Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

And how did Spongebob get his pineapple? Through jihad

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

gradenko_2000 posted:

And how did Spongebob get his pineapple? Through jihad

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022

gradenko_2000 posted:

I'm the guy yelling "don't take it out of context!!!"

lol

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

I'm pretty sure Fivek got doxxed and fired from her job for opposing US war against Syria too

Fish of hemp
Apr 1, 2011

A friendly little mouse!
How would Russian domination over Europe advance the cause of marxism and/or socialism?

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

Fish of hemp posted:

How would Russian domination over Europe advance the cause of marxism and/or socialism?

in what context? like, today? or back when the USSR was around?

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!
If Nicholas II had ruled all of Europe, I could see socialist revolutions popping up right quick.

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

A USSR covering all territory between Gibraltar and the tip of the Kamchatka Peninsula would, demonstrably, have advanced marxism and/or socialism further than it did historically.

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

bedpan posted:

A USSR covering all territory between Gibraltar and the tip of the Kamchatka Peninsula would, demonstrably, have advanced marxism and/or socialism further than it did historically.

given their posting history i assume the op is trying some kind of idiot judo but goddamn that wouldve been sick yeah

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018


Is she still posting

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

From a cursory twitter glance she seems to be anti vax. Hell yes.

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

AnimeIsTrash posted:

From a cursory twitter glance she seems to be anti vax. Hell yes.

yeah her and phil greaves were allies on the plandemic front. both of them managed to meme themselves into abandoning and later condemning germ theory altogether

Fish of hemp
Apr 1, 2011

A friendly little mouse!

croup coughfield posted:

in what context? like, today? or back when the USSR was around?

Today. USSR is not Russia.

I mean if Žižek is wrong about NATO and Europe (and a liberal), that leaves Russia as the dominating military and energy power in Europe. How this would be better for the cause of marxism than NATO backed Europe?

HiroProtagonist
May 7, 2007

Fish of hemp posted:

Today. USSR is not Russia.

I mean if Žižek is wrong about NATO and Europe (and a liberal), that leaves Russia as the dominating military and energy power in Europe. How this would be better for the cause of marxism than NATO backed Europe?

Because whatever Russia does cannot compare to the horror the NATO bloc has inflicted on the rest of the world.

This is not pro Russia either, it's just facts.

Russia just does not have the reach or capability necessary to deprive a majority of the world of essentials, as much as liberals would hate to admit it

And if Europe tied themselves so thoroughly to what they consider a geopolitical enemy then that's their own fault and blame should be pointed in the appropriate direction. It's just not possible to credibly hold simultaneous positions of "Russia is a serious strategic threat" and "Russia is terrorizing Europe by causing an energy crisis"

More to the point, NATO is the dominant bloc and the military arm of capital. Breaking that bloc is good but confusing that with unconditional support for a specific country is confusing critical support for unconditional nationalism

droll
Jan 9, 2020

by Azathoth
Also NATO looks a lot like natto which is also poo poo.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Fish of hemp posted:

I mean if Žižek is wrong about NATO and Europe (and a liberal), that leaves Russia as the dominating military and energy power in Europe. How this would be better for the cause of marxism than NATO backed Europe?

Russia, as a weaker power than NATO (or the US specifically), would be less capable of snuffing out nascent socialist movements as they appear.

HiroProtagonist
May 7, 2007
And lastly not a poster here doesn't wish the USSR wasn't overthrown and a mafioso protege hadn't been groomed to be Yeltsin's successor but here we are post shock doctrine and all

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

Using the EU as a proxy for Europe isn't perfect but it's useful

The EU has a population of about 450 million and Russia has a population of about 140 million

The World Bank says the EU has a GDP of about $17 trillion and Russia a GDP of $1.8 trillion

One EU state has nuclear weapons

I've got questions about how exactly the dissolution of NATO would lead to Europe becoming militarily dominated by Russia.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Atrocious Joe posted:

Using the EU as a proxy for Europe isn't perfect but it's useful

The EU has a population of about 450 million and Russia has a population of about 140 million

The World Bank says the EU has a GDP of about $17 trillion and Russia a GDP of $1.8 trillion

One EU state has nuclear weapons

I've got questions about how exactly the dissolution of NATO would lead to Europe becoming militarily dominated by Russia.

A Russia that has a political system that makes it exceedingly difficult to scrounge up the soldiers to militarily dominate its nearest neighbor. But, sure, their going push on to Berlin.

HiroProtagonist
May 7, 2007

genericnick posted:

A Russia that has a political system that makes it exceedingly difficult to scrounge up the soldiers to militarily dominate its nearest neighbor. But, sure, their going push on to Berlin.

yeah but they should

I know you're responding to a syq but I'd rather the eurozone reorient away from the US because the more the MIC gets starved for resources the more beneficial it is for the rest of the world and the more contradictions continue to heighten, although with the stranglehold the US MIC has on the European arms sales market it's not likely to happen soon enough

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

droll posted:

Also NATO looks a lot like natto which is also poo poo.

gently caress you fermented beans are good. how loving dare you. you little poo poo

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

Fish of hemp posted:

Today. USSR is not Russia.

I mean if Žižek is wrong about NATO and Europe (and a liberal), that leaves Russia as the dominating military and energy power in Europe. How this would be better for the cause of marxism than NATO backed Europe?

so how familiar are you with the history of NATO in europe and its integration into broader US security policy

stuff like the stay-behind networks, surveillance and insanely dark poo poo like the dutroux affair are connected pretty clearly to NATO's institutional context. it's the framework by which the american security interest imposes itself on the continent. so long as one is in NATO, any transition to socialism is flatly impossible because it means that your security state is integrated into the american military-industrial complex and its political economy is therefore intrinsically opposed to any such notion.

russia would be relatively stronger without NATO, but europe would be more easily able to steer its own ship relative to a moderately functional russian regional power, which would itself be less paranoid and aggressive. probably this present war would not have happened, because the european continental powers would've been able to pressure ukraine into implementing minsk 2. i realise that a lot of people prefer the war to that implementation, but it seems very clear that the interests of the working class of europe's nations would have been better served by that than the hosed-up way things have gone since then, including the further entrenchment of US supremacy over europe.

one thing which really does peeve me about the apparent line of reasoning here is that there's an attitude where the disastrous failure of the NATO-based security order on its own, charitable premises - the outbreak of conventional war in europe - is taken as an argument in favour of the NATO-based security order. that is, as we may say, deeply ideological

double nine
Aug 8, 2013

is there a specific link between NATO and dutroux?

oscarthewilde
May 16, 2012


I would often go there
To the tiny church there

double nine posted:

is there a specific link between NATO and dutroux?

yes, but only in the very, very loose epstein-thread sense.

camoseven
Dec 30, 2005

RODOLPHONE RINGIN'

Cuttlefush posted:

gently caress you fermented beans are good. how loving dare you. you little poo poo

natto looks and tastes like crunchy boogers. disgusting.

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

Fish of hemp posted:

Today. USSR is not Russia.

I mean if Žižek is wrong about NATO and Europe (and a liberal), that leaves Russia as the dominating military and energy power in Europe. How this would be better for the cause of marxism than NATO backed Europe?

you could make that the argument that brics surpassing nato would put china in a position to encourage socialist movements but thats a bit beyond the scope of the question. the short answer is that on the face of it, russia gaining power and displacing nato influence in europe isn't really any better or worse for the spread of marxist ideas and socialist power in europe or the broader world. russia has no more interest in a successful socialist movement than any other capitalist power aspiring to imperialism.

theres a current in the anglosphere left that any nation or power that opposes us/nato interests is automatically "on their side" and must be "defended" which is both very stupid and very funny. the fact of the matter is that pretty much no one is on "our" side, which is to say, the side of anti-capitalism. imo the only thing that's good for socialism right now is strengthening domestic socialist organizations to withstand and exploit recession of state power, spreading class consciousness, and maintaining ties and solidarity with similar groups abroad.

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

camoseven posted:

natto looks and tastes like crunchy boogers. disgusting.

natto is not supposed to be crunchy wtf

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

croup coughfield posted:

theres a current in the anglosphere left that any nation or power that opposes us/nato interests is automatically "on their side" and must be "defended" which is both very stupid and very funny. the fact of the matter is that pretty much no one is on "our" side, which is to say, the side of anti-capitalism. imo the only thing that's good for socialism right now is strengthening domestic socialist organizations to withstand and exploit recession of state power, spreading class consciousness, and maintaining ties and solidarity with similar groups abroad.

i'm not sure about this. the closest thing to defending non-aes nations opposing us/nato interests is going to come from mls going "critical support for russia/the lion of syria". and as a group they aren't going to confuse russia or syria as actually being on their side. the rest of the anglosphere left really isn't really doing anything close to that.

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

Cuttlefush posted:

i'm not sure about this. the closest thing to defending non-aes nations opposing us/nato interests is going to come from mls going "critical support for russia/the lion of syria". and as a group they aren't going to confuse russia or syria as actually being on their side. the rest of the anglosphere left really isn't really doing anything close to that.

one mans experience i guess but i see it all the time. online more than anywhere else, though a buddy of mine irl is possessed of this insane idea that russia is actually being shadow controlled by the remnants of the soviet power base lmao. he is awaiting the day where the simpsons meme gif becomes real like millerites wait for the end of days

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

croup coughfield posted:

one mans experience i guess but i see it all the time. online more than anywhere else, though a buddy of mine irl is possessed of this insane idea that russia is actually being shadow controlled by the remnants of the soviet power base lmao. he is awaiting the day where the simpsons meme gif becomes real like millerites wait for the end of days

god drat

doesn't he know about china

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

croup coughfield posted:

russia is actually being shadow controlled by the remnants of the soviet power base lmao

it is, all of the oligarchs and top men were top people in the party and KGB or whatever. they just are not communists any more

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 75 days!

Cuttlefush posted:

god drat

doesn't he know about china

i dunno man hes a good guy and a motivating figure in just about every org I've seen him work with but he has some wild ideas lol

Rutibex posted:

it is, all of the oligarchs and top men were top people in the party and KGB or whatever. they just are not communists any more

im talking true believers here

my dad
Oct 17, 2012

this shall be humorous
is this spillover from some other thread?

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/jacobin/status/1595073366603481090?t=O0eCMYF72RssvP_JzHTThg&s=19

They've really got the pulse of the nation

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



croup coughfield posted:

one mans experience i guess but i see it all the time. online more than anywhere else, though a buddy of mine irl is possessed of this insane idea that russia is actually being shadow controlled by the remnants of the soviet power base lmao. he is awaiting the day where the simpsons meme gif becomes real like millerites wait for the end of days

The pressing desire to find some sort of win for socialism in this conflict between three factions that openly and proudly despise socialism and persecute its adherents has broken a lot of brains. Like yes Putin is ex-KGB, but not every commie cop is our good friend Raphael Ambrosius Cousteau and Putin's whole thing was that they should focus on making money instead of all this betterment of the human condition nonsense.

Epic High Five has issued a correction as of 18:48 on Nov 22, 2022

In Training
Jun 28, 2008

extra funny bc the anglo left has 0 power whatsoever to influence the outcome if this war in any capacity it's just ink on pages and having the right analysis to satisfy...idk I guess yourself and your peer circle. It totally consumes people though

the bitcoin of weed
Nov 1, 2014

it's all about Posting, the most important axis of praxis

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022

they sure do lol

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

croup coughfield posted:

theres a current in the anglosphere left that any nation or power that opposes us/nato interests is automatically "on their side" and must be "defended" which is both very stupid and very funny. the fact of the matter is that pretty much no one is on "our" side, which is to say, the side of anti-capitalism. imo the only thing that's good for socialism right now is strengthening domestic socialist organizations to withstand and exploit recession of state power, spreading class consciousness, and maintaining ties and solidarity with similar groups abroad.

I guess if South Africa is part of the anglosphere then you could say there is enough momentum behind that idea for it to be a current. That's the only English-speaking place where I've heard anyone with a role in a major political organization say that NATO started the war. I haven't been paying much attention to reactions in Pakistan and India though. I know in Latin America that is a somewhat popular current, but that's outside the anglosphere.

The people in the Sahel and Haiti waving Russian flags probably aren't in the anglosphere either.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

V. Illych L.
Apr 11, 2008

ASK ME ABOUT LUMBER

double nine posted:

is there a specific link between NATO and dutroux?

not beyond NATO officials being allegedly implicated in the trafficking network for which he was procuring, because they were an integrated part of the brussels elite

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply