|
From what I've heard on the legal podcasts I listen to (ALAB specifically) Judges absolutely HAAAATE dealing with disputes like this So this lawyer is really not helping himself here
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:13 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 04:31 |
|
"Your honor, this evidence is not being offered for its accuracy, just for its vibe, so I don't see why it needs to be true, right?"
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:14 |
|
Lol Alex's lawyers only supplied the final email in a chain and left out the actual proposal from the defendants
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:15 |
|
Heads up, the audio on the livestream is wonky today
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:15 |
|
KitConstantine posted:From what I've heard on the legal podcasts I listen to (ALAB specifically) Judges absolutely HAAAATE dealing with disputes like this I can't imagine it feels good to tell the lawyers to go home and read the code of conduct like they're naughty schoolchildren.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:16 |
|
All this just to get a video admitted where someone says "the teachers were so brave"
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:18 |
|
I was a garbage student in grade school (depression!!) and I wasn’t loving chided this much
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:18 |
|
Trillhouse posted:I can't imagine it feels good to tell the lawyers to go home and read the code of conduct like they're naughty schoolchildren. If a judge tells a lawyer that it pretty much means they have hugely messed up and are about to get absolutely slammed if the behavior continues. And well I am fairly confident the behavior will continue
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:21 |
|
LMAO Daria's not qualified to be a business records custodian.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:22 |
|
Break for at least 18 min to review new evidence
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:25 |
|
All those hours hocking bullshit supplements for this
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:26 |
|
mojo1701a posted:LMAO Daria's not qualified
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:27 |
|
mojo1701a posted:As I recall, the corporations as witnesses were given a list of topics that were going to be covered (don't know if they got specific questions, but I assume additional details were asked) and none of the corporate witnesses knew anything about what was asked. Just a clarification: Summary judgment is when there is no dispute of material fact and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That isn't what happened here. It could have happened if Jones had participated in discovery at all, but he didn't. What happened here is a full default on liability also known as a death penalty sanction. This is an extremely rare thing to have occur and requires specific findings of bad faith by one of the parties.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:31 |
|
KitConstantine posted:From what I've heard on the legal podcasts I listen to (ALAB specifically) Judges absolutely HAAAATE dealing with disputes like this Yup. Judges expect attorneys to be professionals and able to work with their peers regardless of how divided their respective parties may be. When a judge has to step in, that means the lawyers and/or clients are being exceptionally lovely. It's easy to see who is responsible for what in court. Here, Jones and Mullet, Esq. are both responsible for the jackassery. I really enjoyed her "I'm not surprised" when Mullet said he had sanction motions pending against him personally.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:34 |
|
In all honesty, the absolute this has become I feel will genuinely affect the law in some sort of way. One thing I do like about this judge, I’m learning a LOT from how she approaches the jury and sometimes the defense. I have no desire to ever be a lawyer or step into a courtroom, however this is kinda interesting to sorta witness and watch!
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:37 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Just a clarification: Summary judgment is when there is no dispute of material fact and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That isn't what happened here. It could have happened if Jones had participated in discovery at all, but he didn't. My bad, I got the two confused. It was the default judgment I was thinking of. teen witch posted:In all honesty, the absolute this has become I feel will genuinely affect the law in some sort of way. I mean, "cuck destroyer" is now a matter of legal record.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:38 |
I briefly entertained being a lawyer, but the only slice of the law I'm interested in is constitutional law and uh, they don't teach just that at law school. I do not care about torts, contracts, civil cases, etc Maritime law would also be interesting to me
|
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:39 |
|
Attorney at Sea
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:40 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:I briefly entertained being a lawyer, but the only slice of the law I'm interested in is constitutional law and uh, they don't teach just that at law school. I do not care about torts, contracts, civil cases, etc I had to take an intro to business law course for my (eventual) CPA designation. I found the basics interesting but gently caress me if I ever want to do all of that research for a living. I only occasionally have to look up relevant accounting standards because 99% of my job is filing not-dissimilar corporate and personal tax returns. kntfkr posted:Attorney at Sea Hey, save it for the stand, Barry Zuckerkorn.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:41 |
|
I took a course in media and the law, so that I was interested in but gently caress me I just wanted my BA and to be done with academia for a while ( that was ten years ago)
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:43 |
mojo1701a posted:I had to take an intro to business law course for my (eventual) CPA designation. I found the basics interesting but gently caress me if I ever want to do all of that research for a living. In undergrad I took a business law course taught by a real sitting judge, and a constitutional law course. The business law was interesting from a consumer perspective but I agree with you: holy poo poo I never want to do it I do remember, however, if you're in an accident with a corporate vehicle the corporation is liable. I think I remember that at least...
|
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/gotobedjordan/status/1552660839517130752?s=20&t=1Tg_5mcsFCn602rLIi_QKQ
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:46 |
|
If y'all want another thing to be mad about, here's some fun texas law thanks to Greg Abbott pulling up the ladder as soon as he got elected. Texas law has a cap on punitive damages. It's 2x economic damages plus between $200-$750k for non-economic damages. All of the damages in this case are expressly defined by statute as non-economic damages. The punitive damages in this case will be capped by the judge after the jury verdict at $750k. The jury will probably award like $500m in punitive damages, but because of TORT REFORM, Jones will have to pay less than he gets in random bitcoin donations for punishment.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:49 |
|
Found a picture of Judge Gamble from this morning:
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:53 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:In undergrad I took a business law course taught by a real sitting judge, and a constitutional law course. The business law was interesting from a consumer perspective but I agree with you: holy poo poo I never want to do it Oh, mine was just a college course as part of a two-year accounting diploma. I'm just thankful that Canadian law seems much more "spirit of the law" and based on good-faith arguments (and that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is flexible, despite what the convoy morons say).
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 15:58 |
|
Judge is back, defendants don't get to use the videos they wanted https://twitter.com/gotobedjordan/status/1552670865363324928 Piell fucked around with this message at 16:04 on Jul 28, 2022 |
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:01 |
god it's gotta suck to be the jury on this just chilling in the jury room for like two hours, doing really nothing
|
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:02 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:If y'all want another thing to be mad about, here's some fun texas law thanks to Greg Abbott pulling up the ladder as soon as he got elected. I'd like to think that even though the money he has to pay out will not be a devastating amount, that the stress brought on by this whole thing will shorten his lifespan by a few years. I thought Trump's heart would have congealed and exploded upon losing the election too, but I'm still waiting for that.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:03 |
|
The judge shares the classic FarSide cartoon about the dog translator on her daily calendar mod edit: again, please do not post this and see the below post as to why. One of the GOATS imo Somebody fucked around with this message at 16:06 on Jul 28, 2022 |
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:04 |
I had to edit that out, sorry I love that cartoon but Gary Larson (and his lawyers) have made it clear that they do not want his comics posted outside their own control. That's why the PYF comics (i think?) thread is currently outside of user view
|
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:05 |
|
sorry your honor. I'm not up-to-date with comic law.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:07 |
|
You guys weren't kidding. Daria is a lot more open and eloquent with the defence counsel.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:08 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:god it's gotta suck to be the jury on this I'll be in the minority and love to be on the jury. Did a 3 day Civil case years ago and loved the experience
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:08 |
yeah no worries - not a lot of people know that part of the site
|
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:08 |
|
https://youtu.be/UWWLwtMLWCI 'Hey'
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:09 |
|
What the absolute gently caress was that Prozac thing
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:10 |
|
So we're just going through the greatest hits now.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:11 |
|
Daria talking to the prosecution: What is a video? What is social media? I don't know. Daria talking to the defense: Knows the DARPA acronym from memory
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:12 |
|
"Do you feel Infowars allows all voices on the show?" "Oh yes totally, all voices are welcome" That is the problem lady, you allowed on the voices in your head too
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:14 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 04:31 |
|
As if by magic she can explain Alex’s sourcing process soup to nuts. Yesterday it ‘comes from his head, it’s impossible to know.’
|
# ? Jul 28, 2022 16:16 |