Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
Pretty sure volunteering other people to be martyrs is not how that works.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Elephant Ambush
Nov 13, 2012

...We sholde spenden more time together. What sayest thou?
Nap Ghost
I still want to know what Pelosi told AOC to get her to change her vote on giving tons of war funds to Israel

Gripweed
Nov 8, 2018

CommieGIR posted:

Okay, at this point: Prove they could have done something. Their excuses is the very system that we are expecting them to work in, which is a very valid excuse.

It sucks, but that's how the system works. They can't go full monty and just start caning the GOP to support them or beating Manchin until he votes correctly.

Then we’re right back to my original poinT. You can’t expect the Democrats to advance the causes their voters support. Whether that’s because they don’t want to or because they can’t doesn’t matter.

Iamgoofball
Jul 1, 2015

Koos Group posted:

No, they can't post in this thread or other future iterations of USCE until their threadbans are reconsidered. If it seems as though a threadbanned user was posting here it's probably because their threadban was undone privately and there's no way to note such on someone's rap sheet, as may have been the case with PeterCat.

have you considered just slapping a sixer on them with "unbanned from [thread]" as the reason? they're grown adults they can handle 6 hours of not posting for some recordkeeping

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

Discendo Vox posted:

You get that it's a terrible look to do this and not provide a detailed explanation after several days of pretty visible non-moderation, and a longer period of highly inconsistent moderation?

I wanted to leave that to users to figure out for the sake of the posters' dignity, but in the interest of transparency:

How are u trolled too much. While I respect his trolling in the China thread, doing it here is very much the he's already dead Simpsons meme.

Mellow Seas and Harold Fjord both had problems with lashing out when losing their tempers, as well as excessive reports.

VitalSigns, though he was doing better in the last month or two, had a habit of simply posting too much which led to a general tendency of not contributing much material in each post.

More info is contained in all the users' rap sheets. As I said before, threadbans aren't based on any formula for how many or severe of offenses someone has committed, but rather how many problems they cause for discussion vs. how much original, uncommonly known, clever, well-sourced, or otherwise interesting material they add to it. I don't think any of the threadbanned users are incapable of good posting, but they would need to engage in self-examination such as prayer or meditation, as well as a poster training regimen, before coming back.

Iamgoofball posted:

have you considered just slapping a sixer on them with "unbanned from [thread]" as the reason? they're grown adults they can handle 6 hours of not posting for some recordkeeping

Yes, I didn't want to clutter up rap sheets but if it's causing this much confusion it might be the best option.

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

If the question is "how can we change things in the american political system in time to avert armageddon", the answer, at this point, is very obviously "nothing". Enjoy your summer, because the writing is on the wall, and poo poo is gonna go sour sooner rather than later. The correct moral response is to embrace despair, and then persist regardless. It's valid and necessary to have arguments about best to proceed in these conditions, but if you're laboring with the hope that anything we do will be meaningful on a larger scale, you're laboring under a delusion, and you are inevitably going to break your own heart. Engage in local activism, and stick with it until everything explodes.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

Willa Rogers posted:

Indiana, Florida, Iowa and Ohio all voted for a Democratic president a mere 14 years ago. West Virginia was reliably Democratic over most of my lifetime.

This was the electoral outcome by state in 1976:



You're correct that you'll be dealing with Trump & Bush judges for the rest of your life, but it's not as if state party switches are a force of nature, happening organically, and not due to policy proposals & legislation.

State pols are the ones who determine election law, so it's almost always worthwhile to at least try to take back a party town-by-town, county-by-county, state-by-state--not with people grown in political lab vats, but through personal connection with the voters, ideas that resonate with voters, and effective messaging with voters.

I'm generally with you on that, but apart from overall party realignment, one factor against is that back then the national parties were just way less ideologically aligned than they are today, and political leadership was more driven by local machines out of smoke-filled rooms, with their own character varying greatly place to place. Conservative Dems and liberal Republicans were influential nationwide well into the 1990s. The national party (either side), was a patronage network of mutual backscratching that tolerated a lot of dissent and compromise. Like, I know that's exactly what people complain about today, but we just have a pale reflection of those days. Allegiances were also less nationalized: federal votes often followed state/regional lines no matter which party you were in rather than today's urban/rural divide that also determines your party membership.

Not saying it can't be done: Dems and left-leaning voters desperately need to treat state and local control as seriously as conservatives do. That matters more than whether they turn out for a presidential election every four years. Just that clawing back red districts will take different strategies, work in different places, and get different results than back then, because they're different voters that will accept different coalitions.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Koos Group posted:

How are u trolled too much. While I respect his trolling in the China thread, doing it here is very much the he's already dead Simpsons meme.

Please do not endorse trolling in the forum explicitly intended for good faith discussion. We are literally told to report people we suspect are trolling rather than engage with them. Think about what it conveys to everyone when you tell us you respect people's deliberate violation of the rules, and what it means for expectations about conduct and moderation across the subforum.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Discendo Vox posted:

Please do not endorse trolling in the forum explicitly intended for good faith discussion. We are literally told to report people we suspect are trolling rather than engage with them. Think about what it conveys to everyone when you tell us you respect people's deliberate violation of the rules, and what it means for expectations about conduct and moderation across the subforum.

I feel like 'it better be very funny or very sophisticated or you will catch a probe' has been the de facto standard for as long as I've been reading.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Iamgoofball posted:

have you considered just slapping a sixer on them with "unbanned from [thread]" as the reason? they're grown adults they can handle 6 hours of not posting for some recordkeeping

An underappreciated stratagem imo, especially if you issue the sixer at 3am.

assuming you do the due diligence rather than issuing the low inconvenience probation to a Brit just as they're getting their posting day started

:negative:

BRJurgis
Aug 15, 2007

Well I hear the thunder roll, I feel the cold winds blowing...
But you won't find me there, 'cause I won't go back again...
While you're on smoky roads, I'll be out in the sun...
Where the trees still grow, where they count by one...
This is (largely) a group of people who spend their time following, leaning about, and discussing significant events in the US, and what's more probably sincerely committed to a better future... somehow. It is also largely a "leftist" place in that republican/conservative ideology is not championed.

My "question" is twofold.

When (as we all acknowledge things getting worse), will posting about a sort of meta-understanding of attitudes and actions required not be an important topic in current events discussion?

Why, as a group of people bending ourselves towards understanding a path forward, do we devolve into constant bickering and tribalism?

People say posting isn't praxis and our effort posts here are not activism, but I disagree. Discussing ideas and building coalitions is our job as living humans being that its the only way forward. This should be the ideal place to practice (aside from the immunity to fists).

I've followed this thread in its various forms for years, and it's absolutely informed and helped change my political views. Is denying the potential of informed discussions some sort of self defense against showing up on the wrong side of a DHS report?

I heard of a media disinformation panel shutting down before they even met, due to the head backing out. I had a little fantasy that they saw so much compelling argument that our world is wrong and makes reasonable/necessary action "radical" by design, that they bailed due to a crisis of conscience.

This is a valuable place whether you want to learn, or just want to earnestly process the calamity of our trajectory without being (utterly, at least) gaslit into toxic optimism or establishment sunk-cost fallacy.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Bel Shazar posted:

I feel like 'it better be very funny or very sophisticated or you will catch a probe' has been the de facto standard for as long as I've been reading.

I and every one else who actually wants to be able to discuss things would like to see a lot less de facto and a lot more de jure. The rules exist. They should be enforced, rather than ad hoc reactive purges determined by how funny a mod finds a given incident of sabotaging discussion.

Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 01:59 on May 20, 2022

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

TipTow posted:

Oklahoma had among the highest % of voters go for Debs in 1920. The culture in Oklahoma hasn’t changed that much in a century. Most of those socialists were also extremely religious. Sounds like the Dems have to actually offer poo poo people want to get elected.

Ah, yes, Eugene Debs, who boldly won 5% of the vote in Oklahoma. What a triumph for socialism in America's Heartland.

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Discendo Vox posted:

I and every one else who actually wants to be able to discuss things would like to see a lot less de facto and a lot more de jure. The rules exist. They should be enforced, rather than ad hoc reactive purges determined by how funny a mod finds a given incident of sabotaging discussion.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Jaxyon posted:

Pretty sure volunteering other people to be martyrs is not how that works.

I'm sorry I expect things from my political leaders.

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

Sanguinia posted:

Ah, yes, Eugene Debs, who boldly won 5% of the vote in Oklahoma. What a triumph for socialism in America's Heartland.

Which, as I said, was among the best returns for him in the nation. Do you have a point to make, or merely the snarky white noise?

My larger point is writing off places like Oklahoma as "lost causes" in favor of focusing on swing/battleground states is utterly pointless since that's the exact strategy that has us where we are. "Elect more Democrats!" when the filibuster can't be overcome. There's only so many "blue" and "battleground" states; if liberals are going to write off Oklahoma et al. then they've already conceded the permanent majority to the Republicans as there aren't enough states to win. And as far as the ability to swing Oklahoma, it's been among the most left-leaning states in the country at one point. The religiosity and anti-establishmentarianism that are deeply embedded in Oklahoma culture can be harnessed by the left, or the Democrats if they cared or tried.

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

Discendo Vox posted:

I and every one else who actually wants to be able to discuss things would like to see a lot less de facto and a lot more de jure. The rules exist. They should be enforced, rather than ad hoc reactive purges determined by how funny a mod finds a given incident of sabotaging discussion.

Without taking a stance here, and with no disrespect to anyone involved, but isn't there, like, a QCS thread or something where y'all could be hashing this out? It's a major disruption itself, at this point, and ~forums drama~ does not have a shitload to do with US politics.

Kale
May 14, 2010

UCS Hellmaker posted:

It's more funny that the same poo poo that was an issue before and was supposed to be sent to cccc is back just as bad as ever and half the time current events aren't even talked about here, just endless ranting about how Dems suck

Sidenote, I'd love to hear how the Oklahoma democratic party is supposed to stop that abortion bill, because it's loving Oklahoma and I sincerely doubt that the democratic.party has more then a token number of seats in a massive GOP supermajority of all parts of the government.

I've been popping in here again with the midterm primaries and elections coming up. I used to be what I'd describe as a regular poster here and I'd probably drop by a lot more often if that wasn't seemingly always the dominant topic or if there wasn't seemingly some tense blowup that I don't feel like getting caught in the middle of happening every time I try to read the thread, so that it felt I guess "safe" to start talking about current events in the United States without somebody going on the warpath over what they imagined I was thinking or saying. I can take the heat in a disagreement on politics, but I'm also aware that if it seems like some people are in the midst of flipping their poo poo in the thread then odds are no matter what anyone says they're going to get caught up in the crossfire and told that they're "Kramering into the thread", so why bother posting really. That's the main problem the iterations of this thread have always kind of had to me.

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

POWELL CURES KIDS posted:

Without taking a stance here, and with no disrespect to anyone involved, but isn't there, like, a QCS thread or something where y'all could be hashing this out? It's a major disruption itself, at this point, and ~forums drama~ does not have a shitload to do with US politics.

Yes, it might be better to PM me, go to QCS, or wait for the next D&D feedback thread at this point. How are u has also just informed me that he wasn't trolling in the China thread.

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

TipTow posted:

And as far as the ability to swing Oklahoma, it's been among the most left-leaning states in the country at one point.

In the election you're citing as proof that Oklahoma isn't a lost cause the electorate voted for Harding/Coolidge and their "return to normalcy," explicitly anti-progressivist and nativist messaging by an absolute majority. Even if every Debs vote had gone for the Cox/Roosevelt ticket, which while not exactly great on economic issues overall at least had a pro-organized labor bent in opposition to Harding picking Coolidge for the fame he earned breaking a police union strike in Boston, they STILL would have lost. That's your metric for "Among The Most Left Leaning States?"

Sanguinia fucked around with this message at 02:37 on May 20, 2022

Kith
Sep 17, 2009

You never learn anything
by doing it right.


POWELL CURES KIDS posted:

Without taking a stance here, and with no disrespect to anyone involved, but isn't there, like, a QCS thread or something where y'all could be hashing this out?

Part of the problem is that QCS threads that have even the slightest bit to do with D&D or C-SPAM almost inevitably turn into slapfights between D&D and C-SPAM. In addition to that, QCS has a group of regulars who really love white noise posting. I can very much understand why people would want to have the discussion here and now instead of having it moved to QCS where things can go downhill very quickly.

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

Sanguinia posted:

In the election you're citing as proof that Oklahoma isn't a lost cause the electorate voted for Harding/Coolidge and their "return to normalcy," explicitly anti-progressivist and nativist messaging by an absolute majority. Even if every Debs vote had gone for the Cox/Roosevelt ticket, which while not exactly great on economic issues overall at least had a pro-organized labor bent in opposition to Harding picking Coolidge for the fame he earned breaking a police union strike in Boston, they STILL would have lost. That's your metric for "Among The Most Left Leaning States?"

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/socialist-revolution-oklahoma-crushed-green-corn-rebellion-180973073/

quote:

It might surprise many who call themselves socialists today, including members of Congress, that the heartland of American socialism was once rural Oklahoma. In 1915, there were more registered Socialist Party members in Oklahoma than in New York, which had seven times the population and a much stronger tradition of left-wing politics. Oklahoma socialists built a statewide movement, but won the most converts in the southeastern counties, where a small elite of predominantly white landowners had established a cotton fiefdom in the old Indian Territory. They rented out most of their land to tenant farmers, black and white, who had migrated to Oklahoma from Texas, Arkansas and the Deep South, dreaming of opportunity on a new frontier.

https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=SO001
https://jacobinmag.com/2021/08/okla...class-union-wcu

Criticize the evidence I presented, but the declaration that Oklahoma was once among the most left-leaning states is generally considered true.

Crain
Jun 27, 2007

I had a beer once with Stephen Miller and now I like him.

I also tried to ban someone from a Discord for pointing out what an unrelenting shithead I am! I'm even dumb enough to think it worked!

POWELL CURES KIDS posted:

If the question is "how can we change things in the american political system in time to avert armageddon", the answer, at this point, is very obviously "nothing". Enjoy your summer, because the writing is on the wall, and poo poo is gonna go sour sooner rather than later. The correct moral response is to embrace despair, and then persist regardless.

The way I've been describing it is:

"You're on a train, the bridge is out, the brakes are blown, but the bar car is still open"

captainblastum
Dec 1, 2004

Koos Group posted:

Yes, it might be better to PM me, go to QCS, or wait for the next D&D feedback thread at this point. How are u has also just informed me that he wasn't trolling in the China thread.

Between this whole thing and the 36 hour quarterly feedback thread if I had any doubts about you taking the piss they're gone.

Civilized Fishbot
Apr 3, 2011

Elephant Ambush posted:

I still want to know what Pelosi told AOC to get her to change her vote on giving tons of war funds to Israel

Probably something like "this is going to happen whether you like it or not, but if you go against this then you'll never get what you want again, and if you go with this then you will have opportunities elsewhere to push your agenda. Be pragmatic."

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

Civilized Fishbot posted:

Probably something like "this is going to happen whether you like it or not, but if you go against this then you'll never get what you want again, and if you go with this then you will have opportunities elsewhere to push your agenda. Be pragmatic."

Yes, I'm sure that's exactly what that corrupt radghoul freak said. Are you a traveler from the West Wing dimension?

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

WorkerThread posted:

Yes, I'm sure that's exactly what that corrupt radghoul freak said. Are you a traveler from the West Wing dimension?

What's a radghoul?

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Koos Group posted:

What's a radghoul?

irradiated cannibal human subspecies in the Fallout universe. smh, Koos, do you even play video games

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

Koos Group posted:

What's a radghoul?

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

The bedrock problem with Democrats isn't being bad at outreach, or caving to Republicans with a speed that borders on collusion, or making enormous, unspeakably obvious strategic mistakes that should disqualify them from ever working in politics. The bedrock problem with Democrats is that they have terrible policies, which grow more terrible by the day, and which have left them with nothing meaningful to offer. Nothing. They've made it clear that any accidentally progressive or useful positions they claim to hold are not important--certainly not important enough to actually do something about--and if it isn't fundraising or crushing the left wing of their own party they might as well be the Keystone Kops. They are an impotent, incompetent joke, and the only reasons they've survived as a party is inertia and "not Republicans".

I'm not just ranting here, although it is very thirst-quenching. If the Democrats don't want to ratfuck themselves into the history books, they need to actually change what they're offering, and that starts internally. They can phone bank and robotext as much as they want, focus just on swing states, or not just focus on swing states, or any other goddamn thing--but people don't vote without a reason, and the Democrats aren't giving them one. There is no amount of outreach that will make up for the fact that they are transparently full of poo poo and out of touch. They need to steer left, because their "everything is fine" strategy has done nothing but push this country right, because it is not a compelling argument, because even the most uninformed dipshit with his head in the sand can recognize that everything is incredibly not fine.

Obama built an extremely effective campaigning machine, but he was also selling something that people actually wanted: "Change". People were suffering and they needed that to change. The rhetoric turned out to be empty, but it was at least what needed to be said. And the Democrats seem to have instantly forgotten that, because, uh...

https://twitter.com/joshshapiropa/status/1527370685672108041

That doesn't sound like change to me. That doesn't sound like a winning campaign. Democrats can either acknowledge that poo poo needs to improve, or they can get buried alive in the grave they keep digging themselves. And in case I haven't made my stance on this clear, I don't see them putting down the shovels any time soon.

okay, namaste

Fighting Trousers
May 17, 2011

Does this excite you, girl?

TipTow posted:

Which, as I said, was among the best returns for him in the nation. Do you have a point to make, or merely the snarky white noise?

My larger point is writing off places like Oklahoma as "lost causes" in favor of focusing on swing/battleground states is utterly pointless since that's the exact strategy that has us where we are. "Elect more Democrats!" when the filibuster can't be overcome. There's only so many "blue" and "battleground" states; if liberals are going to write off Oklahoma et al. then they've already conceded the permanent majority to the Republicans as there aren't enough states to win. And as far as the ability to swing Oklahoma, it's been among the most left-leaning states in the country at one point. The religiosity and anti-establishmentarianism that are deeply embedded in Oklahoma culture can be harnessed by the left, or the Democrats if they cared or tried.

As an Oklahoma resident, I'd love to believe you, but here's the problem as I see it: Oklahomans could have someone tell them plainly and to their faces that they are being ripped off and manipulated by the Republicans, and they still wouldn't vote for that person because if they've got a D behind their name, they're part of the "woke radical mob". And if the letter behind the name is an I or maybe even an S, well that's no better, because they're probably still not a good Conservative Christian (tm) and everybody knows that socialism has something to do with CRT. (They're not sure what, but they've heard it's bad)

Basically, the only way we're pulling states like Oklahoma back from this is doing the long, slow, PAINFUL work of convincing people that government can be good, actually, and spending money on things other than law enforcement is beneficial, that the oil and gas industry is not their friend, and that grifters who steal from the public coffers should be bounced out on their ears. But that's gonna be a lot of work.

Enver Zogha
Nov 12, 2008

The modern revisionists and reactionaries call us Stalinists, thinking that they insult us and, in fact, that is what they have in mind. But, on the contrary, they glorify us with this epithet; it is an honor for us to be Stalinists.

TipTow posted:

Criticize the evidence I presented, but the declaration that Oklahoma was once among the most left-leaning states is generally considered true.
Yeah the takeaway of Debs "only" polling 5% in Oklahoma, one of the states where the Socialist Party had a relatively strong presence, should be "drat America's socialist movement has been pretty weak" rather than "drat Oklahoma's politics are basically the same as they were a hundred years ago." After all, Debs in that same 1920 election polled 6% in California, 7% in New York, and a whopping 11% in Wisconsin. By the standards of third parties in American elections, these are impressive percentages even today. Of course, by the standards of the Social-Democratic Party in Germany, the British Labour Party, or even the CCF/NDP in Canada, they're not so impressive.

Enver Zogha fucked around with this message at 13:12 on May 20, 2022

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



In a lot of red states at this point, even and especially ones that were competitive less than a decade ago, there's just nothing. Nobody to talk to, nobody to help. The Party decided that they were consolidating around safe districts like 10 years ago and now we're at where we're at. I'm in one of them, the unsafe districts that are blue in a red state. I like a lot of my local Dems, they're very good people laboring hopelessly against the inevitable. I can vote for them and it's the same thing as not voting for them. The only Dems who come here are people like Bernie, who came to where I'm at to talk to me directly. I look forward to national figuring this out, which is their job, so that I may be driven to vote for nation candidates, which is in their perception my job.

Until they make my national level vote count I'll be leaving it blank while filling out local ones. I understand a bill was put forward recently to do this? They should make that law imho

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

Koos Group posted:

How are u trolled too much. While I respect his trolling in the China thread, doing it here is very much the he's already dead Simpsons meme.

Koos Group posted:

How are u has also just informed me that he wasn't trolling in the China thread.

Maybe there should be a rule added that if posters are expected to interpret posts in good faith, mods/admins should follow suit as well :rolleyes:

Kalit fucked around with this message at 04:20 on May 20, 2022

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

TipTow posted:

Which, as I said, was among the best returns for him in the nation. Do you have a point to make, or merely the snarky white noise?

My larger point is writing off places like Oklahoma as "lost causes" in favor of focusing on swing/battleground states is utterly pointless since that's the exact strategy that has us where we are. "Elect more Democrats!" when the filibuster can't be overcome. There's only so many "blue" and "battleground" states; if liberals are going to write off Oklahoma et al. then they've already conceded the permanent majority to the Republicans as there aren't enough states to win. And as far as the ability to swing Oklahoma, it's been among the most left-leaning states in the country at one point. The religiosity and anti-establishmentarianism that are deeply embedded in Oklahoma culture can be harnessed by the left, or the Democrats if they cared or tried.

How is the left going to harness Oklahoman religiosity for any of its causes seeing as most strains of religion there are deeply conservative Christianity, as opposed to idk. Unitarian Universalist or Liberation theology Catholic?

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

Fighting Trousers posted:

Basically, the only way we're pulling states like Oklahoma back from this is doing the long, slow, PAINFUL work of convincing people that government can be good, actually, and spending money on things other than law enforcement is beneficial, that the oil and gas industry is not their friend, and that grifters who steal from the public coffers should be bounced out on their ears. But that's gonna be a lot of work.

I don't disagree at all. I'm not going to pretend that Oklahoma is ready to elect country-fried Lenin or whatever in the next election, I just take umbrage at attitudes like

haveblue posted:

Oklahoma is not fixable, focus on swing states and the federal level

That treats me and my community as expendable, something to be written off. Left wing politics can win here. Like Epic High Five, Bernie actually did some campaigning, and decidedly won in 2016.

As trite as it may be we legalized medical marijuana in a citizen-initiated referendum that saw higher turnout than the preceding gubernatorial election. It'll take resources and energy, but people around here will come out and vote for things if they're offered things worth voting for.

In any event, treating some states as hopeless lost causes, again, will doom Democrats on a national level. It may already have.

DarkCrawler posted:

How is the left going to harness Oklahoman religiosity for any of its causes seeing as most strains of religion there are deeply conservative Christianity, as opposed to idk. Unitarian Universalist or Liberation theology Catholic?

This one is tricky, other than to say the earlier era of socialism in Oklahoma was rooted in Christianity. I don't have a good answer, other than to say I don't think it's impossible.

Civilized Fishbot
Apr 3, 2011

DarkCrawler posted:

How is the left going to harness Oklahoman religiosity for any of its causes seeing as most strains of religion there are deeply conservative Christianity, as opposed to idk. Unitarian Universalist or Liberation theology Catholic?

You can pair "progressive/leftist" politics with a sort of theologically unadventurous mainline Protestantism. Like MLK or William Jennings Bryan, or the whole Social Gospel movement.

Civilized Fishbot fucked around with this message at 04:35 on May 20, 2022

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

DarkCrawler posted:

How is the left going to harness Oklahoman religiosity for any of its causes seeing as most strains of religion there are deeply conservative Christianity, as opposed to idk. Unitarian Universalist or Liberation theology Catholic?

aren't you literally Finnish

what the poo poo do you know about Oklahoman racial and religious demographics

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
here are my thoughts about the political situation in Karelia:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BRAKE FOR MOOSE
Jun 6, 2001

GreyjoyBastard posted:

here are my thoughts about the political situation in Karelia:

Tensions are high because muikku supplies are low.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply