Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Nenonen posted:

The number of nukes does not factor into whether there could be a war, as even a fraction of the current arsenal would suffice to devastate both sides and make life very unpleasant for a very long time. According to conventional thinking a full nuclear disarmament would even make a war in South China Sea more likely because there would be no threat of MAD.

That being said, this is indeed a positive thing and hopefully they will get to an agreement. China increasing its nuke arsenal would prompt hawks in USA to demand more nukes, and in both cases it would be a massive waste of resources. All that money is wiser spent building trampouline parks for the public.

I'm well aware of that. It's the coming to the table for the first time to talk about nukes that's the important development here.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

I think it's accurate to say that white people are tricked into believing that racism benefits them, that all the other races are coming to steal what they have, that immigrants are taking their jobs, that black people are taking promotions they deserve, that the guys like Trump and Youngkin who are picking their pockets are actually protecting them from lazy greedy black people etc. The only white people for whom this is not true are the 0.1% at the top who are doing the pickpocketing of the working white people they're tricking with white supremacy. They're just pieces of poo poo and will never be allies of PoC because at the end of the day they owe their wealth and position to white supremacy (this is also why the Democrats who are 0.1%ers themselves or wannabe are not allies incidentally)

The only alternative is that they aren't being tricked, that racism really is in their material interest, and it's our job as liberals who want to end racism to keep them from finding this out or shame them into being non-racist against their material interests, and I don't believe that racism is a benefit and if it is then the battle is lost because people will pick their material interests every time over feeling like a good person.

VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 17:24 on Nov 17, 2021

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
The American Petroleum Institute issued a joint statement from America's Oil and Gas companies in response to Biden's directive to the FTC.

- They deny any wrong doing.

- Warn not to go after their retail gas station affiliates.

- Say price increases are largely global and driven by market forces, so it can't just be U.S. oil and gas companies involved.

- Says the price increases are due to the Biden administration cancelling pipeline projects and restricting oil and gas drilling on federal lands and OPEC holding back supply.

- Says the investigation is political and calls on the government to support domestic oil and gas to bring down prices.

https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1461004808777777158

Peter Daou Zen
Apr 6, 2021

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Democrats are so out of touch, rich, and separated from America at large they don't realize calling people Nazi's is a losing strategy. Maybe at Trump's second inaugaration they'll figure it out. :buddy:

BRJurgis
Aug 15, 2007

Well I hear the thunder roll, I feel the cold winds blowing...
But you won't find me there, 'cause I won't go back again...
While you're on smoky roads, I'll be out in the sun...
Where the trees still grow, where they count by one...

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The American Petroleum Institute issued a joint statement from America's Oil and Gas companies in response to Biden's directive to the FTC.

- They deny any wrong doing.

- Warn not to go after their retail gas station affiliates.

- Say price increases are largely global and driven by market forces, so it can't just be U.S. oil and gas companies involved.

- Says the price increases are due to the Biden administration cancelling pipeline projects and restricting oil and gas drilling on federal lands and OPEC holding back supply.

- Says the investigation is political and calls on the government to support domestic oil and gas to bring down prices.

https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1461004808777777158

This infuriates me. One of the last engagements I had with Facebook was finding out how many people are dismally ignorant enough to immediately blame Joe biden for gas prices (and deride and dismiss any and all facts that dispel that narrative). They will eat that framing up.

Thom12255
Feb 23, 2013
WHERE THE FUCK IS MY MONEY

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

His majesty has condescended to grant permission for legislation to be passed.

Oh he didn't say anything about voting yes.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Peter Daou Zen posted:

Democrats are so out of touch, rich, and separated from America at large they don't realize calling people Nazi's is a losing strategy. Maybe at Trump's second inaugaration they'll figure it out. :buddy:

Can't call the fascists fascists, they wont vote for you in increasingly fascist America.

Decon
Nov 22, 2015


Peter Daou Zen posted:

Democrats are so out of touch, rich, and separated from America at large they don't realize calling people Nazi's is a losing strategy. Maybe at Trump's second inaugaration they'll figure it out. :buddy:

Meanwhile, family members will continue to call me a communist/socialist/rioter/etc to my face for half assedly supporting moderate Dem policies like the ACA.

Keep :decorum:ing only democrats though. You're doing so much to help the problem.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

VitalSigns posted:

I think it's accurate to say that white people are tricked into believing that racism benefits them, that all the other races are coming to steal what they have, that immigrants are taking their jobs, that black people are taking promotions they deserve, that the guys like Trump and Youngkin who are picking their pockets are actually protecting them from lazy greedy black people etc. The only white people for whom this is not true are the 0.1% at the top who are doing the pickpocketing of the working white people they're tricking with white supremacy. They're just pieces of poo poo and will never be allies of PoC because at the end of the day they owe their wealth and position to white supremacy (this is also why the Democrats who are 0.1%ers themselves or wannabe are not allies incidentally)

The only alternative is that they aren't being tricked, that racism really is in their material interest, and it's our job as liberals who want to end racism to keep them from finding this out or shame them into being non-racist against their material interests, and I don't believe that racism is a benefit and if it is then the battle is lost because people will pick their material interests every time over feeling like a good person.

