(Thread IKs:
GhostofJohnMuir)
|
Well sure if he can afford home surveillance he can afford to re-reg. But he had a point. I mean, internet dog piles, probations... that which is necessary (or unavoidable) does not offend. But a ban linking to that post is a bad look. I'd drop litigating this if it were explained.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 02:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 15:34 |
|
Cease to Hope posted:isn't it exhausting to be like this all the time Eh, I'm really not. 90% of my posting is wrestling and dumb poo poo. I just swing in now and then to see what is going on with the car wreck. It is fun to work up people who think their poo poo doesn't stink like yours and mine does.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 02:04 |
|
BRJurgis posted:Well sure if he can afford home surveillance he can afford to re-reg. But he had a point. I mean, internet dog piles, probations... that which is necessary (or unavoidable) does not offend. But a ban linking to that post is a bad look. I'd drop litigating this if it were explained. "I demand to be unbanned from D&D so I can continue doing the same kind of posting in dadchat that got me forum-banned from D&D" is not a very good argument, and I gave them a 6er reminder. They posted they knew they were inviting a ban. I don't have a lot of good will toward someone who posted Bishyaler posted:I'm starting to understand why leftist revolutions shot so many people. Half those D&D posters would be against a wall before they finished their first smug diatribe If they wanna nonstop own the libs and fantasize about executing D&D posters in the coming revolution they can do it somewhere that isn't D&D. That posting doesn't bring anything of interest or value to this thread or a hypothetical USPol successor. edit: I'd also note that posters who end up forum-banned from D&D don't have a great track record of not being absolute psychos elsewhere and many of them are now perma'd for being lunatics in CSPAM etc. It takes an awful lot of bad posting over an extended period of time to get booted. Fritz the Horse fucked around with this message at 02:18 on Feb 10, 2023 |
# ? Feb 10, 2023 02:15 |
|
i forgot if i was supposed to be a 'wall lib' or a 'guillotine lib' but its been a while since i analyzed the pros and cons of each
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 02:33 |
|
Fritz the Horse posted:I did suggest to Mellow over PMs several times that he not Post Through It but
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 02:57 |
who is your leader?
|
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 04:47 |
|
bob avakian
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 04:50 |
|
a strange fowl posted:who is your leader? Hideo Kojima?
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 04:51 |
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Hideo Kojima? yeah, why not
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:02 |
|
I remember hearing in the past that the federal government had through policy or even straight up law impeded or completely blocked from investigating white nationalist organizations. Does anybody know what the specifics are for those restrictions?
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:03 |
|
a strange fowl posted:who is your leader? The weed smoking Bigfoot from the Australian mspaint cartoon big lez.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:05 |
|
man after an extra long day at work, it blows my mind to come back to this thread and see people drafting interdepartmental memos on forum policy and poo poo i wish i had that level of energy
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:06 |
|
also it's insane how hard it is to find a 6" pipe that's apparently leaking at 180 gal/min if you only have a rough idea of it's location. tore up like 60 square feet with a backhoe 10 feet down and loving nothing
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:08 |
|
Lib and let die posted:I liked when Fritz would drop Indian Tribal Affairs knowledge on us I'm glad folks find that stuff of interest, I do enjoy talking about it but it's kind of a weird fit for any specific thread and idk that a dedicated indigenous issues thread in D&D or CSPAM would get much traffic. As much as I'd like to talk more specific details I'm also extremely easy to doxx if you know what tribe I work for and what I do.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:20 |
|
for example did you know that "land grant" universities means those colleges were "granted" a bunch of stolen native land? and that the universities "granted" land in 1862 who were already in the "settled" eastern part of the US were just randomly given a bunch of indigenous land in like loving California? like Cornell in NY has land all over the loving place https://www.landgrabu.org/universities that is an extremely good chunk of investigative journalism in that website
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:26 |
|
i haven't had much of a chance to work with our local tribes, but it seems super fraught. like not just federally recognized vs non-recognized issues, but as far as i can tell everyone in the space is related and has deep family beefs going on i did recently get to attend a workshop on cultural burning practices, and the tacos a community member was putting together were incredibly good. and i learned from an incredibly old man why expectant mothers shouldn't drink white sage tea
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:28 |
|
GhostofJohnMuir posted:i haven't had much of a chance to work with our local tribes, but it seems super fraught. like not just federally recognized vs non-recognized issues, but as far as i can tell everyone in the space is related and has deep family beefs going on yeah tribal politics are super complicated and yep there's a ton of family beefs lol. nepotism gets wild I hope you talked to the incredibly old dude for a while. elders have some really amazing insights and also carry most of the cultural knowledge since they're usually oral traditions.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:41 |
|
I built 21 national parks.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 05:42 |
|
GhostofJohnMuir posted:man after an extra long day at work, it blows my mind to come back to this thread and see people drafting interdepartmental memos on forum policy and poo poo once you hit a certain level of obsession with the forums, you convince yourself that this poo poo is fun and enjoyable
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 06:04 |
|
Every thread in D&D should follow Robert's Rules of Order
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 06:08 |
|
Sinnlos posted:Every thread in D&D should follow Robert's Rules of Order I motion to approve this post could I get a second?
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 06:09 |
|
Fritz the Horse posted:I motion to approve this post could I get a second? ...Neigh?
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 06:27 |
Fritz the Horse posted:I motion to approve this post could I get a second? I second. The chair should now state the question to open debate on the motion. I think that would be Koos. Koos, this would be chapter five, section 10, and you're going to want to consider this under the rules for an incidental main motion. Discendo Vox fucked around with this message at 06:54 on Feb 10, 2023 |
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 06:45 |
|
Sinnlos posted:Every thread in D&D should follow Robert's Rules of Order The above question has been presented for debate. The thread will now entertain arguments on whether "Every thread in D&D should follow Robert's Rules of Order." Please raise your hand or signal your request to be recognized for the length of one post.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 06:55 |
|
Fritz the Horse posted:The above question has been presented for debate. The thread will now entertain arguments on whether "Every thread in D&D should follow Robert's Rules of Order." *Raises Hand*
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:10 |
|
point of order! No (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:11 |
|
Sinnlos posted:*Raises Hand* The chair recognizes user "Sinnlos" for one post.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:11 |
|
Fritz the Horse posted:The chair recognizes user "Sinnlos" for one post. Robert's Rules Of Order would bring much needed order to the Debate And Discussion subforum of SomethingAwful.com, while simultaneously making all posting extremely tedious. Furthermore, this would be very funny for approximately 8 hours and allow the mods to grant 6 hour long probations to a majority of active posters in the aforementioned subforum. In my estimation, this has a 14.2% chance of killing the 12,846th worst extant website if enforced long term.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:16 |
Fritz the Horse posted:Please raise your hand or signal your request to be recognized for the length of one post.
|
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:23 |
|
Sinnlos posted:Robert's Rules Of Order would bring much needed order to the Debate And Discussion subforum of SomethingAwful.com, while simultaneously making all posting extremely tedious. Furthermore, this would be very funny for approximately 8 hours and allow the mods to grant 6 hour long probations to a majority of active posters in the aforementioned subforum. In my estimation, this has a 14.2% chance of killing the 12,846th worst extant website if enforced long term. Thank you for your comment. The chair neither confirms nor denies whether they'd considered this exercise as an excuse to 6er a bunch of posters. The chair is also an idiot and will not bother to read Robert's Rules unless directly cited or as is entertaining. Thus, Robert's Rules will be enforced selectively and capriciously unless/until a day or so or I get tired of this. The chair recognizes user "Discendo Vox" for a one-post comment.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:32 |
GhostofJohnMuir posted:i did recently get to attend a workshop on cultural burning practices, and the tacos a community member was putting together were incredibly good. and i learned from an incredibly old man why expectant mothers shouldn't drink white sage tea (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:34 |
Fritz the Horse posted:The chair recognizes user "Discendo Vox" for a one-post comment. I would currently oppose use of the Rules in the forums; they're designed entirely for contemporaneous, verbal proceedings and are ill-suited to the forums medium. Any use of the Rules would require extensive revisions, and while I do have a modified ruleset that could be further adapted for Something Awful's use, I think the time investment would be better applied elsewhere. Additionally, a significant debate would immediately ensue about which edition of the Rules to use. Setting aside the scrublord "in brief" editions for dummies, there's a lot of controversy about changes in the 10th edition that have moved forward since the schism with the 7th edition in 1970. The full 12th edition is also relatively expensive and is arguably an inappropriate cost to expect many users to read. However, in the event that the forum does choose to move to the Rules, I have a set of extensively annotated editions I can send to moderators as needed. I do have a personal copy of the 10th edition that I've modified and cut down for civic meetings which may be appropriate for public moderation deliberations. I have an alternative proposal involving a merged Argdown and Loomio concept I developed a while back for the Nebraska unicameral, but I'll wait for a separate motion for that to be considered.
|
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 07:52 |
|
fritz the horse is going to wake up and find his own head in his bed for this outrage free avs a strange fowl posted:that's so cool. an understanding of the local cultural burning should be essential for land managers anywhere. it was a great experience. it's always almost sobering when i am reminded that there is so much overlap between the natural resources in our landscape and the local native communities in fact it's almost strange to me how the deep relationship between native peoples and the land is repeated so often in our society that it's essentially almost a racist trope in mainstream media, yet even for its ubiquity it's not something i really began to internalize until a site walk in which a cultural specialist and i both raised concerns about preserving the same patch of wildflowers. for me it was about maintaining what little native plant cover there was in a sea of non-native grasses, for them it was because the bulb of the flower was a staple food for the local tribe and this patch was important context because it was very close to the footprint of an old village site there was much good conversation about the prevailing fear of fire, how that prevents the work that needs to happen, and how various members of the tribe see things differently also some excellent points about the imperialist aspect of existing policy. some good discussion on the fact that one of the first acts the spanish put into effect in southern california was a ban on burning. also someone called a calfire official a militarized colonizer to his face, so just lots of fun all around
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 08:03 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:I would currently oppose use of the Rules in the forums; they're designed entirely for contemporaneous, verbal proceedings and are ill-suited to the forums medium. Any use of the Rules would require extensive revisions, and while I do have a modified ruleset that could be further adapted for Something Awful's use, I think the time investment would be better applied elsewhere. Additionally, a significant debate would immediately ensue about which edition of the Rules to use. Setting aside the scrublord "in brief" editions for dummies, there's a lot of controversy about changes in the 10th edition that have moved forward since the schism with the 7th edition in 1970. The full 12th edition is also relatively expensive and is arguably an inappropriate cost to expect many users to read. I move that DV be given a wedgie.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 08:44 |
|
Fritz the Horse posted:I'm glad folks find that stuff of interest, I do enjoy talking about it but it's kind of a weird fit for any specific thread and idk that a dedicated indigenous issues thread in D&D or CSPAM would get much traffic. As much as I'd like to talk more specific details I'm also extremely easy to doxx if you know what tribe I work for and what I do. I thought it was known you were involved with Chickasaw.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 09:18 |
|
Fritz the Horse posted:I don't have a lot of good will toward someone who posted Lmao, what's the chance that if you go through this year's feedback threads this will be one of the sources of "the bloodthirsty warmongering libs here are silencing my dissenting opinions that they should all be loving killed and their corpses pissed on... there is no decorum or respect for free speech"
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 10:39 |
|
I'm looking for the presiding officef and... not seeing them. I motion to begin nominations.
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 11:13 |
|
Elephant Ambush posted:The Octopath Traveler 2 demo is out for all consoles! yooooooo octopath rules, and im gald its getting a sequel. it owns almost as much as me not being permabanned, or that if im banned lurkers will give me certs, or that if im probated for very long times unjustly itll get overturned eventually. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 11:23 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:I would currently oppose use of the Rules in the forums; they're designed entirely for contemporaneous, verbal proceedings and are ill-suited to the forums medium. Any use of the Rules would require extensive revisions, and while I do have a modified ruleset that could be further adapted for Something Awful's use, I think the time investment would be better applied elsewhere. Additionally, a significant debate would immediately ensue about which edition of the Rules to use. Setting aside the scrublord "in brief" editions for dummies, there's a lot of controversy about changes in the 10th edition that have moved forward since the schism with the 7th edition in 1970. The full 12th edition is also relatively expensive and is arguably an inappropriate cost to expect many users to read. My dude this is painful to read
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 12:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 15:34 |
|
NeatHeteroDude posted:I'm looking for the presiding officef and... not seeing them. I motion to begin nominations. Reopen USPOL I'm begging you NHD
|
# ? Feb 10, 2023 12:11 |