|
credburn posted:Does Jon Benjamin as a voice actor have any range whatsoever? He's a good actor, but out of the like dozen characters I've heard him voice, it's never been anything other than Jon Benjamin. more than you'd think. in home movies he's very recognisable as coach mcguirk, but he also plays Jason and other bit parts where it's much less obvious. compare these two vids and you'll know what i mean. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qfFZfzPAOg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTNvKjbnhhw
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:24 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 14:30 |
|
credburn posted:Does Jon Benjamin as a voice actor have any range whatsoever? He's a good actor, but out of the like dozen characters I've heard him voice, it's never been anything other than Jon Benjamin. You don’t ask george wendt to do a crazy voice, you work with the great tones you got
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 22:44 |
|
CainFortea posted:Or just don't use blank firing guns at all. Or just don't put things into a gun you don't want to be propelled out of the barrel.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 01:43 |
|
Cat Hatter posted:Or just don't put things into a gun you don't want to be propelled out of the barrel. Things can happen without you doing it on purpose. There's a word for this. It's called "accident".
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 03:03 |
|
Baron von Eevl posted:I like that by the midpoint of t2 even the other characters are sick of Sarah's monologuing. Now I know why you monologue. But it is something I will never do.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 03:09 |
|
CainFortea posted:Things can happen without you doing it on purpose. There's a word for this. It's called "accident". No, it's called "criminal negligence". Even Joe Sixpack is supposed to open the beach and see if light is able to make it through the barrel, and he's not a professional being paid to make sure everything is safe.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 04:10 |
|
CainFortea posted:Or just don't use blank firing guns at all. Was it Weta Workshop that was working on prop guns that look and feel real and eject brass etc but are not guns at all and can't fire anything? I saw a video about it a few years ago but haven't heard anything since.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 05:42 |
|
A big reason why Hollywood has been so heavily unionised and formalised with procedures and regulations is specifically because this amateur hour poo poo can, does and has gotten people killed. Regulations are written in blood, and all. Even props that use any kind of explosive are dangerous equipment that can kill people if used incorrectly, and must be treated as such. And that's specifically what you have an armorer on set to do.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 05:53 |
|
BioEnchanted posted:I love how his mother is exactly like him, obsessed with sex and alcohol, but she couches it in a classier veneer. Like Archer's all screwing any hot girl who'll have him, but his mother has moments like with the bug in downing street where she completely unnecessarily is like "I modeled the breasts after my own... and may I just say they're still a dead ringer." Jessica Walter really owned that role, simply perfect.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 09:18 |
|
Yeah I still like archer and that's overwhelmingly because I like the cast.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 10:25 |
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:A big reason why Hollywood has been so heavily unionised and formalised with procedures and regulations is specifically because this amateur hour poo poo can, does and has gotten people killed. Regulations are written in blood, and all. Even props that use any kind of explosive are dangerous equipment that can kill people if used incorrectly, and must be treated as such. And that's specifically what you have an armorer on set to do. All you have to do is look at John Landis’s behavior before, during, and after the Twilight Zone accident.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 10:54 |
|
Milo and POTUS posted:Yeah I still like archer and that's overwhelmingly because I like the cast. It's such a great cast, excellent performances all around, and they're all pretty rad people in real life. Literally every character in the show is a major piece of poo poo, with basically no morals or ethics whatsoever, that's sort of the point Pam rules pretty hard, though. KozmoNaut has a new favorite as of 10:58 on Mar 24, 2023 |
# ? Mar 24, 2023 10:56 |
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:All you have to do is look at John Landis’s behavior before, during, and after the Twilight Zone accident. I just went to read what else John Landis has been up to and found his last two executive-produced films were called Some Guy Who Kills People and I Hate Kids.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 13:40 |
|
I mean, look at how Max turned out.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:04 |
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:A big reason why Hollywood has been so heavily unionised and formalised with procedures and regulations is specifically because this amateur hour poo poo can, does and has gotten people killed. Regulations are written in blood, and all. Even props that use any kind of explosive are dangerous equipment that can kill people if used incorrectly, and must be treated as such. And that's specifically what you have an armorer on set to do. The sheer physical size of lights and the amount of power it takes the run them is still high, even though both have come down by an order of magnitude in the last few years. People on scaffolding or cranes are often right out of frame, doing anything from running a fan exactly the right way to manually holding a bounce board. There are camera tracks on the floor and they’re easy to trip on. You could be running 3-phase power in simulated rain. The list goes on and on. It really bothers be that what, a decade after “Safety for Sarah” Baldwin, who has done a LOT of Union productions got involved in this kind of half-assed non-union production. I can’t imagine he needed the money that bad. I know nothing about how the unions work, but why doesn’t SAG-AFTRA or DGA discourage members working on sets without trade unions?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:10 |
|
Wait, Rust was a non-union set?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:13 |
|
Rupert Buttermilk posted:Wait, Rust was a non-union set? After the union all walked because of rampant safety violations and production shortcuts, yes.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:38 |
|
Pope Corky the IX posted:I mean, look at how Max turned out. The dangers of a helicopter parent.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:42 |
|
Edit: ^^^^ oh my god... Sandwich Anarchist posted:After the union all walked because of rampant safety violations and production shortcuts, yes. Jfc, I must've missed that part, holy poo poo. Rupert Buttermilk has a new favorite as of 15:09 on Mar 24, 2023 |
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:55 |
|
Marcade posted:The dangers of a helicopter parent.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 14:56 |
|
every time max landis gets mentioned someone makes that joke
|
# ? Mar 25, 2023 04:28 |
|
Baron von Eevl posted:I like that by the midpoint of t2 even the other characters are sick of Sarah's monologuing. When she starts going off at Dyson about how men can only make things that destroy and will never know what its like to grow life inside them and everyone in the room (as well as everyone in the audience) rolls their eyes before John tells her to just STFU already!
|
# ? Mar 25, 2023 04:48 |
|
Len posted:every time max landis gets mentioned someone makes that joke They sure do, and every time they do they stick the landing
|
# ? Mar 25, 2023 04:48 |
|
Len posted:every time max landis gets mentioned someone makes that joke joke will soon as old as the women he preys on
|
# ? Mar 25, 2023 05:48 |
|
It also gives me more respect for Steven Spielberg because he stated he would never work with or even talk to Landis ever again and forty years later he’s stuck to that. Landis got away with murder but at least he was denied a lucrative partnership with Spielberg for the last few decades.
|
# ? Mar 25, 2023 13:53 |
|
Did the Sarah Connor Chronicles leave off with a bunch of unresolved stuff since it was cancelled? I hate starting new shows that don't have a proper ending
|
# ? Mar 26, 2023 20:37 |
|
eddoghetto posted:Did the Sarah Connor Chronicles leave off with a bunch of unresolved stuff since it was cancelled? I hate starting new shows that don't have a proper ending Extremely. Big cliffhanger and everything.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2023 20:56 |
|
Intrigued by what I've read in this thread, I've been watching TSCC and wow, this feels like it would be a great show if it had come out maybe fifteen years later. This came out I think before 24? Before shows started having progressively developing plots. But everything about this kind of sucks. All the CG is dated extremely badly, all the violence is held back, it's got way too much of that mouthbreather-girl look that was for some reason super attractive for a while, and a lot of the actors they use have the charisma of a potato. And just the general bad parts of Terminator -- like instead of killing their target they throw them around a bit, and also terminators are weirdly bad shots. But it would be hard to make a Terminator movie starting out in modern times. Having to use a phonebook or break into school records to even find John Connor is a big part of the hunt and all that is made pretty redundant by today's technology and social media. credburn has a new favorite as of 21:09 on Mar 26, 2023 |
# ? Mar 26, 2023 21:05 |
|
credburn posted:Intrigued by what I've read in this thread, I've been watching TSCC and wow, this feels like it would be a great show if it had come out maybe fifteen years later. This came out I think before 24? Before shows started having progressively developing plots. But everything about this kind of sucks. All the CG is dated extremely badly, all the violence is held back, it's got way too much of that mouthbreather-girl look that was for some reason super attractive for a while, and a lot of the actors they use have the charisma of a potato. And just the general bad parts of Terminator -- like instead of killing their target they throw them around a bit, and also terminators are weirdly bad shots. TSCC was 2008 24 started in 2001
|
# ? Mar 26, 2023 21:11 |
|
Len posted:TSCC was 2008 I honestly thought TSCC was released right alongside Terminator 3 :O Which I thought came earlier :O
|
# ? Mar 26, 2023 21:21 |
|
credburn posted:Intrigued by what I've read in this thread, I've been watching TSCC and wow, this feels like it would be a great show if it had come out maybe fifteen years later. This came out I think before 24? Before shows started having progressively developing plots. But everything about this kind of sucks. All the CG is dated extremely badly, all the violence is held back, it's got way too much of that mouthbreather-girl look that was for some reason super attractive for a while, and a lot of the actors they use have the charisma of a potato. And just the general bad parts of Terminator -- like instead of killing their target they throw them around a bit, and also terminators are weirdly bad shots. I don't necessarily agree. I mean, wasn't Dark Fate like within the last 5 years? Don't people mostly consider that one the true 3rd film?
|
# ? Mar 26, 2023 23:58 |
|
credburn posted:I honestly thought TSCC was released right alongside Terminator 3 :O It was actually released two years before Terminator: Genisys, which was part of why it was cancelled - Fox didn't want two timelines running side by side and confusing viewers.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 01:24 |
|
Jedit posted:It was actually released two years before Terminator: Genisys, which was part of why it was cancelled - Fox didn't want two timelines running side by side and confusing viewers. I guess this is ironic? Don't you think?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 01:31 |
|
I wonder how many pitches they have to sit through of people proposing to 'fix' the continuity and explain everything like who the first John Connor's father was. Unless it was just Reese going back in time to stop something else and coincidentally banging Sarah Connor.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 06:19 |
|
Beachcomber posted:I wonder how many pitches they have to sit through of people proposing to 'fix' the continuity and explain everything like who the first John Connor's father was. It was either Stan Morsky (the guy who stood Sarah up) or a random hookup that she met in Tech Noir after he stood her up. Not hard to handwave. Anyway, the point of the first movie is that time is cyclic. The events of Terminator lead to both the birth of John and the creation of Skynet: there was a scene in the script where we see what Dyson hints at in the sequel about Cyberdyne's founders taking the arm and chip.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 08:54 |
|
I think I said, the point that a lot of people miss- hell, Dark Fate outright rubs it in your face- as long as the conditions to create Skynet or something like it exist, things will play out more or less the same way. The Terminators and everything else Skynet uses are shown to be explicitly refinements of what already exists in the past. Both Skynet and the Resistance are myopic about that, but to be fair they're just working with what they know, and the Resistance is specifically sending agents to counter Skynet.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 09:13 |
|
Also it's a time paradox to setup either an action movie or a slasher movie, it doesn't have to make sense.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 12:45 |
|
It could be a Dark situation too, where The creation of time travel creates a looping, branching, series of alternate timeline-universes that proceed generally within similar patterns to each other, but wildly differently than the mainline timeline would've gone. -- major spoiler for the overall arc and last season of Dark. edit: Apparently the title isn't in all caps. Yngwie Mangosteen has a new favorite as of 00:09 on Mar 28, 2023 |
# ? Mar 27, 2023 20:22 |
|
What does DARK stand for?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 20:36 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 14:30 |
|
credburn posted:What does DARK stand for? Nothing - it's not an acronym, it's the title of a grim reboot of The Maiden Of Orleans
|
# ? Mar 27, 2023 20:44 |