Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: weg, Toxic Mental)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Vengarr
Jun 17, 2010

Smashed before noon

Funky See Funky Do posted:

The hesitancy of NATO to properly arm Ukraine is so frustrating and terrifying.

I feel like the frustration needs no explanation but the terror comes from the fact that Russia's threats are being taken seriously and are incredibly effective at deterring NATO.

31 Abrams? They could send hundreds, no problem.

They would also have to send the ocean of jet fuel, mountain of spare parts and pallets of ammunition hundreds of Abrams would require through the same extremely stressed railroads currently supplying all of Ukraines’ military needs.

If the Black Sea was available for shipping you would see the floodgates open. Right now they have to be much more selective.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BrassRoots
Jan 9, 2012

You can play a shoestring if you're sincere - John Coltrane
Plus, other countries donated their trash on the backs of promises from US to give them abrams in return right?

Computer viking
May 30, 2011
Now with less breakage.

Vengarr posted:

They would also have to send the ocean of jet fuel, mountain of spare parts and pallets of ammunition hundreds of Abrams would require through the same extremely stressed railroads currently supplying all of Ukraines’ military needs.

If the Black Sea was available for shipping you would see the floodgates open. Right now they have to be much more selective.

Do unarmed freighters carrying land warfare equipment count as warships for the purpose of the treaty? I would be worried about sending them unescorted, but my first impression is that they would be allowed through.

Play
Apr 25, 2006

Strong stroll for a mangy stray

pro starcraft loser posted:

That's not the same as blowing .33 is it??

It's exactly the same, yes. They're both percentages of blood content

Dwesa posted:

Milligrams of ethanol per liter of exhaled air is unit of breath alcohol concentration used in most of Europe.

0.337 mg/l is drunk, but not very drunk. It's about 2-3 0.5l beers or 2 shots

PS: different units

Yeah it's around the legal driving limit in the US. So drunk, but not very drunk on the scale of the average Russian soldier and also not very drunk for flipping over an air defense system

Vengarr
Jun 17, 2010

Smashed before noon

Computer viking posted:

Do unarmed freighters carrying land warfare equipment count as warships for the purpose of the treaty? I would be worried about sending them unescorted, but my first impression is that they would be allowed through.

They are allowed. The problem is that Russia has effectively blockaded all Ukrainian Black Sea ports from foreign shipping, except those involved in the grain deal. Until their subs, mines and anti-ship missiles are removed, it will stay closed.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

Funky See Funky Do posted:

The hesitancy of NATO to properly arm Ukraine is so frustrating and terrifying.

I feel like the frustration needs no explanation but the terror comes from the fact that Russia's threats are being taken seriously and are incredibly effective at deterring NATO.

31 Abrams? They could send hundreds, no problem.

While the US is giving a lot, they're deliberately hanging back and trying to push Europe to the fore - both because Ukraine is in Europe and to give them a chance to shine without being overshadowed by the US.

The problem is that Europe as a group has very little to give because they haven't been spending properly on defense for decades, simultaneously relying on the US and then bitching about US dominance.

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD

Vengarr posted:

They would also have to send the ocean of jet fuel, mountain of spare parts and pallets of ammunition hundreds of Abrams would require through the same extremely stressed railroads currently supplying all of Ukraines’ military needs.

If the Black Sea was available for shipping you would see the floodgates open. Right now they have to be much more selective.

These are easily solvable logistical problems. The US/NATO could arm Ukraine in such a way that would 100% win the war in a matter of months, weeks even. The reason they don't is political/ they're deterred by Russia's nuclear threats.

Butterfly Valley
Apr 19, 2007

I am a spectacularly bad poster and everyone in the Schadenfreude thread hates my guts.

Deteriorata posted:

spending properly on defense for decades

Let's not get carried away and insinuate that the amount of money the US spends on the MIC is 'proper' - it's loving insane. Also I don't know that any European states do particularly bitch about US dominance? No-ones trying to compete with the US there. The norm should not be that every country has hundreds of spare unwanted tanks just sitting around in storage.

Allowing themselves to become reliant upon imported energy, turning a blind eye to numerous FSB assassinations and fuckery across the continent, and letting oligarchs launder their cash in property and donations across the political elite, all in the naive hope that Russia would generally behave in a way mostly tolerable, yes, absolutely culpable.

Butterfly Valley fucked around with this message at 16:08 on Apr 21, 2023

Karma Comedian
Feb 2, 2012

This is a good thread on Bakhmut. Warning, this thread does rt one combat video which contains footage from that recent bunker fight.

https://twitter.com/emilkastehelmi/status/1649415260145696768?t=TcFL8Rqnifw2gsmcwEeGlg&s=19

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

As a famous Russian said bakhmut will be the Stalingrad of our time.


WOOPSIES

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
A couple pages off from WW1 chat but if anyone is interested The Great War is a pretty excellent channel that charts the war week by week. Obviously it's not as in-depth given the scope it has to cover every week but it's a good way to set yourself in the mindset of how many insane things were happening almost daily for four years straight.

The_Franz
Aug 8, 2003

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

As a famous Russian said bakhmut will be the Stalingrad of our time.


WOOPSIES

Except instead of the defenders winning while taking about 1.5 losses for each attacking soldier, the attackers are taking 5+ losses for each defender while making minimal, grinding gains that they probably won't be able to hold in the long run.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
Lol Russia Today and all the other propagandists are about to have a field day since elron munks removed all the labels from state-run propaganda outlets of authoritarian governments

https://twitter.com/RobertMackey/status/1649262277353439233?s=20

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
Also, y'all remember my posts bitching about Russian toilet paper, specifically the Lambi brand sold there and how it's so lovely you can literally see wood fibers and splinters?

yeah i wasnt exaggerating, someone else had the unfortunate discovery too:







russia is so poo poo at literally everything that they managed to gently caress up toilet paper

Philonius
Jun 12, 2005

Butterfly Valley posted:

Let's not get carried away and insinuate that the amount of money the US spends on the MIC is 'proper' - it's loving insane. Also I don't know that any European states do particularly bitch about US dominance? No-ones trying to compete with the US there. The norm should not be that every country has hundreds of spare unwanted tanks just sitting around in storage.

Allowing themselves to become reliant upon imported energy, turning a blind eye to numerous FSB assassinations and fuckery across the continent, and letting oligarchs launder their cash in property and donations across the political elite, all in the naive hope that Russia would generally behave in a way mostly tolerable, yes, absolutely culpable.

US defense spending is excessive, but most European countries have severely deteriorated their militaries through years of budgetary neglect. In my country it got as low as 1.1% of GDP, which was not enough to maintain a credible defense capability. The army had to get rid of all of it's tanks and most of its artillery, the Navy was reduced to 20% of it's old size, and so on. I don't suggest we should have remained on cold war levels of spending like the US has, but some happy medium would have been prudent.

As an example, we currently operate 18 Leopards in a joint battalion with Germany. In 1990 we had 913. That's insane - all of the heavy equipment that all NATO countries combined have scraped together for Ukraine could have been easily supplied by the 1990 Dutch army, and plenty where that came from.

A Pack of Kobolds
Mar 23, 2007



HonorableTB posted:

Also, y'all remember my posts bitching about Russian toilet paper, specifically the Lambi brand sold there and how it's so lovely you can literally see wood fibers and splinters?

yeah i wasnt exaggerating, someone else had the unfortunate discovery too:







russia is so poo poo at literally everything that they managed to gently caress up toilet paper

Is the Piss Crone available to remove the anus splinters or is that someone else’s role?

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

A Pack of Kobolds posted:

Is the Piss Crone available to remove the anus splinters or is that someone else’s role?

If you go to the doctor complaining about anal splintering you get mobilized to the donbass to toughen you up

TEMPLE GRANDIN OS
Dec 10, 2003

...blyat
lol the thumbnails made me think them was blood spots

ninjoatse.cx
Apr 9, 2005

Fun Shoe

How could American have done this :911:

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/21/all-nato-members-have-agreed-ukraine-will-eventually-join-says-stoltenberg

lol lmao lollolol

NATO members have agreed that Ukraine will join once this poo poo is over. Germany is a bit cautious but says yes but not shocked about that and I'm sure Hungary will want some snuggles before it happens too.

Lmao putin you did real good. Really loving good. Now gently caress off

e - At the bottom of the articles is this

Germany, Poland and Ukraine said they would create a hub to repair Leopard tanks used in Ukraine, which could open at the end of May. Canada said it would provide a further C$39 million (£23.26 million) in lethal aid, including sniper rifles and radios.

Handy! Drive over the border, get fixed without fear and drive back in again. I was wondering what they were going to do in regards to repairs.

Tai fucked around with this message at 17:51 on Apr 21, 2023

TEMPLE GRANDIN OS
Dec 10, 2003

...blyat
now putin has to unleash his true power against the wect

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




Arc Hammer posted:

A couple pages off from WW1 chat but if anyone is interested The Great War is a pretty excellent channel that charts the war week by week. Obviously it's not as in-depth given the scope it has to cover every week but it's a good way to set yourself in the mindset of how many insane things were happening almost daily for four years straight.

That's an excellent channel. They do a week by week series, supplemented with 3-4 short videos expanding on specific topics or people. They're currently running possibly YouTube's best history series on WW2 week by week, with an accompanying War On Humanity series covering the civilian casualty toll and more detail on the Holocaust as it happens than is possibly good for you. I definitely appreciate the ironic tension between really good animated maps of the front lines on a divisional scale juxtaposed with death tolls from bombing raids and extermination camps. Gotta keep perspective, war sucks.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

Butterfly Valley posted:

Let's not get carried away and insinuate that the amount of money the US spends on the MIC is 'proper' - it's loving insane. Also I don't know that any European states do particularly bitch about US dominance? No-ones trying to compete with the US there. The norm should not be that every country has hundreds of spare unwanted tanks just sitting around in storage.

Allowing themselves to become reliant upon imported energy, turning a blind eye to numerous FSB assassinations and fuckery across the continent, and letting oligarchs launder their cash in property and donations across the political elite, all in the naive hope that Russia would generally behave in a way mostly tolerable, yes, absolutely culpable.

NATO specifies 2% of GDP on defense spending. Almost no one in Europe has hit that for a very long time.

Tai
Mar 8, 2006

Deteriorata posted:

NATO specifies 2% of GDP on defense spending. Almost no one in Europe has hit that for a very long time.

I think only Greece and UK were at or above 2%

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Tai posted:

I think only Greece and UK were at or above 2%

Finland is over 2%. Which shouldn't surprise anyone, considering.

Turrurrurrurrrrrrr
Dec 22, 2018

I hope this is "battle" enough for you, friend.

Philonius posted:

https://twitter.com/nexta_tv/status/1648734980632084520

I like where they're going with this, but I think the concept can go further. The kamikaze drones can be loaded with smaller kamikaze drones, which are also carrying drones. Basically drones all the way down. We'd only need to supply Ukraine with one of those, and they'd be set for the rest of the war.

Just food for thought: a chopper upgrade package for Gerald R. Ford. Dronefication of aircraft carriers.

Dr. Quarex
Apr 18, 2003

I'M A BIG DORK WHO POSTS TOO MUCH ABOUT CONVENTIONS LOOK AT THIS

TOVA TOVA TOVA
Went to investigate Musk's latest gift to fascists and found the whole site is down for me, so that is fun at least

bad_fmr
Nov 28, 2007

Deteriorata posted:

NATO specifies 2% of GDP on defense spending. Almost no one in Europe has hit that for a very long time.

It is also very important how that money is spent. It appears that apart from Finland and Poland most of Europes armies have turned into grift machines that just waste all the money they are given.

DiomedesGodshill
Feb 21, 2009

Tai posted:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/21/all-nato-members-have-agreed-ukraine-will-eventually-join-says-stoltenberg

lol lmao lollolol

NATO members have agreed that Ukraine will join once this poo poo is over. Germany is a bit cautious but says yes but not shocked about that and I'm sure Hungary will want some snuggles before it happens too.

Lmao putin you did real good. Really loving good. Now gently caress off

I mean it is pretty loving hilarious that one of the dumb reasons Putin and his cronies decided to invade Ukraine is/was "must prevent expansion of NATO!" Welp. Good job mate. Really nailed that one. At this point Japan should apply to NATO to add to the West's and now East's butt wigglin :tutbutt:

Solovyov's head would explode.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

bad_fmr posted:

It is also very important how that money is spent. It appears that apart from Finland and Poland most of Europes armies have turned into grift machines that just waste all the money they are given.

Well at least in Germany it's a behemoth that provides cushy jobs for lifers or at least pledging 12+ years.
I only got the numbers for 2020 but out of 197.000 military personnel total, 39.000 are officers and 95.000 NCOs.
All that brain power for 46.000 enlisted and a sad handful of volunteers.

jaete
Jun 21, 2009


Nap Ghost

Shaman Tank Spec posted:

Finland is over 2%. Which shouldn't surprise anyone, considering.

Yep, now it is. But that's very recent:

Philonius
Jun 12, 2005

sauer kraut posted:

Well at least in Germany it's a behemoth that provides cushy jobs for lifers or at least pledging 12+ years.
I only got the numbers for 2020 but out of 197.000 military personnel total, 39.000 are officers and 95.000 NCOs.
All that brain power for 46.000 enlisted and a sad handful of volunteers.

That seems to be a common thing. The Royal Navy now has more admirals than warships.

Dwesa
Jul 19, 2016

Maybe I'll go where I can see stars
thread on various other Wagner activities

their annual income from these activities (gold mines, precious stones) can be several billion dollars
https://twitter.com/Tatarigami_UA/status/1649471015183851525

DiomedesGodshill posted:

I mean it is pretty loving hilarious that one of the dumb reasons Putin and his cronies decided to invade Ukraine is/was "must prevent expansion of NATO!" Welp. Good job mate. Really nailed that one. At this point Japan should apply to NATO to add to the West's and now East's butt wigglin :tutbutt:

Solovyov's head would explode.
Article 9 of Japanese constitution would probably disallow it

Dwesa fucked around with this message at 20:40 on Apr 21, 2023

Vengarr
Jun 17, 2010

Smashed before noon

Funky See Funky Do posted:

These are easily solvable logistical problems. The US/NATO could arm Ukraine in such a way that would 100% win the war in a matter of months, weeks even. The reason they don't is political/ they're deterred by Russia's nuclear threats.

Ukraine uses different gauges than the west, meaning that all aid has to be shipped to the border, offloaded from western locomotives, put back on Ukrainian trains, and then taken across the border. This is a huge bottleneck and not something “easily solved.” There are plans to get Ukraine on the EU gauge but that’s a massive undertaking even without a war going on and enemies actively shooting at your trains/power infrastructure.

NATO supply trains have to stop and pass inspection at each national border, even for countries within NATO. The “simple fix” is to get 100% of NATO countries to agree to let them pass. That will probably happen by the end of the year—maybe—as long as there are no objections.

Logistics may sometimes be simple, but it is never easy.

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

jaete posted:

Yep, now it is. But that's very recent:



This change was caused by a changed accounting standard. During the cold war, Finland wanted to downplay military expenditures to keep the Soviets happy, and all possible expenses were moved to different departments. In 2021, as a part of harmonizing with NATO standards (which we have been doing for a decade now), we switched to reporting military expenditures by NATO rules, which caused that jump.

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
Dunno why NATO doesn't just turn to Canada and let them sort out everything now and forever more.

Vakal
May 11, 2008

Tai posted:

Dunno why NATO doesn't just turn to Canada and let them sort out everything now and forever more.

Because it turns out that "budgets balance themselves" may not be a good long term strategy.

DiomedesGodshill
Feb 21, 2009

Dwesa posted:


Article 9 of Japanese constitution would probably disallow it

Not with that attitude. Also I said apply, not join. Putin would hear the ole Metal Gear Solid alert noise if Japan just applied (with no intention to follow through).

Now I'm curious about Article 9 of the Japanese constitution.

ARTICLE 9. (1) Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.
(2) In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be sustained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.

:hmmyes:

I wonder if the definition of "threat" includes "just a bit of international trolling".

Well Russia already found the obvious workaround. Special Peace Operation.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/04/21/7398880/

quote:

A Russian court has arrested Kyrylo Budanov, Chief of Ukraine's Defence Intelligence, in absentia in the case of the "terrorist attack" on the Kerch (Crimean) Bridge and plans to put him on the international wanted list.

Source: Prague-based Russian news agency Nastoyashcheye Vremya (Current Time), citing a comment by the court's press service; Russian state-owned news outlet TASS

Details: The news agency reports that the Lefortovo Court of Moscow made the decision.

The FSB accuses Budanov of organising a terrorist community, illegal arms trafficking and terrorism (article 205.4.1, article 30.1, article 205.2(a), article 222.1, article 222.1.3 of the Criminal Code of Russia).

The Russian state-owned news agency TASS clarifies that Budanov was arrested in absentia in the case of the "terrorist attack on the Kerch (Crimean) Bridge". The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation will initiate putting Budanov on the international wanted list.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RDM
Apr 6, 2009

I LOVE FINLAND AND ESPECIALLY FINLAND'S MILITARY ALLIANCES, GOOGLE FINLAND WORLD WAR 2 FOR MORE INFORMATION SLAVA UKRANI

sauer kraut posted:

Well at least in Germany it's a behemoth that provides cushy jobs for lifers or at least pledging 12+ years.
I only got the numbers for 2020 but out of 197.000 military personnel total, 39.000 are officers and 95.000 NCOs.
All that brain power for 46.000 enlisted and a sad handful of volunteers.
The US army is probably 20% officers and 50% ncos give or take a little, if you're looking for a streamlined org chart I don't think any military is going to give it to you.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply