|
Palestinians ousted from their homes in the 1960s still have their land deeds showing they owned it.
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/natethenate/status/1487512103925678080 Hard to argue with this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 20:35
|
|
|
Shaman Tank Spec posted:https://twitter.com/natethenate/status/1487512103925678080 He makes a sound argument.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 20:46
|
|
|
smackfu posted:It’s pretty amusing. Since it costs money to cancel a sales offer, the only people who cancel them really need to cancel them. So if you just front-run every cancellation and execute it first, you likely will have a net gain or at least cause a lot of havoc. This will turn out great when someone counter front runs this by cancelling a mistake sale for 100x its “actual” price. And then, once some idiot bought the first one for 100x, all the rest of your internet clip art is totally worth this huge amount. Now you don’t have to wash trade. Just get the hackers to do it for you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 21:40
|
|
|
BoldFace posted:https://twitter.com/QubitFin/status/1487839018746519552 Connect your wallet so you can get double scammed after the recovery website gets hacked. Scams all the way down.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 21:42
|
|
|
It's an SS Death's Head and I'm comfortable enough in knowing such that I didn't read your post. If you happen to agree, coo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 21:56
|
|
|
Futanari Damacy posted:Prove to whom? If the "civil service" is destroyed, what incentive would the new replacing order have to recognize any title issued under the previous rule? Lol your poo poo belongs to them now. Imagine thinking you could ever go back to your homeland after it's been invaded/destroyed, and that a receipt on the blockchain could act as the enforcement mechanism. Also what if someone else steals that too? Lmao The real answer is: Whatever you need to hear, that you will also accept as real, in order for you to put money into the system so that someone else isn't the bag holder.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 22:17
|
|
|
ghosTTy posted:
yo, ghost titty, i forgot to quote this and say i got no fuckin clue what this means but you can suck my rear end ty
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:06
|
|
IYKYK
|
brb, going to make BagCoin and sell NFTs of pictures of people holding different kinds of bags
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:25
|
|
|
Now I'm genuinely curious: can you, even hypothetically in Disney Corporate Hellworld™, copyright in real life actual human beings? I feel like technically there was already a precedent for this with (trying to) copyright(ing) certain genes, maybe, but I would not at all be surprised if this ends up being Another Thing in 2 years, especially with a good old fashioned "but with Also I don't think the kid whose birth certificate is on the blockchain counts here
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:32
|
|
|
ghosTTy posted:
You know you can look at your previous charts, and see they are all wrong, right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:33
|
|
|
bagmonkey posted:yo, ghost titty, i forgot to quote this and say i got no fuckin clue what this means but you can suck my rear end ty I believe they suffered a sudden seizure, causing their hand to slip and create a wild upwards line at the end there, before mashing at their keyboard and hitting the keys IYKYK before slipping into unconsciousness.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:40
|
|
|
bagmonkey posted:yo, ghost titty, i forgot to quote this and say i got no fuckin clue what this means but you can suck my rear end ty have you considered: number go up?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:41
|
|
|
EorayMel posted:Now I'm genuinely curious: can you, even hypothetically in Disney Corporate Hellworld™, copyright in real life actual human beings? This is somewhat tangential, but it reminded me that John Fogerty had to go to court because a record label accused him of sounding too much like himself. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/john-fogerty-self-plagiarism-lawsuit-creedence-clearwater-revival-752805/
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:51
|
|
|
Futanari Damacy posted:Prove to whom? If the "civil service" is destroyed, what incentive would the new replacing order have to recognize any title issued under the previous rule? Lol your poo poo belongs to them now. Imagine thinking you could ever go back to your homeland after it's been invaded/destroyed, and that a receipt on the blockchain could act as the enforcement mechanism. Also what if someone else steals that too? Lmao Like all libertarian-adjacent ideologies they probably think that property rights arise naturally and are not a construct of the state they live in.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2022 23:54
|
|
|
There are now so many crypto scams competing for dollars that moments of lucidity occasionally bubble up in places where they congregate. Take this popular thread on /r/cryptocurrency: quote:Anybody feel like celebrities are not paying for the Ape NFTs?? Almost there everyone... almost...
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 00:36
|
|
|
lmao goddamn the future just keeps on being as specifically weird as possible:quote:The face of the BAYC-Is-Nazi-Propaganda movement is artist Ryder Ripps, best known these days for the NFT he put out with his rapper ex Azealia Banks last year, I hosed Ryder Ripps, featuring audio of the two in the sack. And, more recently, for selling NFTs incorporating the sex pictures from Hunter Biden’s stolen laptop. i feel like that should have made news more than it did bc fuckin lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 00:38
|
|
|
Behold /r/cryptocurrency carefully examining NFTs: like... should we tell them?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 00:42
|
|
|
coelomate posted:Behold /r/cryptocurrency carefully examining NFTs: Lol the 1% of nfts - defined by being the ones in this guy's wallet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 00:56
|
|
|
Help, police, someone bought my rare monkey picture that I listed for sale.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 00:58
|
|
|
I'm the Krypto_King and I hereby declare that NFT's are legiterally epic, FTMFW.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 01:07
|
|
|
nomad2020 posted:Help, police, someone bought my rare monkey picture that I listed for sale. Qubit had some really dumb code out there and someone took $80m worth of binance tokens while qubit pleaded to them on twitter mid-hack. The exploit is still not patched. Of course. Hard to keep track given this type of stuff happens multiple times per month in the crypto ecosystem. Khorne fucked around with this message at 01:55 on Jan 31, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 01:37
|
|
|
Did NFTs/smart contracts launch immediately with lovely monkey pics, or did they start by attempting to tie them to real/real-ish assets? (contracts to provide goods & services, physical property ownership, investments in companies that provide physical goods, etc.)
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 02:09
|
|
|
HolHorsejob posted:Did NFTs/smart contracts launch immediately with lovely monkey pics, or did they start by attempting to tie them to real/real-ish assets? (contracts to provide goods & services, physical property ownership, investments in companies that provide physical goods, etc.) It started years ago with Ethereum and its "smart contracts." Those smart contracts could be made into "fungible tokens" that became easily produced shitcoins (ICOs etc.), "non-fungible tokens" that became all kinds of poo poo but maybe most famously cryptokitties (which lol no one talks about anymore, but I think is what launched open sea years ago), and dap/dao BS generally (that started in the Hindenburg style disaster of The Dao). Apes are just the current iteration, driven by board markets and easy money during the pandemic, plus I assume some talented and well connected celebrity influencer types.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 02:18
|
|
|
ghosTTy posted:
I have to respectfully disagree with the take here, clearly it’s a WSYUGI paradox with a firm reverse corpse bounce (liquidity trap) — once we hit the high bid return dog ear on the margin line, 100k is right around the corner. And how can you miss that you’ve only got a fraction of the candles that you need? You’re headed for a low candle bounce with a shaky upside if you believe what that chart is telling you, friend.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 02:35
|
|
|
if the Monkey pics are really just links to monkey pics, can't you sell the a link that redirects to the monkey pic, essentially selling the same monkey hundreds of times with redirect links?
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 02:50
|
|
|
Trollologist posted:if the Monkey pics are really just links to monkey pics, can't you sell the a link that redirects to the monkey pic, essentially selling the same monkey hundreds of times with redirect links? Correct. What you by when you buy an NFT is effectively just a position number on a chain. The associated art has absolutely nothing to do with it other than acting as a visual representation for your number on the chain. Unironically one of the better explanations of NFTs was you paying to stand in a line in front of a specific poster. The line doesn't go anywhere, you don't own the poster, and nothing stops somebody else from opening up an identical line and poster but your spot is paid for in that line and only you can have it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 02:55
|
|
|
Trollologist posted:if the Monkey pics are really just links to monkey pics, can't you sell the a link that redirects to the monkey pic, essentially selling the same monkey hundreds of times with redirect links? You don't even need a link that redirects, you can just use the exact same link. There's no check for uniqueness
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 02:59
|
|
|
Protocol7 posted:have you considered: number go up? I... I never considered this
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 03:08
|
|
|
Since NFTs just point to fungible JPEGs, what is the difference between a "real" Bored Ape and another NFT pointing to the same picture, or to the same picture hosted elsewhere? Amusingly NFTs only really start to achieve the purpose of digital ownership + artificial scarcity when a centralized authority (OpenSea) steps in and says: These are the AUTHENTIC Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs. Those other ones are not. Integrate with our API for display of NFT ownership from the BLUE CHECKMARK VERIFIED collection. This is so fractally stupid my head will never stop hurting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 03:17
|
|
|
coelomate posted:Since NFTs just point to fungible JPEGs, what is the difference between a "real" Bored Ape and another NFT pointing to the same picture, or to the same picture hosted elsewhere? Absolutely not a loving thing except the name hence why they need a central authority to manage it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 03:20
|
|
|
jokes posted:You can trademark a color in real life. An NFT isn’t a trademark, or real, or anything, of course UPS' trademark for instance includes the brown color on their vehicles and uniforms, but that doesn't mean they can go around suing anyone who uses brown in their logos. It merely prevents another courier company from using a similar brown in a similar fashion with the intent of misleading customers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 03:26
|
|
|
Aren't pigments intellectual property? Like there was a new blue and a new pink recently.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 03:40
|
|
|
TVsVeryOwn posted:Aren't pigments intellectual property? Like there was a new blue and a new pink recently. Pigments, like paint, I'm sure can be patented or otherwise deemed intellectual property. In that case it is a formula patented, though, not the color the formula results in. At least that's my assumption.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 03:55
|
|
|
Pigments are chemicals and chemical processes can be patented. We have a pretty broad array of ways to make substances that are not protected intellectual property that can color most things a lot of colors but there's still some occasional novel stuff that the patent gatekeeps, the famous example being vantablack.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 04:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 04:07
|
|
|
This is theft
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 04:09
|
|
|
Right, you can make proprietary a particular formulation but the color itself can't be made so proprietary that only you can use it. Tiffany's can prevent Zales from using the trademark blue on their jewelry gift boxes, but nothing prevents Home Depot from selling buckets of paint in the same shade. They likely can't call it Tiffany Blue, but ask an associate to color match your gift box, no biggie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 04:14
|
|
|
coelomate posted:It started years ago with Ethereum and its "smart contracts." Those smart contracts could be made into "fungible tokens" that became easily produced shitcoins (ICOs etc.), "non-fungible tokens" that became all kinds of poo poo but maybe most famously cryptokitties (which lol no one talks about anymore, but I think is what launched open sea years ago), and dap/dao BS generally (that started in the Hindenburg style disaster of The Dao). i did not know until the dan olson video that the reason that ethereum and ethereum classic split was to reverse the dao "hack" (read: exploit of a known, documented security flaw that they never bothered to fix before going live)
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 04:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
If you ever have to ask "wait, it can't be that stupid, can it?" the answer is never "no," it is always either "yes" or "it's actually even dumber."
|
|
#
?
Jan 31, 2022 05:13
|
|
