|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:I've decided not to name him (I redacted my earlier posts but can't redact where I've been quoted) because it might not be him at all. If you're worried about this in any serious way, ping an admin or a D&D mod and they can redact it for you.
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 14:00 |
|
|
fwiw, the guy who has now been redacted was dropped from a few expected appearances end of last week. Not going to name the guy, but operating on the assumption it’s him. Is the name journo mates have heard too
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:26
|
|
|
hope no one mentioned jeremy vine, hes apparently sending out lawyer tweets to everyone
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:26
|
|
|
HopperUK posted:If you're worried about this in any serious way, ping an admin or a D&D mod and they can redact it for you. Thanks - are you one? I'll find the posts and ping you!
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:28
|
|
|
Qwertycoatl posted:Movie Denethor is much worse than Book Denethor. In the books he's grumpy and suspicious of Gandalf and friends, but all his military decisions are strategically sound until the point where Faramir is lying there unconscious and dying, and he gives up (he doesn't know that Faramir could be cured if a True King showed up with the right kind of herbs) There's hints it may be nastier than that - he's trying to burn Faramir and himself in a place where old-school Numenorean royalty sacrificed their relatives to Morgoth in their own funeral rites. He's performing an in-universe Satanic ritual. Maybe he intends it as irony because he thinks Faramir's already dead, but drat, dude, that's a hell of a show to put on for Morgoth's bestest buddy and booster.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:29
|
|
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Thanks - are you one? I'll find the posts and ping you! Alas no! If you're worried you might have defamed someone in Video Games I can do it though:D Try emailing the admins or dropping a PM to someone listed at the top of the D&D forum. Or I can post in the admin request thread in the mod forum if you like!
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:29
|
|
|
Fantastic “wait for the BUT” tension in this clip https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy/status/1678112117533315072?s=46&t=m_nNbkNoHG4lLitcpyHReg
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:31
|
|
|
OzyMandrill posted:Just to re-rail a derial, many years ago (just before the millenium I think?) we got one of the really early digital set top boxes (OnDigital?), before it got killed off, and we had movies on demand (ish). I forget exactly how we paid, but you then got a message saying the movie would start in x minutes. They basically had a number of digital channels for each movie starting every 15 minutes or so, and when you paid your set got the code to let it tune in to the next one to start. It was a bit shonky but it kind of worked. That was Sky, they used to have 20+ movies channels and rotated 2-3 movies on them starting every 15 minutes. Used to piss me off as the news channels were after it (501 and onwards) and had to wade through the movie channels if you couldn't be arsed to type the channel number in.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:43
|
|
|
HopperUK posted:Alas no! If you're worried you might have defamed someone in Video Games I can do it though:D OK I'll have a look - I've only found the one quoting me and one other post naming the name.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 20:51
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:That was Sky, they used to have 20+ movies channels and rotated 2-3 movies on them starting every 15 minutes. OnDigital did it too, back in the very early days of digital OTA TV https://transdiffusion.org/2022/02/18/welcome-to-the-exciting-world-of-ondigital/
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 21:23
|
|
|
Yeah that’s no different to how Sky Box Office used to work way back in the 90s, there’d be a schedule of PPV content and you’d pay a fee to decode a specific feed for viewing. It’s not really “on demand”, your equipment would receive the broadcast whether you wanted it or not, you’d only be able to watch it properly if you paid for the decryption.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 21:31
|
|
|
smellmycheese posted:Fantastic “wait for the BUT” tension in this clip I'll always remember how passionate David Lammy was about the rights of parents to beat their children. Fuckin' windsock twat
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 21:54
|
|
|
The BBC’s coverage of this is surreal.  What exactly did the BBC do on 19 May after the complaint was made? What was the nature of that complaint? Was it clear at that point that potential criminality was involved? Did they interview the presenter? Did they consider contacting the police at the time? Did they consider suspending the presenter then? The BBC has confirmed it has now spoken to the family of the individual involved, but how many attempts were made to contact them after their original complaint? Did the BBC consider taking the presenter off air at the time, while they were looking into the allegations? Who could possibly answer these? Is it the BBC, the very organ publishing the questions?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 21:56
|
|
|
Whenever the BBC reports on itself it feels a lot like the ITYSL sketch
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MRCRUK/status/1678125614845313025
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:12
|
|
|
Its also a bit weird the whole police have now spoken to the bbc? er ok? Like if i did a bunch of weird sex stuff with maybe underaged people why would the police be talking to my employer and not... like, me?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:16
|
|
|
This is why there were no police available to do anything about this
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:17
|
|
|
james corden adding to his list of crimes
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:24
|
|
|
blunt posted:OnDigital did it too, back in the very early days of digital OTA TV Yeah, was definitely OnDigital. Half the price of Sky (tenner a month I think it was) and you got Sky One, Sky Movies, UK gold stuff.. for about 6 months then channels started dropping off, they changed to ITVdigital or something and sent us little holographic stickers to cover up the OnDigital brand on the box. Classy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:31
|
|
|
There's a photo doing the rounds on twitter that claim to be of a certain BBC presenter with his arse out.... I recognise one of the faces
fuctifino fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Jul 9, 2023 |
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:36
|
|
|
I have seen the photo. It’s too bizarre to be real surely
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:46
|
|
|
This has boiled some gammon piss lmao 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:54
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JamieAndrew99/status/1678160881421565953 https://twitter.com/EuropeanBob7/status/1678155383871864836
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 22:57
|
|
|
Just realised I don't actually know who Huw Edwards is because I was thinking of box-headed newsreader Hugh Scully. Probably for the best, by the sound of it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:13
|
|
|
Payndz posted:Just realised I don't actually know who Huw Edwards is because I was thinking of box-headed newsreader Hugh Scully. Probably for the best, by the sound of it. Think of it like this https://twitter.com/horsetoiiets/status/1678161522260946944?s=46&t=m_nNbkNoHG4lLitcpyHReg
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:24
|
|
|
Not as flabby as I expected. 8/10
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:24
|
|
|
this is also his sexy selfie face if anyone wanted to know that. Going to make an attempt to be reasonable and say it's hardly proof, and let ye among us who hath not taken a poo poo "nude" while mostly still in work clothes cast the first stone
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:27
|
|
|
lol what a plonker. Interesting point about how his voice is all over a bunch of poo poo the bbc probably wont fancy using again. Can they sue their employees for rendering a bunch of their media ruined?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:35
|
|
|
Wait is it actually him? Haven’t seen the pics but are they convincing?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:38
|
|
|
MeinPanzer posted:Wait is it actually him? Haven’t seen the pics but are they convincing? There is a low 5% that it could be someone else, as hes twisting his head around and looking down. But it does look like him. ID RECOGNIZE THAT ARSE ANYWHERE!
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:42
|
|
|
The arse pic could also be a completely innocent arse pic unconnected to this particular noncery
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:44
|
|
|
MeinPanzer posted:Wait is it actually him? Haven’t seen the pics but are they convincing? Nothing that couldn't be photoshopped but seems bizarre enough to be real. Like he's showing off his arse but it seems oddly nonsexual? I also don't know if this ties into the BBC Sexmonster stuff? Mostly I'm just confused, saddened, and a little sleepy
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:46
|
|
|
Continuing my unbroken streak of never taking nudey pics of myself, and so far no nudey pics of me have ended up online 
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:48
|
|
|
completely unsolicited declaration of not having internet nudes is deeply suspicious to my mind
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:50
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Continuing my unbroken streak of never taking nudey pics of myself, and so far no nudey pics of me have ended up online THEN WHOS ONLYFANS HAVE I BEEN SUBBED TO FOR ALL THIS TIME! Bit weird we can post Shrek cock, but won't post BBC bum
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:52
|
|
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:completely unsolicited declaration of not having internet nudes is deeply suspicious to my mind I've already seen all of your ductwork
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:52
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:THEN WHOS ONLYFANS HAVE I BEEN SUBBED TO FOR ALL THIS TIME! I subcontract all that work out to your dad
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2023 23:53
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:This is why there were no police available to do anything about this let's hope the first episode is Corden going paintballing
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2023 00:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 14:00 |
|
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:completely unsolicited declaration of not having internet nudes is deeply suspicious to my mind pretty sure a celeb being revealed as an arse nonce is the kind of time when you can say "wow glad I never took any pictures of my arse to send to people" without fear of call-out like it's basically the only time you can say that and it be understandable
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2023 00:06
|
|
