Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.

PT6A posted:

Is she one of the people from the Invention of Lying? Like, did she actually not know that people could just lie?

What is going on in her head?

She just assumes her voters are dumb enough to believe her. Given they have elected her multiple times, they probably are.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tacos Al Pastor
Jun 20, 2003

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:


Interestingly, all the biggest pro-lifers are releasing statements assuring everyone that this decision does not actually ban abortion.

https://twitter.com/SenCapito/status/1540350835384881153

LIES. We all know where they are going next with this.

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016


If I saw this post outside this board I would assume it was a Russian bot or a Republican troll gleefully trying to stir up trouble. On this board, it is very likely genuinely posted in good faith.

Our two party system did not appear by accident. The way our elections and government is set up, your path leads to unilateral disarmament by the left and the complete and utter destruction of every political ideal you believe in with absolutely no hope whatsoever of any victory for as long as you live. Nothing can work here other than 2 parties, when the conservatives are united and will always vote under one banner. Things might get interesting in an alternate world where the GOP somehow shattered into several smaller parties, but they haven't and won't.

So, does that mean we have to acquiesce to the current Dem leadership and beg them to be better? No, that is not what the far-right extremists did. They did not politely ask for their views to be heard, they converted the base, tirelessly worked to make their ideas mainstream within the party, purged the GOP leadership of all opposition, and took over. A new Jesus party would have been a stupid idea doomed to failure, same as the greens or whatever new socialist utopian party we might dream up.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Kanos posted:

I can actually 100% believe that Collins and also a ton of Democrats were truthfully blindsided by this happening, because I truly believe that a lot of them were morons who utterly convinced that it was all brinksmanship and surely no one would ever actually cross that line!

I feel nothing but contempt for them, mind you, and they're absolutely not going to do anything substantive about it, but I can believe them getting caught off guard.

i actually do too. shits not real until its REAL and alot of people are just waking up to "oh gently caress roe is dead" because most folks are weird political nerds/etc like we all are.

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Flying-PCP posted:

The country is simply too big to have a consistent 'shared ethos' throughout. In conservatives' case, wanting to hurt 'the other' isn't an ethos, it's a base instinct, reinforced by propaganda.

Then split. The country, long united, must divide in this instance. If you cannot have anything in common with people then part from them.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Rigel posted:

If I saw this post outside this board I would assume it was a Russian bot or a Republican troll gleefully trying to stir up trouble. On this board, it is very likely genuinely posted in good faith.

Our two party system did not appear by accident. The way our elections and government is set up, your path leads to unilateral disarmament by the left and the complete and utter destruction of every political ideal you believe in with absolutely no hope whatsoever of any victory for as long as you live. Nothing can work here other than 2 parties, when the conservatives are united and will always vote under one banner. Things might get interesting in an alternate world where the GOP somehow shattered into several smaller parties, but they haven't and won't.

So, does that mean we have to acquiesce to the current Dem leadership and beg them to be better? No, that is not what the far-right extremists did. They did not politely ask for their views to be heard, they converted the base, tirelessly worked to make their ideas mainstream within the party, purged the GOP leadership of all opposition, and took over. A new Jesus party would have been a stupid idea doomed to failure, same as the greens or whatever new socialist utopian party we might dream up.

Our system didn't appear by accident but it was built by white land owners who believed in rule only by white land owners even though they were a minority so I think the way things currently work where a white minority controls everything is how the system is designed to work.

midwest ink
Aug 12, 2007
black magic, you say?

Kanos posted:

I can actually 100% believe that Collins and also a ton of Democrats were truthfully blindsided by this happening, because I truly believe that a lot of them were morons who utterly convinced that it was all brinksmanship and surely no one would ever actually cross that line!

I feel nothing but contempt for them, mind you, and they're absolutely not going to do anything substantive about it, but I can believe them getting caught off guard.

I don't know how they were blind sided when Trump promised to put Justices on the court that would overturn Roe. I think that was the only policy he actually was genuine about sticking to.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Garland's DOJ actually moving quickly on something.

Says that states can't ban the abortion pill and can't interfere with people receiving abortifacients by mail that are legal at the federal level and cleared by the FDA.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1540399379827359746
https://twitter.com/jrovner/status/1540366395313201157

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Josef bugman posted:

Then split. The country, long united, must divide in this instance. If you cannot have anything in common with people then part from them.

This is beyond useless right now, dude

Cranappleberry
Jan 27, 2009

Josef bugman posted:

Also to people who are saddened by this. I would advise looking for solutions outside of electoralism in the near future. This is simply from the perspective of one idiot on the internet, but investing in unions and mutual support networks will be vital, at least in my opinion.

Faith in government institutions and major political parties in the US at at an all-time low for a reason. It's been a long time coming from a combination of propaganda, money in politics/oligarchal control/lobbying and conservatives cleverly using their power to push things toward getting what they want politically and also increasing their power despite being the minority. These things on top of material conditions continuously deteriorating while those suffering are being told it's their own fault and/or to vote for the people and parties who are actively, if less, harming them and are also contributing to the problems.

The problems the vast majority of individuals, groups and also the nation have been and continue to accelerate rapidly. What is being done to mitigate these problems is not just not enough to deal with them, it's not significantly slowing the acceleration.

Agree with the statement.

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


Josef bugman posted:

Then split. The country, long united, must divide in this instance. If you cannot have anything in common with people then part from them.

There’s really nothing stopping that from happening. While politicians play Calvinball in DC, the actual feet on the ground are only going to pick more and more fights. There is going to be a lot of unrest in this country.

Blindeye
Sep 22, 2006

I can't believe I kissed you!

Dapper_Swindler posted:

i actually do too. shits not real until its REAL and alot of people are just waking up to "oh gently caress roe is dead" because most folks are weird political nerds/etc like we all are.

Plus I think a lot of big brain moderates assumed conservatives just wanted abortion as a carrot on a stick for their voters because the reality of pulling the trigger wouldn't help them electorally past maybe one electoral cycle.

About the people saying to abandon the Democrats...aside from armed insurrection or extralegal action, what would a new party look like? When this tends to happen the country cedes all legislation to the other side for a decade or so and the new party...is often chock full of people from the old party.

I'm not judging, I'm just genuinely curious what you all envisioned.

Blindeye fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Jun 24, 2022

Flying-PCP
Oct 2, 2005

Josef bugman posted:

Then split. The country, long united, must divide in this instance. If you cannot have anything in common with people then part from them.

If there were any chance that this could happen peacefully it might be worth discussing (in another thread). That won't happen though.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

midwest ink posted:

I don't know how they were blind sided when Trump promised to put Justices on the court that would overturn Roe. I think that was the only policy he actually was genuine about sticking to.

Trump also said he wouldn't ban abortion during both the 2016 and 2020 debates when Biden said "Roe is on the ballot" and Clinton said that Trump could appoint the 5th vote to overturn Roe.

He also said that he had no idea what his court nominees' views on abortion were and wouldn't make it a litmus test before coming out the next day and saying he will only appoint strong pro-life judges.

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


Herstory Begins Now posted:

This is beyond useless right now, dude

We have to realize that this can happen and will if nothing is done about it. You can’t just bury your head in the sand and claim that everyone’s going to get along forever. People are angry, upset, and looking for someone to blame.

Flying-PCP posted:

If there were any chance that this could happen peacefully it might be worth discussing (in another thread). That won't happen though.

We are living, right now, in that-won’t-happen.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Pollyanna posted:

We have to realize that this can happen and will if nothing is done about it. You can’t just bury your head in the sand and claim that everyone’s going to get along forever. People are angry, upset, and looking for someone to blame.

We are living, right now, in that-won’t-happen.

I'm saying that a brit coming in here and saying 'well why don't you guys just split your country up' is loving stupid and beyond useless.

Flying-PCP
Oct 2, 2005

Pollyanna posted:


We are living, right now, in that-won’t-happen.

I'm saying it won't happen peacefully.

Majorian
Jul 1, 2009

Rigel posted:

Our two party system did not appear by accident. The way our elections and government is set up, your path leads to unilateral disarmament by the left and the complete and utter destruction of every political ideal you believe in with absolutely no hope whatsoever of any victory for as long as you live. Nothing can work here other than 2 parties, when the conservatives are united and will always vote under one banner. Things might get interesting in an alternate world where the GOP somehow shattered into several smaller parties, but they haven't and won't.

I think the point is that "the way our elections and government are set up" is the problem. Democratic majorities and supermajorities have largely not succeeded at implementing lasting progressive change in the post-LBJ era, and there is unlikely to be any degree of Democratic control over the federal government in the near-to-medium-term future anyway. If we want our political ideals and values to be reflected in how this country is governed, the system, as it stands, cannot be allowed to continue.

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


Herstory Begins Now posted:

I'm saying that a brit coming in here and saying 'well why don't you guys just split your country up' is loving stupid and beyond useless.

It’s not going to accomplish anything but we can’t pretend it can’t happen, is all I’m saying.

Blindeye
Sep 22, 2006

I can't believe I kissed you!
Also if we split we'll get to see a state with 750k people possessing enough nuclear firepower to end the world. One of 3 or 4 red states which would have such capabilities.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Pollyanna posted:

It’s not going to accomplish anything but we can’t pretend it can’t happen, is all I’m saying.

considering that the civil war happened, I don't think anyone anywhere is in doubt that it is a possibility

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Rigel posted:

So, does that mean we have to acquiesce to the current Dem leadership and beg them to be better? No, that is not what the far-right extremists did. They did not politely ask for their views to be heard, they converted the base, tirelessly worked to make their ideas mainstream within the party, purged the GOP leadership of all opposition, and took over. A new Jesus party would have been a stupid idea doomed to failure, same as the greens or whatever new socialist utopian party we might dream up.

The reason why the outright fascists were able to "take over" the Republican party is because their interests were never at odds with each other. Republican leadership was 100% OK with fascists being in charge because they were fascists themselves. In fact, it was even advantageous to them because it allowed them play the "reasonable, polite Republican" role and get idiot centrists to support them.

The interests of the Democratic leadership and the interests of the people who's only choice is to vote for them are completely at odds.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
In a shocking twist that nobody saw coming, moderate Governor who promised he was nothing like Trump and wanted to leave abortion alone has already announced he will move to ban abortion after 15 weeks in Virginia.

https://twitter.com/ktumulty/status/1540388649375866882

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

He also said that he had no idea what his court nominees' views on abortion were and wouldn't make it a litmus test before coming out the next day and saying he will only appoint strong pro-life judges.

This reversal appears to have been one of those instances where the last thing someone said to him stuck, except in this case it was a longtime pro-life activist who had wormed into the campaign

quote:

Dannenfelser attended a meeting where, after being introduced by Jerry Falwell Jr. and Franklin Graham and flanked by Mike Huckabee and Ben Carson, Trump — on his third wife and third sexual-assault allegation — professed his Christian faith. Dannenfelser claimed to be “impressed.” The campaign asked her to head up its pro-life coalition, essentially asking to use her extensive election infrastructure.

She said she would, for a promise. She sent a pledge, via Conway, for Trump’s signature committing him to “nominating pro-life justices to the Supreme Court.” This was not a request her group had made before. “No president wanted to talk about a pro-life judge,” Dannenfelser tells me. “They were willing to say a ‘constitutionalist judge’ or a ‘strict-constructionist judge,’ and we decided in the end, with Trump, we’re just going to say what we mean.”

She waited for a response, expecting objections to the wording; in typical negotiations of this kind, politicians behaved as if she were trying to trap them, which, of course, she was. As it turned out, Trump did want the letter edited. He wanted it to begin, according to Dannenfelser, with “a description of how terrible Hillary is on life.”

https://www.thecut.com/article/marjorie-dannenfelser-abortion-roe-v-wade.html

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Epic High Five posted:

It's going to be tricky going to convince people to bust their rear end for months on end to build something that only gets immediately destroyed by Dem leadership as soon as they can for a third time in 15 years because they cannot be dissuaded from viewing such things as an existential threat. I'm all in favor of it but it shouldn't ever rely on input from either party nor should it ever give either any degree of power or influence over itself. Also things like recognition that the wider media will never be on its side and agitating against trust in it as a means to prevent it being used a wedge among the coalition.

I'm not sure what you're talking about. 15 years dates it back to 2007, so are you talking about the Obama campaign machine? If so, then you have profoundly misunderstood what I'm talking about. I'm not referring to a temporary organization to rally people behind a single national candidate who completely controls that organization. I'm talking about a movement to shift people's politics, a movement to convince people that progressivism isn't just pie-in-the-sky bullshit from idealistic fools who don't understand the first thing about politics.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Fister Roboto posted:

The reason why the outright fascists were able to "take over" the Republican party is because their interests were never at odds with each other. Republican leadership was 100% OK with fascists being in charge because they were fascists themselves. In fact, it was even advantageous to them because it allowed them play the "reasonable, polite Republican" role and get idiot centrists to support them.

The interests of the Democratic leadership and the interests of the people who's only choice is to vote for them are completely at odds.

The whole idea that fascists "took over" is also just wrong. They've always been in charge. None of this is abnormal for America. What was abnormal was the small period where there was actually a lot of freedom in America, it just happens to be that's when most of us were born and raised so we think it's always been like this. We were lucky to live in the short speed bump where fascists were losing power but now it's rolling back again.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
So when the Good States split the 45% of us who aren't MAGA but live in Bad States can suck it right? Or which good state is taking the entire black south, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, New Orleans, etc etc etc in as refugees?

poo poo is dumb as gently caress. States are 55/45 one way or the other, and even in a war it's going to look like Syria, not a grand battle between two rump states with defined borders.

America Inc.
Nov 22, 2013

I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even 500 would be pretty nice.

Herstory Begins Now posted:

I'm saying that a brit coming in here and saying 'well why don't you guys just split your country up' is loving stupid and beyond useless.

Well I'm an American and I gotta say it's not the worst idea. Either way, there needs to be mass mobilization at the level of another civil rights movement to steer the ship of the nation back on course because it is plunging desperately off a cliff. Elections alone will not fix this.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

bird food bathtub posted:

Oh man gonna get so god drat many fund raising texts out of this. Actual legislation? Nah go gently caress yourself you peons.

Jesus Christ they're already coming in as a deluge

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Herstory Begins Now posted:

This is beyond useless right now, dude

I mean, I'll take your word for it. But if you are not receiving representation from the super state that you are a part of and can see no way of changing it's internal structures to better suit yourself and to keep people you love safe, then perhaps it is inevitable.

Pollyanna posted:

There’s really nothing stopping that from happening. While politicians play Calvinball in DC, the actual feet on the ground are only going to pick more and more fights. There is going to be a lot of unrest in this country.

That is the issue. It's going to have to start somewhere and change is going to have to start somewhere. If it cannot come from within the structure of power as it exists, then the structures must change or break.

Cranappleberry posted:

Agree with the statement.

Thanks. I do not wish to be a doom merchant. Merely to try and help by saying things that help as best I can.

Flying-PCP posted:

If there were any chance that this could happen peacefully it might be worth discussing (in another thread). That won't happen though.

I mean thats a fair point, this is a bit outside of the current thread. However I still think that it is very much a potential result of what is happening.

Pollyanna
Mar 5, 2005

Milk's on them.


America Inc. posted:

Well I'm an American and I gotta say it's not the worst idea. Either way, there needs to be mass mobilization at the level of another civil rights movement to steer the ship of the nation back on course because it is plunging desperately off a cliff. Elections will not fix this.

It starts at the ground level. Be loud, be angry, and take no poo poo.

FistEnergy
Nov 3, 2000

DAY CREW: WORKING HARD

Fun Shoe
The Democrats are not a vehicle for positive change, they're an obstacle just like the Republicans. The veneer of decorum and promised incremental change has gotten so thin that it's translucent.

I'm very proud of my decision not to vote for Joe Biden in 2020.

https://twitter.com/Catsinspace1991/status/1540368127929851905?t=LagRvTtsiD3Z_I3Ml6Eoqg&s=19

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

HonorableTB posted:

Jesus Christ they're already coming in as a deluge



Is there anything about Roe in the "Spicy Lingerie Warehouse" newsletter?

TGLT
Aug 14, 2009
Spicy lingerie and court expansion is a party platform that can unite the left, I think.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Is there anything about Roe in the "Spicy Lingerie Warehouse" newsletter?

"If you'd like to increase the chance of your life being upended with no recourse thanks to a bunch of fascist Christian autocrats, we have just the thing!"

MadJackal
Apr 30, 2004

Pollyanna posted:

We have to realize that this can happen and will if nothing is done about it. You can’t just bury your head in the sand and claim that everyone’s going to get along forever. People are angry, upset, and looking for someone to blame.

We are living, right now, in that-won’t-happen.

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1540404247103037440?s=20&t=yXLVmHE_PFw1f_nwdf_Nkw

Relegating the majority of the US to Hong Kong-esque "special administrative regions" does not result in a stable society.

Zero_Grade
Mar 18, 2004

Darktider 🖤🌊

~Neck Angels~

In other unsurprising news, Log Cabin Republicans continue to be the densest motherfuckers on the planet:
https://twitter.com/LogCabinGOP/status/1540359791511359488

Rebel Blob posted:

This stupid, ill-timed performance is about passing the gun control bill in the house, the pictures are of victims in recent mass shootings.


Haha I think that's Cuellar in the second row up, right side.

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

So when the Good States split the 45% of us who aren't MAGA but live in Bad States can suck it right? Or which good state is taking the entire black south, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, New Orleans, etc etc etc in as refugees?

poo poo is dumb as gently caress. States are 55/45 one way or the other, and even in a war it's going to look like Syria, not a grand battle between two rump states with defined borders.

I mean I'd hope that the splits that will inevitably occur will not, in fact, damage a lot of the none voting but still good populace. I think it's still likely to happen mark you, and I think that the disintegration of the Union is probably going to happen. I don't think it'll be solely along currently existing state lines. I think it will be messier, larger, and will be terrible.

I don't think it will be a good thing, I should have made that clear, but I do think it is a very likely thing. I'd love to be wrong and that there is a solution to the current situation that doesn't require mass upheaval and problems. But I am doubtful that such will occur.

But I am just one voice on the internet. I am doubtful about a lot of things that I thought, but I think it needs to be made very obvious that simply going "oh dear" and moving on inside of systems that hurt people cannot be the only way forward.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

Lib and let die posted:

This is great - in theory - but here's the problem: in order to build a progressive base we need to establish what that base should be centered around. To shift it away from Roe for a moment, we've seen arguments break out in this thread in recent days regarding how the Police should be handled and the only thing that they've revealed is that there is no cohesive thought among anyone that might fall under a label of "progressive" can point to as a binding thread. Some that could claim the progressive label want to abolish the police entirely, others want to diversify the police, and yet others want to reallocate funds away from militarization and into things like "desclation" training and very vehemently cling to those beliefs. How are those reconciled? How are they brought together? To a police abolitionist, how is a "big tent" with police reformists any different than the current democrat party embracing and protecting anti-choice members?

This process of internal establishment of what a progressive party would look like is often suppressed because of some weird narrative that this essential part of defining the progressive planks is seen as a sign of weakness, disorganization, and a lack of ability to accomplish anything due to infighting - how does a progressive movement combat this as well?

You prioritize. You focus on the things that can get you to most votes. There are arguments? Then you focus on the common poo poo. It's life and death, basic human rights, basic democracy, freedom to vote, etc. If you're dealing with police reform as the primary thing you've already sadly failed because it's not black and white. Focus on black and white.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zoph
Sep 12, 2005

MadJackal posted:

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1540404247103037440?s=20&t=yXLVmHE_PFw1f_nwdf_Nkw

Relegating the majority of the US to Hong Kong-esque "special administrative regions" does not result in a stable society.

I think people are completely justified in being angry at the Biden admin being a Buchanan-level catastrophe. Everyone that helped put him in power and give him Congress understood at least a little bit that this was the last real chance to keep the country from completely imploding and they have totally squandered all of their critical time and resources.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply