Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Antigravitas posted:

The "zum Beispiel" at the beginning is quite important.

Like, Lambrecht is a moron, but she's absolutely correct that given the number of vehicles and the ammunition available, Ukraine isn't going to equip armoured brigades with Gepards. They'll use them where it makes the most sense, and that's securing infrastructure against cruise missiles and other aerial targets, which the platform absolutely can do.

It's still mindboggling that the thing was phased out just as drone warfare was picking up. It's really good at tracking and engaging drones, despite its old tech.

Fair enough, I appreciate the clarification.

Edit:

https://twitter.com/maria_shagina/status/1545318030833491970

cinci zoo sniper fucked around with this message at 15:46 on Jul 8, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

The Baltics be like, "No, no, don't throw me in the briar patch, Bear!"

Rigel posted:

Oh, Germany...

"Protecting hard industrial assets? Oh hell yeah please do that, whoever wins this annoying political....shootey shootey.... dust-up thing, someone from some country will still need to run the factories.

Helping the people? lol gently caress you"

Joke's on Germany. Corporations have termed humans as "resources" (i.e. "Human Resources"). Therefore people are infrastructure. :smuggo:

Antigravitas posted:

It's still mindboggling that the thing was phased out just as drone warfare was picking up. It's really good at tracking and engaging drones, despite its old tech.
Yes, but I think the direction Western militaries are taking are to increase the size of autocannon to ~40-50mm and use precision fire from those. It's fewer pieces of metal getting spewed everywhere, and a larger autocannon should be able to engage targets at longer ranges than the 20-25mm autocannons out there.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




I remember Antigravitas posted some German anti-drone auto cannon machine that looked sick.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

cinci zoo sniper posted:

I remember Antigravitas posted some German anti-drone auto cannon machine that looked sick.

Yeah, I saw that too. At a guess, the US wants its Bradley replacement to do dual-duty as an anti-drone platform. I am not very knowledgeable about radar, but I assume modern radar platforms don't need to be massive if you can narrow their search angle.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

Ynglaur posted:

Yeah, I saw that too. At a guess, the US wants its Bradley replacement to do dual-duty as an anti-drone platform. I am not very knowledgeable about radar, but I assume modern radar platforms don't need to be massive if you can narrow their search angle.

You need size if you need range since the signal strength decreases. If you only need low range scanning they can be very small. IIRC the Trophy system used a tiny fire control radar to detect incoming projectiles

DandyLion
Jun 24, 2010
disrespectul Deciever

Ynglaur posted:

Yeah, I saw that too. At a guess, the US wants its Bradley replacement to do dual-duty as an anti-drone platform. I am not very knowledgeable about radar, but I assume modern radar platforms don't need to be massive if you can narrow their search angle.

As with all military procurement the end results will be 1 part efficacy, 2 parts conglomerated Rube Goldberg design by committee.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
regarding short-range air defenses:

mlmp08 posted:

It's various stuff. M-SHORAD is in Europe now. There is also a variant being tested that uses directed energy for counter-mortar and couter-UAS. Pulling from the below account, because he posts a lot of this stuff and retweets and seems to have a decent pulse on acquisitions plans etc. His personal opinions on what to buy and what to do are whatever, but has decent updates on what is happening.

https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1517314410573754368?s=20&t=zHGdFkJ_JfPuO2Bp0HDY2A

https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1526344364137455616?s=20&t=zHGdFkJ_JfPuO2Bp0HDY2A

https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1537115439557357568?s=20&t=zHGdFkJ_JfPuO2Bp0HDY2A

https://twitter.com/MIL_STD/status/1513176060241727496?s=20&t=zHGdFkJ_JfPuO2Bp0HDY2A

And Avenger formations are still out there, and that plus M-LIDS/FS-LIDS and stuff like that are basically what a commander is going to receive if they ask for ground-based defenses now.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
I just keep reading it as SHODAN

Victis
Mar 26, 2008

All these vehicle-based laser machines aren't going to be available to a lot of the countries with mostly mechanized infantry vulnerable to drones

I have no idea what the best small anti-drone measures are, but there doesn't seem to be all that much. Those big EM guns currently need dedicated vehicle support, so possibly working on miniaturization of that? Anti-drone drones? There doesn't seem to be anything reliable besides having electronic warfare units deny the whole area.

edit:
Thought this was interesting

it's set to some typically tasteless meme music but the into to this video has some pretty crazy video (specifically the one where they play it back in slo mo) from switchblades. The second half is one of the hosts unboxing a switchblade set. These are the same guys that interview POWs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48Sllkg63Yw

Victis fucked around with this message at 17:22 on Jul 8, 2022

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Comedy option: breed and train predator birds to gently caress them up.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
Didn't an airport try that against civilian drones (and gave up because while falcons will happily hunt pigeons, they don't care about weird plastic things)?

E: apparently it was the Dutch police and they gave up because the eagles were unmotivated to hunt for things they didn't perceive as prey.

steinrokkan fucked around with this message at 17:21 on Jul 8, 2022

Kaal
May 22, 2002

through thousands of posts in D&D over a decade, I now believe I know what I'm talking about. if I post forcefully and confidently, I can convince others that is true. no one sees through my facade.
My understanding is that the anti-drone laser systems are being developed independently of the Bradley AA-capable turret program.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa
I'mma make a drone that carries a mirror, checkmate :smug:

Kchama
Jul 25, 2007

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

If the quoted dude is a glory hound why hasn’t he left like so many others?

I was commenting on the guys who are upset because it wasn't easy or fun, or in their words, "disappointing" like they expected and instead an artillery hell where they are on the receiving end.

I don't think poorly of people who leave in general. Just those who go there in there expecting it to be their chance to be a Call of Duty protagonist instead of being actually interested in fighting for the sake of Ukraine.

ChaseSP
Mar 25, 2013



The response similar to real life missiles will be automated turret systems that any military will find a big need for as drones continue to grow and become more and more ubiquitous.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

https://twitter.com/islamicworldupd/status/1545434252581519362?s=21&t=W6HTxYi0De4qnWkiyEMN4g

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

A lot of it turned out to have been shipped from elsewhere

https://mobile.twitter.com/Rebel44CZ/status/1545395779896066050

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Also, “a lot of armour”. 4 MBTs lmao. If anything, this is basically formal evidence that they just said “no” and left Lysychansk, before Russians did anything.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
It's not nothing. It's a reinforced company's worth of vehicles, which Ukraine is already in short supply of.

Of course, if we just hand over a few brigades worth of tanks and IFVs in 3 months it won't matter, but so far the West doesn't seem inclined to outright build operational formations for Ukraine.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
It's what Taliban calls "loose change found behind seat cushions"

Yeah, it's not great, but if they left them there there's chance they were already inoperable for some reason.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




I definitely agree that it’s not nothing, but the tweet attempts to claim that it’s a quote-unquote great cache of combat vehicles abandoned in Lysychansk, when this 1) was gathered from the entire entire area of the would-be cauldron even according the Russian commentators, 2) likely is in the ballpark of daily Ukrainian armour losses for the hot areas. It’s a loss alright, just not the loss Russians want to make an appearance of.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
This and stuff like the HIMARS "kills", or a while back there was drone footage of a UA mechanized attack getting bombarded and retreating in good order- all this seems like a flailing response to much more convincing footage released every day from the ukrainian side.

Like, you could see the ukrainians stopping to pick up their dismounts. Nearly identical russian videos show the vehicles speeding away from their buddies only to unceremoniously blow up 75m down the road.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

You know we also don't know the condition of these vehicles. While they may look real nice from afar the turrets could be sabotaged or the electronics inside of the tank.

It's a little different from when the taliban was driving around doing sideshows in m1 Abrams

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1545479924131266564?s=20&t=vZe9KlRxl5WSyY87qsNziw

We know the condition of these

HUGE PUBES A PLUS
Apr 30, 2005

Oh dear, someone got his feelings hurt.

https://twitter.com/joshrogin/status/1545510772868104193

Lavrov is mad because everyone one else just wants to criticise him for the war in Ukraine and not talk about the real issue which is find solutions to the global economic crisis.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:

Oh dear, someone got his feelings hurt.

https://twitter.com/joshrogin/status/1545510772868104193

Lavrov is mad because everyone one else just wants to criticise him for the war in Ukraine and not talk about the real issue which is find solutions to the global economic crisis.

What did he think would happen?

Youth Decay
Aug 18, 2015

HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:

Oh dear, someone got his feelings hurt.

https://twitter.com/joshrogin/status/1545510772868104193

Lavrov is mad because everyone one else just wants to criticise him for the war in Ukraine and not talk about the real issue which is find solutions to the global economic crisis.

Gee I wonder if those two things are connected in any way?

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

CommieGIR posted:

What did he think would happen?

This but for every decision every russian leader has made for the past five months

Sekenr
Dec 12, 2013




HUGE PUBES A PLUS posted:

Oh dear, someone got his feelings hurt.

https://twitter.com/joshrogin/status/1545510772868104193

Lavrov is mad because everyone one else just wants to criticise him for the war in Ukraine and not talk about the real issue which is find solutions to the global economic crisis.

RU sources describe it as he tried to talk to western leaders but only encountered feral russophobia.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/samramani2/status/1545522605502992387

Edit:

https://twitter.com/jackdetsch/status/1545464126436265986

cinci zoo sniper fucked around with this message at 23:12 on Jul 8, 2022

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

Shes Not Impressed posted:

https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1545479924131266564?s=20&t=vZe9KlRxl5WSyY87qsNziw

We know the condition of these

Do attacks like this continuing mean that the "operational pause" is a complete lie or is something else going on here? Are reckless attacks like this expected while Russia tries to pause and replenish its units?

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Chalks posted:

Do attacks like this continuing mean that the "operational pause" is a complete lie or is something else going on here? Are reckless attacks like this expected while Russia tries to pause and replenish its units?

They're called skirmishes. Some of this is testing defenses some of it is tick tac run and gun attacks.

Russia is pulling troops from other borders and poo poo to get things back in order. They are running out of steam temporarily.

If we start seeing gulags get liquidated then things are dire for the offensive.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007


Wow, what kind of damage can these do?

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Wow, what kind of damage can these do?

They are already being used to target ammo depots and C2/Military bases at long range.

Prettz
Sep 3, 2002

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Wow, what kind of damage can these do?
You know the MLRS of Desert Storm fame? It's that, but smaller and holds fewer of the rockets.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Prettz posted:

You know the MLRS of Desert Storm fame? It's that, but smaller and holds fewer of the rockets.

I assume this is to be more mobile?

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Cpt_Obvious posted:

I assume this is to be more mobile?

The MLRS and the other systems provided are EXTREMELY mobile systems.

Kibayasu
Mar 28, 2010

Cpt_Obvious posted:

I assume this is to be more mobile?

Its much faster and lighter, wheeled instead of tracked. Its also far more accurate (when used correctly) then the typical artillery cannon in Ukraine so instead of blanketing an area with hundreds of shells to hopefully hit something you want to the rockets hit where you want them to +/- some margin of error.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Cpt_Obvious posted:

I assume this is to be more mobile?

Kind of. M142 is mounted on a truck that goes ~80 km/h on highway, and M270 is mounted on a Bradley frame (tracks), but can still go ~60 km/h. I doubt either of those are being driven at max speed on rural Ukrainian roads, unless the Russian army alone isn’t meeting the desired health hazard levels. :v:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


Kibayasu posted:

Its much faster and lighter, wheeled instead of tracked. Its also far more accurate (when used correctly) then the typical artillery cannon in Ukraine so instead of blanketing an area with hundreds of shells to hopefully hit something you want to the rockets hit where you want them to +/- some margin of error.

CEP of about 1m iirc.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5