Having some (thankfully nonviolent) experience with the discrepancy between how law enforcement and teachers and others in positions of power treat white people versus minorities, I feel kind of compelled to say that what I've seen is that America is somewhat in the middle of your two descriptions. I don't think white people are "tricked" into being racist or that they aren't beneficiaries of racist discrepancies, but I think many people might be completely fooled at how much keeping society racist actually benefits them personally.

But I guess you could say that about any non-wealthy American conservative right now. Right wing policies don't benefit them that much, but it's great to see people you don't like getting kept down.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus
As inflation continues to rise and material conditions get worse for middle class whites more people are going to stupidly embrace whoever promises the best turbo fascism in order to make things go back to way things "ought" to be, and I'll give you two guesses as to which political party has been running that playbook for years.

I hope I'm wrong and that's just the depression talking.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Lol at Biden pretending to investigate the oil barons who pay for his campaigns.

If he wanted to reduce domestic gas prices he could reinstate the oil export ban that we had from 1975-2015 but oh right he was part of the administration that ended it at the behest of the oil barons in the first place

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

VitalSigns posted:

I think it's accurate to say that white people are tricked into believing that racism benefits them, that all the other races are coming to steal what they have, that immigrants are taking their jobs, that black people are taking promotions they deserve, that the guys like Trump and Youngkin who are picking their pockets are actually protecting them from lazy greedy black people etc. The only white people for whom this is not true are the 0.1% at the top who are doing the pickpocketing of the working white people they're tricking with white supremacy. They're just pieces of poo poo and will never be allies of PoC because at the end of the day they owe their wealth and position to white supremacy (this is also why the Democrats who are 0.1%ers themselves or wannabe are not allies incidentally)

The only alternative is that they aren't being tricked, that racism really is in their material interest, and it's our job as liberals who want to end racism to keep them from finding this out or shame them into being non-racist against their material interests, and I don't believe that racism is a benefit and if it is then the battle is lost because people will pick their material interests every time over feeling like a good person.

Yeah, that was pretty much my entire point. Either it's not in their best interests and they're being tricked, bring convinced to believe something that's not true that damages them for the benefit of another, or that the alternative is that it is in their material interests and that's a much harder and weirder battle than what's bring discussed because at that point it's either actually 100% in their interest or they're all just such inhuman monsters that the only solution is going to be ugly. My entire original point anyways wasn't even able white supremacy, just that Republicans are good at tricking people, convincing them to vote for things that will hurt them for the benefit of Republicans. Thanks for having a discussion in D&D.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

Decon posted:

Keep :decorum:ing only democrats though. You're doing so much to help the problem.

He is, just not the problem you're thinking of

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Think the leftist pitch for America needs to be about Getting The Man Off Your Back.

The man makes you work before you clock in, or steals your wages and tips.

The man makes your doctor call some pencil neck insurance dork to see if he’s allowed to use his expertise to help you. What’s that loving desk working dork got to do with you and your doctor? Get that loving nerd out of here.

The man makes you go to endless HR trainings while you know your boss sexually harasses people at every company party (which none of the hourly folks get invited to) and then fires anybody who mentions the boss doing this. gently caress that! Fair is fair, hold the boss to the same standard you hold me.

The man sits by his pool in his second house, next to his third wife, while the only thing you got three of is kids to feed and jobs to work. The man then tells you you’re lazy. That you’re the lazy one!

The man tells you that you’re going to work until you die, but he retires before he’s even hit 55.

Get The Man Off Your Back is typically a right wing, libertarian framing, but it can obviously be put in service to a concept of freedom and dignity that would appeal to a lot of people.

But you gotta maybe hurt the feelings of some of those HR and lanyard types.

tgacon
Mar 22, 2009

Bel Shazar posted:

We seem to be fortifying our southern border by bigger links between bases.

As someone who lives in between the highways, it almost looks to me like we're writing the I-10 corridor off to seal level rise.

Decon
Nov 22, 2015


RBA Starblade posted:

He is, just not the problem you're thinking of

I'll bite. What's the problem?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Over 100,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in the last year.

- Roughly 2/3s of all deaths (!!!) were just from fentanyl. This is the first time since they started tracking it that a single drug has been responsible for so many overdoses in a year.

- It was not spread out geographically. Despite being small portions of the U.S., nearly half of the deaths were in 6 states in Appalachia.

- There were 28.5% more overdoses in the last year compared to the prior year. A lot of the increase was likely attributable to the pandemic, but most of it is following a pre-pandemic trend.

- Cocaine and amphetamines were responsible for a little over 1/4 of overdose deaths.

- Every other type of drug was in the single digits.

https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1460986915549847552

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Manchin okay with voting for BBB before the end of the year.

Still says that the paid family leave added back in by the House needs to be stripped out.

https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1460996555859763205

manchin says thing, is ok with thing, however is not ok with thing. will go ahead with thing, but has reservations with thing, and does not like thing. feels thing is important but cannot have other thing in thing. gives additional statement stating that timing of thing is wrong for other thing, needs to insist thing not be thing but be other thing or not be thing at all. now thinks thing is bad and is upset thing is being pushed. will go ahead with thing but is hesitant. is offering complaint about thing, as thing simply is not acceptable. will vote for thing, except we need to understand he is definitely not voting for thing. holds press conference saying that he is drawing a line in the sand about thing, will vote for thing, but thing is absolutely not going to have his approval. won't vote for thing. agog at the hubris of party that makes thing, that he is part of, saying cannot support party in thinking thing is acceptable at this juncture. thing is being pushed far too fast, has reservations, will not be bullied on this thing, thing must change. will go ahead with thing. thing is being pushed far too fast, has reservations, will not be bullied on this thing, thing must change. will go ahead with thing. but will have reservations. says thing will be an absolute disaster for this campaign. is getting into a no-win situation. he will get his way in this, he says, so what? that's his prerogative. so now will start with revisiting thing and going back to the negotiating table. will go ahead with thing. but can't make a decision. still will be in for a long debate. does thing not want a debate? will decide on thing after a few months. things will change, so will things. we do not know what is going on. what but other issue is about it not being allowed to say thing to other person. thinks that is unfair treatment, would prefer to not do it, but if the person not allowed it to do so, then I might as well not say it at this. needs to insist thing not be thing but be other thing or not be thing at all. what? or maybe I should put this more simply. in the context of code, manchin is saying that things are not the same. thing should not have been thing because thing was thing and thing/thing was other. I don't think thing? the code is just a way for him to say "this should be the thing" and that is very confusing. when is the last time he really needed to use 'thing?' so needs to clarify. is what thing going to thing vote on thing? votes on idea, which is all that matters, then will move on to vote on wording of text. voted for idea to be something. has to decide if thing can be left out. but will consider if other things should go in there as well. gets in a position to ask for things and has concerns about things, which is a problem. he does want to get things but will not vote with things. wants to make things the default, not change the defaults. seems to be ok to vote. thing will fail at thing vote and he will chide you for having pushed for thing when thing was very bad for america things and not appropriate for the time. but when thing passes will state how pivotal his input was to making thing great, great step forward for all manchin adjacent humans. the system works

socialsecurity
Aug 30, 2003

Peter Daou Zen posted:

Democrats are so out of touch, rich, and separated from America at large they don't realize calling people Nazi's is a losing strategy. Maybe at Trump's second inaugaration they'll figure it out. :buddy:

When you say Democrats do you mean the politicians? or the Dem voters that are way more poor and POC then the Republican voters?

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

selec posted:

Think the leftist pitch for America needs to be about Getting The Man Off Your Back.

The man makes you work before you clock in, or steals your wages and tips.

The man makes your doctor call some pencil neck insurance dork to see if he’s allowed to use his expertise to help you. What’s that loving desk working dork got to do with you and your doctor? Get that loving nerd out of here.

The man makes you go to endless HR trainings while you know your boss sexually harasses people at every company party (which none of the hourly folks get invited to) and then fires anybody who mentions the boss doing this. gently caress that! Fair is fair, hold the boss to the same standard you hold me.

The man sits by his pool in his second house, next to his third wife, while the only thing you got three of is kids to feed and jobs to work. The man then tells you you’re lazy. That you’re the lazy one!

The man tells you that you’re going to work until you die, but he retires before he’s even hit 55.

Get The Man Off Your Back is typically a right wing, libertarian framing, but it can obviously be put in service to a concept of freedom and dignity that would appeal to a lot of people.

But you gotta maybe hurt the feelings of some of those HR and lanyard types.

gently caress :yeah:. Love this - it's a pretty good encapsulation of why I'm left-wing in the first place, and pretty far from where Democratic messages actually end up. If you polled "which party thinks you should be left the gently caress alone" I imagine they would get destroyed even worse than they do on "who do you trust on the economy". A big part of the problem is "cancel culture" type grievances that actually have nothing to do with DC politics or government in general but end up framing the way people think about them.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin
Leftists need to pool their resources into stuff like what Abrams is doing. There is no better way to confirm people that you want to help them than actually helping them, even if is just some of them. They have been telling how bad things are and framing it against the faceless upper class forever. It isn't working. They need to actually do things instead saying they will do things if you just vote for them.

DarkCrawler fucked around with this message at 17:59 on Nov 17, 2021

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Decon posted:

I'll never stop beating this drum: if you think it'll stop at social issues, let alone just racial ones, you aren't paying attention. They have openly stated that they will expand CRT to include any and all issues they can, and have already done so with "woke" as they did in the past with socialism and communism (these are the same sorts that marched against the Lovings in Loving vs Virginia holding signs that read "race mixing is Communism/socialism"). They will do this with other made up issues.

Ceding to this tactic is idiotic.

They're already expanding it to include social-emotional learning, as well as mental health programs in general. To the anti-CRT movement, counselors spending their time paying attention to kids' mental health is seen as taking resources away from college prep and using them to brainwash kids with namby-pamby liberal nonsense instead. Anti-suicide programs are seen as "advertising suicide" to kids who never would've thought of suicide, kids who just want to do all their homework and go to church. Social-emotional learning is being treated as a "gateway" to CRT, an attempt to circumvent anti-CRT laws by changing the terminology. And anti-CRT groups are getting quite heated about this stuff, to the bafflement of school administrators.

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/education/2021/09/30/carmel-clay-schools-virtual-board-meetings-disruptive/5937251001/

quote:

Carmel Clay Schools board will hold its meetings virtually until further notice, the district announced Thursday, after a meeting Monday marred by “the disruptive behavior of adults.”

Just 10 minutes into Monday night’s meeting, the board recessed after a member of the audience stood up and started reading a statement about the new public comment policy as the board was trying to move through its agenda.

Public comment has been suspended for the last several months after a series of heated meetings culminated with a gun falling out of the pocket of an audience member. The board has since added metal detectors.

“In a district as large as CCS, disagreements will occur,” the district said in its statement. “However, we will no longer allow our board meetings to be a means to divide our community.”

The district said an “orchestrated group” has attempted to divide the Carmel schools community – targeting teachers to scare and intimidate them and spreading false and misleading information to disparage the district.

In the scathing statement from Carmel schools, it says that board members have had their home addresses shared publicly in an attempt to intimidate them and group members have demanded the resignation of the district's mental health coordinator. Teachers have received threats of violence and "unwarranted references to family members," according to the district.

"It is harmful and inappropriate to intimidate the teachers and staff who provide direct support for our students," the district said.

A group of parents and other community members, including a former teacher that previously ran for school board, have been organizing for the last six months to oppose Carmel schools' diversity, equity and social emotional learning work. The group, known as Unify Carmel, is advocating for a school district that focuses solely on academics and in which parents have greater control.

At issue Monday night were two policies on the agenda: One was a revision to the board’s existing public comment policy, and the other was a new policy on civility and decorum that sets expectations for how employees, students, parents and community members are expected to treat each other, including at school board meetings.

The policies came as a response to previous outbursts, disruption and unruly crowds at previous board meetings.

During the 40-minute recess Monday, a group of roughly 30 people sat in the board room and discussed the many problems they have with Carmel schools — everything from books they find inappropriate in school libraries to a perceived focus on social-emotional learning and diversity initiatives at the expense of academic achievement. Social-emotional learning and diversity, equity and inclusion work — often referred to as SEL and DEI — are common in schools but have been subject to intense criticism in Carmel and other suburban Indianapolis districts for months.

“We were planning on bringing public comment back,” Superintendent Michael Beresford said after the meeting, “and now this makes us take pause and determine whether we can do our business meetings in a way that is productive and isn't disruptive.”

When the board returned, it finished its meeting — which included four statutorily required public hearings with an opportunity for public comment — over continued disruptions and heckling from the audience.

"Some like to remind the Board and administration that we 'work for them' or claim these tactics, threats, and harassment are constitutionally protected," the district said. "We know of no workplace that would tolerate this form of mistreatment from any boss or supervisor. And we especially refuse to let them target our teachers and staff."

The district will start live streaming meetings beginning with the special session scheduled for Monday, to interview the four finalists for the vacant District 2 seat. On Tuesday, the district will live stream another special session held to choose the candidate to fill that seat. The district said it will regularly reevaluate the need for live streaming.

For a peek into the kinds of reasoning that is driving parents to oppose mental health support for students, just take a look at this page from one conservative parents' group:
https://purpleforparentsindiana.com/2021/03/05/trading-academics-for-far-left-social-emotional-learning/

quote:

Once upon a time, education meant learning how to read, write, do math, and think. It meant learning history and science as well.

That is barely happening now, as government data show.

Perhaps more importantly, once upon a time, school children all over the nation also learned the Ten Commandments—do not murder, do not lie, do not steal, and so on.

They learned the Golden Rule, too: Treat others as you want to be treated.

But those “good old days” are largely gone.

Today, government schools use advanced methods including SEL to instill in children a radical new and oftentimes contradictory “politically correct” value system: radical environmentalism, radical feminism, critical theory, Marxism, social justice, LGBTQ-plus, population control, socialism, hyper-racialism, class struggle, and more.

There’s also an occult connection to it all that would shock most secular observers—not to mention Christians, Muslims, Jews, and adherents of other traditional faiths.

In public schools across the United States today, from pre-K through 12th grade and beyond, children are being subjected to what is seemingly just the latest educational fad—silly, perhaps, but no more harmful than anything else—at least on the surface.

The education establishment refers to it as “social and emotional learning,” “social-emotional learning,” or just SEL for short. Generally they speak only in vague generalities using soothing language while dealing with the public.

And it’s true, some of what falls under the SEL umbrella is fairly harmless.

But then again, the food pellets that contain rat poison are fairly harmless, too—at least until the poison, which is just a trace component in the pellets, is digested by the intended victim.

Similarly, SEL all seems innocent enough at first glance.

“Social and emotional learning (SEL) is the process through which children and adults understand and manage emotions, set and achieve positive goals, feel and show empathy for others, establish and maintain positive relationships, and make responsible decisions,” explains the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL), one of the leading outfits promoting SEL.

The way proponents explain it, SEL is simply aimed to help children do well emotionally and succeed.

What could be wrong with that?

Well, CASEL’s website, a review of SEL programs, and educators themselves reveal a great deal more about the agenda. And it’s not pretty.

Behind the nice public facade lurk swarms of psychologists, psychiatrists, “educators,” and radical leftists hoping to exploit a century of psychological research for the purpose of molding children’s beliefs and “deconstructing” the values parents seek to instill.

“With a growing number of partners, CASEL is creating a more comprehensive approach to education, one that will lead to a more equitable, just, and productive society,” the organization’s website boasts under the headline “SEL as a Lever for Equity,” hitting multiple key buzzwords associated with the far-left “social justice” movement.

In other words, one of the purposes of SEL—as its leading promoters admit—is to reform society.

Among the webinars offered there are “SEL as a Lever for Equity and Social Justice,” and also a lecture on how to use SEL to “support antiracist practices.” Another webinar outlines how to use policy to “dismantle inequities.”

Again, the leftist buzzwords are everywhere. And that isn’t an accident.

Under SEL Competencies, CASEL drops multiple bombshells acknowledging the far-left globalist indoctrination taking place under the guise of “social” and “emotional” learning.

“SEL competencies can be leveraged to develop justice-oriented, global citizens, and nurture inclusive school and district communities,” it states, adding that the programs will involve getting children to “assess power dynamics” and confront “issues of race and class across different settings.”

The children are also expected to “develop an understanding of systemic or structural explanations for different treatment and outcomes.”

In short, they are expected to believe the highly controversial hypothesis that America is awash in “systemic” and “structural” racism, and that only massive government-led social engineering can fix it.

The children are also expected to accept and agree with the artificial divisions being fomented along “race” and “class” lines as part of the now-obvious effort to “divide and conquer” America.

Put simply, this is all blatantly Marxist “critical theory” rhetoric masquerading as “education.”

It’s extremely dangerous.

A review by The Epoch Times of a wide range of SEL programs used across the United States found that all contain similar extremism, along with highly controversial teachings on sex, sexuality, gender, race, racism, class, economic liberty, family, marriage, and more.

Interviews with educators and a review of their writings on the subject were also very revealing.

In short, the real goals of SEL go far beyond “helping” children socially and emotionally. And it isn’t difficult to find that out.

In fact, in practice, SEL is frequently and explicitly used in public schools to instill certain attitudes and values in children that many parents, if not most, would find controversial at the very least.

For example, public-school teachers in Florida, to comply with SEL mandates, were ordered to show a number of videos to their middle school students.

These included propaganda videos promoting homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism, “diversity,” “inclusion,” and more.

Regardless of one’s views on these subjects, countless parents—especially those from faith traditions including Christianity, Islam, or Judaism—would find the effort to obliterate traditional sexual morality and even biological sex in children’s minds to be objectionable.

Numerous other highly controversial political, religious, economic, and worldview positions are treated as “correct” by the forces behind SEL.

More than a few self-styled SEL educators are very open about how they intend to use SEL to brainwash children.

Open Circle Director Kamilah Drummond-Forrester, who supports “social and emotional development for children,” wrote openly at EdSurge.com about weaponizing SEL to indoctrinate children with her hyper-racialist views.

“Teaching [white children] to be aware of their racial identity would allow them to better understand the privileges that accompany that identity,” she wrote, adding that this would help them dismantle the “concept of ‘whiteness.’”

“Social and emotional learning (SEL) has an important role to play in that education.

“One of the core competencies we focus on, as a necessary foundation for the others, is self-awareness. That self-awareness must include race,” she continued, without acknowledging that many parents probably don’t want their children obsessing about “race” or being propagandized by a far-left activist posing as an educator.

In an article for EdTech Magazine on peddling SEL to students amid coronavirus-inspired online learning, writer Adam Stone touts “SEL-oriented teaching materials from the Zinn Education Project.”

Howard Zinn, of course, is the far-left pseudo-historian whose dishonest and politically motivated narratives were most recently debunked by historian Mary Grabar in the book “Debunking Howard Zinn: Exposing the Fake History That Turned a Generation Against America.”

Zinn described himself as “something of a Marxist,” his biographer recounted.

According to EdTech, though, the “SEL-oriented” propaganda from Zinn is supposedly “aimed at nurturing empathy and compassion.”

In the real world, Marxism has everywhere and always nurtured hatred, death, slavery, torture, starvation, shortages, political repression, religious persecution, and other evils.

And yet under the guise of SEL programs and “nurturing empathy and compassion,” millions of children are having their minds poisoned by being force-fed actual Marxist propaganda and fake history.

And perhaps even more alarming, Stone urges educators to use surveillance tools that give “insight into students’ online behaviors—both inside and outside the virtual classroom—to enhance SEL.”

One of the recommended total surveillance tools offers educators “a holistic view of online activity across search engines, social media, email and web apps,” Stone said, adding that an artificial-intelligence engine would perform “real-time assessments” to “flag online behaviors that indicate emotional distress.”

As explained in an earlier segment of this series, Orwellian technology is used to monitor and track “progress” on adjusting children’s attitudes, too. That data is being compiled and saved forever under the label of “emotional intelligence.”

The Big Brother technology is also used to determine whether further “interventions” are needed to coerce the child into holding the desired attitudes, values, and beliefs about the issue in question.

And, as U.S. Department of Education documents make clear, it will also be used to predict “future behavior and interests” of the children.

Of course, educators who have seen through the agenda reject SEL as a massive threat to America’s children.

One of those who spoke out against the SEL abuses taking place in her school, Jennifer McWilliams of Indiana, was even fired for being too vocal about it.

“The thing I find to be the most disturbing about social emotional learning is how well it disguises its true sinister motives,” she told The Epoch Times. “Parents do not understand that SEL psychologically manipulates children to question (and eventually rebuke) any Christian or conservative beliefs that may be taught in the home.”

While parents are led to believe that SEL is like teaching children The Golden Rule, “it is quite the opposite,” McWilliams said.

“Social emotional learning is rooted in progressive, social justice ideology that divides anyone who questions the radical groupthink agenda,” she said. “From my personal experience, not only do parents not understand it but teachers and administrators don’t either.”

SEL also represents the “brainwashing of our children,” McWilliams continued, noting that it trains children to “compromise on everything” with no consideration of what is taught in the home.


“These programs rely on a bombardment of propaganda, conditioning, and role playing to separate children from God and the nuclear family,” she said, saying SEL was the vehicle used to get children to accept as truth the narratives behind Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) and Black Lives Matter (BLM).

The popular SEL program used in McWilliams’s school, Leader in Me, was designed to “shift the culture of the school to influence children’s morals and values based on progressive social justice standards,” she said, adding that it became ubiquitous on campus.

When she began publicly speaking out about it on social media, she was fired for supposedly making the school look bad.

“Parents must speak up and take back control of the influence in their children’s lives. If not, the kids will pay with their freedom,” McWilliams said.

It doesn't end there, but most of the rest is dedicated to describing elaborate conspiracy theories in extensive detail, broken up into sections perfectly sized to spread through Facebook parents' groups. Suffice it to say that the article claims social-emotional learning was invented by a "shadowy New Age powerhouse", influenced by occultists and inspired by the Soviet educational system, being pushed by Bill Gates at the behest of the Chinese Communist Party, and derived from the teachings of a Soviet psychologist whose goal was to brainwash children into communism.

The bolded section is my own emphasis, because I think it really gets at the heart of the whole issue: modern education teaches children to question and challenge the beliefs they're taught at home, disrupting parents' own attempts to bring their children up with the beliefs they believe everyone should hold.


Lastly, I'm going to leave you with this illustration of how this poo poo actually looks and sounds in practice. Not only in terms of how CRT and mental health programs have become linked in the eyes of the conservative opposition, but also in terms of how it's a real headscratcher to think about how the gently caress we're going to reach these people.
https://twitter.com/Mike_Hixenbaugh/status/1443743858114932739
The quote in the tweet is bad enough, but I'm just going to transcribe the last thirty seconds or so here, because holy moly:

quote:

Lastly, have you heard of Hope Squad? It's at grades 5-8. It's a group where fellow students are supposed to report kids who they, as minors, feel are suicidal. It's kinda like "Love Every Dragon". You have a random mom in town soliciting minors based on their sexual orientation. If you have not figured out that that is a red flag, you should. It's a huge red flag.
I really recommend listening to the video, because she says this poo poo so matter-of-factly like it's completely loving obvious and she's completely baffled that no one else understands something so simple, and meanwhile she's saying this poo poo that makes absolutely no loving sense whatsoever and just tying together completely unrelated stuff. It's like a conspiracy theorist with a pinboard and a bunch of red string, making huge leaps of logic and wild accusations with exact the same tone of voice as your mom explaining why she's not going to drive you to McDonalds. How the gently caress do you even engage with this? I don't know. It sure as hell can't be ignored, but it's not even speaking the same loving language.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

selec posted:

Think the leftist pitch for America needs to be about Getting The Man Off Your Back.

The man makes you work before you clock in, or steals your wages and tips.

The man makes your doctor call some pencil neck insurance dork to see if he’s allowed to use his expertise to help you. What’s that loving desk working dork got to do with you and your doctor? Get that loving nerd out of here.

The man makes you go to endless HR trainings while you know your boss sexually harasses people at every company party (which none of the hourly folks get invited to) and then fires anybody who mentions the boss doing this. gently caress that! Fair is fair, hold the boss to the same standard you hold me.

The man sits by his pool in his second house, next to his third wife, while the only thing you got three of is kids to feed and jobs to work. The man then tells you you’re lazy. That you’re the lazy one!

The man tells you that you’re going to work until you die, but he retires before he’s even hit 55.

Get The Man Off Your Back is typically a right wing, libertarian framing, but it can obviously be put in service to a concept of freedom and dignity that would appeal to a lot of people.

But you gotta maybe hurt the feelings of some of those HR and lanyard types.

The problem is that The Man is responsible for funding both parties' politicians, so they have no impetus to get rid of The Man.

DeadlyMuffin
Jul 3, 2007

Peter Daou Zen posted:

Democrats are so out of touch, rich, and separated from America at large they don't realize calling people Nazi's is a losing strategy. Maybe at Trump's second inaugaration they'll figure it out. :buddy:

Yeah, calling the people burning books Nazis is unreasonable and is why the Democrats are going to lose.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
QAnon Shaman was just sentenced to ~4 years in prison, 3 years probation following, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution + damages.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

QAnon Shaman was just sentenced to ~4 years in prison, 3 years probation following, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution + damages.

That feels within the range of appropriate

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Main Paineframe posted:

They're already expanding it to include social-emotional learning, as well as mental health programs in general. To the anti-CRT movement, counselors spending their time paying attention to kids' mental health is seen as taking resources away from college prep and using them to brainwash kids with namby-pamby liberal nonsense instead. Anti-suicide programs are seen as "advertising suicide" to kids who never would've thought of suicide, kids who just want to do all their homework and go to church. Social-emotional learning is being treated as a "gateway" to CRT, an attempt to circumvent anti-CRT laws by changing the terminology. And anti-CRT groups are getting quite heated about this stuff, to the bafflement of school administrators.
Gosh, you're just a ray of sunshine today, MPF! (but for real, those are some good, if depressing posts.)

The linkage between all these different kinds of reactionary thought made me think of a book that I saw somebody post about once in one thread or another, The Authoritarians by Bob Altemeyer. Written in 2006, but general and applicable enough that nothing about it should seem out of date in 2021 (I read it in 2017-18, I think), and it's available for free if you follow the link.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

QAnon Shaman was just sentenced to ~4 years in prison, 3 years probation following, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution + damages.

Hope he gets help for his schizophrenia and doesn't fall in with actual neo-nazi criminals in prison. Not crossing my fingers though.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Willa Rogers posted:

The problem is that The Man is responsible for funding both parties' politicians, so they have no impetus to get rid of The Man.

To be fair they said "the leftist pitch" and leftist doesn't describe either of the two major political parties.

selec posted:

Think the leftist pitch for America needs to be about Getting The Man Off Your Back.

The man makes you work before you clock in, or steals your wages and tips.

The man makes your doctor call some pencil neck insurance dork to see if he’s allowed to use his expertise to help you. What’s that loving desk working dork got to do with you and your doctor? Get that loving nerd out of here.

The man makes you go to endless HR trainings while you know your boss sexually harasses people at every company party (which none of the hourly folks get invited to) and then fires anybody who mentions the boss doing this. gently caress that! Fair is fair, hold the boss to the same standard you hold me.

The man sits by his pool in his second house, next to his third wife, while the only thing you got three of is kids to feed and jobs to work. The man then tells you you’re lazy. That you’re the lazy one!

The man tells you that you’re going to work until you die, but he retires before he’s even hit 55.

Get The Man Off Your Back is typically a right wing, libertarian framing, but it can obviously be put in service to a concept of freedom and dignity that would appeal to a lot of people.

But you gotta maybe hurt the feelings of some of those HR and lanyard types.

This is solid messaging though, I love it. I was just thinking the other day that part of making society better would probably mean the absolute destruction of useless middle management that serves no purpose than to give upper middle class white dudes an unearned feeling of self-importance, but I have no idea how we get there without drastically restructuring society with a generous UBI and rock solid benefits. The idea is there, the road map is not, and I'm not sure it can ever be in this country before descending into inescapable fascism and likely balkanization.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Bel Shazar posted:

That feels within the range of appropriate

The government was looking for 5 years in prison and 5 years of probation to follow. So, the judge actually cut him a bit of a break.

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



selec posted:

Think the leftist pitch for America needs to be about Getting The Man Off Your Back.

The man makes you work before you clock in, or steals your wages and tips.

The man makes your doctor call some pencil neck insurance dork to see if he’s allowed to use his expertise to help you. What’s that loving desk working dork got to do with you and your doctor? Get that loving nerd out of here.

The man makes you go to endless HR trainings while you know your boss sexually harasses people at every company party (which none of the hourly folks get invited to) and then fires anybody who mentions the boss doing this. gently caress that! Fair is fair, hold the boss to the same standard you hold me.

The man sits by his pool in his second house, next to his third wife, while the only thing you got three of is kids to feed and jobs to work. The man then tells you you’re lazy. That you’re the lazy one!

The man tells you that you’re going to work until you die, but he retires before he’s even hit 55.

Get The Man Off Your Back is typically a right wing, libertarian framing, but it can obviously be put in service to a concept of freedom and dignity that would appeal to a lot of people.

But you gotta maybe hurt the feelings of some of those HR and lanyard types.

This is great. Like I said, I think there is some common ground between leftists and Trumpers. The stumbling block for both sides is the system itself, which enriches the wealthy ruling class at our expense. Both parties are creatures and beneficiaries of that system, so they're not likely to do much to stop the gravy train.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The government was looking for 5 years in prison and 5 years of probation to follow. So, the judge actually cut him a bit of a break.

Looks like they want him to sit out the next presidential election.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

QAnon Shaman was just sentenced to ~4 years in prison, 3 years probation following, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution + damages.

Oh wow, maybe the calls from people who said, "wait a loving second for trials and convictions to go through, and the heavier stuff takes longer" had a loving point!

Main Paineframe posted:

They're already expanding it to include social-emotional learning, as well as mental health programs in general. To the anti-CRT movement, counselors spending their time paying attention to kids' mental health is seen as taking resources away from college prep and using them to brainwash kids with namby-pamby liberal nonsense instead. Anti-suicide programs are seen as "advertising suicide" to kids who never would've thought of suicide, kids who just want to do all their homework and go to church. Social-emotional learning is being treated as a "gateway" to CRT, an attempt to circumvent anti-CRT laws by changing the terminology. And anti-CRT groups are getting quite heated about this stuff, to the bafflement of school administrators.

So do these folks actually give a poo poo about college prep, or is that the "whatabouthomelessvets" for schools? I ask, because these seem to be the same shitheads that scream about evolution and new math and poo poo like that.

VVV I said heavier, not heavy. There are still hundreds of these trials to go, and it's going to continue trending towards more serious punishments over time.

Solkanar512 fucked around with this message at 18:17 on Nov 17, 2021

Byzantine
Sep 1, 2007

That's heavy?

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Kraftwerk posted:

Or you know, actual nuclear power plants so we can decarbonize the economy.
I dislike Bill Gates but this project is a good thing:
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/bill-gates-4-bln-high-tech-nuclear-reactor-set-wyoming-coal-site-2021-11-17/

A powerful user name/post combo

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Professor Beetus posted:

To be fair they said "the leftist pitch" and leftist doesn't describe either of the two major political parties.

Great point.

I've always thought it'd be useful to focus on transpartisan ideas rather than bipartisan ideas, and this would be a wonderful example.

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



Willa Rogers posted:

Great point.

I've always thought it'd be useful to focus on transpartisan ideas rather than bipartisan ideas, and this would be a wonderful example.

That's a great way to put it. "Bipartisanship" has lost all of its luster in my eyes after the past ten years or so. Tired of having to surrender most of the good policy in bills to appease Manchin/Sinema types.

Crain
Jun 27, 2007

I had a beer once with Stephen Miller and now I like him.

I also tried to ban someone from a Discord for pointing out what an unrelenting shithead I am! I'm even dumb enough to think it worked!

Main Paineframe posted:

https://twitter.com/Mike_Hixenbaugh/status/1443743858114932739
The quote in the tweet is bad enough, but I'm just going to transcribe the last thirty seconds or so here, because holy moly:

I really recommend listening to the video, because she says this poo poo so matter-of-factly like it's completely loving obvious and she's completely baffled that no one else understands something so simple, and meanwhile she's saying this poo poo that makes absolutely no loving sense whatsoever and just tying together completely unrelated stuff. It's like a conspiracy theorist with a pinboard and a bunch of red string, making huge leaps of logic and wild accusations with exact the same tone of voice as your mom explaining why she's not going to drive you to McDonalds. How the gently caress do you even engage with this? I don't know. It sure as hell can't be ignored, but it's not even speaking the same loving language.

This is the only thing people need to understand with the whole "CRT" controversy. It's another Satanic Panic (which apparently we also have all over again). It's just like calling anything to the Left of Trump "Socialism/Communism". CRT can and will be whatever the people complaining about it want it to be.

The only thing that will remain if you even "pretend" to acquiesce to these people is an educations system that only teaches:

- 1+1=2
- How to read the bible
- How to write your name for signing contracts
- All the minority kids are kicked out and arrested for truancy even though they're not allowed in school.

There's no winning if you actively engage with it beyond just shutting it down. Sadly however School Boards and local politics are saturated with chuds who will do exactly what they want (See: VA banning books they thing are CRT related, which at this point is mostly anything LGBTQ related and Toni Morrison).

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Now that Herr Hitler has been sentenced to 5 years in Landsberg prison for attempting to overthrow the government of Bavaria we can rest assured that the system works and those who doubted the government's commitment to protecting democratic order have been exposed as jackasses and fools

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Main Paineframe posted:

Lastly, I'm going to leave you with this illustration of how this poo poo actually looks and sounds in practice. Not only in terms of how CRT and mental health programs have become linked in the eyes of the conservative opposition, but also in terms of how it's a real headscratcher to think about how the gently caress we're going to reach these people.
https://twitter.com/Mike_Hixenbaugh/status/1443743858114932739
The quote in the tweet is bad enough, but I'm just going to transcribe the last thirty seconds or so here, because holy moly:

I really recommend listening to the video, because she says this poo poo so matter-of-factly like it's completely loving obvious and she's completely baffled that no one else understands something so simple, and meanwhile she's saying this poo poo that makes absolutely no loving sense whatsoever and just tying together completely unrelated stuff. It's like a conspiracy theorist with a pinboard and a bunch of red string, making huge leaps of logic and wild accusations with exact the same tone of voice as your mom explaining why she's not going to drive you to McDonalds. How the gently caress do you even engage with this? I don't know. It sure as hell can't be ignored, but it's not even speaking the same loving language.

I'm gonna get real weird with this, and suggest that a possible avenue to...diffuse, deflect, or simply terminate this kind of nonsense is to just...normalize ridicule. Start going to town halls and committee meetings and...heckle the [REDACTED]s like it's a comedy club. Be mean. Be personal. Be ruthless. Be - brace yourselves - uncouth. It's baffling to me that at no point during that 2 minute rambling nonsense, did anyone shout "lady, are you loving [REDACTED]ed?" when I wanted to shout that as soon as she asked "why are we hiring counsellors at $90k a pop-", like, lady, are you loving stupid?

Get some friends together, and go to a meeting. Show up individually, and then just...don't respect that the chair has respected a [REDACTED]'s time to speak. One of you gets kicked out, and a few minutes later another one picks up because that's why you didn't arrive as a visibly-identifiable group. Make it so that it's so uncomfortable to express nonsensical, fabricated beliefs about poo poo like CRT that they "learned" at Facebook University in a forum for serious public policymaking.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply