the shatner nuke documentary rules

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xoHbBkUGSQ

Mandoric
Mar 15, 2003

Slavvy posted:

Ecologically there is an objective need to reduce the amount of activity being done, of any kind

The ecological need is the exact opposite, for a heroic effort akin to the USSR's industrialization in order to replace dirty machinery with clean where possible or convert to labor-intensive processes where not, rebuild our (as industrialzed countries in general, but especially the US) power generation away from fossil fuels, rework transportation infrastructure toward rail and manufacturing of bulky/heavy goods closer to where they'll be used, and redevelop suburbs into midrise mixed-use with local mass transit and rural areas into properly centralized walkable villages with long-distance transit access while preparing for mass waves of refugees.

Now, war communism doesn't mean 16-hour days at the ammo plant for every single person, there's a need for not just basic services but art, hope, small luxuries, all that. But the potential for that in our future makes me even more inclined to prefer the option of being considered a working member in good standing of whatever neo-SSP than a slacker who uses my time well when that time comes, even though I'd be doing the same things either way.

E: wasn't trying to last-word, just mostly wrote at stoplights and then :justpost: after getting home. Econ or theory threads would probably be a better place to continue, though.

Mandoric has issued a correction as of 01:19 on Oct 18, 2021

DrinkingBird
Sep 26, 2017

Raskolnikov38 posted:

that whole bit in the shatner nuke documentary rules

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xoHbBkUGSQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUKFc1Du86U

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
The MTW lunatics are correct in their assessment that the first world is a giant parasitic labor siphon that outsources much/most of it's dirty work. They're wrong in declaring western service drones secret bourgeoise, but in any utopian global socialist future that doesn't involve sci-fi robots/replicators there might be more full-time etsy artists and artisanal dildo makers overall globally, but there's probably gonna be alot less in society as most of us here experience it. Alot more people are going to have to do traditional heavy labor as their main role in society and it's not going to be done because a huge portion of society just loves cleaning toilets, moving boxes, sewing jeans, extracting resources, or laying bricks as artistic hobbies. If we stop exploiting the third world so aggressively, and provide decent working conditions, and reasonable hours... all of those are workforce multipliers. The people doing those jobs will live better lives than the people doing them now, and be able to express themselves/study/jackoff in their vastly greater free time, but there would be more people doing those jobs and most of them would rather be doing something else.

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



In the current system, fifty rich assholes poop in office washrooms and one person has the full-time job of cleaning those washrooms. Perhaps the rich people could spend 1/50th of their time cleaning their toilet themselves. I'm sure they'd cry about oppression because they can no longer feel superior to the toilet cleaner.

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010



Just saying that the whole "clean the toilets" talk is making me think of a highly militaristic society where everyone just grabs the buckets and brooms and starts cleaning the offices at the end of the work week.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011



this is incredibly loving awesome?!?!

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

Cao Ni Ma posted:

Just saying that the whole "clean the toilets" talk is making me think of a highly militaristic society where everyone just grabs the buckets and brooms and starts cleaning the offices at the end of the work week.

just because something is regimented doesn’t mean it’s militaristic. I don’t think they make Japanese students clean the schools to prepare them for the SDF or anything

Southpaugh
May 26, 2007

Smokey Bacon


dead gay comedy forums posted:

this is incredibly loving awesome?!?!

It rules.


eSports Chaebol posted:

just because something is regimented doesn’t mean it’s militaristic. I don’t think they make Japanese students clean the schools to prepare them for the SDF or anything

If you're responsible for something you are more likely to look after it. And if trashing the place makes more work for everyone else you will rapidly learn the perils of in-group/out-group dynamics.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Cao Ni Ma posted:

Just saying that the whole "clean the toilets" talk is making me think of a highly militaristic society where everyone just grabs the buckets and brooms and starts cleaning the offices at the end of the work week.

what militaristic society do you mean? Like, my frame of reference for that as a dumb nerd is how Japanese and Korean students clean their classrooms themselves on however many set times and that seems perfectly fine to me, not only does it teach cleaning skills it hopefully establishes at least a sliver of empathy for custodians and such that will maybe make at least most of them slightly more useful citizens. I don't see an issue in applying that to the workplace as well.

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010



I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, and I wasn’t referring to any existing nation right now. It’s my personal experience in the military but at a national level. It’s what we did.

eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

Cao Ni Ma posted:

I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, and I wasn’t referring to any existing nation right now. It’s my personal experience in the military but at a national level. It’s what we did.

I mean it is an example of how we can only imagine (and only approve of) anything outside of capitalist relations if it’s Actually Existing Camofare

Chamale
Jul 11, 2010

I'm helping!



Cao Ni Ma posted:

I’m not saying it’s a bad thing, and I wasn’t referring to any existing nation right now. It’s my personal experience in the military but at a national level. It’s what we did.

Did generals clean the toilets, too?

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010



Chamale posted:

Did generals clean the toilets, too?

The generals cleaned the toilets when they weren’t generals.

ded redd
Aug 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

Cao Ni Ma posted:

The generals cleaned the toilets when they weren’t generals.

and so the young inherit a generation of brutalization :smith:

and several pounds of dried poo poo :smith:

wynott dunn
Aug 9, 2006

What is to be done?

Who or what can challenge, and stand a chance at beating, the corporate juggernauts dominating the world?

AnimeIsTrash posted:

Chairman xi, thank you for moving my posting from an urban environment to the countryside.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Rent-A-Cop posted:

If there are things that need doing then that isn't make-work, it's just work. And the ethical way to make sure those things get done is to offer something attractive in exchange for doing them.

Eliminating the parasitic capatlist class does little to help the worker if what you replace it with is a bureaucrat class that simply enforces the same pointless toil, now for the service of a spreadsheet rather than a millionaire.

If there is a shortage of necessary resources then obviously labor is necessary, and if the shortage is severe then even compulsory labor may be warranted. But if there is no shortage then labor simply for the sake of labor is a pointless and inefficient use if everyone's time and energy.

Edit: I guess the fundamental disagreement here is that unlike Ardennes, I don't believe that work has a value beyond what it produces (material, intellectual, emotional, or spiritual products). Although I'm happy to engage in some self education if anyone has some recommended reading
I think if you're approaching the point under socialism where you really can't find enough work for everyone to do then you're basically at the tail end of the transition to full communism. (And, fwiw you can't divide the work week infinitely: a "ten minute work week" is dumb and would just result in a massive administrative overhead that would dwarf the actual productive labor being performed.) And to be honest while I can kind of imagine the administrative ins and outs of a socialist economy, real communism baffles me - for my part I just assume a late-stage socialist subject would find what to do for the next step obvious. Even now in late-stage capitalism, "really can't find enough productive work for everyone to do" is difficult to imagine just because so much of what we do now is just bullshit anyway and it's difficult to filter out in my mind. Right now if something doesn't make a rich person richer somehow, it doesn't get done, and if it does make them richer it definitely does get done even if it's not actually useful - an economy where nearly 100% of labor performed is to truly socially-useful ends is actually kind of difficult for me to imagine in great detail. Obviously I can say the words and understand the broad strokes, but all the smaller consequences and knock-on effects that would come out of such a system, I can't even really speculate with much confidence.

And besides it's like Mao said (to paraphrase): you don't really attain this knowledge by thinking about it a lot. You attain it by doing the thing - accomplishing the task in the context of your real circumstances. Nobody in the world has advanced the dialectic to the point we're reasoning about, so while it's certainly interesting and maybe even a little bit useful to speculate about these things, in the end you must face the truth that we're all kind of talking out of our asses, here.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Having said that, it's not really difficult at all for me to imagine an economy where the typical custodian is living a lifestyle equivalent to a contemporary $125k/yr salary job or better, and the status of that job is not particularly low, because there are no low-status jobs, and because people have enough self awareness to realize that if the custodian didn't exist then the toilets where they work would be unusable inside of a week.

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

there are no low-status jobs
carving out of course a specific exception to this, for anime-appraiser

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

And besides it's like Mao said (to paraphrase): you don't really attain this knowledge by thinking about it a lot. You attain it by doing the thing - accomplishing the task in the context of your real circumstances. Nobody in the world has advanced the dialectic to the point we're reasoning about, so while it's certainly interesting and maybe even a little bit useful to speculate about these things, in the end you must face the truth that we're all kind of talking out of our asses, here.

ain’t that the truth. I’m just a little disappointed that even this thread is so enthralled by capitalist realism that a lot of people can’t even imagine A) the unfathomable amount of socially desirable labor out there for the taking under socialism and B) the boundless depths of human experience and knowledge of the universe that awaits future generations on the other side of the capitalist era of history

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005


kinda proud i named these buds on my first try

MSDOS KAPITAL
Jun 25, 2018





Centrist Committee posted:

ain’t that the truth. I’m just a little disappointed that even this thread is so enthralled by capitalist realism that a lot of people can’t even imagine A) the unfathomable amount of socially desirable labor out there for the taking under socialism and B) the boundless depths of human experience and knowledge of the universe that awaits future generations on the other side of the capitalist era of history
Well you've got kind of two contradictory forces pushing against each other. On the one hand the promise of socialism is that of a worker-directed economy / dictatorship of the proletariat / etc where value is not accumulating to the capitalist class anymore. And presumably working conditions should improve overall, when that happens, as the state should not be pushing undue misery on workers if workers have truly captured the state. On the other hand, the metric by which we prioritize work is no longer that which accumulates the most capital to the capitalist class. A lot of currently well-compensated work would be deprioritized or even disappear, and a lot of poo poo that just doesn't get done at all would suddenly be a very high priority. It's the latter of these that's kind of a mystery (to me anyway) - for example any socialism that properly prices in the effects of climate change is going to find that there is a poo poo ton of socially-useful work to be done, and there are other areas as well, and in fact it's not hard to imagine, that far from socialism resulting in less work to do overall for the typical person, it actually results in more. We probably have right now more work to be done than we have people to do the work, actually, and the longer we stick to capitalism, the bigger the divide becomes I think. And also importantly: we're not pushing all the really miserable stuff to the very ends of resource extraction in the capitalist imperial machine anymore, so all this is especially true in the "developed" world. That also raises the question: how do you get people in so-called developed nations to go along with this, and I suppose optimistically they might see that they are not having their surplus value taken from them so that e.g. Jeff Bezos can piss it away on rockets or whatever - that they are really doing something useful and can see the benefit (including the benefit of the future not looking so loving bleak anymore, which is huge if you can make it happen and be believable for the typical person). The less optimistic answer is that they'll go along with it when they have no other choice because the capitalist empire has finally burned out and can no longer sustain itself - we might have a totally ruined world by then, in the sense of like a permanent stone age.

Put another way: any medium-term prognostications about a theoretical world socialism that have people near the imperial core living lives of even greater luxury in material terms than they currently enjoy, are snake oil. They are not realistic and not to be taken seriously. We can have healthier relations with the means of production for sure, but if we're not working harder and smarter as well then we're still just waiting to boil alive and what's more probably still exploiting someone on the other side of the world while we're doing it, too.

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

That's what I think.

This is all just theoretical discussion, so you can imagine any sort of stateless classless society you want.

But in practice, in the world that we live in now, things might end up looking like Soviet war communism.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Centrist Committee posted:

ain’t that the truth. I’m just a little disappointed that even this thread is so enthralled by capitalist realism that a lot of people can’t even imagine A) the unfathomable amount of socially desirable labor out there for the taking under socialism and B) the boundless depths of human experience and knowledge of the universe that awaits future generations on the other side of the capitalist era of history

100% agreed. who cares if we have layabouts in future communism but i honestly don't think that'd be the case. i'm lazy as hell and would take the dole UBI if offered under the current system but even i recognize there's so, so much to do. there are so many trees to plant, so much masonry to turn into long-lasting buildings, so many beaches to restore, so much plastic to pull out of the oceans. it'd be great if we could be labor-efficient in these departments but at the moment i don't give a poo poo. give me healthcare and a pension and i will literally move to north dakota to turn it into a forest, or chop that forest down to give everyone furniture in 2050, or work the varnish factory that gives a nice stain, or help deliver and install that carbon-sink furniture if i'm able

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

That also raises the question: how do you get people in so-called developed nations to go along with this, and I suppose optimistically they might see that they are not having their surplus value taken from them so that e.g. Jeff Bezos can piss it away on rockets or whatever - that they are really doing something useful and can see the benefit (including the benefit of the future not looking so loving bleak anymore, which is huge if you can make it happen and be believable for the typical person). The less optimistic answer is that they'll go along with it when they have no other choice because the capitalist empire has finally burned out and can no longer sustain itself - we might have a totally ruined world by then, in the sense of like a permanent stone age.

MTW is the centrist option here tbh

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

i say swears online posted:

kinda proud i named these buds on my first try





can someone send this one to the twitter guy who does the body posture lines

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/cnnphilippines/status/1450003588810301445

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005


rip, my dude

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
deleted already!

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021

i say swears online posted:

kinda proud i named these buds on my first try

That's Saddam and Indira Gandhi right?

Some Guy TT
Aug 30, 2011
Probation
Can't post for 6 hours!
https://twitter.com/shreyas_k_reddy/status/1450041846692937731

for context this is the guy from the fringe right wing universal basic income party

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


Lostconfused posted:

But in practice, in the world that we live in now, things might end up looking like Soviet war communism.

to fight climate change and reorganize the economic arrangement in shortest possible order, while providing necessities of life (and I say necessities not stuff that we think that are necessary), war communism might be the best vector of approach tbqh

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

for example any socialism that properly prices in the effects of climate change is going to find that there is a poo poo ton of socially-useful work to be done, and there are other areas as well, and in fact it's not hard to imagine, that far from socialism resulting in less work to do overall for the typical person, it actually results in more. We probably have right now more work to be done than we have people to do the work, actually, and the longer we stick to capitalism, the bigger the divide becomes I think

this is a loving great post

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rent-A-Cop
Oct 15, 2004

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

you must face the truth that we're all kind of talking out of our asses, here.
New thread title.

Thanks for that excellent and well reasoned post. Some interesting stuff there I hadn't considered.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply