Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Who's your 2022 MVP?
This poll is closed.
Shohei Ohtani 50 59.52%
Aaron Judge 19 22.62%
Hey, the national league has an MVP too you know! 15 17.86%
Total: 84 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
has there ever been a SS class this strong before?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

IcePhoenix
Sep 18, 2005

Take me to your Shida

bawfuls posted:

mcmagic was agreeing with you in response to fast cars loose anus

yeah, I just misread the whole thing, alas

Intruder posted:

has there ever been a SS class this strong before?

Considering how long SS was looked at as just a defensive specialist position I can't imagine it's ever been close

pseudodragon
Jun 16, 2007


Sydin posted:

If I had to pick ten players, within the context of me trying to convey the history of the sport through those players and how they changed it and completely independent of fan bias, it would probably be something like:

Ruth: Ushering in the modern era of baseball, the sport was largely unrecognizable to modern audiences before the Bambino.
Gehrig: Another "modern" hitter who changed the game through his prowess. His battle with ALS and the sport's response is also a major pillar of MLB history.
Williams: A great player to use as a starting point for talking about the origins of the shift, also the godfather of applying science to the idea of hitting.
Robinson: Broke the MLB color barrier and through his success helped the eventual full integration of the league. Also a phenomenal player in their own right.
Flood: Essentially laid the groundwork for the modern free agency system via his tenacity in suing MLB. Also a good player.
Johnson: Essentially laid the groundwork for the "modern" pitcher a decade plus in advance, throwing high velo up in the zone combined with nasty breaking stuff.
Bonds: The greatest hitter in history, steroids or not, fight me. Essentially was the quintessential perfect "modern" hitter who had power and patience, and really hammered home the idea that walks didn't "clog the bases"
Sosa/McGwire: I'm cheating by putting two guys into one slot, but the 98' home run chase saved the sport from a premature depth, created a whole new audience of young fans, and really ignited the scrutiny into the steroid era.
Ichiro: A fully international player who came over and shattered the idea in MLB that the best players can only be produced domestically or in South America with the help of domestic coaches/scouts. There was legitimately a period where the best baseball player on the planet was a Japanese guy who'd gotten zero help from MLB folks.
Trout: A legitimate top 5 player of all time who later fans will look back on as one of the all time greats, under appreciated in his time because he spent his career on a team that was utter dogshit.

I like the reasoning included. I might cheat on Bonds/Gehrig since their careers overlap enough that you can sneak lessons on one in with the other.

Same with Bonds/Sosa/McGwire. Sosa and Mac are really only historically significant for the one year that can be a part of the Bonds class.

Possible replacements that are basically guys that represent an important part of baseball history and are used to discuss topics bigger than a single player.

Satchel Paige to cover Negro League history pre-Jackie
Shoeless Joe to cover the speedier side of history and why gambling is bad
Sadaharu Oh as a proxy for the development of baseball outside of the US

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

Intruder posted:

has there ever been a SS class this strong before?

2004 had Nomar, Edgar Renteria, and a 38yo Omar Vizquel :haw:

That's about the best I can remember, so ... no this is probably the strongest

maffew buildings
Apr 29, 2009

too dumb to be probated; not too dumb to be autobanned
only 10 players? done

Dexter Fowler
Kyle Schwarber
Kris Bryant
Anthony Rizzo
Ben Zobrist
Addison Russell
Willson Contreras
Jason Heyward
Javier Baez
Kyle Hendricks
Jon Lester

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

maffew buildings posted:

only 10 players? done

Dexter Fowler
Kyle Schwarber
Kris Bryant
Anthony Rizzo
Ben Zobrist
Addison Russell
Willson Contreras
Jason Heyward
Javier Baez
Kyle Hendricks
Jon Lester

I guess after losing count of how many years it had been since your last title/WS appearance before 2016 happened I can understand how you'd just lose the ability to count entirely

maffew buildings
Apr 29, 2009

too dumb to be probated; not too dumb to be autobanned
I did this math still drunk on a Monday morning (the Wrigleyville way)

Popete
Oct 6, 2009

This will make sure you don't suggest to the KDz
That he should grow greens instead of crushing on MCs

Grimey Drawer

maffew buildings posted:

only 10 players? done

Dexter Fowler
Kyle Schwarber
Kris Bryant
Anthony Rizzo
Ben Zobrist
Addison Russell
Willson Contreras
Jason Heyward
Javier Baez
Kyle Hendricks
Jon Lester

Wow, a perfect list.

bawfuls
Oct 28, 2009

Just scrolled past the poll at the top of this thread and it got me wondering, how would the Judge/Ohtani MVP race & discussion have gone differently if it happened in the mid-1960's?

Without WAR or advanced stats, would '60's baseball writers have been completely awestruck by Ohtani and named him MVP unanimously? Or would they default to Judge for besting Marris so quickly? or maybe the shine would be wearing off the HR record having seen it broken twice in just a few years?

Lets assume for the sake of discussion that '60's Ohtani is also on a good team so he's not losing support for that braindead argument that carried too much weight back then.

Popete
Oct 6, 2009

This will make sure you don't suggest to the KDz
That he should grow greens instead of crushing on MCs

Grimey Drawer
100% they would have picked Judge. They were even more obsessed with Yankee players and records back then.

Nodoze
Aug 17, 2006

If it's only for a night I can live without you
Pitchers back then were throwing way more than 166 innings, so they would probably knock him for that

e: Don Drysdale threw 314 innings in 1962 when he won the Cy Young. Best he ever finished was 5th in MVP voting going 25-9 with a 2.83 ERA over 314 innings, and 23-12 with a 2.77 ERA over 308 innings in 1965. No way they are giving Ohtani an MVP award pitching 166 innings

Nodoze fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Dec 5, 2022

Johnny Bravo
Jan 19, 2011
Being an Asian player probably wouldn't help 60+ years ago either

Nodoze
Aug 17, 2006

If it's only for a night I can live without you

Johnny Bravo posted:

Being an Asian player probably wouldn't help 60+ years ago either

If we are ignoring the Angels suck then we can ignore that too if it even would have mattered. Black players were winning MVP awards in the 50's and 60s too

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES
I’m sort of surprised at the seeming consensus in here that Judge’s MVP award was somehow dependent on being a Yankee specifically or being on a winning team more generally. I would have voted for him without a second thought. He had the best season, and was the most valuable.

Penisaurus Sex
Feb 3, 2009

asdfghjklpoiuyt

Poque posted:

I'm bored where are the deals

Jerry Dipoto keeps calling Cherington: he's got two ferry tickets and a Jarred Kelenic contract ready to go.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!
https://twitter.com/martinonyc/status/1599816026245713921

Signing old pitchers worked out so great for the Mets last year so they are doing it again. I told you guys Eppler was a dogshit GM!!!! Uncle Stevie deserves better.

bawfuls
Oct 28, 2009

Popete posted:

100% they would have picked Judge. They were even more obsessed with Yankee players and records back then.
what if Judge wasn't a Yankee? And this happened say, 5 years after Marris hit 61 so the record was pretty fresh.

Nodoze posted:

Pitchers back then were throwing way more than 166 innings, so they would probably knock him for that

e: Don Drysdale threw 314 innings in 1962 when he won the Cy Young. Best he ever finished was 5th in MVP voting going 25-9 with a 2.83 ERA over 314 innings, and 23-12 with a 2.77 ERA over 308 innings in 1965. No way they are giving Ohtani an MVP award pitching 166 innings
I think you have to just kind of mentally adjust the pitching volume for the era. 2022 Ohtani threw about 90% as many innings as the top-10 pitchers did this year by IP. So pretend 1966 Ohtani is throwing around 240IP in 34-35 starts (league leaders started 41 back then).

GalacticAcid posted:

I’m sort of surprised at the seeming consensus in here that Judge’s MVP award was somehow dependent on being a Yankee specifically or being on a winning team more generally. I would have voted for him without a second thought. He had the best season, and was the most valuable.
I think you may be misreading the posts. There is consensus that had this season happened in 1966, Judge would get the MVP for those reasons.

bawfuls fucked around with this message at 18:25 on Dec 5, 2022

Nodoze
Aug 17, 2006

If it's only for a night I can live without you
2 Years with a 3rd year option seems fine for Verlander? If he sucks then that probably won't kick in and if it does then it means he's probably been good for the contract

bawfuls posted:

what if Judge wasn't a Yankee? And this happened say, 5 years after Marris hit 61 so the record was pretty fresh.

I think you have to just kind of mentally adjust the pitching volume for the era. 2022 Ohtani threw about 90% as many innings as the top-10 pitchers did this year by IP. So pretend 1966 Ohtani is throwing around 240IP.

I understand what you are saying, but I do not think Ohtani is at all capable of throwing 240 innings

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!
https://twitter.com/JonHeyman/status/1599816869044957185

Very lucky for the yankees that this happened before Judge went to SF so they are saved from doing something stupid

Popete
Oct 6, 2009

This will make sure you don't suggest to the KDz
That he should grow greens instead of crushing on MCs

Grimey Drawer
Pitchers being good hitters wasn't that far removed back then so I don't think Ohtani stands out as much in that respect. We haven't had a legitimate two way player in like 80+ years.

Yankees dominated the sport then, breaking Marris record and being a Yankee I think would have been a sure MVP.

bawfuls
Oct 28, 2009

Nodoze posted:

2 Years with a 3rd year option seems fine for Verlander? If he sucks then that probably won't kick in and if it does then it means he's probably been good for the contract

I understand what you are saying, but I do not think Ohtani is at all capable of throwing 240 innings
I think he is as capable of it as say Verlander is of throwing 300.

I think if you transported any modern pitcher back to that era, the best would fare at least as well as the best of the time. They were facing weaker hitters back then and could carry increased workload as a result.

MrMidnight
Aug 3, 2006

Told you JV would end up on the Mets after DeGrom bolted.

Good luck pal, thank you for 5 amazing years (of which 2 you were injured)

Intruder
Mar 5, 2003

I got a taste for blown saves
Knew it was coming but losing Verlander is still a bummer. The pitching depth mitigates the loss a bit but not entirely obviously considering he was by far the best starter on the staff during the regular season

stump collector
May 28, 2007
Aaron Judge would win because he is big and huge in stature and had a big and huge season

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!
PLEASE go get Rodon Yankees. for the love of god

bawfuls
Oct 28, 2009

Popete posted:

Pitchers being good hitters wasn't that far removed back then so I don't think Ohtani stands out as much in that respect. We haven't had a legitimate two way player in like 80+ years.
On the other hand, doing somethign that hadn't been done since Ruth was sure a big boost to Maris' narrative, so why not for Ohtani?

What if Ohtani were a Yankee and Judge were an Oriole?

(though in 1966 the Yankees finished dead last in the AL at 70-89)

IcePhoenix
Sep 18, 2005

Take me to your Shida

mcmagic posted:

https://twitter.com/JonHeyman/status/1599816869044957185

Very lucky for the yankees that this happened before Judge went to SF so they are saved from doing something stupid

Honestly if you asked me which contract I'd rather have for my team between this one and the DeGron one I would take this one pretty easily

maffew buildings
Apr 29, 2009

too dumb to be probated; not too dumb to be autobanned

IcePhoenix posted:

Honestly if you asked me which contract I'd rather have for my team between this one and the DeGron one I would take this one pretty easily

many people are saying this

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

IcePhoenix posted:

Honestly if you asked me which contract I'd rather have for my team between this one and the DeGron one I would take this one pretty easily

Only because it's shorter. The Mets knew Rodon was a FA, right? Maybe Eppler just forgot about him.

Nodoze
Aug 17, 2006

If it's only for a night I can live without you

bawfuls posted:

I think he is as capable of it as say Verlander is of throwing 300.

I think if you transported any modern pitcher back to that era, the best would fare at least as well as the best of the time. They were facing weaker hitters back then and could carry increased workload as a result.

That isn't fair to assume. You also can't say "well, back then he would have been able to do this" because if you want to make that argument how many dingers is Judge hitting? Taking their seasons as is, Ohtanis pitching is no where close to standing out for that time period

IcePhoenix
Sep 18, 2005

Take me to your Shida

mcmagic posted:

Only because it's shorter.

I mean yes that is the obvious factor but also because I'm just wondering how much DeGrom is actually going to pitch during his deal and 5 years and that much money for a dude that can't stay healthy is bad.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

IcePhoenix posted:

I mean yes that is the obvious factor but also because I'm just wondering how much DeGrom is actually going to pitch during his deal and 5 years and that much money for a dude that can't stay healthy is bad.

I'm not saying the Mets should've signed deGrom. I think it's likely he misses ~30% of that contract. He's also a 5 inning pitcher.

maffew buildings
Apr 29, 2009

too dumb to be probated; not too dumb to be autobanned

IcePhoenix posted:

I mean yes that is the obvious factor but also because I'm just wondering how much DeGrom is actually going to pitch during his deal and 5 years and that much money for a dude that can't stay healthy is bad.

I think it'll break down to around 400k per inning over 5 years

Sab0921
Aug 2, 2004

This for my justices slingin' thangs, rib breakin' kings / Truck, necklace, robe, gavel and things / For the solicitors seein' them dissents spin and grin / That robe with the lace trim that win.
Is $43MM the largest single season deal for an MLB player?

Nodoze
Aug 17, 2006

If it's only for a night I can live without you
Verlander is FAR more likely to give you your moneys worth, or something close to it, on that deal vs what deGrom signed for. deGrom could easily end up like Strasburg and barely pitch due to injury given how things have gone recently

IcePhoenix
Sep 18, 2005

Take me to your Shida

Surprised Bawfuls didn't post this one yet

https://twitter.com/FabianArdaya/status/1599811085598855168

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!
Who would you rather have in 2023? Rodon or Verlander? For me it's Rodon not even close.

https://twitter.com/martinonyc/status/1599819633422655489

I'M READY TO BE HURT AGAIN

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

Even as someone who just did this with "team dynasties", comparing baseball players/seasons across eras is essentially impossible and/or pointless.

doing it at a team level is far more possible though, doing it at an individual level is just isnane

bawfuls
Oct 28, 2009

Nodoze posted:

That isn't fair to assume. You also can't say "well, back then he would have been able to do this" because if you want to make that argument how many dingers is Judge hitting? Taking their seasons as is, Ohtanis pitching is no where close to standing out for that time period
I disagree, because of how these different achievements have changed over time.

60+ home runs has always been hard, in all eras of the game. Something about the way the metagame of baseball has evolved has maintained that.

Innings totals meanwhile have consistently declined over the course of baseball's history. Clearly there is something evolving in the metagame which drives this. To argue otherwise is to argue that plumbers from the 19th century who threw 600+ IP were the greatest pitchers of all time and I think we can all understand why that's a nonsensical position.

The change in workload must be related to a change in the nature of the work, not in the innate durability of the pitcher. The most obvious explanation is that guys have to throw max effort or close to it on essentially every pitch now, while their predecessors did not.



it was essentially known a month ago, we've just been waiting for him to get around to the physical to make it official

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MrMidnight
Aug 3, 2006

mcmagic posted:

Who would you rather have in 2023? Rodon or Verlander? For me it's Rodon not even close.

https://twitter.com/martinonyc/status/1599819633422655489

I'M READY TO BE HURT AGAIN

My gut feeling is Rodon to Dodgers

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply