Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Carthag Tuek posted:

check this out lol

theres a memorial park, which is (shot) nominally for the danes who volunteered for the wehrmacht, but is (chaser) actually a memorial for the waffen ss

https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%E6llesskabets_Mindelund_af_1969 (danish, sorry)
https://da-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/F%E6llesskabets_Mindelund_af_1969?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp (google translate)

e: i see theres still a problem with unicode links from SA to wikipedia, so you might have to try this or translate yourself:
https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A6llesskabets_Mindelund_af_1969
https://da-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/F%C3%A6llesskabets_Mindelund_af_1969?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

I mean, at least Denmark did cool poo poo like sending jews across the sound. Meanwhile Finland is over there like "yeah ok so we were allied with the nazis in every possible way, but the nazis said the winter war was cool, so actually everything was cool and perkele we weren't even in the Axisé

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang




im Spice Island

but also, i love these old maps. People love to pretend that our borders have been as they are since the dawn of time, and nobody traveled. historical texts are riddled with travelers, immigrants, and emigrants. historical border areas were ill defined & only somewhat recently were so many hard lines drawn by rulers. the people who lived there crossed over cause it wasn't important to them as long as they were in the same dialect continuum. i have found dozens of ancestors who up & borderhopped over the centuries. i know thats pretty close, but thats just logistics. it seems to have counted exactly the same to their neighbors if you came from another country, as it did if you came from the southern part of the island, ie youre "the new guy" for a while.

and even if they weren't linguistically close, there are so many examples of people who traveled way further. greeks in india, chinese in western europe, vikings in america, arabs in northern europe, etc, etc. and thats just the ones we know of! so many travelogues are lost or were never written at all.

modern people are idiots. probably ancient people were idiots too, but im not exposed to them in daily life so they dont make me as mad

FreudianSlippers
Apr 12, 2010

Shooting and Fucking
are the same thing!

The obvious solution after either World War would've been to forcibly revert Germany to something like this


Hard to invade anyone else when you have to go through a dozen or so other Germanies to do so.

Take the plunge! Okay!
Feb 24, 2007



FreudianSlippers posted:

The obvious solution after either World War would've been to forcibly revert Germany to something like this


Hard to invade anyone else when you have to go through a dozen or so other Germanies to do so.

That worked out amazingly well the last time. Or is that :thejoke:?

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:
That's just a map of German public transport zones.

Grape
Nov 16, 2017

Happily shilling for China!

I'm not even talking about WW2, Greeks are angry as hell about the economic depression and their view that Germany made everything even worse.

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



FreudianSlippers posted:

The obvious solution after either World War would've been to forcibly revert Germany to something like this


Hard to invade anyone else when you have to go through a dozen or so other Germanies to do so.

:yeshaha:

ive said it before but seriously all nations should be microstates. no country with more than 1 million people

FreudianSlippers
Apr 12, 2010

Shooting and Fucking
are the same thing!

Take the plunge! Okay! posted:

That worked out amazingly well the last time. Or is that :thejoke:?

The Thirty Years War was one of the most horrific periods in European history but at least it was fairly contained.

AAAAA! Real Muenster
Jul 12, 2008

My QB is also named Bort

I love that this has the modern version of the Aral "Sea" on it.

Also reminds me of how much I enjoyed reading about the Moroccan Muslim scholar Ibn Battuta traveling the Dar Al Islam in like the 1300s I think? Ended up in India then the Maldives then southern East Africa then Crimea and somehow made it home.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

AAAAA! Real Muenster posted:

I love that this has the modern version of the Aral "Sea" on it.


I learned the other day my mother-in-law is originally from Kökaral Island-turned-Peninsula. She doesn't talk about it. poo poo's depressing.


Blut
Sep 11, 2009

if someone is in the bottom 10%~ of a guillotine

FreudianSlippers posted:

The obvious solution after either World War would've been to forcibly revert Germany to something like this


Hard to invade anyone else when you have to go through a dozen or so other Germanies to do so.

There was a high level plan to do pretty much that that was seriously considered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan

Tuxedo Gin posted:

Well, forcing Germany to spend a decade or more working to pay back the rest of Europe certainly worked out well after WW1. Not sure what could go wrong if we did it again.

War reparations, that sometimes lasted decades, were a feature of European politics for centuries. WW1's Versailles peace having a bad outcome doesn't invalidate the concept in any way. The problem in that specific case wasn't the reparations themselves, it was the lack of enduring security enforcement. If the Allies hadn't abandoned the occupation of the Ruhr in 1925 things would have gone much better for humanity.

Freudian
Mar 23, 2011

An honour to have you on the forums, M. Clemenceau!

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



AAAAA! Real Muenster posted:

I love that this has the modern version of the Aral "Sea" on it.

Also reminds me of how much I enjoyed reading about the Moroccan Muslim scholar Ibn Battuta traveling the Dar Al Islam in like the 1300s I think? Ended up in India then the Maldives then southern East Africa then Crimea and somehow made it home.

The muslim travelers are awesome, lots of first hands impressions from places way outside "the classical world". Another was ibn Fadlan.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Blut posted:

There was a high level plan to do pretty much that that was seriously considered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan

War reparations, that sometimes lasted decades, were a feature of European politics for centuries. WW1's Versailles peace having a bad outcome doesn't invalidate the concept in any way. The problem in that specific case wasn't the reparations themselves, it was the lack of enduring security enforcement. If the Allies hadn't abandoned the occupation of the Ruhr in 1925 things would have gone much better for humanity.
Should have given southern Germany to Austria, then pinned the whole thing on "the Prussians". The North Germans getting hosed while their southern counterparts get to just move on might be just the thing to stop German unity, and any South German politician in charge would probably resist any attempts at unification (not done by them) much harder.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Blut posted:

There was a high level plan to do pretty much that that was seriously considered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan

War reparations, that sometimes lasted decades, were a feature of European politics for centuries. WW1's Versailles peace having a bad outcome doesn't invalidate the concept in any way. The problem in that specific case wasn't the reparations themselves, it was the lack of enduring security enforcement. If the Allies hadn't abandoned the occupation of the Ruhr in 1925 things would have gone much better for humanity.

The issue with Versailles is that it wasn't harsh enough. Germany, like it or not, absolutely started the Great War and was run by a cabal of fanatic preisch militarists. Like even the Kaiser was sidelined so Germany could pick its war without his influence. Stomping it into the ground and dividing it under occupation is why we haven't seen german takeover bids in Europe since 1945, and it should have been done the first go round.

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



pretty sure there was a headline not long ago, that a european country had finished paying off like napoleonic war reparations

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Carthag Tuek posted:

pretty sure there was a headline not long ago, that a european country had finished paying off like napoleonic war reparations

Germany finished paying its WW1 reparations in 2010.

E: Technically the reparations ended in the 30s but they took out debt to pay them, which was paid off in 2010.

Blut
Sep 11, 2009

if someone is in the bottom 10%~ of a guillotine
I would absolutely agree that the lesson from 1945 and our subsequent 80 years of peace in Europe would suggest the problem with 1919 wasn't too much harshness, it was a lack of harshness.

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Should have given southern Germany to Austria, then pinned the whole thing on "the Prussians". The North Germans getting hosed while their southern counterparts get to just move on might be just the thing to stop German unity, and any South German politician in charge would probably resist any attempts at unification (not done by them) much harder.

A post-WW1 division along the lines of:

Most of Poland's gains from 1945,
Schleswig-Holstein back to the Danes,
Germany West of the Rhine to France/Belgium/the Netherlands,
and the Catholic parts of Southern Germany into a Catholic state with Austria

Wouldn't have been too harsh by historical European war contexts at all, and would have had quite valid/manageable geographic/cultural/historical cleavages for the new states. Along with it punishing historically Prussian territory (both in the East and West) most of all, which would make moral/logical sense.

In 1920 it would have left Greater Austria with a 20mn-ish population (and no Prussian junkers) and a Protestant/Northern Germany with a population of about 30mn. And both with much less industrialised economies than their population would suggest given the loss of the industrial areas along the Rhine.

That would have resulted in a far more stable Europe than leaving a vengeful, economically and demographically dominant, unitary German state. The successor states would have been middling powers, with stronger neighbours all around them, far easier to keep the peace with.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
No country that was in direct contact with Poland before 1990 still exists, so that should work as a check, just need to activate Poland again if needed.

Freudian
Mar 23, 2011

Blut posted:

I would absolutely agree that the lesson from 1945 and our subsequent 80 years of peace in Europe would suggest the problem with 1919 wasn't too much harshness, it was a lack of harshness.

A post-WW1 division along the lines of:

Most of Poland's gains from 1945,
Schleswig-Holstein back to the Danes,
Germany West of the Rhine to France/Belgium/the Netherlands,
and the Catholic parts of Southern Germany into a Catholic state with Austria

Wouldn't have been too harsh by historical European war contexts at all, and would have had quite valid/manageable geographic/cultural/historical cleavages for the new states. Along with it punishing historically Prussian territory (both in the East and West) most of all, which would make moral/logical sense.

In 1920 it would have left Greater Austria with a 20mn-ish population (and no Prussian junkers) and a Protestant/Northern Germany with a population of about 30mn. And both with much less industrialised economies than their population would suggest given the loss of the industrial areas along the Rhine.

That would have resulted in a far more stable Europe than leaving a vengeful, economically and demographically dominant, unitary German state. The successor states would have been middling powers, with stronger neighbours all around them, far easier to keep the peace with.

This is going to require an incredible amount of ethnic cleansing and/or the forceful suppression of millions upon millions of very angry and vengeful Germans. I'm not sure that would be moral or logical, or keep the peace, but it does make perfect sense if you think about it in terms of a paradox mapgame, which I can only assume was the sole basis of this line of thought.

sheep-dodger
Feb 21, 2013

Blut posted:

A post-WW1 division along the lines of:

Most of Poland's gains from 1945,
Schleswig-Holstein back to the Danes,
Germany West of the Rhine to France/Belgium/the Netherlands,
and the Catholic parts of Southern Germany into a Catholic state with Austria


Are you ethnically cleansing those areas west of the Rhine and east of the Oder or are you saddling France, Denmark and Poland with massive German minorities that do not want to stay part of that state? Either way is an incredibly stupid proposal and absolutely guarantees further conflict in the future.

Edit: just to illustrate how dumb those territory transfers would be: Denmark was at ~3 million people at 1918, Schleswig-Holstein was at around 1.5 million, congratulations, Denmark now is 1/3rd German

sheep-dodger fucked around with this message at 23:35 on Sep 2, 2022

FreudianSlippers
Apr 12, 2010

Shooting and Fucking
are the same thing!

Abba Kovner had some good ideas.

FreudianSlippers
Apr 12, 2010

Shooting and Fucking
are the same thing!

sheep-dodger posted:


Edit: just to illustrate how dumb those territory transfers would be: Denmark was at ~3 million people at 1918, Schleswig-Holstein was at around 1.5 million, congratulations, Denmark now is 1/3rd German

Denmark, today, is 100% German.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

You can't eliminate sections of the continent from ever mattering again, and handing off big chunks of territory just risks one of the postwar allies either getting into a more powerful position than its former allies and becoming a threat that way or having to fight off constant rebellions from their new captive populace, so that wasn't much of an option either.

You can't beat the potential for aggression out of a culture either. That's not how people work.

ChubbyChecker
Mar 25, 2018

FreudianSlippers posted:

Abba Kovner had some good ideas.

what ideas were those?

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
He wrote some good poems and suggested stalking the SS-Totenkopfverbände men who fled the consequences of their actions to the ends of the earth.

Also some more controversial ideas.

FreudianSlippers
Apr 12, 2010

Shooting and Fucking
are the same thing!

ChubbyChecker posted:

what ideas were those?

Vengeance.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

wikipedia posted:

Kovner led Nakam, a paramilitary organization of Holocaust survivors who sought to take genocidal revenge by murdering six million German people, but Kovner was arrested in the British Zone of Occupied Germany before he could successfully carry out his plans.
I want to know what his plan was, since wikipedia seems to imply everything was in place to murder six million Germans.

sheep-dodger posted:

Edit: just to illustrate how dumb those territory transfers would be: Denmark was at ~3 million people at 1918, Schleswig-Holstein was at around 1.5 million, congratulations, Denmark now is 1/3rd German
The balance could be adjusted a little with a right of return system, to get all the Danes who the Germans chased out and their descendants to move back.

BIG FLUFFY DOG
Feb 16, 2011

On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.


A Buttery Pastry posted:

I want to know what his plan was, since wikipedia seems to imply everything was in place to murder six million Germans.

The balance could be adjusted a little with a right of return system, to get all the Danes who the Germans chased out and their descendants to move back.

surely they just went to denmark? unless you're suggesting filling denmark with minnesotans as an improvement.

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



skåne halland & blekinge blev etnisk udrenset, men det er der ingen der snakker om

sheep-dodger
Feb 21, 2013

A Buttery Pastry posted:

The balance could be adjusted a little with a right of return system, to get all the Danes who the Germans chased out and their descendants to move back.

yeah, adding a bunch of foreign-born immigrants whose parents left the country 60 years ago is definitely going to defuse that tension, because a country that is only 25% full of angry nationalists is way more secure than one that is 33% full of angry nationalists (and that already would require you to rustle up 1.5 million new Danes somewhere)

BIG FLUFFY DOG
Feb 16, 2011

On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.


BIG FLUFFY DOG posted:

surely they just went to denmark? unless you're suggesting filling denmark with minnesotans as an improvement.

A Buttery Pastry posted:

I want to know what his plan was, since wikipedia seems to imply everything was in place to murder six million Germans.

The balance could be adjusted a little with a right of return system, to get all the Danes who the Germans chased out and their descendants to move back.

i looked it up and actually the biggest concentration of danish-americans and by extension danes abroad is utah. i'm not quite sure the mormons would immediately fit right in.

Glah
Jun 21, 2005

sheep-dodger posted:

yeah, adding a bunch of foreign-born immigrants whose parents left the country 60 years ago is definitely going to defuse that tension, because a country that is only 25% full of angry nationalists is way more secure than one that is 33% full of angry nationalists (and that already would require you to rustle up 1.5 million new Danes somewhere)

All it takes is some creative messaging. "The only democracy in Schleswig-Holstein area!", "The Danes are the light of civilization surrounded by barbarians!", "They saw unused wasteland and turned it into highly productive pig farm!", "The spread of secular Lutheran culture in northern Germany fulfills the prophecy of end times and paves the way for second coming of Christ!". Now this may not solve the question of ethnic tensions, but hopefully they'll gain the unwavering support of the world's lone superpower to put the Germans in their place and guarantee the supremacy of Danish settlers.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

BIG FLUFFY DOG posted:

surely they just went to denmark? unless you're suggesting filling denmark with minnesotans as an improvement.
They largely went to America. I mean, if you're gonna move anyway during this period...

BIG FLUFFY DOG posted:

i looked it up and actually the biggest concentration of danish-americans and by extension danes abroad is utah. i'm not quite sure the mormons would immediately fit right in.
This assumes assimilation was uniform over the last century. Of course the real issue for my entirely serious proposal is that the Danish immigrants assimilated basically straight away, choosing not to settle as cohesive Danish communities but to integrate into American culture - aided by them being more proficient in English and more willing to marry whoever. Obviously the Mormons are a case of Danish immigrants getting assimilated into a culture that did result in a more cohesive Danish community.

BonHair
Apr 28, 2007

Carthag Tuek posted:

skåne halland & blekinge blev etnisk udrenset, men det er der ingen der snakker om

On the one hand, Skåne, Halland and Blekinge are righteous Danish clay (rock, to be precise), but on the other hand, why would anyone want that place in their country? I know there real answer is agriculture

I for one an totally buying the EU line about trade across borders and the financial benefits of stability being the main reason Europe has stopped attacking each other. The potential gains from war are too small compared to the benefits of trade and peace.

Russia doesn't share that view, and also probably bought into their own "we will be greeted as liberators" propaganda. But it's not exactly going well for them in Ukraine...

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

BonHair posted:

I for one an totally buying the EU line about trade across borders and the financial benefits of stability being the main reason Europe has stopped attacking each other. The potential gains from war are too small compared to the benefits of trade and peace.
Warfare between near-peers was never a great idea from a national financial standpoint, even if it could benefit individuals to a great degree. The moment we started properly developing our economies, reinvesting wealth internally to grow it further, the balance shifted even further in favor of peace. That was centuries ago. We still went to war, because the people in power thought it'd make them look cool.

pik_d
Feb 24, 2006

follow the white dove





TRP Post of the Month October 2021

Blut
Sep 11, 2009

if someone is in the bottom 10%~ of a guillotine

sheep-dodger posted:

Are you ethnically cleansing those areas west of the Rhine and east of the Oder or are you saddling France, Denmark and Poland with massive German minorities that do not want to stay part of that state? Either way is an incredibly stupid proposal and absolutely guarantees further conflict in the future.

Edit: just to illustrate how dumb those territory transfers would be: Denmark was at ~3 million people at 1918, Schleswig-Holstein was at around 1.5 million, congratulations, Denmark now is 1/3rd German

Freudian posted:

This is going to require an incredible amount of ethnic cleansing and/or the forceful suppression of millions upon millions of very angry and vengeful Germans. I'm not sure that would be moral or logical, or keep the peace, but it does make perfect sense if you think about it in terms of a paradox mapgame, which I can only assume was the sole basis of this line of thought.

Schleswig-Holstein was significantly more Danish, and less German, before the removal of large amounts of Danes from the territory and importation of high numbers of Germans in 1864-1919. Arguing that in 1918 it was too German to ever be Danish is similar to arguing in 1945 that Czechia had become too integral a part of the Reich to ever not be part of Germany. Reverting years of German colonialism in S-H would have been as worthy an outcome as reversing the colonisation of Czechia was.

Germany didn't ethnically cleanse the millions of French people in Alsace–Lorraine in 1871 and would have had no domestic problems holding the territory indefinitely if WW1 hadn't broken out. And the same applied to the millions of Poles who suffered under the Prussians for over a century from the partition until 1919. Territorial transfers of this nature and subsequent gradual population shifts occurred after most wars in European history.

Calling the division of Germany an "incredibly stupid proposal and absolutely guarantees further conflict in the future" is pretty hilarious given the outcome the world got in real life from leaving Germany as the most powerful state in Europe in 1919 demographically and economically - WW2 and the holocaust. Its highly unlikely things could have gone worse.

BIG FLUFFY DOG
Feb 16, 2011

On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.



The ural's are a pathetic mountain range for babies. Hardly worthy dividing a continent over. This majestic thing is its highest peak: . It isn't even the highest peak in russia. It isn't even in the top 100 highest mountains in russia. It's the 124th highest mountain in russia. this hill should divide a continent?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Platystemon
Feb 13, 2012

BREADS
The world has two continents, Afroeurasia and America.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply