Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Piell
Sep 3, 2006

Grey Worm's Ken doll-like groin throbbed with the anticipatory pleasure that only a slightly warm and moist piece of lemoncake could offer


Young Orc

KitConstantine posted:

That should be interesting. He was pretty unhinged at the presser

edit: will her judgement come on Monday in court or be filed?

Court is back on Tuesday, and I think she will explain then but who knows

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Eeyo
Aug 29, 2004

So did Jones say something directly to a juror, or just like shout into the void that the jury should do their own research?

goatface
Dec 5, 2007

I had a video of that when I was about 6.

I remember it being shit.


Grimey Drawer
Surely a gagging order would be an immediate action?

pixaal
Jan 8, 2004

All ice cream is now for all beings, no matter how many legs.


goatface posted:

Surely a gagging order would be an immediate action?

Might be fun to let it fester over the weekend

Trillhouse
Dec 31, 2000

Eeyo posted:

So did Jones say something directly to a juror, or just like shout into the void that the jury should do their own research?

he was giving a press conference on the courthouse steps while the jurors were exiting the rear. jurors say they didn't hear him

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Trillhouse posted:

he was giving a press conference on the courthouse steps while the jurors were exiting the rear. jurors say they didn't hear him

He also cast aspersions on the lead plaintiffs' attorney, the attorney's firm, and the attorney's father, said the judge was controlled by the aforementioned, and claimed that Norm told him that Norm would have been arrested if he had behaved similarly yesterday

Faust IX
Nov 6, 2009
Let's all be extremely realistic here: Mattei and the plaintiffs knew that, well, he would do just this sort of thing. Except I thought it would be last night on his show, instead of this morning in front of the courthouse. With the crowd size, we do not know whether or not know if the jury has successfully been tainted.

Let's go with the obvious one: of loving course they have. Even Norm admits he KNEW his client would pull this stunt after the first recess with the jury being let out. "We presume that a properly instructed jury follows the law" is a bullshit thing to say, and Norm should shut the gently caress up.

That Zero Policy thing? Jones just threw his lawyers under the bus. Again. Except this time, it's in a way that should DEFINITELY hold them in contempt of court, and just fled the state.

Rabe Radbury
Dec 12, 2019
Amazon has the right idea.

Grape
Nov 16, 2017

Happily shilling for China!

KitConstantine posted:

And remember the context - this is in Connecticut, about 20 miles from where the shooting happened. The parents and relatives of victims testified yesterday in heartwrenching fashion

and jones is up there today grandstanding, ranting, and cutting advertisements on the stand

This was catastrophic

20 minutes easy if I-84 is clear.

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



we'll get the missing footage in a bit:
https://twitter.com/cathyrusson/status/1573358537669070849
https://twitter.com/cathyrusson/status/1573364723038445568

i was wondering why people were calling this a 2 minute segment when we definitely watched more than that before the feed cut
e: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOmt_-OWgHk

Wiggly Wayne DDS fucked around with this message at 18:44 on Sep 23, 2022

Burning_Monk
Jan 11, 2005
Mad, Bad, and Dangerous to know
Looks like they put up the missing 15mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOmt_-OWgHk

Random Stranger
Nov 27, 2009



Trillhouse posted:

he was giving a press conference on the courthouse steps while the jurors were exiting the rear. jurors say they didn't hear him

"Your honor, 'attempted jury tampering'? Really? Do they give out Nobel prizes for attempted chemistry?"

Faust IX
Nov 6, 2009
I just had to show this off here because man, Norm is horrible at hiding emotion, just like his client.

https://twitter.com/SpenglerCreator/status/1573372775556911105

Who'd have thought he'd be checking twitter all morning instead of bothering, you know, stopping his client from trying to nullify the jury (through tampering via press conference). And yes, he used the words "I do believe in jury nullification" at the end of the last 15 minutes of the stream that was glitched and finally uploaded.

The judge was practically begging him not to make him her very first disciplinary act against a lawyer in 20 years as a judge. And the plaintiffs should have gone harder on that point.

Scaramouche
Mar 26, 2001

SPACE FACE! SPACE FACE!

OneMoreTime posted:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/09/23/us/alex-jones-sandy-hook?auth=login-google

This is Elizabeth's liveblog on NYT, some highlights:

"The judge is asking Pattis to persuade his client not to urge the jurors to do their own research, which of course violates a cardinal rule of trial. Actually, she’s wondering whether that’s possible. Out of respect for the court as an institution he says he’ll try. But he says that Jones goes to the courthouse steps because he can’t get a fair hearing in the press."

Followed by:

"The judge is admonishing Pattis to stick to the matter at hand — persuading Jones to stop instructing the jury from his news conferences on the courthouse steps."

I'm surprised the judge didn't then ask "so this means his attempt at jury tampering is justified in your opinion?"

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Scaramouche posted:

I'm surprised the judge didn't then ask "so this means his attempt at jury tampering is justified in your opinion?"
i have to imagine if pattis had bothered to watch the video between breaks he'd focus on the question being posed to jones was effectively: if you could tell the jury something what would it be?

does it speak well to pattis' conduct that his client was unaware or unable to comprehend this wasn't a question he should answer? well we'll find out tuesday

the yeti
Mar 29, 2008

memento disco



Generic American posted:

They are purely pejoratives for people that he thinks are demon-worshipping vampires, where "liberal" means Democrat and "neoliberal" means a Democrat that is pretending to be a conservative.

It bears repeating too that when he or any conspiracist says globalists they have always and still do mean The Jews.

His brand of conspiracy has deep antisemitic and fascist roots, be circumspect dismissing it as comedic dipshit antics

mojo1701a
Oct 9, 2008

Oh, yeah. Loud and clear. Emphasis on LOUD!
~ David Lee Roth

the yeti posted:

It bears repeating too that when he or any conspiracist says globalists they have always and still do mean The Jews.

His brand of conspiracy has deep antisemitic and fascist roots, be circumspect dismissing it as comedic dipshit antics

And even if he personally didn't mean "Jews" when he says "Globalists", those conspiracy theories are inherently poisoned for that reason and should be reexamined under that lens.

But non-explicit racism isn't a deal-breaker for most racists like Alex, so full steam ahead. Which doesn't dissuade actual racists for thinking you mean Jews when you say it.

Kung Food
Dec 11, 2006

PORN WIZARD

mojo1701a posted:

And even if he personally didn't mean "Jews" when he says "Globalists", those conspiracy theories are inherently poisoned for that reason and should be reexamined under that lens.

But non-explicit racism isn't a deal-breaker for most racists like Alex, so full steam ahead. Which doesn't dissuade actual racists for thinking you mean Jews when you say it.
He absolutely personally means Jews. He has complained about the "Jewish mafia" and that the Unite the Right rally had "leftist Jews in disguise" in it. He also has no problem with hosting out and proud antisemites on his show like Richard Spencer.

There was also a Knowledge Fight episode where the Dollops guys co-hosted, and Jones described a confrontation with some globalists at a restaurant and Gareth asked how he knew they were globalists, and I was just thinking "Yes how indeed." Because they were Jewish

Kung Food fucked around with this message at 22:00 on Sep 23, 2022

Everett False
Sep 28, 2006

Mopsy, I'm starting to question your medical credentials.

Jones is part of the Christian Identity movement which asserts that most of the people currently calling themselves Jews aren't real Jews, and that the real Lost Tribes of Israel ended up in England and the United States which is why white Americans are God's real Chosen People. Therefore he can insist that "Globalist" is not a codeword for Jews (because the people he's referring to aren't really Jewish).

Obviously he's not consistent about this ideology because he isn't consistent about anything. But it's there and it's pretty easy to see it as an undercurrent to everything he says once you know about it.

Powerful Katrinka
Oct 11, 2021

an admin fat fingered a permaban and all i got was this lousy av

Everett False posted:

Jones is part of the Christian Identity movement which asserts that most of the people currently calling themselves Jews aren't real Jews, and that the real Lost Tribes of Israel ended up in England and the United States which is why white Americans are God's real Chosen People. Therefore he can insist that "Globalist" is not a codeword for Jews (because the people he's referring to aren't really Jewish).

Obviously he's not consistent about this ideology because he isn't consistent about anything. But it's there and it's pretty easy to see it as an undercurrent to everything he says once you know about it.

There's regular ol' anti-Semitism, too, that never goes away

Morroque
Mar 6, 2013
To be completely fair to Jones, everything a guest on his show starts going down the actual non-pretend antisemitism route, it does get awkward between them. One of the few times he will just go quiet for a bit. Non-pretend antisemitism just doesn't come easy to him, for whatever reason. Like he is just not that well-practiced at it. It doesn't come smoothly like his anti-trans or anti-LGBT bigotry does.

This does not extend to InfoWars as a workplace, though. One employee, Rob Jacobson, quit over constant antisemitic remarks directed at him by other staff.

InfoWars has a weird and complicated relationship with antisemitism. I suspect it was a result of their radio contracts that antisemitism was a risky proposition while other bigotries were not, though that's just a guess on my part.

Kung Food
Dec 11, 2006

PORN WIZARD

Morroque posted:

To be completely fair to Jones, everything a guest on his show starts going down the actual non-pretend antisemitism route, it does get awkward between them. One of the few times he will just go quiet for a bit. Non-pretend antisemitism just doesn't come easy to him, for whatever reason. Like he is just not that well-practiced at it. It doesn't come smoothly like his anti-trans or anti-LGBT bigotry does.

This does not extend to InfoWars as a workplace, though. One employee, Rob Jacobson, quit over constant antisemitic remarks directed at him by other staff.

InfoWars has a weird and complicated relationship with antisemitism. I suspect it was a result of their radio contracts that antisemitism was a risky proposition while other bigotries were not, though that's just a guess on my part.

I mean he had Richard Spence on his show. He of all people should have been a known quantity. I totally believe naked antisemitism gives him pause, but only because he is less practiced in fig leafing overt sieg hiel style antisemitism when he is used to the more subvert globalist/elites style. ie why are you super texting what I am trying to subtext.

Plan R
Oct 5, 2021

For Romeo
The new 'Knowledge Fight' with Elizabeth Williams is equal parts hilarious and horrifying.

Captain Invictus
Apr 5, 2005

Try reading some manga!


Clever Betty

Morroque posted:

To be completely fair to Jones
no

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

And to add, he's absolutely thrown around Protocols of the Elders of Zion poo poo on his show

That idea that he's not fully there is entirely the point of the plausible deniability approach

StrangersInTheNight
Dec 31, 2007
ABSOLUTE FUCKING GUDGEON
the only reason he gets quiet at overt anti-semitism is that those guests are breaking the social contract of using dogwhistles bc being overtly anti-semitic is associated with Nazis

even bigots play the respectability game. especially bigots.

Plan R
Oct 5, 2021

For Romeo
Can someone explain to me why a poorly-shaved red-faced drug-addled gorilla can just get away with this poo poo?

Deptfordx
Dec 23, 2013

It turns out a Rich person who feels like they can ignore Societys rules written and unwritten can get away with a lot for a long time.

Don't try this if you're poor.

Plan R
Oct 5, 2021

For Romeo
It's an insult to Gorillas.

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

Plan R posted:

Can someone explain to me why a poorly-shaved red-faced drug-addled gorilla can just get away with this poo poo?
Money and external decorum/denial

Upsidads
Jan 11, 2007
Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be pirates


How have none of these loons mentioned channel 4's Utopia like it's a documentary for their bullshit?

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

Upsidads posted:

How have none of these loons mentioned channel 4's Utopia like it's a documentary for their bullshit?
Or the Netflix remake, which, in a particularly bold move, was released early in the pandemic

(it's too obvious, you see, there's no code to break, nothing to feel special about "noticing")

There's probably no one conspiracy theorist figureheads hate more than people that "scoop" them

stringless fucked around with this message at 13:50 on Sep 24, 2022

the yeti
Mar 29, 2008

memento disco



Plan R posted:

Can someone explain to me why a poorly-shaved red-faced drug-addled gorilla can just get away with this poo poo?

A lot of people here find that persona an aspirational figure, turns out. Both for the immunity to consequences and the ideology.

Tree Dude
May 26, 2012

AND MY SONG IS...
Alex usually goes after people who are too rich/powerful to waste their time fighting back against Alex for saying some crazy poo poo. Easier for them to just ignore it.

When they do actually persue it like with the Chobani situation they almost always instantly settle for an apology. Alex will bury the apology in a long broadcast on Sunday when fewer people listen and then immediately start acting like he won and they were begging him to settle and lies lies lies.

LifeSunDeath
Jan 4, 2007

still gay rights and smoke weed every day
That the judge hasn't held him in contempt 20 times yet is insane. He posted a picture of the judge with lasers eyes and the words TYRANT. There's judges out there that would be turbo mad about that.

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug

LifeSunDeath posted:

That the judge hasn't held him in contempt 20 times yet is insane. He posted a picture of the judge with lasers eyes and the words TYRANT. There's judges out there that would be turbo mad about that.

I think shes not going after him for that as that was a pissbaby like Jones wants.
I would bet she goes full heavy as poo poo on him in the closing remarks, where it matters most.

red19fire
May 26, 2010

Day 1: ABSOLUTELY ZERO TOLERANCE FOR SHENANIGANS IN MY COURT.

Day 6: Attorney Pattis, this is now the 4th time I have asked Mr Jones to cease calling for his listeners to assassinate the plaintiffs in the street. Will you give him another juice box and ask him politely to calm down? Another 2 or 3 normal warnings and I will have to issue a stern warning.

Plan R
Oct 5, 2021

For Romeo
At a certain point the judge should treat him like your average raving derelict.

Faust IX
Nov 6, 2009
Maybe that's exactly what's happening. The judge knows that the defense is so incompetent that they literally can't stop their client from incriminating himself over and over. Perhaps it's literally a case of "hey, here's the rope, enjoy hanging yourself with it" in the sense that every outburst, every comment, every stunt Jones pulls on the stand and while still under oath...well. It would be an amazing Highlight Reel for closing arguments. Like, just playing the "best hits" of the trial Jones' personally acted in.

At least that's the kind of clever way to really prove the point: with his own words on the stand.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

poisonpill
Nov 8, 2009

The only way to get huge fast is to insult a passing witch and hope she curses you with Beast-strength.


Lmao we are so chucked as a society

This lunatic can literally rant and rave at the trial about how he’s made tens of millions from his unhinged and hurtful lies

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply