|
"for every additional person that joe biden repulses as he becomes ever cozier with capital, no less than one additional person chooses to vote for him over his opponent." this is what liberal cheerleaders sincerely believe and it is fun to remind their followers of this every time you are urged to vote for biden. Logically, it follows that biden should be trying to maximize the number of people who agree with me and refuse to vote for him. Why are you against this, are you a GOP supporter? Ruzihm posted:Reminder that the leaders of the field of political "science", such as the hack Andrew Hall, rely on models like this to make their assessments and predictions Ruzihm has issued a correction as of 20:19 on Mar 25, 2022 |
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 20:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 22:55 |
|
|
The Onion character "Diamond Joe" Biden was elected president but since he was not around his stunt double Joseph Robinette Biden assumed the office as a prank.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 20:25
|
|
|
TehSaurus posted:If it's the one I'm thinking of it is policymaking rather than electoral politics, because the two are only loosely related. it's only when you get into the upper income brackets that you start to see some correlation, and ofc the higher you go the stronger it is
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 21:11
|
|
|
Nothus posted:They may have been asleep at the switch with Trump, but America's ruling class will rig any election that looks like a threat. Especially against a backdrop of global instability and shrinking imperial influence That was because Trump, unlike Bernie, was not a threat to the ruling class. Bernie was not much of one either after all.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 21:25
|
|
|
MSDOS KAPITAL posted:yeah basically there is mathematically no correlation between the will of the broader electorate, like 95% of the population, and the policies of the US government almost like rather than individual wills it's reflective of some kind of... interests.... alll shared by the same class.. hm.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:04
|
|
|
MonsieurChoc posted:That was because Trump, unlike Bernie, was not a threat to the ruling class. Bernie was only a threat to Chris Matthews
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:06
|
|
|
copy posted:almost like rather than individual wills it's reflective of some kind of... interests.... alll shared by the same class.. hm.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:12
|
|
|
Out reading the Biden budget and enjoying all the progressive policies. They're all just off the page, in a different paper.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/aurorao83/status/1507383562202320907?s=21 The democrats are going to get destroyed in 2022.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:21
|
|
|
the democrats are going to keep posting through it and then act completely shocked + blame the left when they get insanely destroyed in 2022
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:30
|
|
|
i wish it were reckoning time
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:34
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:https://twitter.com/aurorao83/status/1507383562202320907?s=21 these people deserve nothing less than total, complete annihilation
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:50
|
|
|
a reckoning is coming. I don’t care about the politicians I desire the destruction of the libs themselves
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 22:52
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:https://twitter.com/aurorao83/status/1507383562202320907?s=21 Imagine thinking you've done something when the best you can do is a bunch of weasel words and "people literally aren't starving, yet"
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 23:03
|
|
|
"i don't understand something at all" is not something you should say pridefully and i'm going to assume whatever you are about to say about that topic you just said you don't understand is definitely wrong and also maybe insane and stupid
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 23:22
|
|
|
i have never comprehended anything in my entire life. every facet of reality is a terrifying unexplainable blur and every event is a random surprise to me. i think joe biden is doing a great job
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 23:24
|
|
|
Hello I am Thirty Eight Years Old and I don't understand, at all, why anyone could possibly be disappointed with President Joe Biden.
|
|
#
?
Mar 25, 2022 23:26
|
|
|
It's easy to be oblivious when you're wealthy
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 00:58
|
|
|
"We gained a supreme court appointment" is the loving funniest thing after the democrats were dumb enough to believe the republicans when they said it was too close to the end of obama's second term for him to be allowed to pick a new justice and that if they were in that same position they absolutely would not do that and they would wait until the coming election was over just absolute dogshit brains
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:07
|
|
|
A single Supreme Court seat gained by luck. Meanwhile, the GOP stole two or three seats and the Democrats are too bound by decorum and 'our holy institutions' to pack the court. So not really that much of an "accomplishment".
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:09
|
|
|
how is it gaining a seat if you're appointing a replacement for a justice that was appointed by a democrat. that's not what gaining a seat means
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:15
|
|
|
I'm supposed to vote dem for a lottery chance at the council of elders and a vaccine rollout largely distributed by private companies that started under trump?
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:18
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:https://twitter.com/aurorao83/status/1507383562202320907?s=21 woof, the replies 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:27
|
|
|
F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:A single Supreme Court seat gained by luck. Meanwhile, the GOP stole two or three seats and the Democrats are too bound by decorum and 'our holy institutions' to pack the court. So not really that much of an "accomplishment". if the democrats had any desire to control the court they have a pretty good case for impeaching clarence thomas and probably also kavanaugh but they don't give a poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:45
|
|
|
the bitcoin of weed posted:if the democrats had any desire to control the court they have a pretty good case for impeaching clarence thomas and probably also kavanaugh but they don't give a poo poo The Dems are practically being spoon fed a path toward impeaching Thomas, but I'd be extremely surprised if they had the balls to actually follow through. At best they'll use Thomas as a way to scold or guilt people into voting for them. At worst they'll just shrug and cry about the rules.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:51
|
|
|
MSDOS KAPITAL posted:how is it gaining a seat if you're appointing a replacement for a justice that was appointed by a democrat. that's not what gaining a seat means they're so weak, all new appointees are republican until proven otherwise. the bitcoin of weed posted:if the democrats had any desire to control the court they have a pretty good case for impeaching clarence thomas and probably also kavanaugh but they don't give a poo poo i loved the dem pearl clutching when progressives called for packing the court.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 01:54
|
|
|
Republicans are so crazy and unreasonable, the safe thing to do is just give them everything they want all the time
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 09:39
|
|
|
Zvahl posted:swing states in presidential elections don't loving matter because biden is the same as trump is the same as obama and there hasn't been any meaningful difference in any of them for at the very least 75 years I'll disagree with you here and say there were in fact been substantiative differences between dems and republicans up to 1992 at least as it pertains to domestic affairs. If and when a postmortem of the democrat party is to be performed it is Clinton that killed the party. Every presidential and midterm election since then has been either a reaction to repulsion at the republican project or a reaction to democrats' ineffectiveness at opposing it. There has been nothing electorally on the table except the republican project since Clinton acquiesced to it with arguably the exception of the 2016 election.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 10:54
|
|
|
F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:A single Supreme Court seat gained by luck. Meanwhile, the GOP stole two or three seats and the Democrats are too bound by decorum and 'our holy institutions' to pack the court. So not really that much of an "accomplishment". It was literally the opposite of luck, it was a planned decision. I understand how it can look like luck, given that RBG was completely incapable of doing the same, in the manner of "Golly, we're lucky Stevens wasn't as stupid and full of hubris as RBG was" but that's not luck, that's just statistics being that out of eight people you're very unlikely to find anyone dumber and more arrogant than she was.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 11:01
|
|
|
LastInLine posted:I'll disagree with you here and say there were in fact been substantiative differences between dems and republicans up to 1992 at least as it pertains to domestic affairs. If and when a postmortem of the democrat party is to be performed it is Clinton that killed the party. Every presidential and midterm election since then has been either a reaction to repulsion at the republican project or a reaction to democrats' ineffectiveness at opposing it. There has been nothing electorally on the table except the republican project since Clinton acquiesced to it with arguably the exception of the 2016 election. yeah this is fair, my primary issue with this poo poo party lately has been more american empire in which the 75 year time frame makes sense but Clinton making it a taglong dog for republican policies especially with the 94 midterms setting the stage for perpetual republican appeasement and clout chasing is definitely where things happened for domestic issues, before that it was slightly less audacious general incompetence while trying to huff whatever charisma jfk left in the back of that continental
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 12:18
|
|
|
cenotaph posted:I'm supposed to vote dem for a lottery chance at the council of elders and a vaccine rollout largely distributed by private companies that started under trump? Uh, yes? Is there someone making a better offer I'm not seeing? You leftists are so childish, living in a world of "want" instead of "can." Even Joe Biden, the most leftward president ever, and his absolute girlboss of a VP aren't enough to appease you babies. I tried, but that reads like something I could imagine seeing on Twitter. Is it even possible to write something so stupid it doesn't sound like the liberal discourse?
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 13:05
|
|
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:are you retarded dude? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 13:27
|
|
|
Big Mad Drongo posted:Uh, yes? Is there someone making a better offer I'm not seeing? You leftists are so childish, living in a world of "want" instead of "can." Even Joe Biden, the most leftward president ever, and his absolute girlboss of a VP aren't enough to appease you babies. "you leftists" is too direct of a response for it, the correct phrasing is asking a rhetorical question in a new post with a sort of '*sigh* oh well, guess this is what we smart people have to put up with' flavor on it instead of referring to anything biden related directly, say that some people are just unpleasable and don't understand civics. any criticism of harris, obviously, is racist as well as sexist, and you only addressed the sexism D+ see me after class 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 13:34
|
|
|
TehSaurus posted:If it's the one I'm thinking of it is policymaking rather than electoral politics, because the two are only loosely related. do you have a link? this sounds extremely up my alley
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 13:45
|
|
|
Thank you for bringing the fact that I was probated to my attention. I looked in my rapsheet and realized I missed the last three. Non-Americas privilege I suppose.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 13:53
|
|
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Thank you for bringing the fact that I was probated to my attention. I looked in my rapsheet and realized I missed the last three. Non-Americas privilege I suppose.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 13:59
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:i have never comprehended anything in my entire life. every facet of reality is a terrifying unexplainable blur and every event is a random surprise to me. i think joe biden is doing a great job i laughed loud enough to get a thump from the neighbor 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 15:56
|
|
|
F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:The Dems are practically being spoon fed a path toward impeaching Thomas, but I'd be extremely surprised if they had the balls to actually follow through. At best they'll use Thomas as a way to scold or guilt people into voting for them. At worst they'll just shrug and cry about the rules. Does it really help them to do another impeachment that won't actually result in removal from office when they have all sorts of other ineffectual things they could be doing? I guess the theater of it could potentially be a useful distraction from everything else to a certain type
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 17:29
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/seungminkim/sta...ingawful.com%2F this also assumes the trump tax cuts will be allowed to expire in 2025 after the gop has retaken the house, senate, and presidency lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 21:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 22:55 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/justinsink/stat...ingawful.com%2F
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2022 21:23
|
|