Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I suppose it depends on whether or not you think democracy should be "ask people what they think right now and do that" without any other qualifiers or examination of confounding factors (elections, brexit) or whether you think it's this horrifically complex process with the intent of giving people as much ability to improve their lives while also not infringing on their neighbours, and that history suggests this can't work if you centralize power in a small number of people so whatever the ideal system looks like it's probably going to be incompatible with capitalism and a lot of the government as we have it.

Is the act of asking people what they want good and validating of any result it produces or is it just a necessary element of producing an actual good outcome? Because I would conceptualize it as the latter but I think it is frequently conceptualized as the former. Democracy isn't inherently good, it's just that philosopher kings aren't real.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 23:50 on Feb 9, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Jakabite posted:

It’s unfortunate that I do think Anderson is a decent reflection of a very decent (numerically, and in no other way) share of British people. If we want democracy to represent the views of the country then he’s actually a sensible option. Why that is is a different issue, and one that I’m not sure we’ve managed to articulate a good answer for. In any case, what a oval office.

I think Lee Anderson is a good representation of a large number of people who feed at the teat of The Sun/Mail/Express/GB News/talk radio & get encouraged to work against their own material interests.

Muttering "false consciousness" & "cultural hegemony" to myself to keep some measure of hope that's needed to keep living.

Democracy only works when you have an informed electorate. Needless to say we do not have an informed electorate but a misinformed one.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010
You’re both dead on of course. I was talking in a bit of a ‘democracy in a vacuum’ sense I guess. My Slovak friend I’m visiting thinks we should institute tests to make sure that smarter people have more voting power. He wasn’t sure what to do with the fact that in the UK at least lots of the most educated people are loving arseholes. We couldn’t nail down what an arsehole test would look like.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Democracy in a vacuum would be very simple because it is difficult to cast votes when your blood is boiling out of your eyeballs.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Jakabite posted:

what an arsehole test would look like.

volume of beans

Unkempt
May 24, 2003

...perfect spiral, scientists are still figuring it out...

Jakabite posted:

We couldn’t nail down what an arsehole test would look like.

'Have you ever voted for the Conservative Party?'

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

The thing I find interesting about the death penalty conversation is that the main argument against it is Mistake, but then we never have the awkward follow on conversation about the fact that we all acknowledge that sometimes juries convict based on vibes.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Alchenar posted:

we all acknowledge that sometimes juries convict based on vibes.

Do we? I think juries are actually surprisingly good.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
There's also the argument that it tends to correlate strongly with increased rates of serious crimes for reasons that we don't have a full picture of, but we don't have a full picture of why a lot of common medicines work either and I'm not convinced that pharmacology should be done by popular vote.

Deferring to bootmakers in matters of boots and so on.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I mean the main argument against it from me is just that I don't think it is particularly helpful? The severity of the punishment necessitates a high degree of certainty which means that killing people is actually very slow and expensive anyway, and it doesn't appear to do anything to deter crime because people who commit serious crimes do it either without thinking or while thinking they won't be caught.

If you wanted the maximum deterring punishment then you could also, arguably, torture people for their entire lives, or for a while and then kill them, but pro death penalty people don't generally suggest that either.

Which I think leads to the conclusion that the pro death penalty position is not really material-outcomes-based at all, it is because the person proposing it gets some sort of fulfilment from the act of killing the subjects of their ire. It isn't about making society better, it is about them feeling like justice happened

Which, honestly, also tracks with the situations I would think it appropriate too.

Only Kindness
Oct 12, 2016

Alchenar posted:

the main argument against it is Mistake

The main argument is that the state shouldn't be in the business of putting its own citizens to death in the first place.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Unless that's what they want, but pro capital punishment people tend to also be weirdly strongly against right to die. Which tracks with it being more about their fulfilment than anything else.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
are we citizens? I thought we were subjects?

Just Another Lurker
May 1, 2009

NotJustANumber99 posted:

are we citizens? I thought we were subjects?

We are disposable.

Endjinneer
Aug 17, 2005
Fallen Rib
You're a citizen until subjected to the death penalty, then you're an object.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
is there anyone whose been put to death but somehow survived and then went on to reoffend? Cos that would be good.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018
Rasputin

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
jesus?

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

This just popped up on my feed, and lol...

https://twitter.com/mattgrantsky/status/1623328741878292481

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

He wants that starmussy bad.

Only Kindness
Oct 12, 2016
Caught a split second of Question Time after finishing Poker Face. They're blithering about whether ChatGPT will lead to mass unemployment.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Only Kindness posted:

Caught a split second of Question Time after finishing Poker Face. They're blithering about whether ChatGPT will lead to mass unemployment.

It's certainly capable of replacing most journalists if they can remove most of the racism filters.

And, arguably, all of question time.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 00:43 on Feb 10, 2023

Only Kindness
Oct 12, 2016

OwlFancier posted:

arguably, all of question time.

HEYOOOOO there it is :golfclap:

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!
Vice article:

https://archive.is/dKSqE

quote:

UK Proposes Making the Sale and Possession of Encrypted Phones Illegal

The Home Office says it wants to target “bespoke” devices used for crime, but critics say it is unclear what a bespoke device is.

A section of the UK government has proposed making the sale or possession of bespoke encrypted phones for crime a criminal offense in its own right. The measure is intended to help the country’s law enforcement agencies tackle organized crime and those who facilitate it, but civil liberties experts tell Motherboard the proposal is overbroad and poorly defined, meaning it could sweep up other forms of secure communication used by the wider population if not adjusted.

etc


I don't even know what an encrypted phone is :corsair: and the only secrets hiding behind my calculator icon are a few square roots.

Diet Crack
Jan 15, 2001

Notice how they make all the poo poo that they do illegal for everyone else..
As per design.


"“Let Lee do his job as deputy chairman. He is going to be a brilliant deputy chairman. He’ll be working with the membership. He’ll be increasing the membership no doubt,” she added"
No doubt indeed, nuke this loving shithole.

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe

Guavanaut posted:

There's also the argument that it tends to correlate strongly with increased rates of serious crimes for reasons that we don't have a full picture of, but we don't have a full picture of why a lot of common medicines work either and I'm not convinced that pharmacology should be done by popular vote.

Deferring to bootmakers in matters of boots and so on.

Is this because of the whole "poo poo I'm going to hang for X minor crime so YOLO lets do Z major crime as well since it can't get worse"?

Who knows maybe it will herald a peasant rebellion and the rise of a new golden age.

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008

Z the IVth posted:

Is this because of the whole "poo poo I'm going to hang for X minor crime so YOLO lets do Z major crime as well since it can't get worse"?

It's more like if the sentence for mugging someone is 3 years, there's not really any point using a weapon, since there's a big difference between that and 7-10 years for aggravated assault (or whatever).
But if the sentence for mugging is life imprisonment, then why not just merk whoever you're mugging since A) they can't testify against you if they're dead so you're more likely to get away with it, and; B) life imprisonment vs death isn't a massive difference.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

kingturnip posted:

It's more like if the sentence for mugging someone is 3 years, there's not really any point using a weapon, since there's a big difference between that and 7-10 years for aggravated assault (or whatever).
But if the sentence for mugging is life imprisonment, then why not just merk whoever you're mugging since A) they can't testify against you if they're dead so you're more likely to get away with it, and; B) life imprisonment vs death isn't a massive difference.

you'd think, but death sentence is actually apparently a working deterrent... kinda

but yes in general past a pretty low-tier sentence, harsher punishments for crimes do not add all that much marginal value, presuming your metric is "reduce number of crimes" and not "hurt people"

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://twitter.com/newsthump/status/1623657586745540609

SixFigureSandwich
Oct 30, 2004
Exciting Lemon

Jaeluni Asjil posted:

Vice article:

https://archive.is/dKSqE

I don't even know what an encrypted phone is :corsair: and the only secrets hiding behind my calculator icon are a few square roots.

It's services like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncroChat
where the phones are pretty obviously meant to be used for planning your crimes

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

SixFigureSandwich posted:

It's services like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncroChat
where the phones are pretty obviously meant to be used for planning your crimes

Lol. All those “super encrypted phone chat!!!” things are so obviously CIA / NSA honeytraps

Answers Me
Apr 24, 2012

Jakabite posted:

It’s unfortunate that I do think Anderson is a decent reflection of a very decent (numerically, and in no other way) share of British people. If we want democracy to represent the views of the country then he’s actually a sensible option. Why that is is a different issue, and one that I’m not sure we’ve managed to articulate a good answer for. In any case, what a oval office.

I think he has the potential to be a very dangerous and powerful figure, to be honest. Someone that can grow into a Farage-esque populist, but with added authentocrat ‘credibility‘, and at the heart of the Tory machine rather than outside it. It’s a potent recipe.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
Welp, Rowling's wizard game is turning out to be an impressively dense nexus for terrible people.

https://twitter.com/protanorak/status/1623829660466388992?s=46&t=6dwTID7Od3t993nHVqKFLQ

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Rowling has touched children all over the world, and that's why family courts should be dissolved.

Speaking of terrible people:
https://twitter.com/CaelanConrad/status/1623783178153467910

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Jakabite posted:

You’re both dead on of course. I was talking in a bit of a ‘democracy in a vacuum’ sense I guess. My Slovak friend I’m visiting thinks we should institute tests to make sure that smarter people have more voting power.

The American South did exactly this, in theory. Turns out that's a good way to disenfranchise anyone whose skin colour you don't like.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009


I'm convinced; may he be sentenced to death.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

feedmegin posted:

The American South did exactly this, in theory. Turns out that's a good way to disenfranchise anyone whose skin colour you don't like.

Yeah, he isn’t the most developed political thinker.

Lol @ Forstater. You’d think if you were regularly being kicked off platforms you’d realise you’re the baddies

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Darth Walrus posted:

Welp, Rowling's wizard game is turning out to be an impressively dense nexus for terrible people.

https://twitter.com/protanorak/status/1623829660466388992?s=46&t=6dwTID7Od3t993nHVqKFLQ

In the replies you can see what a charming life he's led against his ex partners. Revenge porn, restraining orders, and apparently took his speaking appearance at a con to traumadump on the audience and told all the mentally ill people in said audience to stop taking their medications and go to his website where he can provide counselling instead.

Very normal stuff.

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

Jakabite posted:

Yeah, he isn’t the most developed political thinker.

Lol @ Forstater. You’d think if you were regularly being kicked off platforms you’d realise you’re the baddies

If you were capable of that sort of self-reflection you probably wouldn't be one of the baddies in the first place

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kill All Cops
Apr 11, 2007


Pacheco de Chocobo



Hell Gem

unusual design for a urinal cake, but i'll take it

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply