|
Main Paineframe posted:Bari Weiss got Twitter's Deputy General Counsel fired, because she told Elon that she thought he was obstructing the process of handing all of Twitter's internal emails and documents over to her and Matt Taibbi so that they could hunt for evidence that Twitter's previous management was conspiring with the libs. Hell, just the fact that now Twitter's worst users are now making company policy decisions because they have the ear of its CEO, a man who acts on whatever the literal last person who talks to him tells him to do because he's an empty-brained special boy with a three second attention span, is as loving hilarious as it is terrifying.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 02:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 12:56 |
|
Was there anything interesting in the “twitter files” Seems like absolutely toning has come of it or been worth a drat
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 05:28 |
|
Levitate posted:Was there anything interesting in the “twitter files” Hunter Biden has a massive dick and the Biden family/campaign asked Twitter to try and delete any instances of it being posted by people because it was functionally revenge porn and that's illegal in a lot of places that Twitter operates and can be sued in. That's about it.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 05:38 |
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:Lol if Chelsea Manning ends up the positive influence. She and Grimes broke up I think.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 05:49 |
|
Levitate posted:Was there anything interesting in the “twitter files” They unearthed a bunch of emails along the lines of "the Biden campaign sent us a list of tweets to remove" followed by a bunch of tweet URLs with no descriptions. The tweets were all deleted, of course, and Taibbi doesn't tell us what they were, so the reader could only imagine what important info Twitter was suppressing on the Biden campaign's behalf. Unless, of course, the reader goes and looks up the tweets on an archival service, which revealed that they were all photos of Hunter's dick. The rest of the Twitter Files so far was p much the same way: Taibbi throwing a scary narration over the most innocuous poo poo. A good chunk of it was just "Republican politicians were pissed" and "Twitter employees aren't even thinking about the First Amendment".
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 06:43 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:Bari Weiss got Twitter's Deputy General Counsel fired, because she told Elon that she thought he was obstructing the process of handing all of Twitter's internal emails and documents over to her and Matt Taibbi so that they could hunt for evidence that Twitter's previous management was conspiring with the libs. As much fun as it is to dump on Elon, not sure we should leap to conclusions in this particular case. We don’t and likely never will know the details here, assuming Elon/Twitter isn’t bent on destroying attorney-client privilege. e: ‘destroy’ = a bombastic way to say ‘waive’. Apologies for any confusion caused. Saying things that waive privilege now could have very negative implications in future litigation. the other hand fucked around with this message at 19:57 on Dec 7, 2022 |
# ? Dec 7, 2022 14:16 |
|
the other hand posted:As much fun as it is to dump on Elon, not sure we should leap to conclusions in this particular case. We don’t and likely never will know the details here, assuming Elon/Twitter isn’t bent on destroying attorney-client privilege. I dunno, elon is big mad this morning. So I assume he hosed something up and is on a rampage I tweet very infrequently and generally banal poo poo about my new book releases. This morning I tweeted: "@Elonmusk the guy isn't a mole in deep cover, he is an employee. Do you not know how to read a loving org chart?" And was perma-banned from Twitter by the time I got back from my shower. It is the best day of my life.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 14:52 |
Caros posted:I dunno, elon is big mad this morning. So I assume he hosed something up and is on a rampage F (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 15:20 |
|
the other hand posted:assuming Elon/Twitter isn’t bent on destroying attorney-client privilege. He seems to be bent on destroying a lot of things he probably shouldn't be, including the web site he spent $44 billion on, soooo
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 16:05 |
|
Levitate posted:Was there anything interesting in the “twitter files” It's unfortunately giving the "careers" of Taibbi, Bari Weiss and other Twitter warriors a new lease on life. And if course Glenn Greenwald is working pro bono because why wouldn't a habitual contrarian defend the poor little billionaire.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 16:29 |
|
the other hand posted:As much fun as it is to dump on Elon, not sure we should leap to conclusions in this particular case. We don’t and likely never will know the details here, assuming Elon/Twitter isn’t bent on destroying attorney-client privilege. are clients bound by attorney-client privilege? i would think elon is free to say whatever he wants. or am i misunderstanding you?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 17:26 |
|
lobster shirt posted:are clients bound by attorney-client privilege? i would think elon is free to say whatever he wants. or am i misunderstanding you? I think if a client lies about something to do with the attorney they probably can't claim privilege if the attorney publicly corrects them
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 17:36 |
|
There’s also a difference between an attorney representing Twitter and an attorney representing Musk, and a difference between Musk’s statements as his own personal opinions and his statements as a part of Twitter, the company, and these separations can and do get hairsplit constantly in court.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 17:40 |
|
the other hand posted:As much fun as it is to dump on Elon, not sure we should leap to conclusions in this particular case. We don’t and likely never will know the details here, assuming Elon/Twitter isn’t bent on destroying attorney-client privilege. I'm not sure what you mean by this, but Musk has chimed in and corroborated Taibbi's claims. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1600237095364096000
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 17:44 |
|
Hunter's hog: we have a right to know
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 17:47 |
|
lobster shirt posted:are clients bound by attorney-client privilege? i would think elon is free to say whatever he wants. or am i misunderstanding you? elon is free to waive the attorney-client privilege, yes it would probably be good for him to listen to legal advice about what will waive it and if that is a good idea
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 17:56 |
|
evilweasel posted:it would probably be good for him to listen to legal advice about what will waive it and if that is a good idea Why start now?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 18:54 |
|
I wish I had 44 billion to light on fire
|
# ? Dec 7, 2022 22:02 |
|
evilweasel posted:elon is free to waive the attorney-client privilege, yes I think if Elon was in the business of listening to legal advice he probably wouldn't be firing people from Twitter's legal department for trying to do due diligence.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2022 01:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/JamesClayton5/status/1600619990691954688
|
# ? Dec 8, 2022 19:02 |
|
You forgot to post Elon's tweet basically admitting it's true but "there's other crimes going on!!!".
|
# ? Dec 8, 2022 19:06 |
|
Were these room conversions done before Elon took over?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 00:02 |
|
No, they converted some spare conference rooms into bedrooms to support their new "hardcore" working style under Musk. This was done pretty openly. The Musk collective's rebuttal has been to shriek about kids dosing on discarded fentanyl because in modern society we can only focus on one thing at a time.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 00:10 |
|
Mzbundifund posted:Were these room conversions done before Elon took over? I doubt it because 1) there was still work from home prior to his purchase and 2) since Twitter has gone "hardcore" Elon has taken every measure to get ensure that work comes first before anything else (not like the visa holders have any choice) and anything that would be seen as a perk (food, normal work hours, janitorial services) trashed. Teratrain posted:No, they converted some spare conference rooms into bedrooms to support their new "hardcore" working style under Musk. This was done pretty openly. Yeah, for some reason the office in charge of zoning is supposed to be also running LE/drug response programs lol. Really it was Elon doing the equivalent of getting pulled over for drunk driving and yelling at the cop that there's someone else doing a bigger crime. BadOptics fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Dec 9, 2022 |
# ? Dec 9, 2022 00:10 |
|
10 years ago almost every major tech company was moving toward this "live your work, gently caress real life" "revolutionary" approach and it's nice to see it being called out for being grotesque.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 01:37 |
|
BadOptics posted:I doubt it because 1) there was still work from home prior to his purchase and 2) since Twitter has gone "hardcore" Elon has taken every measure to get ensure that work comes first before anything else (not like the visa holders have any choice) and anything that would be seen as a perk (food, normal work hours, janitorial services) trashed. That makes sense. The rooms looked so hotel-room nice I couldn’t believe they were installed so quickly, but of course it looks like that was just his room he spared no expense on.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 01:44 |
|
I guess going home is Quiet Quitting.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 01:58 |
|
Just need a water cooler filled with Bulk Soylent and you'll be ready to code again in no time.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 01:59 |
|
Twitter Files day 2 finally happened and disgraced NYT editor Bari Weiss has been trying to create a narrative that Twitter censors conservative voices in its content moderation, but just revealed that Libs Of TikTok is apparently protected from on high by upper management. https://twitter.com/Esqueer_/status/1601058246592077824?s=20&t=EBayiM03kb9QH-I5HiDYJw
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 05:21 |
|
Young Freud posted:Twitter Files day 2 finally happened and disgraced NYT editor Bari Weiss has been trying to create a narrative that Twitter censors conservative voices in its content moderation, but just revealed that Libs Of TikTok is apparently protected from on high by upper management. What's SIP-PES in this context? Can I call them sippies?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 05:31 |
|
Prism posted:What's SIP-PES in this context? Can I call them sippies? Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support So "If some big account/the President of the US says something inflammatory send it straight up to the C-Suite/lawyers to make a the call". So you know....what every organization on the planet does.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 05:44 |
|
BadOptics posted:Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support Usually not with Libs of Tik-Tok though. Thanks.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 05:45 |
|
Bari was too socially toxic at work and generally dumb to keep a lifetime appointment as token conservative NYT columnist, something many would kill for. Difficult to imagine how low she'll ultimately sink.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 06:01 |
Sodomy Hussein posted:10 years ago almost every major tech company was moving toward this "live your work, gently caress real life" "revolutionary" approach and it's nice to see it being called out for being grotesque.
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 08:37 |
|
Sodomy Hussein posted:Bari was too socially toxic at work and generally dumb to keep a lifetime appointment as token conservative NYT columnist, something many would kill for. Difficult to imagine how low she'll ultimately sink. There's honestly a lot going on in that screenshot, not just LoTT getting preferential treatment. There's a watermark on the screen that is a reference to Twitter's new VP of Trust & Safety Ella Irwin, which she copped to...https://twitter.com/ellagirwin/status/1601084794288640000?t=j2_EbJINjRTTP3bwVf3o9w&s=19 And that page gives access to everything, including DMs and IPs. Now, Irwin is saying that she had full control over the access, but noted transphobe Abigail Shirer, who is involved with Weiss on these Twitter Files BS, said they were given "extensive, unaltered access", so who knows who's telling the truth. Also, if you look closely, you'll see the traffic of the LoTT account which is apparently 1 million followers but only 800 verified users, even after the whole "buy-a-bluecheck" scheme.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 13:23 |
|
Prism posted:What's SIP-PES in this context? Can I call them sippies? According to Weiss, SIP-PES was a committee that the CEO, the head of Legal, and the head of Trust and Safety sat on. It was the top arbiter on all content moderation decisions, the last level of appeal. Moderation actions on "politically sensitive" accounts would require their signoff. In other words, Twitter mods weren't allowed to touch LibsOfTikTok's account without the direct approval of the CEO, the head mod, and the head lawyer.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 15:32 |
|
That Italian Guy posted:
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 15:37 |
|
Young Freud posted:There's honestly a lot going on in that screenshot, not just LoTT getting preferential treatment. There's a watermark on the screen that is a reference to Twitter's new VP of Trust & Safety Ella Irwin, which she copped to...https://twitter.com/ellagirwin/status/1601084794288640000?t=j2_EbJINjRTTP3bwVf3o9w&s=19 Why are they giving reporters access to any of this and acting like it’s an ok thing to do. It’s still weird and hosed up! I know it’s just Musk bullshit but still
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 15:39 |
|
Levitate posted:Why are they giving reporters access to any of this and acting like it’s an ok thing to do. It’s still weird and hosed up! "Reporters" is a generous title for the people involved with this. Bari couldn't even keep an opinion column position at the NYT and Taibbi has been crying about "cancel culture" for the last few years. It's more like the person who writes "To the Editor" letters to their local newspaper got access to millions of accounts/DMs so they can settle every grudge they have against "them".
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 15:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 12:56 |
|
Just at making some white supremacist or transphobe's account protected to the level of needing CEO approval to do anything to it because they were/are so terrified of being accused of cancel curture or whatever the gently caress Such a colossal level of brain rot
|
# ? Dec 9, 2022 15:56 |