Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
What is the most powerful flying bug?
This poll is closed.
🦋 15 3.71%
🦇 115 28.47%
🪰 12 2.97%
🐦 67 16.58%
dragonfly 94 23.27%
🦟 14 3.47%
🐝 87 21.53%
Total: 404 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Post
  • Reply
speng31b
May 8, 2010


lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cao Ni Ma
May 25, 2010



lmao

Grandpa Palpatine
Dec 13, 2019

by vyelkin
they're right but not for the reason they think

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3
Nov 15, 2003

I thought they would have been fond of certain Argentines.

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

Slavvy posted:

Saying they didn't take Kiev is disingenuous when it was clear that the whole exercise was as a threat ala Georgia and actually capturing it was never on the table to start with. I find it very doubtful that anyone involved seriously thought they could actually storm the city.

its not clear at all that the russians thought they couldnt takr kyiv when they started the offensive. claiming this is disingenuous is ridiculous lol

they had a lot of reasons to believe they could in fact -- they had seeded ukraine's government with sympathizers, the ukrainian military had been owned by russia before, the russian military had 8 years since then to gather combat experience in syria and build up its capability even more, they had overwhelming materiel superiority, zelensky was not that popular, biden was also unpopular, the west didnt seem united or likely to sacrifice its economy and defenses for ukraine

on top of all this, what you claim requires that the russians were making a threat that they didnt believe they could carry out, and also thought everyone else knew they couldnt carry out. that would just be dumb as gently caress.

paul_soccer12
Jan 5, 2020

by Fluffdaddy

Lol pipe down

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Best Friends posted:

the nazis, who are only .0001% of the military, keep ending up on camera a good fraction of the time somehow

They bought all the cameras just before the war. Clever move imo

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022

lol

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

https://twitter.com/Ukraine/status/1604492740754083843

e: lmao someone already posted

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

OctaMurk posted:

they had seeded ukraine's government with sympathizers

lol Christ. We’re just supposed to let this pass without comment eh?

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Frosted Flake posted:

lol Christ. We’re just supposed to let this pass without comment eh?

That ambulance was placed in kiev by the russians

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

Frosted Flake posted:

lol Christ. We’re just supposed to let this pass without comment eh?

lol

Slavvy
Dec 11, 2012

OctaMurk posted:

its not clear at all that the russians thought they couldnt takr kyiv when they started the offensive. claiming this is disingenuous is ridiculous lol

they had a lot of reasons to believe they could in fact -- they had seeded ukraine's government with sympathizers, the ukrainian military had been owned by russia before, the russian military had 8 years since then to gather combat experience in syria and build up its capability even more, they had overwhelming materiel superiority, zelensky was not that popular, biden was also unpopular, the west didnt seem united or likely to sacrifice its economy and defenses for ukraine

on top of all this, what you claim requires that the russians were making a threat that they didnt believe they could carry out, and also thought everyone else knew they couldnt carry out. that would just be dumb as gently caress.

:regd16:

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

Frosted Flake posted:

lol Christ. We’re just supposed to let this pass without comment eh?

Sometimes it helps when you just don't read this stuff.

CongoJack
Nov 5, 2009

Ask Why, Asshole
did Ukraine even offer any payment to go along with that message or were they expecting FIFA to do it for free?

speng31b
May 8, 2010

CongoJack posted:

did Ukraine even offer any payment to go along with that message or were they expecting FIFA to do it for free?

lol

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

CongoJack posted:

did Ukraine even offer any payment to go along with that message or were they expecting FIFA to do it for free?

Ukraine doesn't pay for anything, it has paypigs for that.

speng31b
May 8, 2010

DancingShade posted:

Ukraine doesn't pay for anything, it has paypigs for that.

bad metaphor as joey b may be paying the bills but is also clearly the findom in this scenario

OhFunny
Jun 26, 2013

EXTREMELY PISSED AT THE DNC
https://twitter.com/Suriyakmaps/status/1604449577561645056?s=20&t=aI6jI-FShzXD2pojma8TcQ

That would be here on a larger map.

GoLambo
Apr 11, 2006
I don't understand how you can claim to understand the most basic tenants of military strategy and suggest the Russians were so stupid they though they could take the capital city with A Couple Thousand Guys. Whatever the gently caress they where doing over there it absolutely was not going to be a "roll into Kiev and start fighting street to street" as a strategy. That's actually ridiculous to suggest.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

CongoJack posted:

did Ukraine even offer any payment to go along with that message or were they expecting FIFA to do it for free?

I don't usually call people out for their posts, but this is some ignorant poo poo. Of course Ukraine paid, if they didn't then it was just to get FIFA to reject the ad. The entire reason that FIFA exists is to grift and graft as much money as possible. Those people wouldn't even give a gently caress away.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

GoLambo posted:

I don't understand how you can claim to understand the most basic tenants of military strategy and suggest the Russians were so stupid they though they could take the capital city with A Couple Thousand Guys. Whatever the gently caress they where doing over there it absolutely was not going to be a "roll into Kiev and start fighting street to street" as a strategy. That's actually ridiculous to suggest.

Most people do not understand military strategy let alone doctrine, operations. This has been the hardest thing for me to wrap my head around since this kicked off, as people insist on using the language of the profession of arms, sometimes very technically, to describe nonsense.

CongoJack
Nov 5, 2009

Ask Why, Asshole

Zeroisanumber posted:

I don't usually call people out for their posts, but this is some ignorant poo poo. Of course Ukraine paid, if they didn't then it was just to get FIFA to reject the ad. The entire reason that FIFA exists is to grift and graft as much money as possible. Those people wouldn't even give a gently caress away.

yea man we all know what FIFA is about. Cool to call a post ignorant and then go on to admit you also have no idea whether Ukraine was going to pay for their spot.

speng31b
May 8, 2010

CongoJack posted:

yea man we all know what FIFA is about. Cool to call a post ignorant and then go on to admit you also have no idea whether Ukraine was going to pay for their spot.

lol

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Before, people who weren’t interested in military affairs didn’t use the language of it. Now, it’s a whole thing of libs claiming expertise while rattling off garbage.

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021
bruv, look at the munition dumps the russians are using! and no broken arrow air support?

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost

Frosted Flake posted:

Most people do not understand military strategy let alone doctrine, operations. This has been the hardest thing for me to wrap my head around

:ironicat:

speng31b
May 8, 2010


:ironicat:

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021
a jaded professional is no match for an amateur with cum-for-brains.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
A professional who assumes without evidence that Russia will do awesome doctrinal maneuvers and strategy, desperately discarding any evidence to the contrary, is going to be some garbage in garbage out analysis. Even if they sometimes happen to use doctrinal terms correctly, if it suits their point at that time. When needed, can discard the terms or misrepresent their meaning and say it’s so the proles understand.

OctaMurk
Jun 21, 2013

GoLambo posted:

I don't understand how you can claim to understand the most basic tenants of military strategy and suggest the Russians were so stupid they though they could take the capital city with A Couple Thousand Guys. Whatever the gently caress they where doing over there it absolutely was not going to be a "roll into Kiev and start fighting street to street" as a strategy. That's actually ridiculous to suggest.

They thought they were going to just roll in and take it over because the Ukrainians would give up. That plan obviously did not work

If that was not the plan, then what was the plan? They would sit outside Kiev without the troops to take it or the will to blow it up until . . . what? Either they intended to take Kiev and it didnt work because they had bad assumptions, or they were going to "threaten" Kiev into surrendering without the troops or the will to make good on any threat, which is actually ridiculous.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Who blew up the pipeline tho.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Yeah, and Ukraine is not an independent power here, and while I think Zelensky was well-intentioned (for a politician at least) when he was initially elected it was clear who he wasn't going to be able to independently direct the affairs of the country, this hasn't gotten better after the war has started. Ukraine is now completely dependent on the West, and particularly the US, and they wouldn't be able to conduct any serious operations without the aid that has been flowing in.

They would simply lose to the Russians otherwise. And, to be clear, the Ukrainians haven't just been getting some tanks and helmets, but combat helicopters, fighters, and AD systems. They also don't have the ability to independently produce arms besides some very "Mad Max" technicals.

In addition, there would be nothing else supporting their economy at this point as economic activity almost certainly is bottoming out and they are living off handouts and printing presses.

PiratePrentice
Oct 29, 2022

by Hand Knit

OctaMurk posted:

They thought they were going to just roll in and take it over because the Ukrainians would give up. That plan obviously did not work

If that was not the plan, then what was the plan? They would sit outside Kiev without the troops to take it or the will to blow it up until . . . what? Either they intended to take Kiev and it didnt work because they had bad assumptions, or they were going to "threaten" Kiev into surrendering without the troops or the will to make good on any threat, which is actually ridiculous.

lmfao

these people are truly delusional, literally no way of approaching any kind of material analysis or thought in the world

speng31b
May 8, 2010

mlmp08 posted:

A professional who assumes without evidence that Russia will do awesome doctrinal maneuvers and strategy, desperately discarding any evidence to the contrary, is going to be some garbage in garbage out analysis. Even if they sometimes happen to use doctrinal terms correctly, if it suits their point at that time. When needed, can discard the terms or misrepresent their meaning and say it’s so the proles understand.

cringe

GoLambo
Apr 11, 2006

Frosted Flake posted:

Before, people who weren’t interested in military affairs didn’t use the language of it. Now, it’s a whole thing of libs claiming expertise while rattling off garbage.

I think we're all guilty of trying to keep up with the ideas and terminology we're confronted with, often in a way we're out of our depth, and this is normal and fine. Lord knows I was this stupid 15 years ago about the same topic and that didn't shut me up about it. But come on, we're all in our 30s now and you have to assume that the land army descended from that "quantity has a quality all its own" quote would not be considering something beyond even a rookie mistake, whatever kind of insane fantasy boxing guys 1 to 100 because you are just that good or something would be.

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Frosted Flake posted:

Before, people who weren’t interested in military affairs didn’t use the language of it. Now, it’s a whole thing of libs claiming expertise while rattling off garbage.

smh posting from ur cope cage

GoLambo
Apr 11, 2006

OctaMurk posted:

They thought they were going to just roll in and take it over because the Ukrainians would give up. That plan obviously did not work

If that was not the plan, then what was the plan? They would sit outside Kiev without the troops to take it or the will to blow it up until . . . what? Either they intended to take Kiev and it didnt work because they had bad assumptions, or they were going to "threaten" Kiev into surrendering without the troops or the will to make good on any threat, which is actually ridiculous.

It's still not as stupid as suggesting they would fight block to block outnumbered 100 to 1. It can be some other kind of stupid, like expecting the shock to begin negotiations, but it absolutely isn't the poo poo you're trying to sell. Why don't you try a better guess then, instead of this obviously ridiculous one? There are plenty of bad, even terrible ideas they could have had about this, but that one is out of the question. It wasn't on the table.

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

PiratePrentice posted:

lmfao

these people are truly delusional, literally no way of approaching any kind of material analysis or thought in the world

What's your analysis?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PiratePrentice
Oct 29, 2022

by Hand Knit

Zeroisanumber posted:

What's your analysis?

They rolled up to Kyiv expecting the government to surrender, Russia didn't think Ukraine was stupid and evil enough to throw three entire generations of men into a meat grinder for no gain other than the destruction of their entire country.

They were. That's the analysis.

e: that is to say that "taking over Kyiv" was never the point, the point was to get the ukrainian government to surrender and install a Russian puppet instead.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply