Sickening posted:Let’s not forget that multi session host pools for windows 10 can’t join aad only intune beacuse reasons. This isn’t true anymore
|
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 11:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:53 |
|
The Fool posted:Teams is second best in two major product categories and does a solid job of tying those features together into a cohesive whole.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 12:49 |
|
Really hate when someone is up my rear end for a fix or update for something....after handing it over you never hear from them again Did it work? Did you not end up using it? Do you just not care? (X)
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 12:50 |
|
I opened a ticket to get internet access added to one of our servers, and it be placed in the SSL Bypass group (because they didn't setup their SSL inspection quite right) Denied. I provided examples of a ticket last month where we did the same thing for 3 other servers after I spoke with the SECURITY TEAM and showed them what was happening Approved BTW BOB WE NEED A SCREENSHOT OF THE ANTIVIRUS CLIENT ON THAT MACHINE It's Linux bitch we don't have AV on those SORRY Anyway, I figured out that I went about this the wrong way - our datacenter team can give our servers internet access. So it's best to just ask them and we don't have to deal with the network and security folks. Then some super helpful person replied to my ticket. "Have you installed the ssl certificates in the special way for your application?" (https://help.zscaler.com/zia/adding-custom-certificate-application-specific-trusted-store) Did you look at any of the logs or screenshots in the ticket or the other tickets that are linked? Jesus christ. Where do I apply to be a professional copy/paster?
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 12:56 |
|
i am a moron posted:This isn’t true anymore Since when? It was true two months ago.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 20:59 |
|
There are the usual caveats of being Azure AD-only but it's out of preview now https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/deploy-azure-ad-joined-vm
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 21:19 |
Yea I just learned this on some AVD project that kicked off two weeks ago
|
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 21:37 |
|
i am a moron posted:Yea I just learned this on some AVD project that kicked off two weeks ago Fun. I went down this rabbit hole REALLY hard a few months back and there were conflicting pieces of documentation over this topic. I went through every tier of support hell only to get to someone said "oh yeah, this document that says it will work is wrong, sorry." Glad its now working. Because the "preview" version of this didn't work. it only worked for hybrid joined.
|
# ? Jun 30, 2022 22:04 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:Even if I had nothing else to do, a meeting request that comes with no notice and without some sort of contrition in the invite doesn't get attended. Oh I agree, but because we all got the popup before we even saw the email (most of us don't leave Outlook in the foregound while working), we all collectively were like "poo poo, did I forget a meeting with the boss" dropped our work and panic joined, then figured it out in the time it took him to literally show up 10 minutes late with Starbucks (only it was the work's coffee pod machine output)
|
# ? Jul 1, 2022 00:35 |
|
SyNack Sassimov posted:First off, wow, my first thread title, thanks IE! I visited the forums for the first time in like a year, searched my name, found this, thoroughly enjoyed it, and now I want an IT themed Disney album with this, and the one that I did (and some others).
|
# ? Jul 1, 2022 03:29 |
|
I hate when product guys live in their own bubble inhabited by spherical cows. Hey, we should be able to do x. "It doesn't work like that" Yes, I know it doesn't work like that. What I'm telling you is that it should work like that. "But we have feature y for that" Feature y doesn't work in the real world because it's already used for a million other things and is error prone and manual. I want to be able to do x instead. "It doesn't work like that."
|
# ? Jul 1, 2022 03:43 |
|
I love being encouraged to take initiative, put forward suggestions for improvements, and slap together a coherent argument for why "change the item order in this list" is not something that's worth an urgent hotfix. And then being told "do it anyway".
|
# ? Jul 4, 2022 22:42 |
|
EU is likely to finally ratify the maligned DMA act, along with DSA( https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news...ine-environment ). The first is to let anyone get in into every core service from apple/google/facebook/whatever it counts as big tech, meaning that theoretically steam/apple app store/etc. cannot no longer hold their monopolies. DSA is something i've never heard until now, it makes every law concerning sale of real products and services apply to the web, meaning that if any weird law from the last century blocking whatever applies to your web firm, you are hosed and you need it to kill it yesterday. Why it pisses me off? Because one of the doom scenarios is that ios must allow third party stores, and it's going to be a malware infestation to every parent/grandparent you made switch to iphones, cause they will click on every pop up and install whatever they push via banner/notification. SlowBloke fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Jul 6, 2022 |
# ? Jul 6, 2022 16:41 |
|
Wait, so you’re not enthusiastic about returning to The Internet Circa 2002 all so that the likes of Tim Sweeney can more efficiently wire credit card readers to slot machines?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 18:24 |
|
Walled gardens were never going to last, the only positive take is we got a couple solid decades reprieve out of them. Now it's time for bonzi buddy 2.0
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 18:34 |
|
SlowBloke posted:EU is likely to finally ratify the maligned DMA act, along with DSA( https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news...ine-environment ). The first is to let anyone get in into every core service from apple/google/facebook/whatever it counts as big tech, meaning that theoretically steam/apple app store/etc. cannot no longer hold their monopolies. DSA is something i've never heard until now, it makes every law concerning sale of real products and services apply to the web, meaning that if any weird law from the last century blocking whatever applies to your web firm, you are hosed and you need it to kill it yesterday. And now with entering the post-security world posted in the other thread: https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/current-activity/2022/07/05/prepare-new-cryptographic-standard-protect-against-future-quantum Its doom and gloom all the way down today.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 18:39 |
|
ptier posted:And now with entering the post-security world posted in the other thread: At no point does anyone sit down and think what threat model your organisation has to have where you are worrying about quantum computer owning attackers and how few of that ~50 entities give a poo poo about your webstore selling cat t-shirts.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 19:11 |
|
Arquinsiel posted:The worst thing about this kind of article is that when you ask how exactly a quantum computer will break encryption they go "because quantum", and if you really push them they'll mutter something about it being faster. The main thrust is that there WILL BE a quantum computer that can do such a thing because math, and the kind of math those computers seem to be good at, at least theoretically. And eventually, they will be cheap and easy to acquire, as with all computing technology. If we start working on a successor to PKI then, it will be way too late. So, instead, lets do it now so that when it does happen, we at least have something to work with. The real problem is that if there is a flaw in the algo, NSA has like a 50/50 shot of not telling anyone until its too late.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 19:25 |
|
Arquinsiel posted:The worst thing about this kind of article is that when you ask how exactly a quantum computer will break encryption they go "because quantum", and if you really push them they'll mutter something about it being faster. Because once they pop the key you used, everything you ever did that they were able to packet capture is now trivially readable? Making the standard and pushing people to it now means that in 15 years when quantum computers are expensive commodity hardware instead of bespoke fiddly research tools, most of the interesting-enough-to-hack parties are no longer using vulnerable crypto. Now I wonder how long it would take one of the cutting edge quantum computers to break the wallet key for Satoshi's Bitcoin Hoard.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 19:31 |
|
SlowBloke posted:EU is likely to finally ratify the maligned DMA act, along with DSA( https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news...ine-environment ). The first is to let anyone get in into every core service from apple/google/facebook/whatever it counts as big tech, meaning that theoretically steam/apple app store/etc. cannot no longer hold their monopolies. DSA is something i've never heard until now, it makes every law concerning sale of real products and services apply to the web, meaning that if any weird law from the last century blocking whatever applies to your web firm, you are hosed and you need it to kill it yesterday. Does this mean there could potentially be an Android iMessage client?
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 21:19 |
|
ptier posted:The main thrust is that there WILL BE a quantum computer that can do such a thing because math, and the kind of math those computers seem to be good at, at least theoretically. And eventually, they will be cheap and easy to acquire, as with all computing technology. If we start working on a successor to PKI then, it will be way too late. So, instead, lets do it now so that when it does happen, we at least have something to work with. Methylethylaldehyde posted:Because once they pop the key you used, everything you ever did that they were able to packet capture is now trivially readable? Making the standard and pushing people to it now means that in 15 years when quantum computers are expensive commodity hardware instead of bespoke fiddly research tools, most of the interesting-enough-to-hack parties are no longer using vulnerable crypto.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 21:48 |
|
Another day, another Marketing person demanding I make a change ASAP that turns out to be for something his department doesn't own that causes a production outage. He went straight under that bus, you run an ASAP demand up the chain that causes an outage because you don't know what you're doing, you get to answer questions about it. Thankfully I was able to revert the change within 3 minutes of hearing about the outage since I had the original state saved in case it didn't work.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 21:59 |
|
Sooooo, anybody else affected by the Network Solutions outage that has been on-going for over 24 hours now? (p.s. what DNS providers does everyone recommend)
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 23:29 |
|
route 53, azure dns, or cloudflare
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 23:30 |
|
The Fool posted:route 53, azure dns, or cloudflare I did not know people still used anything other than these. (We have one client that has internet through Sonic and insists they keep DNS on them as well - nothing against Sonic, but ....really?)
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 01:41 |
|
SyNack Sassimov posted:I did not know people still used anything other than these. Look, you don't want to mix and match your internet. Like how you don't google on Edge, or Bing with Chrome
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 02:17 |
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:Does this mean there could potentially be an Android iMessage client? Correct, so is a sea of fake whatsapp clients that snoop all the messages.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 08:36 |
|
SlowBloke posted:EU is likely to finally ratify the maligned DMA act, along with DSA( https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news...ine-environment ). This also requires *all messaging services* to be interoperable. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, iMessage, Telegram, Signal... It's hilarious. Either they all dump their encryption (if any) or they give up and shut down. I'm very curious what's going to happen.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 14:52 |
|
Sywert of Thieves posted:This also requires *all messaging services* to be interoperable. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, iMessage, Telegram, Signal... It's hilarious. Either they all dump their encryption (if any) or they give up and shut down. I'm very curious what's going to happen. Companies are going to give up and shut down
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 15:08 |
|
Nah, every company will start an initiative to develop a new open messaging standard and none of them are compatible and they all refuse to adopt anyone else's.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 15:12 |
|
XMPP is back, baby!
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 15:44 |
|
Sywert of Thieves posted:I love being encouraged to take initiative, put forward suggestions for improvements, and slap together a coherent argument for why "change the item order in this list" is not something that's worth an urgent hotfix. Don't ever become a consultant. The entire job is about having your suggestions ignored and being told to do it the dumb way instead.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 15:54 |
|
Sywert of Thieves posted:This also requires *all messaging services* to be interoperable. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, iMessage, Telegram, Signal... It's hilarious. Either they all dump their encryption (if any) or they give up and shut down. I'm very curious what's going to happen. Telegram is the only one that is pretty much compliant already, the api covers every user facing feature already, the rest of that list not so much.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 16:41 |
|
xzzy posted:Nah, every company will start an initiative to develop a new open messaging standard and none of them are compatible and they all refuse to adopt anyone else's. Jeoh posted:XMPP is back, baby!
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 17:42 |
|
GreenBuckanneer posted:Companies are going to give up and shut down One can only hope. Alas, I doubt this will actually happen.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 17:46 |
|
I assume OP was being facetious, but I'll bite anyways: chat is too important for anyone to shut it down. Anyone that's a big player is gonna fight hard to keep it available and be the ones to control whatever protocol gets used.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 17:52 |
|
Methylethylaldehyde posted:
If it would take a regular old supercomputer 9,000 years to crack it, this experimental quantum computer can do it in less than a second: https://twistedsifter.com/2022/07/quantum-processor-completes-9000-years-of-work-in-36-microseconds
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 19:00 |
|
PremiumSupport posted:If it would take a regular old supercomputer 9,000 years to crack it, this experimental quantum computer can do it in less than a second: You probably meant this as a joke, but it's extremely misleading. Quantum computers aren't faster than regular computers in a general sense. Instead, there are certain algorithms that can only run on a quantum computer that are more computationally efficient than the best algorithms for a conventional computer. The opposite is true, as well. Certain encryption methods just happen to be vulnerable to some of those algorithms. KillHour fucked around with this message at 19:07 on Jul 7, 2022 |
# ? Jul 7, 2022 19:05 |
|
The Fool posted:route 53, azure dns, or cloudflare
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 19:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:53 |
|
A month and a half into the new job and I'm getting really tired of the attitude for our AWS environment being "We can't do anything that will cost more money."
|
# ? Jul 7, 2022 19:51 |