Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
selec
Sep 6, 2003

Manchin is also opposed to any changes around Feinstein:

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1648371862643130378?s=46&t=6Q05E9cp_ar9ql-5Jy81HQ

I think we may need to update that “Manchin Cycle” infographic people used to post. She needs to retire, but I suspect there may be some staffers who oppose that, and who else has access to her? Maybe we need to promise the staffers lifetime sinecures or something to get things rolling.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

selec posted:

She needs to retire, but I suspect there may be some staffers who oppose that, and who else has access to her? Maybe we need to promise the staffers lifetime sinecures or something to get things rolling.

Whoa there, buddy. Sounds like you're dangerously close to doing politics here. As the adults in the room, the Democrats are only allowed to tweet and send meekly worded emails. The public will punish them if they are indecorous, you see. Best to just not appoint any more judges for the next two years.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

PostNouveau posted:

Whoa there, buddy. Sounds like you're dangerously close to doing politics here. As the adults in the room, the Democrats are only allowed to tweet and send meekly worded emails. The public will punish them if they are indecorous, you see. Best to just not appoint any more judges for the next two years.

There have been a few Democrats who said she should resign. But, Manchin and basically every female Senator said she shouldn't and pointed out that male Senators have been out for years and nobody called for them to resign. Schumer says he spoke to her and she will be "returning soon" and isn't going to comment on whether she should resign, so he is basically on that side as well.

Which is technically true and there is definitely some element of sexism in that nobody ever said that about male Senators, but they also should have resigned and "everybody else does it" isn't really a great reason to continue the trend.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

There have been a few Democrats who said she should resign. But, Manchin and basically every female Senator said she shouldn't and pointed out that male Senators have been out for years and nobody called for them to resign. Schumer says he spoke to her and she will be "returning soon" and isn't going to comment on whether she should resign, so he is basically on that side as well.

Which is technically true and there is definitely some element of sexism in that nobody ever said that about male Senators, but they also should have resigned and "everybody else does it" isn't really a great reason to continue the trend.

There seems to be a disconnect where the Senate Dems (a lot of whom are like 80 themselves, especially the leadership) are looking at this like it's just a temporary health thing that she'll be back from, when the reality seems to be that she's precipitously declined and even if they drag her back, she shouldn't be there. Based on all the reports, she should be getting a lot of treatment and not working. It's like elder abuse at this point.

This of course goes for any of the other ancient liches that run our country no matter their gender.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

PostNouveau posted:

There seems to be a disconnect where the Senate Dems (a lot of whom are like 80 themselves, especially the leadership) are looking at this like it's just a temporary health thing that she'll be back from, when the reality seems to be that she's precipitously declined and even if they drag her back, she shouldn't be there. Based on all the reports, she should be getting a lot of treatment and not working. It's like elder abuse at this point.

This of course goes for any of the other ancient liches that run our country no matter their gender.

Agreed. The reporting coming out in 2018 when some Democrats were quietly trying to convince her to retire and not run for re-election basically said that she considered being forced out to basically be "losing" and tarnishing her legacy, so she was going to ride out her last term for the entire 6 years because she didn't want to "lose" by retiring after people told her too.

It's very Senate-brained thinking. Although, it is not just the Senate. There are lots of people in prominent positions in politics, culture, and business who feel like heeding calls to retire or resign is basically admitting defeat and tarnishing their reputation regardless of circumstance. It is just even more frustrating when that person is holding up important public good by doing so in a way that the CEO of a company or head of a TV series refusing to leave is not.

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010
I think there's the general understanding that Feinstein is declining, she's no longer judiciary chair and is expected to retire at the end of the term. The issue is no one wants to set a precedent of forcing her out given many of them are also pushing retirement age. If they have their own health issues they'd like to be able to return to the Senate without being forced to resign.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Unclear why, but Christie seems to want to give his Presidential campaign another shot.

I can't really see this ending in any way other than disaster for him again. If Trump somehow flames out, then DeSantis is there to pick up the remains. Christie ran basically at the height of his popularity last time and got nowhere. I don't see him getting much more popular after being out of office for 8 years and trying the same thing again.

Although, I guess I have to give him credit for being the one Republican who seemed prepared for the obvious follow-up question on abortion. His answer seems like it will piss off the more extreme pro-lifers, though.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1648385852450414593

quote:

Washington CNN — Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is talking to potential donors, thought leaders, staffers, and others to discuss a possible campaign for president in 2024, sources close to Christie told CNN.

Christie is in the process of making a decision and has indicated he will make one in the coming weeks.

The New Jersey Republican sees himself as the only serious GOP candidate willing to take on former President Donald. He also sees himself as a candidate who could appeal to enough independents to beat President Joe Biden in the general election, should Biden announce a reelection bid.

Christie is one of several high-profile figures mulling a bid for the Republican ticket. To this point, only Trump, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson and entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy have officially announced their candidacy as others, like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, continue to lay the groundwork for a run.

While Christie called a potential presidential run a “huge risk” at an event hosted by Semafor in Washington on Tuesday, he said “If it turns out that I’m on a debate stage in August of this year and Donald Trump decides to be on it, you can be sure that we’ll have some exchanges that I hope will be illuminating to the public about both him and me.”

He also defended his previous support for the former president, saying the “line was crossed” during the 2020 election when Trump said it was stolen. “There’s a difference between spinning politically to try to put yourself in a better position before the vote happens and after the vote happens to say it was ‘rigged,’” Christie said.

“No one in this country asked him to be their retribution,” Christie added of Trump. “I think a President should be our inspiration, not our retribution.”

On Trump’s indictment and abortion
Asked about Trump’s recent indictment at the Semafor event, Christie said Tuesday that “bullsh*t hypocrisy” exists on both sides of the aisle.

“With the crime that’s happening in Manhattan, the idea that he would divert any resources from taking violent criminals off the street and making streets safer to go after a seven-year-old hush money payment to a porn star – how that improves the quality of life for the people in Manhattan, I don’t know,” Christie said of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

At the same time, Christie said the underlying actions alleged in the indictment are unworthy of a President.

“It’s pretty obvious, that’s not the character of somebody we want sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office,” Christie said. “He shouldn’t be being prosecuted in a Manhattan courtroom for it. He should be prosecuted in the court of public opinion for it, and he should be held to account that way for it.”

“We don’t need to criminalize it to condemn it,” Christie said.

Turning to abortion rights, Christie said that the issue “is not in the Constitution” and should be left to the states. “I’m pro-life. I have always believed in exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother,” Christie said. “The federal government should not be involved in this question. This should be determined by the 50 states.”

“What happens is you’re going to have different laws in different states. That happens every day on very important issues,” Christie said. “I think it’s inconsistent for us as a party to say we’re against federal control unless federal control works to our advantage.”

kronix
Jul 1, 2004

Seph posted:

Please read the article you linked because it does not say what you think it says. On page 3:

There is a ton of misinformation about EVs due to the strong vested interests against electrification. I’m not saying you are purposefully spreading misinformation but this is a common anti-EV talking point that actually has nothing to do with EVs inherently and has everything to do with Tesla being a lovely manufacturer.

This isn't me purposely spreading misinformation, of course a lot of issues unrelated to the drivetrain because most EVs are packed with tech. My only point is that yes, in theory EVs should be more reliable. We have a nearly century of data for diesel trucks and we don't have data for battery electric trucks in the wild. EV motors don't last forever and will likely need to be replaced many times over the life of a truck, same with batteries. You can't do total cost of ownership without that data.


Fornax Disaster posted:

I’d like to add to this by pointing out that truck driving isn’t just a career for the uneducated. It also acts as a lifeboat for people who have been pushed out of other fields by globalization and technological change. I know a few truck drivers who started in middle age. One lost the family farm in a divorce, another had a big tomato greenhouse business that couldn’t compete with cheaper imports, another is a former graphic designer. Going after trucking is attacking these people in their last refuge.

Truckers have previous negative experience with government mandated technology. DEF systems (urea) have been very unreliable, to the point where it created a market for rebuilt older trucks.

I didn't mean it's only for the uneducated, just that you don't need any special education to become a truck driver. It's a tough career but it's a job that you can actually support a family with maybe and save for retirement while not completely destroying your body. One of my dad's drivers was a refugee from central America who barely spoke english when he arrived went on to become an owner operator and that truck helped put his kid through college and eventually medical school.

Going after truck drivers is literally the opposite of what the Democratic party should be doing.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

In a surprise to nobody, McConnell says they will oppose any effort to replace Feinstein on the Judiciary Committee because Democrats just want to do so to "ram through their radical judges."

Is there anything he can do about that?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Eric Cantonese posted:

Is there anything he can do about that?

Yes. They need unanimous consent on the committee or to break a filibuster in the overall Senate to remove her and then appoint someone else.

Kalli
Jun 2, 2001




Seems like you could cut out a lot of the middlemen here if you just allowed corporations to legally adopt children.

Absolutely buckwild that the response from the reporting that unaccompanied minors / other kids shoved into the foster care system just keep mysteriously showing up working factory gigs is to just.... make kids working those jobs legal.

Old Surly
Dec 8, 2004

and all of your troubles are solved and gone

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Unclear why, but Christie seems to want to give his Presidential campaign another shot.

I can't really see this ending in any way other than disaster for him again. If Trump somehow flames out, then DeSantis is there to pick up the remains. Christie ran basically at the height of his popularity last time and got nowhere. I don't see him getting much more popular after being out of office for 8 years and trying the same thing again.

Money, he can campaign and has his "friends" can deposit millions into accounts he will control. Or we has a book planned, either way its always money.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Agreed. The reporting coming out in 2018 when some Democrats were quietly trying to convince her to retire and not run for re-election basically said that she considered being forced out to basically be "losing" and tarnishing her legacy, so she was going to ride out her last term for the entire 6 years because she didn't want to "lose" by retiring after people told her too.

It's very Senate-brained thinking. Although, it is not just the Senate. There are lots of people in prominent positions in politics, culture, and business who feel like heeding calls to retire or resign is basically admitting defeat and tarnishing their reputation regardless of circumstance. It is just even more frustrating when that person is holding up important public good by doing so in a way that the CEO of a company or head of a TV series refusing to leave is not.

She also had the trail blazed for her by Robert Byrd and Strom Thurmond, who died in office at 92 and 100. Byrd at least had a good reason to cling onto the seat because the Democrats weren't going to win it once he retired.

Twincityhacker
Feb 18, 2011

kronix posted:

This isn't me purposely spreading misinformation, of course a lot of issues unrelated to the drivetrain because most EVs are packed with tech. My only point is that yes, in theory EVs should be more reliable. We have a nearly century of data for diesel trucks and we don't have data for battery electric trucks in the wild. EV motors don't last forever and will likely need to be replaced many times over the life of a truck, same with batteries. You can't do total cost of ownership without that data.

I didn't mean it's only for the uneducated, just that you don't need any special education to become a truck driver. It's a tough career but it's a job that you can actually support a family with maybe and save for retirement while not completely destroying your body. One of my dad's drivers was a refugee from central America who barely spoke english when he arrived went on to become an owner operator and that truck helped put his kid through college and eventually medical school.

Going after truck drivers is literally the opposite of what the Democratic party should be doing.

It would be really nice if there wasn't a blue collar job that *didn't* destroy your body. Just standing on concrete all day fucks up your knees even with rubber mats. Worst so far I've gotten is some fly away strands of my hair stuck in a running glue roller, though the standing all day on concrete is more of a culmitive thing.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

kronix posted:

This isn't me purposely spreading misinformation, of course a lot of issues unrelated to the drivetrain because most EVs are packed with tech. My only point is that yes, in theory EVs should be more reliable. We have a nearly century of data for diesel trucks and we don't have data for battery electric trucks in the wild. EV motors don't last forever and will likely need to be replaced many times over the life of a truck, same with batteries. You can't do total cost of ownership without that data.

I didn't mean it's only for the uneducated, just that you don't need any special education to become a truck driver. It's a tough career but it's a job that you can actually support a family with maybe and save for retirement while not completely destroying your body. One of my dad's drivers was a refugee from central America who barely spoke english when he arrived went on to become an owner operator and that truck helped put his kid through college and eventually medical school.

Going after truck drivers is literally the opposite of what the Democratic party should be doing.

Full size EVs haven't been practical until recently, but we've had electric forklifts for literally a hundred years, undergoing intense daily workload. Electric buses and electric locomotives have a long history. Hybrid vehicles have been around for decades. Electric motors and drive trains are not some newfangled device with teething issues. Their problems are predictable and the engineering challenges are known.

And noone is 'going after truck drivers.'

TheDeadlyShoe fucked around with this message at 20:08 on Apr 18, 2023

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
HHS is partnering with vaccine manufacturers and allocating additional money to keep covid vaccines free for uninsured Americans.

Pfizer and Moderna have agreed to offer the vaccines at no cost for the uninsured and the federal government will stop buying vaccines in bulk, but continue to purchase them for state, local, and tribal governments.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1648394728189165568

quote:

Biden Administration Will Fund Program to Keep Covid Vaccines Free for the Uninsured

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration plans to spend more than $1 billion on a new program to offer free coronavirus shots to uninsured Americans later this year after the vaccines move to the commercial market, administration officials said.

The program for the uninsured, which will be modeled partly on an existing childhood vaccination program, will include a first-of-its-kind partnership with pharmacy chains that will cover the administrative costs of giving the doses to patients. Pfizer and Moderna have pledged to offer the shots at no cost to those who lack insurance.

The administration’s move partly resolves a critical loophole in the nation’s coronavirus strategy ahead of a new vaccination campaign with reformulated shots that is likely to begin as soon as late summer. Federal officials have said that they no longer plan to mass-purchase doses for Americans as they have in prior coronavirus vaccination campaigns, allowing the vaccines to be sold commercially and ceding power to manufacturers to set their own prices.

In June, federal regulators are expected to choose a new formulation of the shots that will target versions of the virus they expect to circulate broadly later in the year. Those shots would most likely roll out around September, similar to the timing of last year’s booster campaign.

The administration is also planning to buy discounted doses for community health clinics and federal and state vaccination programs that traditionally deliver vaccines to the uninsured. The program will be called the Bridge Access Program for Covid-19 Vaccines and Treatment, according to an administration fact sheet obtained by The New York Times.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
The Judge in the Fox v. Dominion trial has appointed a special master to review all of Fox's electronic communications after it was suspected that they were withholding evidence from the opposing attorneys.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1648402294965256196

DynamicSloth
Jul 30, 2006

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Unclear why, but Christie seems to want to give his Presidential campaign another shot.

It makes sense on paper to run an attack dog against Trump, there are billionaires who would happily bankroll such a campaign even if it had no prospect of winning if it meant they could seize the party from Trump.

The only problem is this was the exact same rationale as the Christie '16 campaign, and while he landed some clean hits on little Marco he was totally useless against Trump and their is zero reason to believe that has changed.

the_steve
Nov 9, 2005

We're always hiring!

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Unclear why, but Christie seems to want to give his Presidential campaign another shot.

I can't really see this ending in any way other than disaster for him again. If Trump somehow flames out, then DeSantis is there to pick up the remains. Christie ran basically at the height of his popularity last time and got nowhere. I don't see him getting much more popular after being out of office for 8 years and trying the same thing again.

Although, I guess I have to give him credit for being the one Republican who seemed prepared for the obvious follow-up question on abortion. His answer seems like it will piss off the more extreme pro-lifers, though.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1648385852450414593

He's probably just doing it for the publicity bump. Get a piece of the news cycle for a few weeks while he gives them the ol' Will I Won't I? before making an announcement that after lots of prayer and talking it over with his family, now just isn't the time for him to make a presidential bid.

Meatball
Mar 2, 2003

That's a Spicy Meatball

Pillbug

the_steve posted:

He's probably just doing it for the publicity bump. Get a piece of the news cycle for a few weeks while he gives them the ol' Will I Won't I? before making an announcement that after lots of prayer and talking it over with his family, now just isn't the time for him to make a presidential bid.

Unless he has a book coming, then he'll use campaign donations to buy up a shitload of copies.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Kind of interesting to see what policies Trump is focusing on in 2024. He has just released his fourth policy platform for his 2024 campaign.

So far, he has released:

- An immigration plan.
- A plan for dealing with trans kids in school and sports.
- A plan for dealing with CRT and racial indoctrination in public schools.
- A plan for ending homelessness.

Nothing on taxes, the economy, healthcare, or foreign policy yet. He has made some public comments about Ukraine, but has not put forth an actual official foreign policy platform.

The other interesting thing is that all of those areas (except immigration) are areas where the federal government doesn't have a ton of power to actually implement those policies.

Trump's plan is to make homelessness illegal and give the homeless a choice of jail, a mental institution, or rehab. It also includes new programs to help homeless veterans.

quote:

Trump vows to clean up homeless problem with tents, rehab, jail

Former President Trump has a plan to fix the homeless problem, saying he will work with states to outlaw urban camping and give street people the choice between going to rehab in tent cities or face jail time.

Mr. Trump said his chief priority is to clean up the streets for “law-abiding citizens who make our society function,” while vowing to do more to help homeless veterans.

“We want to take care of them, but they have to be off our streets,” Mr. Trump said in a video message released Tuesday. “There is nothing compassionate about letting these individuals live in filth and squalor rather than getting them the help they need. We need professionals to help them.”

Mr. Trump said he plans to relocate the homeless to tent cities where they can get the help they need from health care workers to get them back on their feet or into mental institutions.

He also said he plans to put a greater focus on veterans living on the street.

“For those who are just temporarily down on their luck, we will work to help them quickly reintegrate into a normal life,” he said. “For those who have addictions, substance abuse and common mental health problems, we will get them into treatment.”

He added, “And for those who are severely mentally ill and deeply disturbed, we will bring them back to mental institutions, where they belong, with the goal of reintegrating them back into society once they are well enough to manage.”

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/apr/18/donald-trump-vows-clean-homeless-problem-tents-reh/

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Unclear why, but Christie seems to want to give his Presidential campaign another shot.

I can't really see this ending in any way other than disaster for him again. If Trump somehow flames out, then DeSantis is there to pick up the remains. Christie ran basically at the height of his popularity last time and got nowhere. I don't see him getting much more popular after being out of office for 8 years and trying the same thing again.

Although, I guess I have to give him credit for being the one Republican who seemed prepared for the obvious follow-up question on abortion. His answer seems like it will piss off the more extreme pro-lifers, though.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1648385852450414593

To be fair, if something happens to Donny then the current field is all but certain to be massacred by Christie. Of all the people to jump in, he's the only one with some sort of actual shot at this thing, while also having by far the highest potential monetary grift for a loser. Everyone else is a no shot "they were in the race?" candidate in absolutely any cycle, even if there's no looming Trump. DeSantis is his own category, where he could possibly successfully run a race where there are no other bullies running.

PostNouveau posted:

She also had the trail blazed for her by Robert Byrd and Strom Thurmond, who died in office at 92 and 100. Byrd at least had a good reason to cling onto the seat because the Democrats weren't going to win it once he retired.

Even aside from the depressingly large wheeled onto the floor in a confused state caucus, the Senate has a tradition of "nobly" rising from your deathbed for one last vote. Your Kennedy and McCain coming in hot from brain cancer types.

So Feinstein is in a weird place where we seem to finally be recognizing that maybe an ailing gerontocracy might be a bad idea, but is weird that we're finally having this discussion when it's a lady.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

- A plan for dealing with CRT and racial indoctrination in public schools.

Am I the only person who always has to take a minute to realize we're talking racism and not brain injury when they see the abbreviation CRT?

Gyges fucked around with this message at 20:31 on Apr 18, 2023

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Unclear why, but Christie seems to want to give his Presidential campaign another shot.

I can't really see this ending in any way other than disaster for him again. If Trump somehow flames out, then DeSantis is there to pick up the remains. Christie ran basically at the height of his popularity last time and got nowhere. I don't see him getting much more popular after being out of office for 8 years and trying the same thing again.

Although, I guess I have to give him credit for being the one Republican who seemed prepared for the obvious follow-up question on abortion. His answer seems like it will piss off the more extreme pro-lifers, though.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1648385852450414593

I honestly would love to see this, if he remembers how bad Trump made him look and decides to go full New Jersey on him.

e: say what you will about Chris Christie but he knows how to wear a suit and stand normally

Velocity Raptor
Jul 27, 2007

I MADE A PROMISE
I'LL DO ANYTHING

Gyges posted:

Am I the only person who always has to take a minute to realize we're talking racism and not brain injury when they see the abbreviation CRT?

Not just you. Occasionally my mind thinks "TV" and not "racism" when I see "CRT".

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Which is technically true and there is definitely some element of sexism in that nobody ever said that about male Senators, but they also should have resigned and "everybody else does it" isn't really a great reason to continue the trend.

Uh... nobody has ever said what about male senators, exactly? Because the calls for male senators to resign as soon as it might actually hurt the party for them to stay seem to be pretty much immediate, from what I recall of when situations have come up in the past?

Traditionally the quickest way to get someone out of the Senate while letting them save face is to offer them a job in the administration - I wonder if Biden has considered that option? Seems worth sacrificing a pretty importing position if it means getting confirmations through.

GlyphGryph fucked around with this message at 20:43 on Apr 18, 2023

gurragadon
Jul 28, 2006

Professor Beetus posted:

I honestly would love to see this, if he remembers how bad Trump made him look and decides to go full New Jersey on him.

e: say what you will about Chris Christie but he knows how to wear a suit and stand normally

I think he's running for vice president again. No way Trump goes with Pence again, he's a liability now plus a traitor to Trump. Wasn't Christie one of Trumps choices in 2016 but got talked out of it?

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

gurragadon posted:

I think he's running for vice president again. No way Trump goes with Pence again, he's a liability now plus a traitor to Trump. Wasn't Christie one of Trumps choices in 2016 but got talked out of it?

Yeah I think Big T's handlers actually blocked a meeting with Christie by keeping Trump's plane on the tarmac or something.

They're both disgusting jabronis from the tri-state area, it could work

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

GlyphGryph posted:

Uh... nobody has ever said what about male senators, exactly? Because the calls for male senators to resign as soon as it might actually hurt the party for them to stay seem to be pretty much immediate, from what I recall of when situations have come up in the past?

The most famous recent examples were Ted Kennedy, John McCain, Robert Byrd, Thad Cochran, and Strom Thurmond.

I don't think any of them had their party publicly calling for their resignation and most of them died in office.

Tayter Swift
Nov 18, 2002

Pillbug

Meatball posted:

Unless he has a book coming, then he'll use campaign donations to buy up a shitload of copies.

Who on God's Green Earth is going to donate to Christie for President lmao

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Fox has settled with Dominion.

Settlement is undisclosed right now.

Silly Burrito
Nov 27, 2007

SET A COURSE FOR
THE FLAVOR QUADRANT

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Fox has settled with Dominion.

Settlement is undisclosed right now.

That is some grade A BS. I get why Fox would settle but drat I wanted them to lose this case.

Youremother
Dec 26, 2011

MORT

I wonder what they were afraid of the special master discovering that caused them to fold so hard.

Cpt. Mahatma Gandhi
Mar 26, 2005

I hope Dominion is putting Fox through the wringer, but drat if this news isn't disappointing.

Old Surly
Dec 8, 2004

and all of your troubles are solved and gone
That sucks, Fox can throw a 1.6 billion at this problem and right wing ghouls will happily restock their coffers.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
lol wonder how much Dominion took them for.

It's not enough.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

I hope Fox has legally agreed that Tucker Carlson should have to wear a novelty shirt at all times saying "I AM A BIG LIAR AND I SMELL LIKE FARTS".


at the very least the next election will be funny with fox hosts saying things like "This election is very dubious! But not because of the voting machines, which are incredibly reliable and trustworthy." while glancing just offscreen at the lawyer

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The most famous recent examples were Ted Kennedy, John McCain, Robert Byrd, Thad Cochran, and Strom Thurmond.

I don't think any of them had their party publicly calling for their resignation and most of them died in office.

Yeah, up until now the only way to actually get pressure to resign was for being caught doing major crimes, being caught being gay, or the brief window that caught Frankin for harassment. Simple cognitive decline was almost a badge of honor in the Senate.

Zamujasa
Oct 27, 2010



Bread Liar
One of those times you really wish settlement wasn't an option just to find out the truth.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

at the very least the next election will be funny with fox hosts saying things like "This election is very dubious! But not because of the voting machines, which are incredibly reliable and trustworthy." while glancing just offscreen at the lawyer

Yeah, that's my main takeaway from this. If Trump is the candidate in 2024 and loses, does he run the same playbook? Does the RWM play along this time? And does Dominion sue again, and go to court this time?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BetterToRuleInHell
Jul 2, 2007

Touch my mask top
Get the chop chop
Dominion attorneys saying it was a $785 million settlement.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply