|
So the judge is the one who requested cameras in the courtroom, and bless her because we got to hear the phrase "Amber Turd" repeated several times in a court of law. That's official now
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 05:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 18:01 |
|
|
I put wine and turds together, and decided this trial is *pissin' me off*
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 05:35
|
|
|
Powerful Katrinka posted:Yeah, she lied. She lied about all of her injuries Yeah I know. I watched it. Sorry if It read like I believed that happened E: sry it's 1am that came out bad. I fully am on everything you've said in this thread Barreft fucked around with this message at 06:06 on Jun 2, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:04
|
|
|
your honor may it please the court you see I am, myself, an amateur internet ring impact specialist and this is clearly oh wait hold on myth ankle monitor is beeping for some reason
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:09
|
|
|
Powerful Katrinka posted:So the judge is the one who requested cameras in the courtroom, and bless her because we got to hear the phrase "Amber Turd" repeated several times in a court of law. That's official now I can't deny that doesn't make me grin, but also, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/arts/amber-heard-tiktok-johnny-depp.html
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:17
|
|
|
Powerful Katrinka posted:So the judge is the one who requested cameras in the courtroom, and bless her because we got to hear the phrase "Amber Turd" repeated several times in a court of law. That's official now some lawyer dumbass bitch correct me if im wrong but i assume this is because so many peopl e were trying to get in that an overflow room was legally necessary, so they had to have cameras
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:19
|
|
|
Dang It Bhabhi! posted:your honor may it please the court you see I am, myself, an amateur internet ring impact specialist and this is clearly oh wait hold on myth ankle monitor is beeping for some reason It may look as though my client has suffered none but AHA here is a blacklight
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:33
|
|
|
Now imagine I am making ghost noises and stealing stuff from your fridge Mystery
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:34
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow evades the hangmans noose yet again the cad
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 08:14
|
|
|
runnypoops posted:Jack Sparrow evades the hangmans noose yet again the cad lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 09:23
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/DonnaDotPaella/status/1532090519429472256
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 09:31
|
|
|
Can't believe telling obvious and defaming lies will now be considered defamation. This sets a dangerous precedent
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 10:03
|
|
|
I mean it is true that all western legal systems are a joke where abuse is concerned, but you resolve that by lowering the absurdly high standards of evidence required and imprisoning people until they're positively safe to release ie, 99% will never be safe to release
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 10:12
|
|
|
Mooey Cow posted:Can't believe telling obvious and defaming lies will now be considered defamation. This sets a dangerous precedent obvious and defaming lies like "I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out." when will society put a stop to this awful slander
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 11:08
|
|
|
Thank god the multimillionaire won their suit vs the other multimillionaire, I'm invested in which multimillionaire is the slightly less piece of poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 11:13
|
|
|
SilvergunSuperman posted:Thank god the multimillionaire won their suit vs the other multimillionaire, I'm invested in which multimillionaire is the slightly less piece of poo poo. I thought they were both broke, gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 11:14
|
|
|
The kicker was when she slipped up and namedropped Kate moss, who was then asked to testify and said depp was a great guy. Real 200 iq move there
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 11:57
|
|
|
What Im reading is in a case where all she had to do is not say "I did this on purpose to hurt his career knowing these were lies" she testified "I did this on purpose to hurt his career knowing these were lies" Is that right?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:00
|
|
|
Barudak posted:What Im reading is in a case where all she had to do is not say "I did this on purpose to hurt his career knowing these were lies" she testified "I did this on purpose to hurt his career knowing these were lies" no, she did not say that the years of physical abuse were lies, if that's what you're asking it may have been unwise to hinge her defense on speaking the truth, but i can understand why someone might think years of photos and contemporaneous reports to third parties would be more compelling than it turned out to be Cease to Hope fucked around with this message at 12:06 on Jun 2, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:04
|
|
|
Here’s a tip on how to avoid a future defamation case: if you’re going to publish an article about how you’re the poster child for domestic abuse and sexual violence survivors, don’t produce a two hour audio tape of yourself gaslighting your accused abuser where you point out that whenever you get violent and start physically hitting them they try and defuse the situation by walking away and it pisses you off they never fight back. It really makes it hard to believe you constantly feared for your life.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:39
|
|
|
Cyks posted:Here’s a tip on how to avoid a future defamation case: if you’re going to publish an article about how you’re the poster child for domestic abuse and sexual violence survivors, don’t produce a two hour audio tape of yourself gaslighting your accused abuser where you point out that whenever you get violent and start physically hitting them they try and defuse the situation by walking away and it pisses you off they never fight back. It really makes it hard to believe you constantly feared for your life. yeah god forbid she yell at the dude beating her down on the regular, she should've realized his lawyer would selectively edit that recording years later to convince a bunch of people she's the actual abuser
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:44
|
|
|
Cease to Hope posted:yeah god forbid she yell at the dude beating her down on the regular, she should've realized his lawyer would selectively edit that recording years later to convince a bunch of people she's the actual abuser The entire audio is available and submitted in evidence for the jury to review.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:45
|
|
|
Cyks posted:The entire audio is available and submitted in evidence for the jury to review. including the parts where she points out he was beating her, which were edited out of the leaked versions everyone likes to link that whole conversation is her trying to get him to acknowledge what he's doing rather than drinking until he blacks out then denying he did anything. foolish to believe the truth matters to the dude beating you down i guess but what can you do
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:46
|
|
|
Cease to Hope posted:including the parts where she points out he was beating her, which were edited out of the leaked versions everyone likes to link So you’re saying the jury got to hear that part and still disagreed with it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:48
|
|
|
Cyks posted:So you’re saying the jury got to hear that part and still disagreed with it. yeah the jury hosed up, not the first or the last time in a domestic abuse case with a rich and charismatic wifebeater
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:49
|
|
|
I don't get it. If there was incontrovertible evidence that she was being abused why did the jury find against her?
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:55
|
|
|
Funky See Funky Do posted:I don't get it. If there was incontrovertible evidence that she was being abused why did the jury find against her? because people will believe any conspiracy theory as long as it lines up with their initial gut suspicion of a DV victim the better question is how a statement that didn't mention depp by name and didn't accuse him of anything was defamatory, but when it's a trial by public opinion with an unsequestered jury, the law doesn't really matter very much
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 12:59
|
|
|
She said during the trial that the op-ed was about Depp and the op-ed points to a specific time frame, two years prior to publication which would have been late 2016, the same year she filed the restraining order and a month before the divorce was finalized. Saying “she didn’t say his name specifically” is being disingenuous.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:09
|
|
|
The jury found that the unnamed target of her op-Ed was depp. You can hem and haw about what did or didn’t happen all you like, but he was clearly the topic of that little write up and this is the basis of the defamation case.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:14
|
|
|
The article she wrote about being a victim of intimate partner violence was probably just referring to some high school fling she had.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:15
|
|
|
Cyks posted:She said during the trial that the op-ed was about Depp and the op-ed points to a specific time frame, two years prior to publication which would have been late 2016, the same year she filed the restraining order and a month before the divorce was finalized. Saying “she didn’t say his name specifically” is being disingenuous. it still didn't actually accuse him of anything, just mentioned that she'd been in the news regarding domestic abuse, which is incontrovertibly true. it was foolish to say that the op-ed was about depp, but she was relying on the pile of pictures and contemporaneous reports to third parties of his abuse to be believed. it's doubly foolish to expect anyone to believe the evidence collected by the victim of a rich charismatic man, i suppose, when it's more fun to believe the epic poop memes and the edited videos accusing her of doing coke in the middle of the trial Blue Raider posted:The jury found that the unnamed target of her op-Ed was depp. You can hem and haw about what did or didn’t happen all you like, but he was clearly the topic of that little write up and this is the basis of the defamation case. if the op-ed was true (and every single word of it is incontrovertibly true), then it doesn't matter if it was about depp. the truth is never defamation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:15
|
|
|
Bar Patron posted:The article she wrote about being a victim of intimate partner violence was probably just referring to some high school fling she had. It does specifically mention suffering abuse before being of college age, perhaps you should read it
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:16
|
|
|
Well her lawyers didn’t prove that she was telling the truth in court, so that brings the situation full circle to yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:18
|
|
|
Centusin posted:It does specifically mention suffering abuse before being of college age, perhaps you should read it yeah this is the wild part. i'd love to see anyone point to which part of this isn't true quote:I was exposed to abuse at a very young age. I knew certain things early on, without ever having to be told. I knew that men have the power— physically, socially and financially— and that a lot of institutions support that arrangement. I knew this long before I had the words to articulate it, and I bet you learned it young, too. the rest of the op-ed is about metoo in general and the need to strengthen DV laws
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:18
|
|
|
But civil law doesn't provide any measure of justice. Ohhhh no a scumbag millionaire had to pay a trivial amount of their fortune. Maybe they'll have to sell a house they live in for a week a year! Justice is achieved by imprisoning or hanging domestic abusers. Civil law is a joke and has nothing to do with it. In any case with even a hint of criminality, all civil judgements should be completely subordinated to a criminal trial.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:20
|
|
|
None of us know what is or isn’t true. We aren’t mind readers and we weren’t there. But people can also just say whatever they want to without the burden of proof. She and her lawyers were unable to prove these assertions in court, which lead to a defamation ruling against her. Idk what’s so hard about this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:22
|
|
|
Blue Raider posted:None of us know what is or isn’t true. We aren’t mind readers and we weren’t there. man every claim in that op-ed can be trivially verified. she didn't accuse depp of beating her publicly until these lawsuits, so you don't have to get all "we aren’t mind readers and we weren’t there."
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:24
|
|
|
Now quote the rest of the post
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 18:01 |
|
|
Blue Raider posted:Now quote the rest of the post the rest of the post is moot. it wasn't a trial to see if johnny depp beat her, it was a trial to see if the op-ed was false. but the op-ed was completely anodyne, and it's nuts that the jury decided to punish her for accusing him of DV in the course of the trial also, don't play this neutral observer with no opinion nonsense Blue Raider posted:amberheard when johnny depp walked in and saw her making GBS threads on the bed: "youre clearly not a golfer" Blue Raider posted:Captain Jack sparrow OWNS shameful lawyer with CLAPBACK LOGIC Blue Raider posted:She shat Blue Raider posted:I’ve seen enough. Ready the electric chair people like you decided they liked memes more than believing a victim. Cease to Hope fucked around with this message at 13:28 on Jun 2, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 13:26
|
|