|
bows1 posted:I didn’t realize Scorsese did so much work with the Osage tribe to do it right. I love that. Great thread and has me even more hyped for the movie.
|
# ? May 21, 2023 15:22 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 12:38 |
|
This looks pretty charming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puVDIUk0kM8
|
# ? May 22, 2023 17:14 |
|
Jewmanji posted:This looks pretty charming: I've heard very very positive things about this from people I know that got to see it early.
|
# ? May 22, 2023 17:38 |
|
Mordiceius posted:I've heard very very positive things about this from people I know that got to see it early. This gives me strong Waiting for Guffman vibes and I'm in
|
# ? May 22, 2023 18:38 |
|
Strays looks dreadful.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 03:49 |
|
I looked up some short documentary youtubes about the Osage massacre and wow. I recommend not looking up anything about the story or the movie before watching the movie. Don’t even look up casting info. It’s full of shockers and now I wish I got the full concentration of shock on premiere weekend. Don’t be like me!
|
# ? May 23, 2023 05:29 |
|
Something kind of weird about temporarily preserving historical ignorance in order to better enjoy shocking tragedies as entertainment.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 05:40 |
|
It’s not that weird.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 05:59 |
|
RestingB1tchFace posted:Strays looks dreadful. I genuinely have no idea who the film is for. I assume 20 year old college guys? It just looks like the most dire poo poo. I haven't been too impressed with much of Universal's offerings this year. I didn't like Knock at the Cabin. Renfield was an incredible let down. I'm seeing Fast X tomorrow, but not expecting it to necessarily be amazing. Cocaine Bear isn't my style of film, so I haven't seen that one, but I hear that one is good.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:08 |
|
Bugblatter posted:Something kind of weird about temporarily preserving historical ignorance in order to better enjoy shocking tragedies as entertainment. I feel like allowing a film based on a tragedy to have maximum impact on viewing is showing some respect to the true story, especially since you’re gonna look up the true story afterwards anyways for accuracy Am I really out of line here?
|
# ? May 23, 2023 06:32 |
|
Steve Yun posted:I feel like allowing a film based on a tragedy to have maximum impact on viewing is showing some respect to the true story, especially since you’re gonna look up the true story afterwards anyways for accuracy Not out of a line. On second look my statement feels a lot more judgmental than it did in my head. I'm doing the same thing you suggested, but it does feel kind of odd that I'm treating a very real tragedy in the same manner as I would spoilers for a new Star Wars movie or what have you. There's just something that nags at my mind about it, can't put my finger on it.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 07:38 |
|
Mordiceius posted:I genuinely have no idea who the film is for. Super Mario Bros? M3GAN? Puss in Boots? Also Oppenheimer is good
|
# ? May 23, 2023 08:50 |
|
at 77 Wim Wenders still has it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTgWYojq-z8
|
# ? May 23, 2023 11:14 |
|
fez_machine posted:at 77 Wim Wenders still has it yup
|
# ? May 23, 2023 12:52 |
|
Bugblatter posted:Something kind of weird about temporarily preserving historical ignorance in order to better enjoy shocking tragedies as entertainment. spoiler brain is weird when one starts treating historical events as spoilers, yes
|
# ? May 23, 2023 13:32 |
|
Jewmanji posted:This looks pretty charming: I just kept thinking of Wet Hot American Summer but the entire movie is about the theater part.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 13:34 |
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:spoiler brain is weird when one starts treating historical events as spoilers, yes I totally read that post wrong. Idk why I thought they meant preserving historical accuracy for dumb movies. I think I confused this thread with another thread. Yes it’s weird lol
|
# ? May 23, 2023 13:37 |
|
What's weird about it? Unless I'm also reading it wrong, if you happen to not know the story then waiting until the movie to learn about it - thus letting the narrative discovery have maximum impact - is not weird.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 14:21 |
|
Yeah I dunno, I didn’t read 12 Years a Slave before I saw it. Seems fine to me? Edit: maybe people are getting hung on the word “spoilers” as trivializing a real trauma?
|
# ? May 23, 2023 14:22 |
|
Yeah I think it’s using the word spoilers for real events that makes it weird. Discussing it as if it were fiction you’re trying not to know too much about. Not looking deeper isn’t a huge issue.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 14:33 |
|
I'm reading the book in preparation since I want to engage with the movie without trying to figure out the mystery. A different way to think about it, equally valid.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 14:47 |
|
fez_machine posted:at 77 Wim Wenders still has it Oh man, so much good cinema coming up. This looks great.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 15:33 |
|
fez_machine posted:at 77 Wim Wenders still has it Gimme
|
# ? May 23, 2023 15:42 |
|
kiimo posted:Super Mario Bros? M3GAN? Puss in Boots? Super Mario Bros looks like the kind of insufferable film that would make me rather jump head first into a wood chipper. I'm not a horror guy so no M3GAN. Puss In Boots was last year. Oppenheimer isn't out yet but I'm kinda over Chris Nolan.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 18:25 |
|
Mordiceius posted:I'm not a horror guy so no M3GAN It's may as well not be. It's mostly a sci-fi movie where a robot kills a few people
|
# ? May 23, 2023 18:36 |
Mordiceius posted:Super Mario Bros looks like the kind of insufferable film that would make me rather jump head first into a wood chipper. I watched Mario with my 6 (almost 7) year old daughter the other day, and it's a perfectly fine kid's movie, but not much more than that. It also has, like, 20 times more references than an MCU movie, somehow? If you think about any part of it for more than 1 second, it falls apart. But it is 100% a kid's movie (and not the early Pixar kind), so you probably shouldn't? Except for all those references that only someone my age (turning 40 on Saturday) or older, who is watching it with their kid, would get. Basically, if you can stand to watch a Despicable Me movie, you'll probably have a decent time. If you can't, stay the gently caress away from it. thrawn527 fucked around with this message at 19:22 on May 23, 2023 |
|
# ? May 23, 2023 19:11 |
|
Happy birthday! Mine is next Wednesday and it's a great time of year to have a birthday isn't it
|
# ? May 23, 2023 19:17 |
kiimo posted:Happy birthday! Mine is next Wednesday and it's a great time of year to have a birthday isn't it Thanks! Happy birthday to you! It really is birthday season. I'm going to a birthday party for one of my kid's friends every weekend this month, and then her birthday is at the beginning of June. What the hell happened 9 months (and however many years) ago? thrawn527 fucked around with this message at 19:23 on May 23, 2023 |
|
# ? May 23, 2023 19:21 |
|
It should be worth noting that the film adaptation of Killers of the Flower Moon has a different narrative focus than the book. Multiple interviews with Scorsese and the cast/crew have said that they've done away with the whodunit structure of the book and the audience is made aware of everything right upfront.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 21:05 |
|
CelticPredator posted:Yeah I think it’s using the word spoilers for real events that makes it weird. Discussing it as if it were fiction you’re trying not to know too much about. I agree, I really really don't like the word spoiler being used here. That being said I am honestly going to watch the movie first before I do any reading about this since I really don't have time right now to do this event justice and also it really seems like Scorsese went about making this movie in the absolute right way and that the Osage peoples story is being told in a way that they want it to be told and is respectful to their history. Just overall really impressed by what I have read about the production so far. But if anyone has suggestions for decent books to read about this (aside from the one the movie is based on) I am open to all suggestions.
|
# ? May 23, 2023 22:47 |
|
Mordiceius posted:I genuinely have no idea who the film is for. Right. Seems like a waste of talent to make a gimmicky movie like this. It would probably be much better if they ditched the dog angle altogether and just made the movie about Will Forte's character.....because Forte is hilarious.
|
# ? May 24, 2023 03:36 |
|
CelticPredator posted:It’s not that weird. Perhaps, but it's kind of gross to trivialise a historic tragedy in such a way. "But my entertainments!" Come the gently caress on, mate.
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:14 |
|
Bro you’re super late
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:15 |
|
CelticPredator posted:Bro you’re super late I'm sorry. I didn't realise that responding to a post on the same page had an arbitrary time limit set entirely by you. I'm so so so so so so very sorrrrrrrrry. Also, don't defend or downplay people encouraging ignorance about historic tragedies because "spoilers!" That's also kind of hosed up in its own way. Or do we all no longer have your permission to highlight that issue either?
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:25 |
|
It’s not like people are going out of their way to avoid learning about something, they’re just holding off until after they see the movie. If the movie didn’t exist they probably would never have learned about it at all. I think we can all chill out about it, is what I’m saying
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:28 |
|
edogawa rando posted:I'm sorry. I didn't realise that responding to a post on the same page had an arbitrary time limit set entirely by you. I'm so so so so so so very sorrrrrrrrry. lol
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:55 |
|
Steve Yun posted:I looked up some short documentary youtubes about the Osage massacre and wow. I recommend not looking up anything about the story or the movie before watching the movie. Don’t even look up casting info. It’s full of shockers and now I wish I got the full concentration of shock on premiere weekend. Don’t be like me! This post is pretty weird. I get wanting to experience the story while maintaining some suspense but this comes off as treating it like a spectacle or something. Recommending people not even look up cast credits as if they're a big spoiler comes off pretty lovely. Colonel Whitey posted:It’s not like people are going out of their way to avoid learning about something, they’re just holding off until after they see the movie. If the movie didn’t exist they probably would never have learned about it at all. I think we can all chill out about it, is what I’m saying I do agree with this sentiment tho.
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:56 |
|
Yeah its the discussion that makes it weird. Not so much the act itself. I vaugely knew about watergate and all that but watching the white house plumbers is pretty drat wild, because drat random plane crash yo...but that actually happened. What are the odds.
|
# ? May 24, 2023 06:57 |
|
Colonel Whitey posted:It’s not like people are going out of their way to avoid learning about something, they’re just holding off until after they see the movie. If the movie didn’t exist they probably would never have learned about it at all. I think we can all chill out about it, is what I’m saying Because discouraging people from learning about a historic event, especially one of major significance to a particular group of people, because “spoilers” like the guy further up the page did trivialises what happened as if it’s some sort of spectacle for our entertainment. That said, I’m not sure what some dipshits get out of downplaying the shittiness of what Mr Spoilers said and trying to discourage discussion about it either, so there’s that.
|
# ? May 24, 2023 07:04 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 12:38 |
|
quote:Replace “spoilers” with “racism” and think about how you sound here.
|
# ? May 24, 2023 07:16 |