|
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:09 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 01:54 |
|
Hide your kids hide your wife
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:14 |
|
We must secure the existence of gas boilers and a future for cis children
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:14 |
|
Angepain posted:We must secure the existence of gas boilers and a future for cis children
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:19 |
|
Nothingtoseehere posted:It's quite funny that there was definitely suspicion about Sadiq Khan being too melty during the Corbyn leadership and now he's seen as too left wing for Starmer. I think Starmer and the homunculi in his inner circle are somewhat concerned that Khan could make a run at the leadership in the not-too-distant future. Which is a lot more appealing an idea now than it was a few years ago, I'll be honest.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:20 |
|
I thought the legend told it was supposed to be the king in the north?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:26 |
|
kingturnip posted:I think Starmer and the homunculi in his inner circle are somewhat concerned that Khan could make a run at the leadership in the not-too-distant future. He's about the only person who might have a chance at it that I don't despise at the moment, I think. Be nice to have someone who isn't a lily-white man as Labour leader for a change, too. Don't suppose he's got a chance in hell these days though. E: to be clear, my level of enthusiasm is 'I don't hate him, most of the time' which is a sharp contrast to Starmer Unkempt fucked around with this message at 10:40 on Jul 22, 2023 |
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:30 |
|
Unkempt posted:
That's because he's only in the news being attacked by Starmer or the Tories. He's melty as gently caress and I doubt he'd shake things up so realistically he'll probably be very close to Starmer one way or another if he becomes Labour leader.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:43 |
|
He might say 'children living in poverty is bad' which will put him far ahead of sir starver.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 10:50 |
|
https://fortune.com/2023/07/19/chatgpt-accuracy-stanford-study Looks like ChatGPT versions might be getting worse not better at certain things: quote:High-profile A.I. chatbot ChatGPT performed worse on certain tasks in June than its March version, a Stanford University study found. Don't rely on it for your maths homework (or coding!) boys & girls!
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 11:36 |
|
Lmao
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 11:54 |
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:https://fortune.com/2023/07/19/chatgpt-accuracy-stanford-study Yeah, I've had it doing SQL queries for me and it didn't know that if you have 2 join statements in the same query, they need to be bracketed. Silly Chat GPT.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 13:01 |
|
NotJustANumber99 posted:I thought the legend told it was supposed to be the king in the north? He doesn't seem all that interested.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 13:19 |
|
Keith: Labour’s job is to have nice policies that no Tory could possibly object to https://twitter.com/patrickkmaguire/status/1682680354455408640?s=46&t=m_nNbkNoHG4lLitcpyHReg
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 13:20 |
|
lol, they're not even prepared to fight for the sainted Blair's most treasured policy: https://twitter.com/iainjwatson/status/1682714636808798210?s=46&t=ARI_L-v32Oind1-d9B3a3Q
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 13:44 |
|
smellmycheese posted:Keith: Labour’s job is to have nice policies that no Tory could possibly object to Labour policies being on Tory leaflets before they’re even announced and backtracked on is much better
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 13:50 |
|
smellmycheese posted:Keith: Labour’s job is to have nice policies that no Tory could possibly object to https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1681424737384435713
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 14:03 |
|
smellmycheese posted:Keith: Labour’s job is to have nice policies that no Tory could possibly object to They must never make the mistake of having identifiable policy ever again.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 14:11 |
|
Look I know we're the opposition but we can't go around saying things that tories might oppose.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 14:23 |
|
Jesus, he's such an absolute shameless arsehole.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 14:47 |
|
A holeless shamearse.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 14:55 |
|
I thought they were taking their policies directly from Tory leaflets?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 15:01 |
|
An arseless shamehole?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 15:08 |
|
big scary monsters posted:I thought they were taking their policies directly from Tory leaflets? Look, I didn't join Sir Keir Starmer's staff to do anything as mundane as read a leaflet. I was head of Labour Students at Durham, for Tony's sake. I joined to do a mound of coke and get a bunch of free meals from lobbyists.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 15:10 |
|
https://twitter.com/HumanBollard/status/1682748439732400128
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 15:41 |
|
Blasmeister posted:They must never make the mistake of having identifiable policy ever again. you should work with that pollster woman the labour party seem obsessed with
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:12 |
|
I think its uncharacteristic of Starmer to support Arsenal. If asked what football team he supports he should reply "I will not be drawn into debates about football teams. The British public know that if I were to pick a side, it would be a good side, it would be a side that works for Great Britain, it would be a side that grows the economy and thats what I promise under the first term of a Labour government."
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:12 |
|
Labour can't possibly make a policy decision. If they do that then there could be negative and positive reactions. If there are negative reactions well then Labour will lose votes and after all the entire point of politics is to get the most votes. If the policy garners a positive reaction then it will be come a negative reaction when Labour drop that policy to make sure they gain the votes of the people that had a negative reaction to the policy thus leading to more lost votes. Labour's manifesto must be as empty as the moral centre of its MPs.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:35 |
|
https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/1682415870981668864
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:42 |
|
Lol he's absolutely going to destroy* your country in 20 years (* Moreso)
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:49 |
Failed Imagineer posted:Lol he's absolutely going to destroy* your country in 20 years Optimistic to think we'll have a country in twenty years.
|
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:54 |
|
They should do a count up of all the kids who said they were going to be Prime Minister one day - 99.99%* will fail in that ambition. Just now and then one might succeed. After all, it worked for William Hague..... NOT. *completely made up %.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 16:56 |
|
Gorn Myson posted:I think its uncharacteristic of Starmer to support Arsenal. If asked what football team he supports he should reply "I will not be drawn into debates about football teams. The British public know that if I were to pick a side, it would be a good side, it would be a side that works for Great Britain, it would be a side that grows the economy and thats what I promise under the first term of a Labour government."
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 17:25 |
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Lol he's absolutely going to destroy* your country in 20 years Disagree. Being thrown into the sordid pit of Westminster will crush his fragile briefcase boy mind. He will be exposed in a scandal involving Pimlico prostitutes and buckets of cocaine within 5 years.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 17:38 |
|
I despise every oval office who allows this kind of petty toddler ambition to direct their life. If your main ambition is to be Prime Minister, you will be incredibly poo poo at it. Particularly, and this applies to Streeting's former lackey, if you've never actually had to engage with real life before going into politics.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 17:47 |
|
bessantj posted:Labour can't possibly make a policy decision. If they do that then there could be negative and positive reactions. If there are negative reactions well then Labour will lose votes and after all the entire point of politics is to get the most votes. If the policy garners a positive reaction then it will be come a negative reaction when Labour drop that policy to make sure they gain the votes of the people that had a negative reaction to the policy thus leading to more lost votes. Labour's manifesto must be as empty as the moral centre of its MPs. The tao of labour. The policy that can be named is not the true policy
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 17:51 |
|
If you see the policy on the leaflet, kill it.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 17:56 |
|
Bobby Deluxe posted:*2 months later* "Look, it's simply not economically viable for football to 'come home' as some unrealistic and frankly leftist voices are demanding. It's neither responsible nor is it sensible for that to happen, which is why I have walked out onto the pitch here at the semi final, punctured the ball with my swiss-army knife, and demanded the English team go home for their tea." I welcome the government's decision to keep the football that is trying to come home on an old cruise ship, bit would urge the government to go further by removing the lines painted on the deck.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 18:14 |
|
Just been reading about Nauru, as it’s been in the news because the Bitcoin fascists at FTX wanted to buy it, and - dear lord - if this isn’t a truly hearbreaking, miserable story about how colonialism and pure greed hosed up a perfectly lovely place https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/dark-history-nauru/
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 18:37 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 01:54 |
|
two whole weeks ago lol https://twitter.com/LBC/status/1677238704962777090
|
# ? Jul 22, 2023 20:15 |