Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
skooma512
Feb 8, 2012

You couldn't grok my race car, but you dug the roadside blur.

Jon Pod Van Damm posted:

Will people care. How many people in the U.S. are aware that there are still U.S. troops in Syria and Iraq.

Even Syria is like "US troops have boots on the ground in Syria?" to me because it's always felt like an afterthought and downplayed that I still have to remember everytime before I get to "still"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

FuzzySlippers posted:

it is possible America already lost WW3 when it blew it’s load in weapons and soft power in Ukraine without success, failed to restrain Israel, and then failed to recognize the need to start fixing anything broken about America to change course. If there isn’t any political will to fix the broken arms industry how is it going to even present a credible defense of Taiwan much less succeed?

These 2030s plans for new wonder weapons that’ll allow for the US to dominate the pacific are straight delusions.

It's best that the USA doesn't realise this though. At least not until more of the rot (and rust) has done its work.

TeenageArchipelago
Jul 23, 2013


FuzzySlippers posted:

it is possible America already lost WW3 when it blew it’s load in weapons and soft power in Ukraine without success, failed to restrain Israel, and then failed to recognize the need to start fixing anything broken about America to change course. If there isn’t any political will to fix the broken arms industry how is it going to even present a credible defense of Taiwan much less succeed?

These 2030s plans for new wonder weapons that’ll allow for the US to dominate the pacific are straight delusions.

Man the Nazis turning to wonder weapons in a desperate ploy to prevent their inevitable defeat sure we're something.

Not like America would ever do that though

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy
Maybe if we build a single 500 trillion dollar superjet armed with really expensive missiles and chemical lasers (those are futuristic right?) that will be enough to intimidate everyone into sticking with USD for international settlements, thus allowing the flow of treasure to the imperial capital to continue unimpeded.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


President Xi, my man, my pal, just want to have a feel for the situation, a vibe check if you will... How the People's Liberation Army Navy - a drat fine institution of revolutionary spirit if you ask me - is doing nowadays? Like, we are just letting the mind wander here for a bit, but say something happened in South Korea, you know, or maybe further south... What if you could do something really loving funny as an answer?

BULBASAUR
Apr 6, 2009




Soiled Meat
Its more likely the US lost the hegemony. If there was war on domestic territory it would be a totally different situation, but that probably will never happen. The old empire will stew in its corner of the world. As some person joked recently the soft landing is that we become like the UK. Hence the joke about the Falklands. They 'won' that war, but it was clear from how it went down that its power had waned so much it was no longer a serious global player.

BULBASAUR has issued a correction as of 07:28 on Jan 12, 2024

Kassad
Nov 12, 2005

It's about time.

BULBASAUR posted:

Its more likely the US lost the hegemony. If there was war on domestic territory it would be a totally different situation, but that probably will never happen. The empire will stew in its corner of the world. As some person joked recently the soft landing is that we become like the UK.

Decoupling from China does have some Brexit vibes

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Kassad posted:

Decoupling from China does have some Brexit vibes

(bangs fist on table) There will be no decoupling from the iphone factories!

A domestic microchip of any variety in the USA does not make a consumer good. There are a few more steps involved. And the microchips themselves kind of still need stuff from China.

I joke about iphones of course but Raytheon weren't keen on it either.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


DancingShade posted:

(bangs fist on table) There will be no decoupling from the iphone factories!

A domestic microchip of any variety in the USA does not make a consumer good. There are a few more steps involved. And the microchips themselves kind of still need stuff from China.

I joke about iphones of course but Raytheon weren't keen on it either.



so, I know, I know, I know, but hear me out, you guys won't believe this poo poo. So I talked with Carter and well, what do you know, the Americans went for it...



Mandel Brotset
Jan 1, 2024

dead gay comedy forums posted:



so, I know, I know, I know, but hear me out, you guys won't believe this poo poo. So I talked with Carter and well, what do you know, the Americans went for it...





deng ftw

Mandel Brotset
Jan 1, 2024

china ftw

Mandel Brotset
Jan 1, 2024

communism ftw

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy
Actual legitimate industrial base FTW.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


I was just looking for ANY excuse to use that photo of Deng smoking because c'mon

FuzzySlippers
Feb 6, 2009

DancingShade posted:

It's best that the USA doesn't realise this though. At least not until more of the rot (and rust) has done its work.

don't get me wrong, this whole rotten structure collapsing is unambiguously good for the world as a whole.

frozenphil
Mar 13, 2003

YOU CANNOT MAKE A MISTAKE SO BIG THAT 80 GRIT CAN'T FIX IT!
:smug:
this thread is fun because all CSPAM threads are eventually relevant here

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




dead gay comedy forums posted:

I was just looking for ANY excuse to use that photo of Deng smoking because c'mon

love the grandma throne

mila kunis
Jun 10, 2011

dead gay comedy forums posted:



so, I know, I know, I know, but hear me out, you guys won't believe this poo poo. So I talked with Carter and well, what do you know, the Americans went for it...





deng laughing cause he know

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:

Vox Nihili posted:

how much of Yemen do the Houthi need to control before they start getting referred to as something other than "tribal militia" by the media

200%?

Zodium
Jun 19, 2004

dead gay comedy forums posted:



so, I know, I know, I know, but hear me out, you guys won't believe this poo poo. So I talked with Carter and well, what do you know, the Americans went for it...





:c00l:

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
i see the us went for the old middle eastern boondoggle gambit, a real dying empire classic

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

But Biden knows, it's a truth as old as time that you cannot change horses midstream

his victory is assured

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Cerebral Bore posted:

i see the us went for the old middle eastern boondoggle gambit, a real dying empire classic

The great thing is also the USN has most of its assets either coming from, going to, or in the Middle East and has a single carrier group and some destroyers to take on China if push came to shove.

Speaking of which the first Constellation frigate got delayed again, and it is going to be 2027 at the earliest before it can even be launched and perhaps 2029-2030 before it is fully operational. China has 4 frigates currently in the process of launching or fitting out.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 14:31 on Jan 12, 2024

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


Trabisnikof posted:

That’s a good example of why the USA has to provide the skeleton for any ground operations even if they’re going to attempt to flesh it out with allied or private forces.

I don’t think the PMCs can effectively operate in a country without a military backstop and logistics supply chain. they don’t have the means or materiel to conduct amphibious or air assaults at a scale that would meaningfully impact things.

I’m sure American special forces are already on the ground in Yemen, but what more can they do that they haven’t been doing for the last decade? More missile strikes? Between the two wars, the USA is already expending missiles at an unsustainable rate.

yeah, nato-aligned mercenaries don't really have heavy equipment like tanks, armed aircraft, etc because those cost too much money for the revenue they generate compared to some steroid guy with brain damage who'll kill himself after a few years. they have apcs, ifvs, drones, maybe some light tanks, and they're supposed to be used as support. they're for filling in lines, holding bases, and escorting vips basically.
wagner had some of that stuff but they're basically a state-sponsored enterprise like some kinda murderous usps

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Hatebag posted:

yeah, nato-aligned mercenaries don't really have heavy equipment like tanks, armed aircraft, etc because those cost too much money for the revenue they generate compared to some steroid guy with brain damage who'll kill himself after a few years. they have apcs, ifvs, drones, maybe some light tanks, and they're supposed to be used as support. they're for filling in lines, holding bases, and escorting vips basically.
wagner had some of that stuff but they're basically a state-sponsored enterprise like some kinda murderous usps

Wagner has a bunch of heavy equipment including artillery and tanks, they may even had their own air arm at one point. They were created to give the Russian government some deniability but were clearly state funded, it is just obviously something weird went on between them and the Kremlin.

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


yeah sorry that wasn't clear I meant wagner had heavy equipment like tanks, artillery, armed aircraft, etc

mycomancy
Oct 16, 2016

frozenphil posted:

this thread is fun because all CSPAM threads are eventually relevant here

"Doomsday Economics!"

"Biosphere Collapse!"

"TRMPT!"

"gently caress Joe Biden!"

"Marxism!"

"By your shitposts combined, I am Captain WW3!"

Milosh
Oct 14, 2000
Forum Veteran
It's gonna suck when another country watches the movie the Obama's produced and just turns the lights off over here.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Ardennes posted:

Speaking of which the first Constellation frigate got delayed again,

okay this dude writes very long threads and he's also the guy who said that bad Chinese tires in Mar 2022 meant that Russia was going to lose in Ukraine, but ...

code:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1715782930075734126
code:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1744465661248544810
he says that both the Littoral Combat Ship and the Constellation-class frigates lack sufficient VLS launchers to be able to defend themselves against the kinds of threats that current ships have been defending themselves against in the Red Sea

... which means that even if these ships were up-and-running and deployed in any significant amount, not only would they be unsuited for taking part in operations against Yemen, they'd be even worse off if facing against an enemy better equipped than the Yemenis

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

gradenko_2000 posted:

okay this dude writes very long threads and he's also the guy who said that bad Chinese tires in Mar 2022 meant that Russia was going to lose in Ukraine, but ...

code:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1715782930075734126
code:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1744465661248544810
he says that both the Littoral Combat Ship and the Constellation-class frigates lack sufficient VLS launchers to be able to defend themselves against the kinds of threats that current ships have been defending themselves against in the Red Sea

... which means that even if these ships were up-and-running and deployed in any significant amount, not only would they be unsuited for taking part in operations against Yemen, they'd be even worse off if facing against an enemy better equipped than the Yemenis

The Constellation has got a 32 cell VLS, which admittedly, probably isn't going to be fully outfitted with anti-air missiles. Basically, it is going to run out of missiles (everything being equal) in about a third of the time as Arleigh Burke and therefore is just going to be a lot more vulnerable to swarm attacks. The LCS is a complete sitting duck and would have to be protected by other ships.

Also, the issue for Russian equipment wasn't the tires, but they were stuck in several feet of mud at the time. Even great tires are only going to help so much.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 16:13 on Jan 12, 2024

SixteenShells
Sep 30, 2021
While I appreciate that our money is being spent on ships that are all useless instead of ones that are useful in war, I do wish it were spent on not the military instead.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


Ardennes posted:

Also, the issue for Russian equipment wasn't the tires, but they were stuck in several feet of mud at the time. Even great tires are only going to help so much.

look man I played snowrunner. The fact that Putin immediately nationalize KAMAZ for a war effort shows how much a neoliberal he is

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
Nation interest also put out an article saying China can suck up Taiwan's missile in a short time during a conflict

What Taiwan Can Learn from the Houthis

I think the article is trying to say US naval ships can be overwhelmed but its using Taiwanese naval to frame this angle.

(Also, the Osprey makes an comedy name drop)

stephenthinkpad has issued a correction as of 16:39 on Jan 12, 2024

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




bankrupt sore loser america is gonna build the saddam satellite cannon and use it like a cheap intercontinental mortar to keep bombing countries even after yemen sinks its navy and the western economy collapses

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Real hurthling! posted:

bankrupt sore loser america is gonna build the saddam satellite cannon

Gerald Bull rides again!

BillsPhoenix
Jun 29, 2023
But what if Russia aren't the bad guys? I'm just asking questions...

gradenko_2000 posted:

okay this dude writes very long threads and he's also the guy who said that bad Chinese tires in Mar 2022 meant that Russia was going to lose in Ukraine, but ...

code:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1715782930075734126
code:
https://twitter.com/TrentTelenko/status/1744465661248544810
he says that both the Littoral Combat Ship and the Constellation-class frigates lack sufficient VLS launchers to be able to defend themselves against the kinds of threats that current ships have been defending themselves against in the Red Sea

... which means that even if these ships were up-and-running and deployed in any significant amount, not only would they be unsuited for taking part in operations against Yemen, they'd be even worse off if facing against an enemy better equipped than the Yemenis

An LCS burned down in San Diego because they decided to make a highly flammable warship. Not sure they have any purpose beyond defense company enrichment.

BULBASAUR
Apr 6, 2009




Soiled Meat
what kind of defense can you even have against a drone swarm besides your own drown swarm

future ships just gonna be covered in drone ports to maintain their swarms at sea, like a momma spider covered in lil crawlers

Hatebag
Jun 17, 2008


BULBASAUR posted:

what kind of defense can you even have against a drone swarm besides your own drown swarm

future ships just gonna be covered in drone ports to maintain their swarms at sea, like a momma spider covered in lil crawlers

aa guns. drones are mostly slow. not gonna work in a few years when the drones are launching hypersonic glide bombs from 100s of miles away, though

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

BULBASAUR posted:

what kind of defense can you even have against a drone swarm besides your own drown swarm

future ships just gonna be covered in drone ports to maintain their swarms at sea, like a momma spider covered in lil crawlers

This is actually not a complex problem. You just need a larger number of good enough, smaller, ships rather than incredibly expensive ships that try to do everything.

You disperse forces but mass fires.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




cheap drones cant carry the super big boy bombs so just cope cage the boats

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply