Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Laughing Zealot
Oct 10, 2012


I remember watching the original Fog not many years ago and being surprised by how good it is, even if it's nowhere near Halloween.

The 2005 remake on the other hand is absolutely god awful.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WeaponX
Jul 28, 2008



Laughing Zealot posted:

I remember watching the original Fog not many years ago and being surprised by how good it is, even if it's nowhere near Halloween.

The 2005 remake on the other hand is absolutely god awful.

The early 2000s- when the world had Tom Welling fever!

Dawgstar
Jul 15, 2017

Laughing Zealot posted:

I remember watching the original Fog not many years ago and being surprised by how good it is, even if it's nowhere near Halloween.

The 2005 remake on the other hand is absolutely god awful.

Yeah. In a point in its favor the female lead is much more connected than just a hitchhiking Jamie Lee Curtis Tom Atkins picks up but that's like its only one. We even go from a Carpenter soundtrack to Fall Out Boy.

M_Sinistrari
Sep 5, 2008

Do you like scary movies?



Jedit posted:

No, it just says "6 MUST DIE" on the plank. It doesn't specify who the six are. We don't actually know if any of the victims are descendants of the original conspirators apart from Father Malone, who admits guilt.

I got a backdated pay raise, so I ordered All These Haunts Be Ours in the Black Friday sale. It's half price today only on the Severin site.

Going from what I remember in the novelization, they're all descendants of the founders.

CV 64 Fan
Oct 13, 2012

It's pretty dope.
Elm Street remake making a horror icon an absolute, unquestionable NONCE.

Erin M. Fiasco
Mar 21, 2013

Nothing's better than postin' in the morning!



He was always a child predator that's like the entire crux of his character man

I'm not saying this to absolve the remake or anything because I'm not interested in watching it in the first place but it was blatant text in the first three movies at the very least

Tuxedo Catfish
Mar 17, 2007

You've got guts! Come to my village, I'll buy you lunch.
Freddy, the apparition, is a child predator. The thing is that like Candyman he's not really the ghost of the person who died. If the human Freddy deserved exactly what was coming to him, then the apparition might as well just be a natural disaster instead of a slasher villain.

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN
Elm Street should have stuck with the formula from 2, where it's somewhat implied that the abstract Freddy concept is spread as a meme (i.e. from reading Nancy's diary) and then manifests in ways particular to each individual based on their issues. So really there are Freddies, who are not constrained to set rules.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

Freddy Krueger is Freddy Kreuger. The evil man and child predator who just became a more dangerous supernatural monster after his death. But he’s still Freddy Kreuger because that’s who the monster is.

The Candyman is a spirit. A tulpa. Evil brought to live by belief and oppression and neglect and fear. Daniel Robitaillle is a victim of evil cursed to the Candyman. As is Helen. As is the new guy in the new film. Because the Candyman isn’t a man turned monster. He’s an idea.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Erin M. Fiasco posted:

He was always a child predator that's like the entire crux of his character man

I'm not saying this to absolve the remake or anything because I'm not interested in watching it in the first place but it was blatant text in the first three movies at the very least

He was also a child killer. The new one he’s just a pedo. Idk it’s icky and not fun and the film had the nerve to try and make him “fun” at the end with recycled quips

Gonz
Dec 22, 2009

"Jesus, did I say that? Or just think it? Was I talking? Did they hear me?"
They tried real hard with the Jackie Earle Haley take on Freddy, but nobody is ever going to successfully be able to recapture the lightning in a bottle that Wes Craven and Robert Englund had.

Doltos
Dec 28, 2005

🤌🤌🤌

Tuxedo Catfish posted:

Freddy, the apparition, is a child predator. The thing is that like Candyman he's not really the ghost of the person who died. If the human Freddy deserved exactly what was coming to him, then the apparition might as well just be a natural disaster instead of a slasher villain.

Agreed. The character of Freddie Kreuger is all about revenge, terrorizing, etc. Those aren't really human traits that match up with what he was before he died.

STAC Goat posted:

The Candyman is a spirit. A tulpa. Evil brought to live by belief and oppression and neglect and fear. Daniel Robitaillle is a victim of evil cursed to the Candyman. As is Helen. As is the new guy in the new film. Because the Candyman isn’t a man turned monster. He’s an idea.

Agree with this too. He's a manifestation of the energy of the environment. He's like a nature spirit or something that pops up in fantasy when you chop down a bunch of trees except it's from the tragedy of the crack epidemic. I really didn't like the newest one because it didn't seem to have that aura. I think Nia DaCosta was born too late to really fully understand the misery.

Origami Dali
Jan 7, 2005

Get ready to fuck!
You fucker's fucker!
You fucker!
gently caress it, I'm making an Exorcist 3 fan edit.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Do an exorcist believer edit where it doesn’t suck complete rear end

WeaponX
Jul 28, 2008



CelticPredator posted:

Do an exorcist believer edit where it doesn’t suck complete rear end

2 hours of a blank screen

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Lol

It was so weirdly dull. DGG should’ve made it funny. Instead he made it so deadly serious that it was uninteresting

veni veni veni
Jun 5, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 2 hours!
I’m morbidly curious about Believer but I haven’t heard a single person say a single positive thing about it. Not even like “well at least it was fun”

Skrillmub
Nov 22, 2007


veni veni veni posted:

I’m morbidly curious about Believer but I haven’t heard a single person say a single positive thing about it. Not even like “well at least it was fun”

I thought it was a solid 6/10 of a movie.
I've never watched the original all the way through, it's too old, too boring, and too religious. So I had 0 expectations to betray.
I agree, the new Exorcist crams a bit too much into its run time. Having the mom back from the first one for no reason is a weak spot. Having the girl from the first one back for three seconds at the end was BULLSHIT. But overall, I thought it was a decent movie. The kids did a good job. The exorcism was pretty cool. The scenes from the trailer played way better in context. It has interesting ideas. I am not interested at all in anything Catholic, so I liked that it added more religions into the mix.
I feel like people just got mad because they wanted something you can never have. You'll never get the impact of the first Exorcist with an Exorcist sequel. You'll never get the impact of Halloween with a Halloween sequel.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

i just think DGG forgot how to make horror fun. H18 was fun and good. HK was fun but not good. Ends just stopped being a fun romp and got too serious.

I felt the same with Believer. Just joyless and dull.

weekly font
Dec 1, 2004


Everytime I try to fly I fall
Without my wings
I feel so small
Guess I need you baby...



H18 was good cause there were no pretentions about continuing the story. Any time DGG has to world build and expand its loving dreadful. And this is coming from someone who liked Coreyween.

Opopanax
Aug 8, 2007

I HEX YE!!!


I'll probably watch Beliver for next year's challenge because I'm sure as hell not paying money for it

Gyro Zeppeli
Jul 19, 2012

sure hope no-one throws me off a bridge

Yeah, I get the morbid curiousity of wanting to see it, although honestly, even curiousity is too much, it's just a really loving boring movie. Definitely do not pay actual money for it (like I, the sucker, did.)

Skrillmub
Nov 22, 2007


Tomie Unlimited
A massive improvement over Tomie vs. Tomie and easily the best in the series. Tomie is dead at 4 minutes, back at 10 and poo poo starts to get weird at 15. And does it ever get weird. Full on Evil Dead style horror fun.
This time around Tomie is the elder daughter in a family and the dynamic works really well. Once she's back, her influence poisons them immediately and there's some really awful familial abuse. Once she's dead again things start to go insane and it doesn't let up until the end.
That doesn't mean there's a shortage of boys obsessed with Tomie. There's plenty and they're fairly good this time.
Here is a list of things in this movie:
Tomie's head lunchbox
Tomie gets a giant metal spike through her shoulder
Tomie's head centipedes (a lot of them)
Tomie's giant head taking up a whole room
Tomie's head grows a hair body with smaller Tomie head ornaments
Tomie tentacle porn
Headless Tomie runs around like a Deadite
Tomie has a face growing on her shoulder and it wants to kiss you

This is the one to watch. Great from start to finish and a perfect end to the series.

My final ranking of the Tomie movies:

Tomie Unlimited - Must watch
Tomie Re-Birth - Worth watching
Tomie - Worth watching
Tomie Another Face - For Tomie enthusiasts
Tomie Forbidden Fruit - For Tomie enthusiasts
Tomie Replay - For Tomie enthusiasts
Tomie Revenge - Don't watch
Tomie Beginning - Don't watch
Tomie vs. Tomie - AVOID


Thanks again to Darthemed for showing me where to watch these movies. I did have a good time. Tomie Unlimited was fully worth it.

fart blood
Sep 13, 2008

by VideoGames

Gonz posted:

They tried real hard with the Jackie Earle Haley take on Freddy,

I mean…did they though?

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Opopanax posted:

I'll probably watch Beliver for next year's challenge because I'm sure as hell not paying money for it

Someone had it on the plex I used.

Shrecknet
Jan 2, 2005


fart blood posted:

I mean…did they though?
No one has tried harder than Samuel Bayer on that movie. the amount of talent assembled behind the camera for NOES '10 is absurd. It just didn't matter because the fundamental idea (let's wipe the slate and clean-reboot NOES) was a bad one

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

They seem to have cut all the unique dream scenes out of the film

Gaz2k21
Sep 1, 2006

MEGALA---WHO??!!??

Disposable Scud posted:

Elm Street remake making a horror icon an absolute, unquestionable NONCE.

The term NONCE isn’t exclusive to pedophiles it’s a catch all term for any sex offender (Not Of Normal Criminal Etiquette) I don’t think the original Freddy’s crimes were every sexually charged he does occasionally get a bit creepy though (looking at you tongue phone)

M_Sinistrari
Sep 5, 2008

Do you like scary movies?



Gaz2k21 posted:

The term NONCE isn’t exclusive to pedophiles it’s a catch all term for any sex offender (Not Of Normal Criminal Etiquette) I don’t think the original Freddy’s crimes were every sexually charged he does occasionally get a bit creepy though (looking at you tongue phone)

In the original, it was primarily pushed as Freddy was a kid killer, with the implication he might also be a kid toucher which was presented more as an extra thing to get parents more inclined to go vigilante on him.

Martman
Nov 20, 2006

Gaz2k21 posted:

The term NONCE isn’t exclusive to pedophiles it’s a catch all term for any sex offender (Not Of Normal Criminal Etiquette)
This sounds extremely made up and pretty much every time a word has some legend about an acronym explaining its origin it's wrong

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Jordan Peels NONCE

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

Cravens original intent was for Freddy to be a sexual predator but he choose to only hint at it in the movie. But the movies hint very heavily at it. Freddy is super creepy. I thought it was very strange so many were shocked by the remake saying the quiet part out loud.

Don’t get me wrong the remake sucks for a lot of reasons. But thats just taken from the original and made explicit.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Martman posted:

This sounds extremely made up and pretty much every time a word has some legend about an acronym explaining its origin it's wrong

People have also said it's a UK prison system acronym for "Not On Normal Communal Exercise" - an inmate who isn't allowed to socialise in General Population. But it's assuredly a backronym; the Oxford English Dictionary has it as a possible alternate spelling of "nance", a derogatory term for an effeminate man or homosexual (sorry Jack), or "nonse", a Lincolnshire term for a worthless person.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

STAC Goat posted:

Cravens original intent was for Freddy to be a sexual predator but he choose to only hint at it in the movie. But the movies hint very heavily at it. Freddy is super creepy. I thought it was very strange so many were shocked by the remake saying the quiet part out loud.

Don’t get me wrong the remake sucks for a lot of reasons. But thats just taken from the original and made explicit.

It sucks because it can’t commit to anything. You want to make Freddy a pedo and make it super dark and icky? I guess do that. You want to shift the idea that he was innocent and the kids framed him? Then do that. You want him to be a quippy man? Do that.

But not all of it together. It just creates a deeply unpleasant soup.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Also if I wanted to see Freddy pedo the movie I’d just watch little children again and feel skeeved out

Tired Moritz
Mar 25, 2012

wish Lowtax would get tired of YOUR POSTS

(n o i c e)
Wtf when has Freddy ever been framed?

Baron von Eevl
Jan 24, 2005

WHITE NOISE
GENERATOR

🔊😴
I kinda think "the parents were wrong and let mob mentality kill an innocent (but weird) guy" is kind of an interesting angle. If nothing else it's a better spin than "also Freddy molested the kids."

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

The remake has some weird dance where they say Freddy was a pedophile who is hunting more kids but actually he was falsely accused and is hunting the kids who lied and got him killed but actually nah he really was a child predator and he’s hunting the kids who ratted him out. I think. I dunno. I’m not even confident enough in that to spoil it. I’m not rewatching the movie to confirm but it’s a muddled mess.

It’s also just a fundamentally misguided misunderstanding of the point of the first film. Freddy is a monster AND he’s seeking revenge on the children of those who murdered him. Because it turns out murdering someone and covering it up has consequences and isn’t cool and violence and secrets just make things worse.

Gargamel Gibson
Apr 24, 2014

STAC Goat posted:

Freddy Krueger is Freddy Kreuger.

Hell of a twist. People in the 80s just weren't ready for it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Baron von Eevl posted:

I kinda think "the parents were wrong and let mob mentality kill an innocent (but weird) guy" is kind of an interesting angle. If nothing else it's a better spin than "also Freddy molested the kids."

They should’ve went with it because it would’ve allowed them to have a fully justified quippy anti hero Freddy without anyone getting mad that we all love a child killer lol

Although I do think it’s a funny idea having some 5 year olds decided to frame a grown rear end man. Dennis the menace vs Freddy

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply