|
teen witch posted:Lmao holy poo poo I mean. This defense lawyer is obviously bad. Baby's first case trial. But like- what does all this behavior do to win the case exactly? How is this getting him closer to victory by acting completely unprofessional and like the piece of poo poo he represents? Nelson Mandingo fucked around with this message at 07:00 on Jul 28, 2022 |
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 06:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:38 |
|
|
Nelson Mandingo posted:I mean. This defense lawyer is obviously bad. Baby's first case trial. But like- what does all this behavior do to win the case exactly? How is this getting him closer to victory by acting completely unprofessional and like the piece of poo poo he represents? They're not after victory, they want to run the process out. They want a mistrial, and even if it doesn't go to that they'll do everything they can to continue kicking the can down the road for as long as humanly possible.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 06:59
|
|
|
Nelson Mandingo posted:I mean. This defense lawyer is obviously bad. Baby's first case trial. But like- what does all this behavior do to win the case exactly? How is this getting him closer to victory by acting completely unprofessional and like the piece of poo poo he represents? From Jones’s perspective having a lovely lawyer might be good, because if he can later claim that he had incompetent representation he can try to get the damages reduced, or even sue the lawyer and give that money to the plaintiffs instead of his own money.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 07:06
|
|
|
I predict a fatal atrazine-induced hemorrhagic stroke in the near future.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 07:08
|
|
|
It also serves to feed the narrative that everyone in the courtroom is out to get them and it's not fair.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 07:11
|
|
Glory to Italia!
|
But this is a court. You have to reasonably present facts. If there is literally video and written evidence of you acting like a jerk like that- I mean. That's challenging your own narrative. Of course people are being less than charitable to you. Because you're being an rear end in a top hat. I can understand wanting to kick the can down the road as long as possible (so Jones can get assets in place so he's not financially ruined) and trying to do whatever you can for a potential mistrial/bias narrative. But they're even loving that part up with not being prepared and being obtuse jerks about it. At the end of the day it's pretty clear Jones is hosed. He's going to pay a tremendous amount of money to these families. There is nothing that can stop that now. Just delay it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 07:16
|
|
|
Yeah this all seems like it's just performance, whether for the furtherance of the grift, to satisfy the howling demons in his head, or both. I would hazard a guess that some of the point is to stay aggrieved and angry.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 07:16
|
|
|
Lmao at expecting justice from a civil court except by accident. It should be criminal harassment from the moment any judge establishes he bothered the families regardless of procedural timewasteing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 07:22
|
|
|
Dang, I missed the second half after the break. Sad that I missed Daria actually speaking and hearing rhnjudge rip into the defense. That Law & Crime channel audio seems jacked up in part 2, is anyone else experiencing that?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:04
|
|
|
Herbicidal Maniac posted:Dang, I missed the second half after the break. Sad that I missed Daria actually speaking and hearing rhnjudge rip into the defense. That Law & Crime channel audio seems jacked up in part 2, is anyone else experiencing that? There you go. Part 1 and Part 2 of today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMG9FijZ3NI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRsHushXiXQ
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:12
|
|
|
Hot drat, much better quality than the livestream. Are they streaming it live as well or nah? I’ll be adding them to the OP, thanks so much! E: if anyone else has anything you feel should go into the OP, let us know Even if it’s an edit of the Daria TV show logo with Daria Karpova’s face. teen witch fucked around with this message at 08:21 on Jul 28, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:15
|
|
|
Much better visual quality but the audios not the greatest. Better than nothing I suppose! Edit: Thanks for the links!
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:19
|
|
|
Yeah it seems they're actually filming it because they're getting angles I didn't see in the official livestream. Potentially something to add from the same channel. I don't think they had day 1 for the most part. Your choice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptP2FbsYDDc <- Plaintiff opening statements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxD2XSZfrlE <- Alex Jones Defense Attorney opening statements. (Which I believe the judge ended up throwing out because it wasn't factual lol) Nelson Mandingo fucked around with this message at 08:52 on Jul 28, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:49
|
|
|
Nelson Mandingo posted:There you go. Part 1 and Part 2 of today. Is part 2's audio not jacked up for you? It sounds like something caught in the spokes of a bike or something.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:53
|
|
|
Herbicidal Maniac posted:Is part 2's audio not jacked up for you? It sounds like something caught in the spokes of a bike or something. Yeah. Missed that. It's bad audio until 46~ minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKb-ySKkN5Q Here is a not bad audio version? Nelson Mandingo fucked around with this message at 08:59 on Jul 28, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:56
|
|
|
Audio comes good at about 46 minutes, hopefully it's something they can fix for the prior part but at least it's not the whole vid
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 08:58
|
|
|
The plaintiff's lawyer got me thinking that not all lawyers are bad, this guy owns wtf
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:02
|
|
|
AHH F/UGH posted:The plaintiff's lawyer got me thinking that not all lawyers are bad, this guy owns If you want more of him he's done interviews with the boys at the Knowledge Fight podcast, and they've done episodes covering the deposition of several Info Wars employees which are interesting and elucidating. The formulaic objections episodes are deposition coverage, with clips from the depositions themselves: https://knowledgefight.libsyn.com/size/25/?search=Formulaic
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:07
|
|
|
It's an interesting relationship too, the host of the podcast, Dan Friezen, is providing expert information to the plaintiff side, and was actually in the room for some of the depositions. He is the foremost expert on Alex Jones after doing a tri weekly podcast on him for something like 7 years. You can see him in the spectator seats at the end of part 1 of today's trial vid.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:10
|
|
|
AHH F/UGH posted:The plaintiff's lawyer got me thinking that not all lawyers are bad, Lets not get ahead of ourselves.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:14
|
|
|
AHH F/UGH posted:The plaintiff's lawyer got me thinking that not all lawyers are bad, this guy owns What’s hilarious is that Mark Bankston is the nice lawyer
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:25
|
|
|
Megabound posted:Audio comes good at about 46 minutes, hopefully it's something they can fix for the prior part but at least it's not the whole vid Ah cool thanks. I only skipped to about 25 mins to check. Also just watched the Mark's opening statements and holy poo poo the way he phrased the damages makes $150 mil sound reasonable. $1 for each person who was influenced by the conspiracy and that same amount for the medical impact it had on the family.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:33
|
|
|
Stolkin posted:Up here, during a questioning on an affidavit (which is, I think, the equivalent of these depositions), if a deponent does not know the answer to a question, we usually ask for an undertaking to provide the information later in a written response. Do you folks down there not do that? Because I hear a lot of non-responsive answers without a demand for a real answer. There are definitely ways to get written answers under oath, and they used some of those at trial the past two days as well. They’re typically called interrogatories or requests for admission, but they are normally part of standard discovery. They aren’t just part of a deposition. Further, even if they had submitted written questions in advance of the depositions, the Jones team would have still stonewalled because that’s their strategy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 09:33
|
|
|
Nelson Mandingo posted:Yeah. Missed that. It's bad audio until 46~ minutes. Unfortunately that's the start of part 1, not part 2
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 12:02
|
|
|
I believe it’s 30 min to uh…something or other folks. In the interim https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b34UOPERE7k
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 14:31
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Further, even if they had submitted written questions in advance of the depositions, the Jones team would have still stonewalled because that’s their strategy. As I recall, the corporations as witnesses were given a list of topics that were going to be covered (don't know if they got specific questions, but I assume additional details were asked) and none of the corporate witnesses knew anything about what was asked. That's why they kept having to ask Rob Dew, "Do you personally not know, or does the corporation not know?" when Dew kept answering that he doesn't know. A corporation legitimately not knowing something is one thing, because records can be lost, informal poo poo, etc., but none of them did any research at all. I assume part of that led to the summary judgment, but I don't know as I only recently started listening to this. I'm not a long-time listener/first-time caller.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 14:45
|
|
|
Nelson Mandingo posted:I mean. This defense lawyer is obviously bad. Baby's first case trial. But like- what does all this behavior do to win the case exactly? How is this getting him closer to victory by acting completely unprofessional and like the piece of poo poo he represents? Also, underneath: https://twitter.com/K0stroun/status/1552646343616782336?s=20&t=besiRE9J7ZTpTI5W_nC_Sg Woooooooow, I wonder if there's going to be some fallout from this. An absolute shitshow. Edit: 
mojo1701a fucked around with this message at 14:53 on Jul 28, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 14:50
|
|
|
We are live https://youtu.be/9zdICB2Hhto
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:01
|
|
|
Today's stream is up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zdICB2Hhto e:fb
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:01
|
|
|
And we got Alex!
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:02
|
|
|
i like the stenographers star shirt.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:02
|
|
|
We're almost certain to have some spicy judge chat before the jury is brought in after that kerfuffle yesterday afternoon
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:03
|
|
|
"your honor may I address the court" "nope"
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:04
|
|
|
Hahaha "Your honor may I address the court?" "No"
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:04
|
|
|
Shut the discord streams down!!!
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:05
|
|
|
mojo1701a posted:Also, underneath: You can catch Reynal's agressive behaviour in the last couple minutes of the Day Two, Part Two recording.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:07
|
|
|
judge asks Alex Jones if he's chewing gum. he says he isn't. she said it looked like he was chewing. "hmm, then why is he chewing" i ask myself.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:07
|
|
|
Chewing his tongue because the pills are wearing off.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:09
|
|
|
either that or chili. (i assume he's grinding his teeth because he's on amphetamines.)
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:38 |
|
|
Judge not impressed with Alex's lawyer's poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 15:12
|
|
