Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: weg, Toxic Mental)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
zone
Dec 6, 2016

Those RPG warhead drones aren't meant to be reusable anyway. They're a one use munition for targeting heavy equipment. The reusable heavy drones/octocopters etc. primarily use mortar rounds of various descriptions as their ammo.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ishikabibble
Jan 21, 2012

Deki posted:

NAFO memes are loving awful in a vacuum but throw 20 at them at some scraggly bearded contrarian's twitter and the ensuing butthurt is glorious.

Speaking of, I just heard that Gonzalo Lira got booted out of Ukraine for materially helping the Russian army. Apparently he narc'd out a bunch of other collaborators to avoid any punishment but being kicked out of the country.

I think the terribleness is the point. It's like turning the Nazi playbook against them, being utterly loving idiotic in order to bring any opposition down to their level and beat them with stupidity, and show how not-to-be-taken-seriously they are.

Someone posting unironic Russian propaganda can't talk them down (because they'll lose), they can't ignore them (because they'll flood the comments under their tweet), and any other option is basically admitting a loss too.

Power Khan
Aug 20, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
You're not going to have a good faith arguments with disinformation firehoses and various flavours of russian propaganda poo poo. Ridiculing them and drowing them out in fart noises is exactly what works.

Karate Bastard
Jul 31, 2007

Soiled Meat

Toxic Mental posted:

Isn't that the guy who was a failed sex tourist and so he stayed in the country to try and get his incel revenge on Ukranian women by chain smoking and heavily drinking and being really fat? lol

Wait are you saying that's a valid way of getting revenge on people? I've been going about this the entirely wrong way

Deus Ex Macklemore
Jul 2, 2004


Zelensky's Zealots

Power Khan posted:

You're not going to have a good faith arguments with disinformation firehoses and various flavours of russian propaganda poo poo. Ridiculing them and drowing them out in fart noises is exactly what works.

I don't know if you've seen the rules here but doing that is somehow "cringe" so let's show some decorum to the terrible humans both perpetrating war crimes as well as those licking their boots.

Pennsylvanian
May 23, 2010

Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky Independent Presidential Regiment
Western Liberal Democracy or Death!

Deki posted:

NAFO memes are loving awful in a vacuum but throw 20 at them at some scraggly bearded contrarian's twitter and the ensuing butthurt is glorious.

Speaking of, I just heard that Gonzalo Lira got booted out of Ukraine for materially helping the Russian army. Apparently he narc'd out a bunch of other collaborators to avoid any punishment but being kicked out of the country.

Lazerpig claimed that he asked into it, and a Ukrainian rep told him that Lira stayed in Ukraine after ratting out his collaborators, but grew so paranoid that he would be killed that he didn't leave his apartment at all. Police did a wellness check to find him begging to be escorted out of the country. That's entirely from a Youtuber with a goofy name though, so take it with a pound of salt.

Tai
Mar 8, 2006

Flyinglemur posted:

I don't know if you've seen the rules here but doing that is somehow "cringe" so let's show some decorum to the terrible humans both perpetrating war crimes as well as those licking their boots.

I think having a normal chat about the outcome of nafo is probably ok rather than posting memes from nafo which is what I assume the rules means.

Mods?

Burns
May 10, 2008

Russian propaganda. Now that poo poo is cringe.

Speaking of, has the west done anything to gently caress with Russia's beloved propagandists? Besides sanctions?

Deus Ex Macklemore
Jul 2, 2004


Zelensky's Zealots

Tai posted:

I think having a normal chat about the outcome of nafo is probably ok rather than posting memes from nafo which is what I assume the rules means.

Mods?

Tigey
Apr 6, 2015

Pennsylvanian posted:

Lazerpig claimed that he asked into it, and a Ukrainian rep told him that Lira stayed in Ukraine after ratting out his collaborators, but grew so paranoid that he would be killed that he didn't leave his apartment at all. Police did a wellness check to find him begging to be escorted out of the country. That's entirely from a Youtuber with a goofy name though, so take it with a pound of salt.

If true then lol

But also, it shows that:

1) Even during an full-scale invasion that poses an existential threat, Ukraine is still permitting explicitly pro-Russia foreign political 'commentators' to operate unhindered on its territory.

2) Police even carried out a wellness check - during wartime when their resources are presumably stretched - in order to check up on his safety and wellbeing.

That's evidence of functioning institutions, respect for rule of law and freedom of the press. Neo-Nazi Banderite Regime my rear end.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Tigey posted:

Just upset because even a single avatar makes their oh so serious reporting look ridiculous. No academics or commentators chiming in, just an army of terminally online nobodies and ridicule from cartoon dogs.

TBH it's also pretty cringe to see Serious OSINT Threat Analysis Engineers furiously dismissing the cartoon dogs, because rallying against a dictator through ridicule is definitely an unprecedented, ahistoric level of silliness.

Tarquinn
Jul 3, 2007

I know I’ve made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you
my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal.
Hell Gem
Speaking of drones...

https://mobile.twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1635688402745012242

https://mobile.twitter.com/CinemaShogun/status/1635689712194138118

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

Tai posted:

I think having a normal chat about the outcome of nafo is probably ok rather than posting memes from nafo which is what I assume the rules means.

Mods?

Yes it's completely fine to discuss the infowar (lol!!!) which is just a modern aspect of this war and war in general. What we don't want are the image macros like the one in the OP that seem to trivialize a brutal war.

the holy poopacy
May 16, 2009

hey! check this out
Fun Shoe

Is anyone other than the Mail stating it was a crash? Other outlets are using more circumspect language and saying a Russian fighter "forced down" the drone, which could be read as a physical collision, but this is the first report confirming a collision.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

Pro Russian dipshits are just mad they can't vomit out their misinformation and lies without pushback any more. Doesn't matter how mad they get about it, anything that puts a crimp in the day of professional liars and the scum of humanity is fine by me. If it makes them quit because of rage, even better. Anything beyond this is just a bonus when it comes to worthless propagandists.

golden bubble
Jun 3, 2011

yospos

zone posted:

Those RPG warhead drones aren't meant to be reusable anyway. They're a one use munition for targeting heavy equipment. The reusable heavy drones/octocopters etc. primarily use mortar rounds of various descriptions as their ammo.

Even the "reusuable" quadcopters and octocopters are consumables. There was an interview recently with an Ukrainian artillery brigade commanders, and he said that while most drones sent to artillery companies last a week before blowing up, most drones sent to infantry companies last half a day before blowing up.

sniper4625
Sep 26, 2009

Loyal to the hEnd

the holy poopacy posted:

Is anyone other than the Mail stating it was a crash? Other outlets are using more circumspect language and saying a Russian fighter "forced down" the drone, which could be read as a physical collision, but this is the first report confirming a collision.

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1635685779639873540

EUCOM confirmed a collision.

Borscht
Jun 4, 2011

the holy poopacy posted:

Is anyone other than the Mail stating it was a crash? Other outlets are using more circumspect language and saying a Russian fighter "forced down" the drone, which could be read as a physical collision, but this is the first report confirming a collision.

e: you know what, I got this second hand and I should not contribute to possible disinformation

Just Another Lurker
May 1, 2009

edit: not needed.

Just Another Lurker fucked around with this message at 18:16 on Mar 14, 2023

Borscht
Jun 4, 2011

Just Another Lurker posted:

That's the Daily Mail (Daily Heil), i'm going to need a trustworthy source to verify that. :colbert:

The BBC just sent me a push notification

BBC but not that Big Beef City guy posted:

A Russian fighter jet has collided with a US drone over the Black Sea, forcing the US Air Force to bring down its unmanned aircraft, the American military says.

It says the drone was conducting a routine operation in international airspace when two Russian jets tried to intercept it.

It says the "unsafe and unprofessional act by the Russians" nearly caused one of the fighter jets and the drone to crash.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

Fumble
Sep 4, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 11 days!

Just Another Lurker posted:

That's the Daily Mail (Daily Heil), i'm going to need a trustworthy source to verify that. :colbert:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64957792

bbc isnt much better these days, but still.

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

That's probably enough to completely crash the Russian jet too, I'd assume? I mean those things are the size of school busses and weigh about the same. I guess I'm just not sure what the context is, did the Russian jet bonk into the drone's wing trying to tip it, or was it some kind of head-on collision?

B-Rock452
Jan 6, 2005
:justflu:

the holy poopacy posted:

Is anyone other than the Mail stating it was a crash? Other outlets are using more circumspect language and saying a Russian fighter "forced down" the drone, which could be read as a physical collision, but this is the first report confirming a collision.

The jet apparently dumped it's fuel before the collision which means it was almost definitely intentional

Borscht
Jun 4, 2011

B-Rock452 posted:

The jet apparently dumped it's fuel before the collision which means it was almost definitely intentional

It dumped fuel ON the drone.

The_Franz
Aug 8, 2003

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/440347/russian-aircraft-collides-into-us-unmanned-system-international-waters

quote:

Two Russian Su-27 aircraft conducted an unsafe and unprofessional intercept with a U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance unmanned MQ-9 aircraft that was operating within international airspace over the Black Sea today.

At approximately 7:03 AM (CET), one of the Russian Su-27 aircraft struck the propeller of the MQ-9, causing U.S. forces to have to bring the MQ-9 down in international waters. Several times before the collision, the Su-27s dumped fuel on and flew in front of the MQ-9 in a reckless, environmentally unsound and unprofessional manner. This incident demonstrates a lack of competence in addition to being unsafe and unprofessional.

“Our MQ-9 aircraft was conducting routine operations in international airspace when it was intercepted and hit by a Russian aircraft, resulting in a crash and complete loss of the MQ-9,” said U.S. Air Force Gen. James B. Hecker, commander, U.S. Air Forces Europe and Air Forces Africa. “In fact, this unsafe and unprofessional act by the Russians nearly caused both aircraft to crash.”

“U.S. and Allied aircraft will continue to operate in international airspace and we call on the Russians to conduct themselves professionally and safely,” Hecker added.

This incident follows a pattern of dangerous actions by Russian pilots while interacting with U.S. and Allied aircraft over international airspace, including over the Black Sea. These aggressive actions by Russian aircrew are dangerous and could lead to miscalculation and unintended escalation.

U.S. Air Forces in Europe – Air Forces Africa routinely fly aircraft throughout Europe over sovereign territory and throughout international airspace in coordination with applicable host nation and international laws. In order to bolster collective European defense and security, these missions support Allied, partner, and U.S. national objectives.

Sounds like some Russian fighters were behaving recklessly in international air space, which isn't without precedent.

DandyLion
Jun 24, 2010
disrespectul Deciever

Toxic Mental posted:

That's probably enough to completely crash the Russian jet too, I'd assume? I mean those things are the size of school busses and weigh about the same.

Regardless of whether it crashed or was merely damaged the russians' in their infinite wisdom hurt more from even minor damage of their aircraft (vis-a-vis sanctions limiting their ability to repair them) than the US does from the loss of a multi-million dollar drone.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1635661279829344257
More unconnected, unsupported Copelerone pieces set up near Melitopol.

Shinjobi
Jul 10, 2008


Gravy Boat 2k

B-Rock452 posted:

The jet apparently dumped it's fuel before the collision which means it was almost definitely intentional

What a costly maneuver

Tarquinn
Jul 3, 2007

I know I’ve made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you
my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal.
Hell Gem
Here's the official press release:

https://www.eucom.mil/pressrelease/42314/russian-aircraft-collides-into-us-unmanned-system-in-international-waters

quote:

Russian aircraft collides into US unmanned system in international waters
Two Russian Su-27 aircraft conducted an unsafe and unprofessional intercept with a U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance unmanned MQ-9 aircraft that was operating within international airspace over the Black Sea, March 14, 2023.
By U.S. AIR FORCES EUROPE - AIR FORCES AFRICA Ramstein Air Base, Germany Mar 14, 2023
Two Russian Su-27 aircraft conducted an unsafe and unprofessional intercept with a U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance unmanned MQ-9 aircraft that was operating within international airspace over the Black Sea today.

At approximately 7:03 AM (CET), one of the Russian Su-27 aircraft struck the propeller of the MQ-9, causing U.S. forces to have to bring the MQ-9 down in international waters. Several times before the collision, the Su-27s dumped fuel on and flew in front of the MQ-9 in a reckless, environmentally unsound and unprofessional manner. This incident demonstrates a lack of competence in addition to being unsafe and unprofessional.

“Our MQ-9 aircraft was conducting routine operations in international airspace when it was intercepted and hit by a Russian aircraft, resulting in a crash and complete loss of the MQ-9,” said U.S. Air Force Gen. James B. Hecker, commander, U.S. Air Forces Europe and Air Forces Africa. “In fact, this unsafe and unprofessional act by the Russians nearly caused both aircraft to crash.”

“U.S. and Allied aircraft will continue to operate in international airspace and we call on the Russians to conduct themselves professionally and safely,” Hecker added.

This incident follows a pattern of dangerous actions by Russian pilots while interacting with U.S. and Allied aircraft over international airspace, including over the Black Sea. These aggressive actions by Russian aircrew are dangerous and could lead to miscalculation and unintended escalation.

U.S. Air Forces in Europe – Air Forces Africa routinely fly aircraft throughout Europe over sovereign territory and throughout international airspace in coordination with applicable host nation and international laws. In order to bolster collective European defense and security, these missions support Allied, partner, and U.S. national objectives.

For more information, please contact U.S. Air Forces Europe at usafepao.pao@us.af.mil.

Vire
Nov 4, 2005

Like a Bosh

Toxic Mental posted:

That's probably enough to completely crash the Russian jet too, I'd assume? I mean those things are the size of school busses and weigh about the same. I guess I'm just not sure what the context is, did the Russian jet bonk into the drone's wing trying to tip it, or was it some kind of head-on collision?

Considering the jet cost like twice as much as the reaper seems like a bad trade if it did went down.

LaserPrinter69
Sep 6, 2022

"I did a perfect print job, grown men were coming up to me and saying with tears in their eyes, 'Sir, it was a perfect print job.' What they're trying to do to your favorite printer (ME!) is a disgrace."
Oh suddenly we care about the environmental impact of dumping fuel :qq:

The_Franz
Aug 8, 2003

You have to be pretty goddamn ignorant/stupid to risk your life trying to intimidate an unmanned drone to the point that you collide with it though.

The only thing the drone pilot in an office in Nevada sipping a coffee likely thought was "WTF is wrong with these people? Are they drunk or suicidal?"

The_Franz fucked around with this message at 18:29 on Mar 14, 2023

EorayMel
May 30, 2015

WE GET IT. YOU LOVE GUN JESUS. Toujours des fusils Bullpup Français.

The_Franz posted:

You have to be pretty goddamn ignorant/stupid to risk your life trying to intimidate an unmanned drone though.

It was looking at me weird :mad:

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

The_Franz posted:

You have to be pretty goddamn ignorant/stupid to risk your life trying to intimidate an unmanned drone though.

Pilot unresponsive, requesting permission to engage

Pekinduck
May 10, 2008

LaserPrinter69 posted:

Oh suddenly we care about the environmental impact of dumping fuel :qq:

I mean when you're writing the official response you might as well throw it in there :v:

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
russia needed extra spare parts for it's air force. Simples

Borscht
Jun 4, 2011
drop fuel on me, daddy Su-27

Cthulu Carl
Apr 16, 2006


"One step closer to the inevitable" Isn't the entire point of drones that you can go "Eh, unbox another one" when dumb poo poo like this happens?

Toxic Mental
Jun 1, 2019

Yeah the difference between crashing or engaging a manned plane vs. an unmanned drone is a lot different, they've very clearly hugely different magnitudes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Telsa Cola
Aug 19, 2011

No... this is all wrong... this whole operation has just gone completely sidewaysface
Their plane likely did not go down because 1. The USA would be blasting that poo poo from the roof tops if it did. And 2. Because they just clipped the prop which probably did some form of structural damage to whatever clipped it, but it's not like they full body rammed it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply