|
Mr. Nice! posted:Pattis just now filed a motion to disqualify the judge from his show cause hearing tomorrow. For someone who doesn't understand legalese, what is Pattis trying to argue? That the judge is obviously biased against him because the judge is holding him accountable for his own actions?
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 18:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 18:13 |
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:The last thing on the TX docket was the judge's order denying Reynal's motion to enforce protective order to cover his rear end from his fuckup. She just sharpied over his language, wrote denied, and signed it. Where can you find the filings list for the 459th district court? I've been searching and can't find anything
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 18:25
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:Where can you find the filings list for the 459th district court? I've been searching and can't find anything They’re not publicly viewable. You can view the docket at https://www.traviscountytx.gov/district-clerk/online-case-information but won’t be able to see the documents themselves without an account.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:06
|
|
|
I'm not a lawyer, what kind of a hearing is a show cause hearing, usually? Will it be the defense saying a bunch of nonsense, the judge saying denied, and everybody going home? Or will it be the judge yelling at the defense for all of the many crimes that they've committed?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:13
|
|
|
Froghammer posted:I'm not a lawyer, what kind of a hearing is a show cause hearing, usually? Will it be the defense saying a bunch of nonsense, the judge saying denied, and everybody going home? Or will it be the judge yelling at the defense for all of the many crimes that they've committed? A show cause hearing is literally a judge saying “get in front of me and show me good cause why I should not sanction you for your actions.”
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:43
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:A show cause hearing is literally a judge saying “get in front of me and show me good cause why I should not sanction you for your actions.” I think he’s got this
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:45
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I think he’s got this Yes, but who got Capone?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:50
|
|
|
I think it was the ICP.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:50
|
|
|
In this case Reynal is probably in more trouble than Pattis, but Pattis is gonna get more ire cause he keeps loving around.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:52
|
|
|
Randalor posted:For someone who doesn't understand legalese, what is Pattis trying to argue? That the judge is obviously biased against him because the judge is holding him accountable for his own actions? I think he knows it's doomed, he's just trying to create a justification for an appeal later. "See how biased this judge was?" He knows he can't win, so he's trying to string things out long enough that the plaintiffs give up. He's hoping that the appeals court will somehow miss how much of an obstructionist rear end he's being.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 19:58
|
|
|
Agents are GO! posted:Yes, but who got Capone? I dunno who got Capone, but Capone got Geraldo pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:02
|
|
|
He's just hoping Alex Jones will dies so he can back out of this mess.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:04
|
|
|
goatface posted:I think it was the ICP. Having to perp-walk to The Oddities is something I wouldn't wish on anyone.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:05
|
|
|
sweet geek swag posted:I think he knows it's doomed, he's just trying to create a justification for an appeal later. "See how biased this judge was?" He knows he can't win, so he's trying to string things out long enough that the plaintiffs give up. He's hoping that the appeals court will somehow miss how much of an obstructionist rear end he's being. This has nothing to do with the plaintiffs. This is between the judge and the attorneys. Pattis has defense counsel. Arguing against him will be the lawyers for the state disciplinary board.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:11
|
|
|
Yeah this is a legal thing, not a civil. He can’t wait it out
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:12
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:This has nothing to do with the plaintiffs. This is between the judge and the attorneys. Pattis has defense counsel. Arguing against him will be the lawyers for the state disciplinary board. How likely is it that disciplinary action would result in Pattis being removed from the case? Seems unlikely given that the Judge wasn't willing to release him as counsel for Jones before this
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:18
|
|
|
Cthulu Carl posted:I dunno who got Capone, but Capone got Geraldo pretty good. Yeah, Geraldo got Capwned. (Apologies to ERB.) KitConstantine posted:Pattis's argument that 'punishing me will mean that Alex Jones has no defense council' seems interesting. The punishment will be that he has to represent Jones forever. You've seen the corpse synod, welcome to the corpse advocate.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:26
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:Pattis's argument that 'punishing me will mean that Alex Jones has no defense council' seems interesting. That argument holds no grounds. The jury won’t be told about attorney discipline matters, and he won’t be removed from the case.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:48
|
|
|
UCS Hellmaker posted:single response from the judge filed 5 minutes later Sonyou have to send a motion to dismiss the judge to the judge you're trying to dismiss? Is a judge ever going to say " thats right, I should be dismissed " ?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 20:56
|
|
|
Your Gay Uncle posted:Sonyou have to send a motion to dismiss the judge to the judge you're trying to dismiss? Is a judge ever going to say " thats right, I should be dismissed " ? Sometimes, yeah. Kim Blandino, weirdo vexatious litigant in Nevada, had like 8 judges recuse themselves because he kept suing them and bringing motions to recuse. But importantly, you have to make the motion to the judge first, to be able to bring it up to his boss on appeal. If you don't ask him to dismiss himself, you don't get to appeal that question (as the motion points out).
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:01
|
|
|
Devor posted:Sometimes, yeah. I'm sure those Judges saw it as like a get out of jail free card for themselves and not having to deal with him. Like when Scientology defeated the IRS by individually filing thousands of personal lawsuits.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:04
|
|
|
Lots of times judges will recuse themselves. I’ve had a judge offer to recuse themselves because they went to law school with opposing counsel.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:05
|
|
|
Hey guys! Did you know that everybody that isn't AJ and his thralls are satanists and pedophiles?! It's like somebody scraped off my eyelids!
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:10
|
|
|
Plan R posted:Hey guys! Did you know that everybody that isn't AJ and his thralls are satanists and pedophiles?! It's like somebody scraped off my eyelids! This sounds like you are trying to tell me something about yourself
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:17
|
|
|
Devor posted:weirdo vexatious litigant I think I found my AJ pet prediction.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:34
|
|
|
Plan R posted:Hey guys! Did you know that everybody that isn't AJ and his thralls are satanists and pedophiles?! It's like somebody scraped off my eyelids! "Did you ever take the LORD'S name in vain? That's what I thought, you vile heathen. And did you ever look in a mirror while naked as a child? Exactly, you sick freak. Bing bong everyone is a satanic pedophile." Probably how Alex Jones would defend it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:45
|
|
|
Randalor posted:"Did you ever take the LORD'S name in vain? That's what I thought, you vile heathen. And did you ever look in a mirror while naked as a child? Exactly, you sick freak. Bing bong everyone is a satanic pedophile." Seriously. I've been mainlining "Knowledge Fight" and if you're up against Gay Commie Vampires I can understand the froth!
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 21:49
|
|
|
Newest Opening Arguments had a discussion about punitive caps. Hope this link works. https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9vcGVuYXJncy5jb20vZmVlZC8/episode/NzNmZWM4MmEtZmJlMy00YTIxLTg5ZDctZjgxZDA0ODVjMjE3?ep=14
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2022 22:35
|
|
Glory to Italia!
|
Mr. Nice! posted:I missed this because I wasn't tracking a connecticut federal bankruptcy action, but the CT plaintiffs got their remand from bankruptcy court. Mr. Nice! posted:Nothing is happening today. The case was just formally remanded back to the CT court today from bankruptcy court. There will be show cause hearings tomorrow against attorneys Reynal and Pattis for leaking confidential information. Jury selection resumes on the 18th in CT case.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 01:20
|
|
|
Cable Guy posted:Neither of these Connecticut sites resolve for me... is there a mirror? (The Travis County one does, just not the CT ones) You could try going to the case website here and see if you can get to the documents there. Speaking of, a couple new motions from the plaintiff's lawyers, asking for Alex to answer questions to which he was non-responsive in depositions, as well several files known to exist that Alex has so far refused to produce (specifically, the agreement between Free Speech Systems and PQPR, and the Google analytics info about advertisements on about Sandy Hook on Infowars)
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 01:24
|
|
|
Stream for the hearing is up, the actual hearing should be starting in half an hour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jd5GPfS1Pgs
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 14:34
|
|
|
Looks like things have started already
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 14:59
|
|
|
And we got Reynal! Which my autocorrect now recognized oh nooo
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:00
|
|
|
Old timers struggling with video call.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:00
|
|
|
Never been more jazzed to watch a Teams call Not even a webex
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:01
|
|
|
Also WOW Reynal looks like John Mulaney, I could kind of see that casting
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:01
|
|
|
When the judge calls your conduct as counsel requiring 4 disciplinary hearings 'shocking' and 'unprecedented' is that...good??
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:05
|
|
|
This is just scheduling for Reynal - the Pattis show is the real fun that starts at 10:30.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:05
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:When the judge calls your conduct as counsel requiring 4 disciplinary hearings 'shocking' and 'unprecedented' is that...good?? "Counsel, your snickerdoodles are shockingly delicious and it's an unprecedented explosion of flavor in my mouth! Case dismissed!"
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 18:13 |
|
|
I feel like Reynal is going to play dumb about most of this because Jones' adjacent people seem to struggle with specifics and details like she is asking for. It's going to make her furious.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2022 15:08
|
|