Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe
I don't think that the title of a book published almost 70 years ago can be a spoiler.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

droll
Jan 9, 2020

by Azathoth
It's the title of the book and it's been brought up by Seldon in this TV series, right? How is it a spoiler

BigPaddy
Jun 30, 2008

That night we performed the rite and opened the gate.
Halfway through, I went to fix us both a coke float.
By the time I got back, he'd gone insane.
Plus, he'd left the gate open and there was evil everywhere.



Can we at least get the fact the Emperors are looked after by a robot leaked that starts a rumor going around Trantor so we get to see a press conference with a robot laughing at the rumor to show it isn’t true?

I don’t want to be ruled by no robot!

ElGroucho
Nov 1, 2005

We already - What about sticking our middle fingers up... That was insane
Fun Shoe
The Salvor actor is as bad as Lee Pace is good, which is a lot

aparmenideanmonad
Jan 28, 2004
Balls to you and your way of mortal opinions - you don't exist anyway!
Fun Shoe

ElGroucho posted:

The writing for the Salvor actor is as bad as the writing for Lee Pace is good

I honestly can't tell if she's bad or good because there's been some glimmers despite the mess they're giving her to work with.

Pham Nuwen
Oct 30, 2010



withak posted:

I don't think that the title of a book published almost 70 years ago can be a spoiler.

Nybble
Jun 28, 2008

praise chuck, raise heck
Foundation 2.0

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro
I think it’s kind of funny that some people (book readers) are still mad at Salvor looking directly into the camera and going “why am I special???” when it is obvious from the book’s sequels and prequels that they are bringing in the Second Foundation elements early. My guess, from what happened in the books, is that the SF is sending agents to manipulate events towards the planned outcome, which is why Salvor’s bf let her dad sacrifice himself to blow up the corvettes: it was the “best outcome.”

Also, pretty cool that the Anacreons all flew Federal Corvettes from a Elite Dangerous! :pcgaming:

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Toxic Fart Syndrome posted:

I think it’s kind of funny that some people (book readers) are still mad at Salvor looking directly into the camera and going “why am I special???” when it is obvious from the book’s sequels and prequels that they are bringing in the Second Foundation elements early. My guess, from what happened in the books, is that the SF is sending agents to manipulate events towards the planned outcome, which is why Salvor’s bf let her dad sacrifice himself to blow up the corvettes: it was the “best outcome.”

Also, pretty cool that the Anacreons all flew Federal Corvettes from a Elite Dangerous! :pcgaming:

Continued book discussion


It is not clear at all that the 2nd foundation is doing anything at all. It's specifically indicated otherwise in later books. They stayed on Trantor to further the science of psychohistory and mentalics, and to protect the library because psychohistory suggested that Trantor would just be ignored after the final fall.

And there was no way they would be able to effect any change, as Seldon himself talks about the need for leverage. Which means mental control at specific points.

It's the same sort of story as the Eternals, who's quest was to make the greatest possible change using the smallest possible action. Like moving a container of a chemical 1 foot to the right.

DaveKap
Feb 5, 2006

Pickle: Inspected.



ElGroucho posted:

The Salvor actor is as bad as Lee Pace is good, which is a lot
She's actually a fantastic actress. She's being directed and written poorly, though.

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


Arglebargle III posted:

Man the sequence on Terminus with the kids shows just how much the writers rely on clichés. This isn't really advancing the plot, but we need a scene showing that Terminus is being sacked. So we have an over the shoulder documentary cam following a kid, something that was overused by 2005. The scene between the two kids on the street is kind of appalling writing.

"What happened here?" Kid, you are both living through a violent sack. It's obvious what happened, and why aren't you at all concerned with your own safety? The line read is really relaxed.

"It will make for a good story if we get out of this." Once again this is a 12 year old boy. Not a sergeant trying to give a pep talk to a private. These are scared children, but they talk exactly as if they were characters from Saving Private Ryan.

Either the writers are just bad or the writing for this show was badly rushed. Because either they thought "yeah this is good stuff!" or they thought "we need to shoot a scene showing that Terminus is getting sacked, and we have to have it in by midnight tonight"

Maybe the 12 year old is miscast because he just beat the poo poo out of a soldier.
The "12 year old boy" is a 16 year old girl. Or at least the actor is a 16 year old girl. I think that addresses most of your confusion about her actions actually. She's acting more mature for the sake of her younger friend because she is more mature.

I agree that the concept of the indiscriminate sack was frustratingly at odds with the plot though. Feels like someone wrote up a story (which is actually good and makes sense), and someone else came in and was like, "well, wouldn't it be more dramatic and exciting if they were executing people in the streets?" I do not like that imaginary second person. I'm also blaming that second person for the comical "ambush" where our heroes walk openly down a street to the most critical piece of equipment on the planet as if the coast could possibly be clear, and all the scenes in earlier episodes where lone defenders just stand in the open in front of the horde of Anacreons with no apparent understanding of the concept of cover.

I'm really enjoying the show though and haven't been that bothered by those kinds of things. They're really silly, but they're surface level silly. The plot doesn't revolve around taking those things seriously- "the few defenders watch the Anacreons prepare," "it's chaos as the Anacreons take the city," and "our heroes try to sneak into the ship but are caught" are all perfectly acceptable plot points. Just because they were portrayed in more or less jarring ways doesn't ruin the story for me.


LinkesAuge posted:

If that was true there would be no Second Foundation. It seems people often like to make the same mistake with Psychohistory as they do with the three robotic laws, they take the premise as "truth" instead of realising that Asimov's whole point is that the story is about the flaws of the premise.
This is an excellent book spoiler that explains an issue book readers seem to be having (and indeed, an issue I've been having):

Spoiler about book themes but show events: Seldon says the universe can rotate around an individual... to Raych. 2nd Foundation Raych. The Foundation itself (First Foundation) must believe that individuals cannot matter, as they follow the plan of one man, but Seldon himself seems to have known that he was creating a convenient story to manipulate the bulk of events, even as he sets in motion a plan to allow individuals to tweak the path of the future. Seldon lies when it is convenient. He did in the books, and he's already clearly doing it in the show.

The weird thing is that Salvor Hardin psychically heard him say that. I'm not sure that was part of the plan, and I'm honestly not sure exactly what's going on with the vault in the show. I'm prepared to be disappointed by the show once we know what's going on, but so far the themes of the book have been no more undercut by the show than they were by Asimov himself before the end of the original trilogy.

ElGroucho
Nov 1, 2005

We already - What about sticking our middle fingers up... That was insane
Fun Shoe
Stranger Foundations

dpkg chopra
Jun 9, 2007

Fast Food Fight

Grimey Drawer
I've read the books and I'm sick of hearing about the books in this thread, jfc.

Also, defending the flaws of the show based on stuff that is explained in the books is pointless.

I like the show, but undercutting within the first season the central premise it proposed in the first episode is not a good look.

We haven't even seen Psychohistory as a predictive force get a win yet so there are no emotional stakes in seeing that, actually, some individuals might be able to alter the flow of history. The reveal ends up seeming like lazy writing.

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


Ur Getting Fatter posted:

I've read the books and I'm sick of hearing about the books in this thread, jfc.

Also, defending the flaws of the show based on stuff that is explained in the books is pointless.

I like the show, but undercutting within the first season the central premise it proposed in the first episode is not a good look.

We haven't even seen Psychohistory as a predictive force get a win yet so there are no emotional stakes in seeing that, actually, some individuals might be able to alter the flow of history. The reveal ends up seeming like lazy writing.
I brought it up because it seemed like a common complaint, but one you'd only have if you were invested in the initial premise of the book.

I agree that it's a bit unsatisfying that we haven't seen the promise of psychohistory, as outlined in the first episode, borne out at all yet. But we have yet to see anything resolve in that plot line. As I said, I'm prepared to be disappointed, but we're still in the process of playing out the first crisis, and I honestly have no idea where things are going to end up.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



The big twist/departure will be that Hari Seldon was a crazy crank and the real oracle was Ian Malcolm

Tom Guycot
Oct 15, 2008

Chief of Governors


Eiba posted:

I brought it up because it seemed like a common complaint, but one you'd only have if you were invested in the initial premise of the book.

I agree that it's a bit unsatisfying that we haven't seen the promise of psychohistory, as outlined in the first episode, borne out at all yet. But we have yet to see anything resolve in that plot line. As I said, I'm prepared to be disappointed, but we're still in the process of playing out the first crisis, and I honestly have no idea where things are going to end up.



I think whats weird is they're dragging things out so painfully slow, yet paradoxically are also (book stuff) cramming together the first and second crisis sooner than they occurred and skipping the entire intervening decades and religion that let them succeed in the second crisis without a shot fired in a dramatic fashion, and rushing through the actual plot. . Turning clever ploys and political maneuvering into big shoot 'em up gun battles because the producers are either too dumb or think their audience is too dumb to have a plot thats not about gun battles is what kind of misses the entire premise of the book. Wasn't GoT that was all about scheming plans of factions, like the biggest show ever? They didn't learn a lesson from that that audiences can stand a little plotting and intrigue?

Thats why it gives the impression the producers/writers are embarrassed by the actual story, as the best part by far is also the only part they're allowing to be slow and about political factions and their plans and internal problems, their original story of The Emperors.

As long as the Emperors are on screen I'm hooked and want to see more, but all the Foundation stuff so far has been a mess, even ignoring the book nerdery and viewing it as its own original work, it feels like sloppy compared to the Empire stuff.

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*
Show spoiler:

I'm thinking the Empire's robot governess did space 9/11. The cycle of cloning has made her lonely, consistently saying goodbye to the person she cares for most. Her religious belief in change is incompatible with the clone empire. She is likely behind the newest emperor's genetic difference and when Emperor Darkness makes note of something wrong with the new Dawn she hurriedly escorts him off to death.

More than all that, Demerzel constantly mentions how she is solely dedicated to Empire. Now that could mean the title held by Dawn, Day, and Dusk or it could mean the idea of the Empire persevering, sort of like the Foundation's mission. Sad for Lee Pace. Nobody deserves to be betrayed by their android Mommy Wife.

Just-In-Timeberlake
Aug 18, 2003

The Puppy Bowl posted:

Show spoiler:

I'm thinking the Empire's robot governess did space 9/11. The cycle of cloning has made her lonely, consistently saying goodbye to the person she cares for most. Her religious belief in change is incompatible with the clone empire. She is likely behind the newest emperor's genetic difference and when Emperor Darkness makes note of something wrong with the new Dawn she hurriedly escorts him off to death.

More than all that, Demerzel constantly mentions how she is solely dedicated to Empire. Now that could mean the title held by Dawn, Day, and Dusk or it could mean the idea of the Empire persevering, sort of like the Foundation's mission. Sad for Lee Pace. Nobody deserves to be betrayed by their android Mommy Wife.



Demerzel is R. Daneel Olivaw, who masterminds everything to ensure humanity survives per the Zeroeth Law of Robotics

Zazz Razzamatazz
Apr 19, 2016

by sebmojo

Ur Getting Fatter posted:

I've read the books and I'm sick of hearing about the books in this thread, jfc.


Yeah, why would the books matter in a TV show adaption of some books? :rolleyes:

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*

Just-In-Timeberlake posted:


Demerzel is R. Daneel Olivaw, who masterminds everything to ensure humanity survives per the Zeroeth Law of Robotics


I don't remember that character.

withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe

The Puppy Bowl posted:

I don't remember that character.

You didn’t read to the end.

The Puppy Bowl
Jan 31, 2013

A dog, in the house.

*woof*
Read the original trilogy about 15 years ago. Don't know that the show has much to do with those books about old white guys smoking cigars around nuclear power plants.

Just-In-Timeberlake
Aug 18, 2003

The Puppy Bowl posted:

I don't remember that character.

Which?


R Daneel is from the Robot series of novels with Elijah Bailey (Caves of Steel, Naked Sun, etc) that pre-date the Empire. Robots and Empire is the book that sets him on the path to saving humanity.

Demerzel is R Daneel in the prequel books and he's the one that encourages Seldon to not give up on psychohistory but to continue to develop it, but I don't remember which ones

He then shows up at the end and is revealed to be the mastermind in the fifth book, Foundation and Earth

Just-In-Timeberlake fucked around with this message at 20:47 on Oct 26, 2021

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
I hope we get a flashback episode where Demerzel is man and also wears a futuristic detective outfit

ElGroucho
Nov 1, 2005

We already - What about sticking our middle fingers up... That was insane
Fun Shoe
Didn't she torture some lady to get information? That wasn't very cash money (Robot Laws) of her

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!
Go talk about the book in another thread for fucks sake

Just-In-Timeberlake
Aug 18, 2003

Boris Galerkin posted:

Go talk about the book in another thread for fucks sake

No

Arglebargle III
Feb 21, 2006

More Lee Pace,
Less Disgrace

Literally Lewis Hamilton
Feb 22, 2005



Boris Galerkin posted:

Go talk about the book in another thread for fucks sake

:qq:

It’s speculation like any other thread has about the upcoming plot

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Boris Galerkin posted:

Go talk about the book in another thread for fucks sake

Go make your own tv show thread, with blackjack and hookers then. It's a show based on a book series. People are going to compare them. I suggest you deal with it.

Collateral
Feb 17, 2010
I speculate that : copy/paste plot from Wikipedia!

Did guess right? :downs:

syense
Oct 13, 2018

people who play large jenga at bars have nothing of interest in their lives.
So far the only good reading the books has done for me is give me a lovely list of proper nouns that appear. That's cool too I guess.

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro

syense posted:

So far the only good reading the books has done for me is give me a lovely list of proper nouns that appear. That's cool too I guess.

Still haven’t heard “atomics.” :colbert:

chaosbreather
Dec 9, 2001

Wry and wise,
but also very sexual.

Welcome to the Foundation (2021) thread!
Please don't talk about literally anything that happens or you think might or might not happen in the book or the tv show, but if you really have to please use spoiler tags because that way when there are actually proper spoilers people will just assume that you're talking about your pet theory or the lighting and mouse over it. Please do not talk about anything other than the show. Please do not talk about the thread. Please do not enjoy the show, or book, for any reason. Accepted discussion topics are:

* book is different, and thus bad
* show is different, and thus bad
* anyone who likes this is an idiot because it is fast moving flash flash for babies
* anyone who likes this is a boring nerds because it is slow moving talk talk for boring nerds
* apple is definitely doomed now they made show

Thanks for helping to maintain TV IV's standard of discussion!

Toxic Fart Syndrome
Jul 2, 2006

*hits A-THREAD-5*

Only 3.6 Roentgoons per hour ... not great, not terrible.




...the meter only goes to 3.6...

Pork Pro
:lol: the thread isn't even that bad this week. :crossarms:

This thread's bones/no bones is Lee Pace/No Lee Pace.

withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe
Is it permitted to unsubscribe from Thread between episodes?

sebmojo
Oct 23, 2010


Legit Cyberpunk









Im sorry it is not

Bargearse
Nov 27, 2006

🛑 Don't get your pen🖊️, son, you won't be 👌 needing that 😌. My 🥡 order's 💁 simple😉, a shitload 💩 of dim sims 🌯🀄. And I want a bucket 🪣 of soya sauce☕😋.
The lesson I'm getting is that I enjoy a lot of things that goon's don't seem to like all that much.

turboraton
Aug 28, 2011
We are all agreeing that the Empire stuff is amazing and that is not portrayed in the book. We could all also agree that the Terminus stuff is dragging and being poorly developed.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


There's a lot of stuff in this show that has seemed baffling at the time, but on reflection makes perfect sense. It's a show that you need to reflect on sometimes after you have all the pieces. Like Brother Dawn being good at shooting the birds because he's colorblind, and he was hiding his kills because he was scared of being found out, not because he didn't want to show up Brother Dusk.

I'm reserving judgement on the Terminus plot-line until all the pieces come together. We've been told Seldon has a plan. I don't know what it is, and I can't really guess at it, so I can't say whether it's cool or dumb until we see it play out. And that means I'm able to enjoy it week to week, for what it is. I've got some nitpicks, but I'm kind of impressed at how well they built up the feel of the settlement.

The show is good.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply