Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: OwlFancier)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Damnit, Guava stole the first half of my post.

Angepain posted:

I love this because even taken completely at face value it would mean half the goddamn country isn't allowed to fall in love with A Foreign
I mean, yes. In an entirely unironic sense the people who come up with and enforce these policies use phrases like 'white erasure' and 'muddying the genepool.' They literally do not want non british genes entering our incestuous little cesspool.


Guavanaut posted:

Canada at least has MAID as a fallback if you want to do that, whereas the pro suffering ghouls over here won't even let us have that.
But what if I am terrible at dusting?

E: 22 is the number of times I will call this boy a cutie:

Bobby Deluxe fucked around with this message at 14:10 on Dec 6, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/dec/06/saudi-sunny-foreign-care-workers-could-quit-uk-after-clampdown

quote:

It’s sunnier in Dubai, the visa lasts longer in the US and the wages are better in Canada. Many foreign care workers had already been thinking of quitting Britain for similar jobs elsewhere before the home secretary announced on Monday that dependants of new applicants would no longer be welcome.

Experts say the move, effective from next spring, will only make England’s severe care staff shortage worse amid international competition for people willing to look after society’s most vulnerable on low pay.

And, sure enough, Annie, a care worker from Botswana who was one of the first to arrive last year under the scheme inviting foreign care staff and their families, is already filling in the forms to switch to Canada.

“I wouldn’t have come,” she said when asked about James Cleverly’s new ban on bringing dependants. “It will affect a lot of people. Some of us are already looking at going to Australia, Canada or America because of the living conditions here, the amount of money I am paid, the rent.”

Annie has been working 15-hour days in Wiltshire and Somerset caring for elderly people. She makes about £1,500 a month and spends about two-thirds of that on rent. She brought her husband and daughter with her – some of the 120,000 dependants who accompanied 100,000 care workers on the scheme in the year to September.

Announcing his crackdown on Monday, Cleverly said too many of these were “drawing on public services rather than helping grow the economy”. Annie’s husband is learning to drive so he can become a care worker too.

In East Anglia, Jonathan, a care worker from the Philippines who had brought his wife and nine-year-old daughter with him, said: “This will reduce numbers. The reason overseas workers come here is the opportunity to bring your family and I don’t want to live separately from my family. Most of us have the same objective: to bring our families here.”

He is trained in complex care needs but earns just £11 an hour, which he described as “shockingly low”. Coming without family was unappealing he said, not least because “the weather in this country is depressing”.

“If you go to Saudi, Dubai or Hong Kong it’s sunny, so the psychological impact [of being away from family] is less,” he said.

So even if care and health are exempt from the new earning requirements, many will still leave because as rightly stated, who wouldn't want to live with their families? If people think things are bad now, it's going to get a hell of a lot worse

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
I recall some of the right were openly talking about a "Qatar style solution" to all the migration bullshit they themselves have invented, where you have a two tier system of citizens and people with no rights who can gently caress off before they affect are precious culture.

This is part of the 'finding out' stage of that.

Crust First
May 1, 2013

Wrong lads.
I don't want to give any false hope as I haven't looked into things completely, but when I came over under the old visa rules (managed to apply like a month before the minimum income threshold went into effect) my entire path through the visa system remained under the old rules (including when and how I could apply for ILR).

That said, the changes they're proposing are so inhumane that I don't know if they'll somehow manage to force people onto the new minimum income threshold halfway through their track to ILR when they file for the extension. It would be abhorrent but, that's sort of by design.

edit: Found some more info, seems like the Home Office thinks it shouldn't apply at renewal but Sunak does.

https://www.ft.com/content/44667d25-13ab-4d20-bc67-b5ac414c1dc2


Monsters.

Crust First fucked around with this message at 15:09 on Dec 6, 2023

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Are they going to have time to actually pass these facist laws? Because a May election is pretty much confirmed as far as I hear, and that’s going to come around very quickly after Xmas

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Remember 5 years ago when it was

DreddyMatt
Nov 25, 2002
MY LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS IS EXCEEDED ONLY BY MY UNQUENCHABLE THIRST FOR PISS. FUK U AMERIKKKA!!

smellmycheese posted:

Are they going to have time to actually pass these facist laws? Because a May election is pretty much confirmed as far as I hear, and that’s going to come around very quickly after Xmas

Why may?
Surely sunak knows he's on his way out, why not hold on in power as long as possible?

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

DreddyMatt posted:

Why may?
Surely sunak knows he's on his way out, why not hold on in power as long as possible?

Warm weather gets the decrepit boomers out

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Guavanaut posted:

Remember 5 years ago when it was

young people just love being patronized by boomers

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!

smellmycheese posted:

Are they going to have time to actually pass these facist laws? Because a May election is pretty much confirmed as far as I hear, and that’s going to come around very quickly after Xmas

The immigration one? They don't need to create new legislation for that. Home Office can just do it.

It could maybe get challenged through the courts, but the courts might not want to touch it.

keep punching joe fucked around with this message at 15:16 on Dec 6, 2023

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

cat botherer posted:

young people just love being patronized by boomers
And putting avocados on toast!

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67630766

quote:

Is the Rwanda policy a vote winner? One High Street has its say

As the government unveils a new treaty to deliver its Rwanda plan, we sought the views of people along one High Street about the controversial policy to deter migrants from crossing the channel.

"If you look on there," says Vince Ayris, lifting down a large artillery shell casing engraved with 400 names, "you can see the name of every British soldier killed in Afghanistan."

Over the din of the shoe repair and key cutting machines, the 61-year-old recounts how he delicately etched one of these shiny casings for each of the bereaved families who saw their military relative come home in a coffin.

"I met the Queen for doing this," he says, proudly polishing the one he keeps on display in his shop. "She shook my hand".

quote:

"I think it's come to the point where we have to sort this out," says Vince, a former parish councillor and Conservative supporter.

"You can't keep talking about something without acting on it. You have to go one way or the other and we've gone too far with it to go back. It would show a weakness now to go back.

"Rwanda's not a bad place, we're not sending them to a prison, they're being looked after. It's not a bad thing, it's just distant."

Isomermaid
Dec 3, 2019

Swish swish, like a fish
The way these people can pose for a photo with a gentle friendly smile after going on record saying the most infuriatingly fashy poo poo will never stop enraging me.

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!
They dont think they are being fashy though. They genuinely believe what they are suggesting is reasonable.

Isomermaid
Dec 3, 2019

Swish swish, like a fish

Mega Comrade posted:

They dont think they are being fashy though. They genuinely believe what they are suggesting is reasonable.

I know. I wish they could be made to see the consequences of their words until the taste of what they are saying makes them choke.

FiftySeven
Jan 1, 2006


I WON THE BETTING POOL ON TESSAS THIRD STUPID VOTE AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS HALF-ASSED TITLE



Slippery Tilde

Crust First posted:

I don't want to give any false hope as I haven't looked into things completely, but when I came over under the old visa rules (managed to apply like a month before the minimum income threshold went into effect) my entire path through the visa system remained under the old rules (including when and how I could apply for ILR).

That said, the changes they're proposing are so inhumane that I don't know if they'll somehow manage to force people onto the new minimum income threshold halfway through their track to ILR when they file for the extension. It would be abhorrent but, that's sort of by design.

edit: Found some more info, seems like the Home Office thinks it shouldn't apply at renewal but Sunak does.

https://www.ft.com/content/44667d25-13ab-4d20-bc67-b5ac414c1dc2


Monsters.

This entire situation has me so loving angry and worried, my partner had an anxiety attack last night and was questioning if she even wanted to come to the UK to live with me considering how unwelcoming the UK has become. She is going for her Biometrics today and we have already sunk a chunk of money into this process, and honestly, I dont have anything to say to make her feel better about this. I still think the UK is a better option than the US, given the healthcare costs and other societal issues the US has, and the fact that I run a business and its not transferable. But that said, the lack of clarity on all of this leads me to ask, are we just wasting our time and money? Would Labour be likely to reverse all of this horrible poo poo if it does go through? Will it stand any chance of not being challenged and blocked in court?

I just dont know.

The Question IRL
Jun 8, 2013

Only two contestants left! Here is Doom's chance for revenge...

Isomermaid posted:

I know. I wish they could be made to see the consequences of their words until the taste of what they are saying makes them choke.

Remember after the Brexit vote how some newspapers would go find business owners who voted for Brexit who said that there business was going under because they couldn't hire migrant workers/they no longer had access to EU funding/the cost of exporting was pricing them out of the market?

Like it felt good for schadenfreude, but it didn't change any of their minds. Not enough to make a difference.
I'd say even bringing these people over to Rwanda to see what it is really like isn't going to change their minds, since they won't be living it.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

Isomermaid posted:

The way these people can pose for a photo with a gentle friendly smile after going on record saying the most infuriatingly fashy poo poo will never stop enraging me.

I had a quick look at his facebook profile, and he once had this as his profile picture:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

The Question IRL posted:

I'd say even bringing these people over to Rwanda to see what it is really like isn't going to change their minds, since they won't be living it.
It might do if the guards steal their passports and any means of escaping like they've been known to do with the other people who got sent there.

Zalakwe
Jun 4, 2007
Likes Cake, Hates Hamsters



The Question IRL posted:

Remember after the Brexit vote how some newspapers would go find business owners who voted for Brexit who said that there business was going under because they couldn't hire migrant workers/they no longer had access to EU funding/the cost of exporting was pricing them out of the market?

Like it felt good for schadenfreude, but it didn't change any of their minds. Not enough to make a difference.
I'd say even bringing these people over to Rwanda to see what it is really like isn't going to change their minds, since they won't be living it.

Sunak and co are actually completely out of step with voters on immigration - see below. The thing you have to remember is that voters are not senior Tories' audience at the moment, everything they are doing is part of a battle to win their membership over. Also Farage. Not saying you will get any better from Labour though.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/03/most-british-people-hold-positive-view-of-immigration-survey-reveals

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

FiftySeven posted:

This entire situation has me so loving angry and worried, my partner had an anxiety attack last night and was questioning if she even wanted to come to the UK to live with me considering how unwelcoming the UK has become. She is going for her Biometrics today and we have already sunk a chunk of money into this process, and honestly, I dont have anything to say to make her feel better about this. I still think the UK is a better option than the US, given the healthcare costs and other societal issues the US has, and the fact that I run a business and its not transferable. But that said, the lack of clarity on all of this leads me to ask, are we just wasting our time and money? Would Labour be likely to reverse all of this horrible poo poo if it does go through? Will it stand any chance of not being challenged and blocked in court?

I just dont know.

Labour aren't going to change anything under Starmer.
Whatever you decide to do as a couple, don't assume it will get better from an application point of view.

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!
Labour canvassers came round to our block last night. I arrived home to the front door of the block just as they were ringing all the different bells. Sadly, one very confused elderly lady of 94 years of age (who we believe - not medically qualified opinions - is showing signs of dementia) came to the front door of the flats in the freezing cold & rain in her pjs.

As they were bamboozling the old lady with questions like "do you vote" (I mean it was pretty obvious to me that even if you didn't know the old lady which I do, that she wasn't quite with it - she's also quite deaf - wasn't the best thing to be doing).

I said to the canvassers (one of whom was the candidate in the next GE and who I know).

I was asked if I would be voting Labour and I said no - I used to be a member. Then the other canvasser asked me why I had stopped and I said they way they treated Corbyn and also Starmer's stance on Palestine which is a very important personal issue for me, she said she fully agreed (but is still in Labour!) and as I went in she said "From the river to the sea!" I thought she better look out saying things like that in the Starmeroid party.

Isomermaid
Dec 3, 2019

Swish swish, like a fish

fuctifino posted:

I had a quick look at his facebook profile, and he once had this as his profile picture:



I'm looking between the picture and this quote and just trying to reconcile the dissonance. It shouldn't make me so angry, I'm not naturally combative, but it just really does. Remembering that lyric "You see a man's face, but you can't see his heart". Ugh :-(

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!

fuctifino posted:

I had a quick look at his facebook profile, and he once had this as his profile picture:


:chloe:

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Isomermaid posted:

Remembering that lyric "You see a man's face, but you can't see his heart". Ugh :-(
Reminds me more of the Pratchett quote about how the way to a man's heart is up and under the ribcage.

Trainee PornStar
Jul 20, 2006

I'm just an inbetweener
I'm really enjoying watching Boris in the covid enquiry.

Obviously nothing will happen but watching him squirm is excellent tv.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001


It's ok to look if you don't touch the poop. hth

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
This also applies to watching Boris.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://twitter.com/PoliticsMoments/status/1732008344682918131

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

fuctifino posted:

"I'm a dumb, racist oval office. Now watch me pose like I poo poo myself."

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009


In retrospect Nick's tie-breaking vote to mandate self-noncing trousers may have been an early sign of the lib dems losing their youth demographic.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
UKMT Winterval 2015/16 - If I'm at work you're not wearing any trousers

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Nick rushed to assure the youth that having the trousers at the midway point between his waist and feet was the sensible adult way to wear them.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

I found this on facebook of all places the other day.



No idea what it's from and fully expect that character to get milkshake ducked, but it does summarise a huge problem with most centrist journalism.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Guavanaut posted:

UKMT Winterval 2015/16 - If I'm at work you're not wearing any trousers

I support this (uhh the title I mean)

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Bobby Deluxe posted:

I found this on facebook of all places the other day.



No idea what it's from and fully expect that character to get milkshake ducked, but it does summarise a huge problem with most centrist journalism.

well the original is bluer but from a now retired journalism professor

https://twitter.com/sheffjournalism/status/1018788640388984832?lang=en

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea
but if you disagree with someone they won't ask you back for another interview

what is truth anyway

WhatEvil
Jun 6, 2004

Can't get no luck.

Hey! The UK is number 1 in something!

Up 19.6% since 2014 is... *checks notes*... Child Poverty! The largest increase across all EU/OECD countries.



From UNICEF: https://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/media/3301/file/UNICEF-Innocenti-Report-Card-18-Child-Poverty-Amidst-Wealth-Exec-Summary-2023.pdf

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

Guavanaut posted:

Reminds me more of the Pratchett quote about how the way to a man's heart is up and under the ribcage.
I don't think it was Pratchett. But I don't know where it was originally from.

I used to have this poster hanging in my kitchen in the 1990s:


Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

a pipe smoking dog
Jan 25, 2010

"haha, dogs can't smoke!"
Amazing stuff as the government publishes their "Rwanda is safe bill" immediately prompting Rwanda to say they will pull out as it breaches international law.

Also the immigration minister resigned.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply