Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

BRAKE FOR MOOSE posted:

Tensions are high because muikku supplies are low.

...ngl, now i want to try it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

GreyjoyBastard posted:

aren't you literally Finnish

what the poo poo do you know about Oklahoman racial and religious demographics

They're right in the sense that Oklahoma is majority Christian with an evangelical Baptist minority within that who are probably very conservative but as someone who is also not from Oklahoma or very personally accuainted with Christians there I think we both have the same ground view which is none. Also as to the question of why you don't use more progressive religious movement, we already have them and they primarily live in blue states. You're not going to flip stars using religion trying to import new ones, you need to meet people where they are first.

How many are out and out unreachable bigots and how many are reachable? I have no idea and you would need to do on the ground research to build any movement. The actual for real Christian message is a message that should resonate with leftists and can be harnessed to move people left. It's tossing out an old system of laws for compassion.

The biggest problem with evangelical Christianity is sola fide, the belief that belief alone promises salvation. You still need to be a holy person and do good acts but that's all evidence of your belief and not acts you must perform for salvation. This is uh, insanely heretical. But no one really cares about that poo poo and reforms are just races to see who can better misunderstand original texts.

Also, as to the idea any state is unsavable, the evangelical christians are a slim minority in Oklahoma. Even if you think every single one of them is an unsavable bigot who is more monster than human, you're deciding it's not worth helping the majority who are suffering from their death cult.

Gumball Gumption fucked around with this message at 05:36 on May 20, 2022

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

E: quote isn't edit

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Gumball Gumption posted:


The biggest problem with evangelical Christianity is sola fide, the belief that belief alone promises salvation. You still need to be a holy person and do good acts but that's all evidence of your belief and not acts you must perform for salvation. This is uh, insanely heretical. But no one really cares about that poo poo and reforms are just races to see who can better misunderstand original texts.


I’m sorry, you’re taking one of the major points of the Reformation itself and calling it “insanely heretical”? You’re really going to rage against Martin Luther as the real problem here? Who are you to declare what is and isn’t proper doctrine?

Also, shoving all evangelical denominations into the same pot doesn’t make any sense at all. There are massive differences between Lutherans and Baptists.

FLIPADELPHIA
Apr 27, 2007

Heavy Shit
Grimey Drawer

GreyjoyBastard posted:

aren't you literally Finnish

what the poo poo do you know about Oklahoman racial and religious demographics

Uhh I live in Oklahoma City (have lived here my whole life) and the poster is 100% correct. Religion in Oklahoma is a satanic blend of authoritarian racism, violent nationalism, and unhinged prosperity gospel. Our legislature just passed a Bill that makes a zygote a person.

It is the most politically hopeless state in the country.

Canned Sunshine
Nov 20, 2005

CAUTION: POST QUALITY UNDER CONSTRUCTION



FLIPADELPHIA posted:

It is the most politically hopeless state in the country.

I feel like Mississippi still has a leg up on it.

eviltastic
Feb 8, 2004

Fan of Britches

GreyjoyBastard posted:

aren't you literally Finnish

what the poo poo do you know about Oklahoman racial and religious demographics

Fwiw while they are not wrong about the lay of the land, given that the poster mentioned the denomination by name, it's also relevant that Oklahoma has some of the oldest and largest extant congregations of Unitarian Universalists.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

Solkanar512 posted:

I’m sorry, you’re taking one of the major points of the Reformation itself and calling it “insanely heretical”? You’re really going to rage against Martin Luther as the real problem here? Who are you to declare what is and isn’t proper doctrine?

Also, shoving all evangelical denominations into the same pot doesn’t make any sense at all. There are massive differences between Lutherans and Baptists.

In terms of US religious movements, "Evangelicalism" is a distinct movement from mainline Protestant churches, and is founded in Second Great Awakening stuff. It leads to strange things like how the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is not evangelical, but the Lutheran Missouri Synod is. Likewise, the American Baptists are mainline Protestant while the Southern Baptists are evangelical. And the gap between mainline and evangelical churches has become bigger in many ways than internal differences in detailed theology, just since the gap in focus, practice, and culture has overshadowed the rest. There are even Catholics who consider themselves Evangelicals and feel more common purpose with Southern Baptists than with the mainstream Catholic church.

A lot of the differences end up being things like biblical literalism, born-again ideology, and generally injecting religious teachings into your interactions with others, but there's a difference in the view of faith vs works too. Mainstream Lutheranism holds that salvation comes from faith alone, but also holds that good works are evidence of faith, and someone who has found salvation through faith will do good works as a matter of consequence. Evangelical Lutheranism might still hold that technically, I'm not sure, but they generally have a very different view of the kind of good works that save you. Which is why "Donald Trump might be a sinner but he's clearly doing God's work!" is way easier for evangelicals to say than mainstream Protestants or Catholics.

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

TipTow posted:

Which, as I said, was among the best returns for him in the nation. Do you have a point to make, or merely the snarky white noise?

My larger point is writing off places like Oklahoma as "lost causes" in favor of focusing on swing/battleground states is utterly pointless since that's the exact strategy that has us where we are. "Elect more Democrats!" when the filibuster can't be overcome. There's only so many "blue" and "battleground" states; if liberals are going to write off Oklahoma et al. then they've already conceded the permanent majority to the Republicans as there aren't enough states to win. And as far as the ability to swing Oklahoma, it's been among the most left-leaning states in the country at one point. The religiosity and anti-establishmentarianism that are deeply embedded in Oklahoma culture can be harnessed by the left, or the Democrats if they cared or tried.

Debs' relative success in Oklahoma comes off of its heavy sharecropping economy in that period. It's a pretty slim level of relative success, but generally, the base for socialists in the rural areas in this period was sharecroppers. This is no longer the case. Indeed, if you read Debs' speeches, he does sound like a preacher, but then so did most every politician at that time.

There's a tendency in online discourse, I think, to just kind of assume that the political lean that you have is the one everyone else secretly has and that it's the one that will win elections. I'm not sure there's a substantive way to win Oklahoma in a way that captures the religion of the area that doesn't cause unacceptable compromises in more core areas.

Historically, the Socialist party did best relative to the population in New York, and there was a period where they could win elections fairly consistently in NYC, even sending a US House rep.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

GreyjoyBastard posted:

aren't you literally Finnish

what the poo poo do you know about Oklahoman racial and religious demographics

...am I wrong?

I'd also say that pointing out past socialist history of Oklahoma as a reason for why there would be potential for leftists ignores kind of one very important thing...most American unions were racist as gently caress.

DarkCrawler fucked around with this message at 13:24 on May 20, 2022

Enver Zogha
Nov 12, 2008

The modern revisionists and reactionaries call us Stalinists, thinking that they insult us and, in fact, that is what they have in mind. But, on the contrary, they glorify us with this epithet; it is an honor for us to be Stalinists.

Panzeh posted:

generally, the base for socialists in the rural areas in this period was sharecroppers. This is no longer the case. . . Historically, the Socialist party did best relative to the population in New York, and there was a period where they could win elections fairly consistently in NYC, even sending a US House rep.
It's also worth adding that a good deal of support for the Socialist Party in NYC and certain other places they had a notable presence in (e.g. Milwaukee) was based on immigrant communities: Germans, Jews, Finns, Hungarians, etc.

Both Engels and Lenin noticed how few "American Americans" (as Lenin termed them) were joining the Marxist movement. It wasn't until 1936 that the CPUSA could claim that the majority of its membership was born in the United States (compared to 70% foreign-born in 1933.)

DarkCrawler posted:

most American unions were racist as gently caress.
To be fair, the relationship between the socialist movement in the USA and the labor movements was often uneasy at best by the 1890s-1920s. Most union officials subscribed to Gompers-style "apolitical," "pure-and-simple" unionism that eschewed identification with socialism.

That being said, the Socialist Party's leadership did accommodate racism, to the extent of permitting segregated locals in the South, as Philip S. Foner notes in his American Socialism and Black Americans. Debs himself criticized racism, but he wasn't a leader of the party and didn't want to be.

Enver Zogha fucked around with this message at 14:18 on May 20, 2022

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.
Good news keeps on rolling in!

Another mass shooting, this time in Chicago

https://apnews.com/article/crime-shootings-chicago-5b8abfd9f6488cecd891d435dcb66a0f

Police: Chicago shooting leaves 2 people dead, 8 wounded


quote:

CHICAGO (AP) — Two people are dead and another eight wounded following a shooting near a fast food restaurant in Chicago that sent bystanders scattering, authorities said.

The shooting happened about 10:40 p.m. Thursday near a McDonald’s on the city’s Near North Side, a few blocks from the city’s Magnificent Mile shopping district. One person was taken into custody and a weapon was recovered, police said in statement.

Details about what led to the shooting weren’t immediately released by police, but a witness, Deonna Jackson, 18, said the shooting appeared to stem from a fight outside the restaurant.

“When the fight first started, we were right next to them,” Deonna Jackson, 18, told the Chicago Sun-Times. ”We had to run because I didn’t want anyone to swing on me.”

And things keep getting worse and worse for Biden

Biden’s approval dips to lowest of presidency: AP-NORC poll


https://apnews.com/article/biden-approval-rating-drops-ap-norc-poll-d41bce85e1b062b588a32908b2affa65

quote:

President Joe Biden’s approval rating dipped to the lowest point of his presidency in May, a new poll shows, with deepening pessimism emerging among members of his own Democratic Party.

Only 39% of U.S. adults approve of Biden’s performance as president, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Research, dipping from already negative ratings a month earlier.

Overall, only about 2 in 10 adults say the U.S. is heading in the right direction or the economy is good, both down from about 3 in 10 a month earlier. Those drops were concentrated among Democrats, with just 33% within the president’s party saying the country is headed in the right direction, down from 49% in April.

Of particular concern for Biden ahead of the midterm elections, his approval among Democrats stands at 73%, a substantial drop since earlier in his presidency. In AP-NORC polls conducted in 2021, Biden’s approval rating among Democrats never dropped below 82%.

The findings reflect a widespread sense of exasperation in a country facing a cascade of challenges ranging from inflation, gun violence, and a sudden shortage of baby formula to a persistent pandemic.

“I don’t know how much worse it can get,” said Milan Ramsey, a 29-year-old high school counselor and Democrat in Santa Monica, California, who with her husband had to move into her parents’ house to raise their infant son.

I'm honestly surprised his AR with democrats is that high. I don't any people on my side of the political spectrum that are happy with him

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Those are some dire numbers. Possibly the worst I can recall seeing among a president’s own voters

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

FLIPADELPHIA posted:

It is the most politically hopeless state in the country.

A self-fulfilling prophecy. I've lived here my whole life ('sup OKC posting buddy) and I can tell you that a part of the reason our legislature passed a bill making a zygote a person is because this place was abandoned by national Democrats 20+ years ago. It "made more sense" to focus energy and resources into battleground states. And now even with a trifecta in the federal government the Democrats can't or won't do poo poo.

DarkCrawler posted:

...am I wrong?

Maybe? I don't have any data on hand, and yes of course conservative evangelical Christianity is bigger here than elsewhere in the U.S. but saying "most strands" is a bit of a statement and I'm disinclined to believe it but of course would welcome data. Not everyone who goes to church every Sunday is some insane bible-thumping theocrat.

DarkCrawler posted:

I'd also say that pointing out past socialist history of Oklahoma as a reason for why there would be potential for leftists ignores kind of one very important thing...most American unions were racist as gently caress.

As for this, you should try reading some of the articles I posted earlier. The Green Corn Rebellion was explicitly multi-racial.

Anyway, didn't mean to make US CE all about Oklahoma.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Solkanar512 posted:

I’m sorry, you’re taking one of the major points of the Reformation itself and calling it “insanely heretical”? You’re really going to rage against Martin Luther as the real problem here? Who are you to declare what is and isn’t proper doctrine?

Also, shoving all evangelical denominations into the same pot doesn’t make any sense at all. There are massive differences between Lutherans and Baptists.

I mean, I don't think being a cult nation has been very good for America and that is one of the central beliefs of the cults that built this country. I'm being glib but from the direction of how do you harness religion to get people to do left wing things and help others, your central belief being that you do those things to show off your faith isn't helpful.

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Killer robot posted:

In terms of US religious movements, "Evangelicalism" is a distinct movement from mainline Protestant churches, and is founded in Second Great Awakening stuff. It leads to strange things like how the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is not evangelical, but the Lutheran Missouri Synod is. Likewise, the American Baptists are mainline Protestant while the Southern Baptists are evangelical. And the gap between mainline and evangelical churches has become bigger in many ways than internal differences in detailed theology, just since the gap in focus, practice, and culture has overshadowed the rest. There are even Catholics who consider themselves Evangelicals and feel more common purpose with Southern Baptists than with the mainstream Catholic church.

A lot of the differences end up being things like biblical literalism, born-again ideology, and generally injecting religious teachings into your interactions with others, but there's a difference in the view of faith vs works too. Mainstream Lutheranism holds that salvation comes from faith alone, but also holds that good works are evidence of faith, and someone who has found salvation through faith will do good works as a matter of consequence. Evangelical Lutheranism might still hold that technically, I'm not sure, but they generally have a very different view of the kind of good works that save you. Which is why "Donald Trump might be a sinner but he's clearly doing God's work!" is way easier for evangelicals to say than mainstream Protestants or Catholics.

I was assuming they meant specifically evangelical denominations of Lutheran and Baptist but we have a guy arguing it's all Martin Luther's fault--never mind all the protestant nations that had movements just as wacky as the puritans back in the sixteen hundreds--so I don't even know anymore.

Cheesus
Oct 17, 2002

Let us retract the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wirebrush of enlightenment.
Yam Slacker

BiggerBoat posted:

I'm honestly surprised his AR with democrats is that high. I don't any people on my side of the political spectrum that are happy with him
Do you know any well-off Democrats?

My Boomer mother-in-law loves him almost entirely because he's Not Trump.

While I may have missed it, did student loan forgiveness ever come back into the news since the SCOTUS leak?

That's my incredibly low-bar litmus test for voting for Democrats this mid-term. No loan forgiveness from Biden, all races get a "None of the Above" write-in.

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

BiggerBoat posted:

And things keep getting worse and worse for Biden

Biden’s approval dips to lowest of presidency: AP-NORC poll


https://apnews.com/article/biden-approval-rating-drops-ap-norc-poll-d41bce85e1b062b588a32908b2affa65

I'm honestly surprised his AR with democrats is that high. I don't any people on my side of the political spectrum that are happy with him

Job approval means different things to different people. For some people, the scope is narrow (such as blame for inflation, gas prices, stagnant legislature, etc not being his since it's out of his direct/immediate control), for some people the scope is broad (he should push harder, sign more executive orders even if they'll get stayed/overturned, etc).

On top of that, I'm sure there's core group who will always just say "yes" to job approval for anyone who is a part of the same political party they identify with.

Kalit fucked around with this message at 14:13 on May 20, 2022

Srice
Sep 11, 2011

Cheesus posted:

Do you know any well-off Democrats?

My Boomer mother-in-law loves him almost entirely because he's Not Trump.

While I may have missed it, did student loan forgiveness ever come back into the news since the SCOTUS leak?

That's my incredibly low-bar litmus test for voting for Democrats this mid-term. No loan forgiveness from Biden, all races get a "None of the Above" write-in.

It hasn't come back into the news in a significant way (There are republicans who are pushing a bill to prevent student loan forgiveness but it's not exactly breaking news that they'd be opposed to it and it's not like it'd pass right now either) so I suspect it's on the backburner until the next student loan expiration period, especially since the SCOTUS leak gave dems something to run on for midterms.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

The interesting thing about the AP poll is that it shows Dems' dropping approvals of Biden while other polls show that the abortion issue has energized mainly Democratic voters.

Kalit posted:

Job approval means different things to different people. For some people, the scope is narrow (such as blame for inflation, gas prices, stagnant legislature, etc not being his since it's out of his direct/immediate control), for some people the scope is broad (he should push harder, sign more executive orders even if they'll get stayed/overturned, etc).

The AP story, if you read it, goes into the details you're seeking; it covers his broken-out approvals on the economy, immigration & the Ukraine war, and compares them with prior polling.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Cheesus posted:

Do you know any well-off Democrats?

My Boomer mother-in-law loves him almost entirely because he's Not Trump.

While I may have missed it, did student loan forgiveness ever come back into the news since the SCOTUS leak?

That's my incredibly low-bar litmus test for voting for Democrats this mid-term. No loan forgiveness from Biden, all races get a "None of the Above" write-in.

I hope you mean "all federal races" because your local reps need all the support they can get and can't do poo poo about federal student loans.

Kalit
Nov 6, 2006

The great thing about the thousands of slaughtered Palestinian children is that they can't pull away when you fondle them or sniff their hair.

That's a Biden success story.

Willa Rogers posted:

The AP story, if you read it, goes into the details you're seeking; it covers his broken-out approvals on the economy, immigration & the Ukraine war, and compares them with prior polling.

I was referring to just the last sentence of BiggerBoat's post, with them being surprised that there are people who still [overall] approve of Biden. Sorry if that was unclear.

Kalit fucked around with this message at 15:19 on May 20, 2022

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Solkanar512 posted:

I hope you mean "all federal races" because your local reps need all the support they can get and can't do poo poo about federal student loans.

My local (Democrat) reps who spout off about needing to fund the police? They need my help? For what?

Fighting Trousers
May 17, 2011

Does this excite you, girl?

TipTow posted:

A self-fulfilling prophecy. I've lived here my whole life ('sup OKC posting buddy) and I can tell you that a part of the reason our legislature passed a bill making a zygote a person is because this place was abandoned by national Democrats 20+ years ago. It "made more sense" to focus energy and resources into battleground states. And now even with a trifecta in the federal government the Democrats can't or won't do poo poo.

I get it. I've lived my whole life in flyover country, and the last decade plus in Oklahoma. It's frustrating to see people dismiss your entire life based on where you live, and it's frustrating to watch the national DNC abandon people who might otherwise vote for them.

quote:

Anyway, didn't mean to make US CE all about Oklahoma.

Yeah that.

eta:

Blue Footed Booby posted:

I was assuming they meant specifically evangelical denominations of Lutheran and Baptist but we have a guy arguing it's all Martin Luther's fault--never mind all the protestant nations that had movements just as wacky as the puritans back in the sixteen hundreds--so I don't even know anymore.

It's not Martin Luther, or even the Reformation in total. It's the fact that American Evangelicals have turned the American civil religion into their for realsies religion and now worship the American nation alongside (or even in place of) God.

Fighting Trousers fucked around with this message at 15:35 on May 20, 2022

Dietrich
Sep 11, 2001

Fighting Trousers posted:

It's not Martin Luther, or even the Reformation in total. It's the fact that American Evangelicals have turned the American civil religion into their for realsies religion and now worship the American nation alongside (or even in place of) God.

But only a very specific version of america which only exists in their fantasy. Which is in keeping with their behavior being dictated by a very specific version of Jesus that only exists in their fantasy so there it is.

PC LOAD LETTER
May 23, 2005
WTF?!

FLIPADELPHIA posted:

It is the most politically hopeless state in the country.

I dunno Idaho is getting pretty crazy.

Literal Dominionists running around saying they're going to shoot all the DEMONcrats running for office and/or intimidating others out of office.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

TipTow posted:

A self-fulfilling prophecy. I've lived here my whole life ('sup OKC posting buddy) and I can tell you that a part of the reason our legislature passed a bill making a zygote a person is because this place was abandoned by national Democrats 20+ years ago. It "made more sense" to focus energy and resources into battleground states. And now even with a trifecta in the federal government the Democrats can't or won't do poo poo.

I mean, it would have made more sense if for some reason adding more states had not become this bizarre anathema to the Democratic Party/United States in general. There's no reason to focus on Oklahoma if you can wrest enough power to add a few stars to the flag - if DC isn't an option there are still others. As we already know, populations between states don't matter so who cares, U.S. Virgin Islands is now Island Virginia with two senators.

But yes, if you limit yourself to 50 states then abandoning any state is idiotic. Then again, the Democratic Party has long since abandoned political domination over being a vehicle of political cronyism and influence and secure jobs for loyalists and leadership regardless of actual political results and a handful of starry-eyed hopefuls.

quote:

Maybe? I don't have any data on hand, and yes of course conservative evangelical Christianity is bigger here than elsewhere in the U.S. but saying "most strands" is a bit of a statement and I'm disinclined to believe it but of course would welcome data. Not everyone who goes to church every Sunday is some insane bible-thumping theocrat.

I mean glancing at Wikipedia it seems to be 50% evangelical Christians, 30% some other strain of Christianity, which is pretty big. Also 70% white. And the last election was like +33 Trump. Even if you aren't a bible-thumping theocrat it still doesn't remove all the other reasons people vote Republican. Mainly, and tied to many others, white supremacy.

Not that there isn't anything to gain from progressive faith outreach, it is a pretty good way to move voters (black churches already do it for Democrats without necessarily always being all that progressive for reasons of sheer survival).

quote:

As for this, you should try reading some of the articles I posted earlier. The Green Corn Rebellion was explicitly multi-racial.

And involved a thousand people or so and ended pretty badly by all accounts. I don't think there was ever much of a multi-racial strain in U.S. labor/socialism in the South except for few instances like that.

quote:

Anyway, didn't mean to make US CE all about Oklahoma.

I mean it makes for a similar case all around U.S, though - if they ever were potential Democratic states (beyond Southern Democrats) the weight of history, America's bonkers political system and partisanship have made them impossible to gain for Democrats now and the answers to their problems don't realistically lie in winning any state like Oklahoma.

For state-specific things, if we assume competence and greater ambition beyond fat stacks would have somehow taken them over, hey should work more on making purple states certain Democratic states by smart campaigning, mass mobilization of voters and playing as dirty with gerrymandering, judicial appointments, gubernatorial bullshit and whatnot.

But obviously, they won't because most of their jobs will be secure enough either way :shrug:

DarkCrawler fucked around with this message at 16:13 on May 20, 2022

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Kalit posted:

Job approval means different things to different people. For some people, the scope is narrow (such as blame for inflation, gas prices, stagnant legislature, etc not being his since it's out of his direct/immediate control), for some people the scope is broad (he should push harder, sign more executive orders even if they'll get stayed/overturned, etc).

On top of that, I'm sure there's core group who will always just say "yes" to job approval for anyone who is a part of the same political party they identify with.

I get it. I think that by and large the GOP is overall more prone to that tribalism though. I'd also imagine a big part of that 75% constitutes a lot of "better than Trump" thinking, along with deflecting the blame to congress

EDIT

And I feel confident that the states I edited into the post I quoted on the last page are lost for at least the rest of my lifetime. I don't see how citing some numbers from over 100 years ago is supposed to make me think I should have any misplaced hope about that.

BiggerBoat fucked around with this message at 17:48 on May 20, 2022

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Good

https://twitter.com/redistrict/status/1527677794607587335?s=21&t=H3TZ1aq0PKgNiF5MQqKr7g

AIPAC and other lovely groups spent absurd money to try and stop her and they failed

Cranappleberry
Jan 27, 2009

FlamingLiberal posted:

Good

https://twitter.com/redistrict/status/1527677794607587335?s=21&t=H3TZ1aq0PKgNiF5MQqKr7g

AIPAC and other lovely groups spent absurd money to try and stop her and they failed

Israel is one of those issues that many politicians either are in support of (sending money, weapons, protecting their apartheid state and crimes against humanity) or tiptoe around because of the money and being labelled, but also because they think voters care.

In reality, most voters do not care about Israel and if they do, it's not anywhere near one of their top priorities. Israel may also have an outsized influence in online spaces like comment sections and twitter, but that isn't representative of how voters feel.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



That’s true, which is why it’s so insane that these groups have so much outsized influence on that issue

theCalamity
Oct 23, 2010

Cry Havoc and let slip the Hogs of War
https://twitter.com/whcos/status/1527676466284183553?s=21&t=AOMbKl9yIsDEiRyIBo5H3A

First, shouting out that the economy is doing good actually while more and more people are struggling is extremely tone deaf. I doubt the average person is going to care about this when there are more pressing and material concerns.

Second, they’re playing into sinophobia with this kind of rhetoric. They need to stop trying to position China as the enemy and focus more on the issues at home.

Third, the US has over 1 million COVID deaths while China has had a little over 5k. Clearly, China is placing more value on actual human lives than the economy. Meanwhile, the US continues to let people die from it and won’t provide any more relief.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

theCalamity posted:

Meanwhile, the US continues to let people die from it and won’t provide any more relief.

You can't really understate people's own behaviour in that, though. Sure people are still dying a whole bunch in the US and North America in general, but we have access to vaccines and masks and our vaccination rates (especially with regard to boosters) are abysmal, and I hardly ever see people wearing masks. You can no more force people to take COVID seriously than you can force them to quit smoking or alcoholism. These things are killing people and there's no will on the part of the people dying to make any sort of change.

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

That "lowest unemployment" thing is also disingenuous as poo poo, and really perverse to be bragging about.

rscott
Dec 10, 2009

PT6A posted:

You can't really understate people's own behaviour in that, though. Sure people are still dying a whole bunch in the US and North America in general, but we have access to vaccines and masks and our vaccination rates (especially with regard to boosters) are abysmal, and I hardly ever see people wearing masks. You can no more force people to take COVID seriously than you can force them to quit smoking or alcoholism. These things are killing people and there's no will on the part of the people dying to make any sort of change.

Not sure I understand this take. We've done a ton of stuff wrt regulations to make people quit smoking (or never start in the first place) and it's had a demonstrable effect on the number of people who smoke now compared to 20 years ago.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

rscott posted:

Not sure I understand this take. We've done a ton of stuff wrt regulations to make people quit smoking (or never start in the first place) and it's had a demonstrable effect on the number of people who smoke now compared to 20 years ago.

Right, and we've tried a lot of things to try to get people to get vaccinated and wear masks too (some of it has definitely increased the number of people taking those precautions), but you have to accept that you just can't reach everyone. Wearing a mask or getting a quick vaccination is a hell of a lot easier than quitting an addiction and yet people are still like "no thank you, I'd rather roll the dice with a deadly virus a few times." I agree it's not an exact parallel but the main point is: you can point people in the right direction but you can't save people who don't want to be saved.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

rscott posted:

Not sure I understand this take. We've done a ton of stuff wrt regulations to make people quit smoking (or never start in the first place) and it's had a demonstrable effect on the number of people who smoke now compared to 20 years ago.

It's just "welp we tried :shrug:" with little actual consideration on if we actually tried or not. You can't force little to quit drinking or smoking but you can incentivize them too, the same way you can incentivize mask wearing and covid precautions. But mass action and incentivizing instead of outlawing and forcing compliance don't have a lot of traction in the US so the current attitude is we tried and anyone who didn't comply is a personal failing and nothing to do with the larger society.

Xombie
May 22, 2004

Soul Thrashing
Black Sorcery

rscott posted:

Not sure I understand this take. We've done a ton of stuff wrt regulations to make people quit smoking (or never start in the first place) and it's had a demonstrable effect on the number of people who smoke now compared to 20 years ago.

We haven't banned smoking, though. We've just banned or taxed the sale of tobacco. Because you can't actually ban smoking, just make it inconvenient. Covid is free. How are you suggesting we make getting Covid inconvenient via regulation?

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
COVID is inherently inconvenient in the short term in addition to being risky for one's health in the long term, possibly, and we know how to vastly cut down on the risk of either, and people aren't motivated to do any of it. If "you could die or suffer long-term illness" isn't enough to get people to act responsibly, how the gently caress is any amount of regulation going to move the needle?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Xombie
May 22, 2004

Soul Thrashing
Black Sorcery

Gumball Gumption posted:

You can't force little to quit drinking or smoking but you can incentivize them too, the same way you can incentivize mask wearing and covid precautions.

We don't incentivize not drinking or smoking, though. We don't reward people at all for quitting either.

quote:

But mass action and incentivizing instead of outlawing and forcing compliance don't have a lot of traction in the US so the current attitude is we tried and anyone who didn't comply is a personal failing and nothing to do with the larger society.

We haven't outlawed or forced compliance with abstaining from alcohol or tobacco anywhere.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply