(Thread IKs:
weg, Toxic Mental)
|
Could you imagine Trump already being guilty on the 14th amendment in Maine, cranking his hog along for weeks, and then Nikki Haley has to be the candidate because he's ineligible?
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 18:24 |
|
|
Toxic Mental posted:Hal is currently living on a big open farm upstate where he can run and play with all the other IKs as much as he wants I haven't seen Teen Witch in a bit either. Did she go there too?
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:36
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:Could you imagine Trump … cranking his hog … for weeks No I could not, thank you very much.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:43
|
|
|
Any predictions on how the Supreme Court would rule on the states barring trump from being on the ballot?
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:46
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:Could you imagine Trump already being guilty on the 14th amendment in Maine, cranking his hog along for weeks
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:46
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Further proof the most dangerous place for kids is not with drag queens but with evangelicals Spare the rod, spoil the parents
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:48
|
|
|
Piggy Smalls posted:Any predictions on how the Supreme Court would rule on the states barring trump from being on the ballot? My prediction is that "  STATES RIGHTS" won't be a central part of their ruling because it doesn't get them to the conclusion they are working backward from
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:49
|
|
|
Piggy Smalls posted:Any predictions on how the Supreme Court would rule on the states barring trump from being on the ballot? They will side with the Colorado supreme court because if they don't, the president isn't a president but really a dictator that people ask not to kill all their political opponents or refuse to leave office. They won't rule on whether or not it was an insurrection. That'll lead to a ton of states removing Biden from the ballot because of "border treason" or something and a bunch more removing Trump for actual insurrection. Then the few swing states will have both and nothing will change as far as the election result is concerned (unless more swing states remove Trump), but then you have a president that like 50%+ didn't just not vote for, but *couldn't* vote for. So basically, get a bunch of state-by-state partisan ballot purging, or give the president dictatorial powers. Toxic Mental fucked around with this message at 17:53 on Jan 19, 2024 |
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:50
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:No I could not, thank you very much. Sorry, I forgot, Hunter's hog is objectively what actually cranks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:54
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:No I could not, thank you very much. yes you could...you're doing it right now even
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:54
|
|
Agents are GO! posted:I hope haljordan is doing well, wherever they are. Being IK of this thread can drive one mad..........
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 17:59
|
|
|
And anyone said Nim-Rod-a yet? Filing a trademark now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:01
|
|
|
Toxic Mental posted:They will side with the Colorado supreme court because if they don't, the president isn't a president but really a dictator that people ask not to kill all their political opponents or refuse to leave office. They won't rule on whether or not it was an insurrection. The easy way out is to say that its up to congress to enforce who can be disqualified not states.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:02
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:Could you imagine Trump already being guilty on the 14th amendment in Maine, cranking his hog along for weeks, and then Nikki Haley has to be the candidate because he's ineligible? No 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:09
|
|
|
SlurredSpeech609 posted:The easy way out is to say that its up to congress to enforce who can be disqualified not states. Anybody else noticing how weird separation of power got in tyool 2024?
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:09
|
|
|
digital penitence posted:Wait, she was born in 1972? I thought she was 10 years older. She's aging like Ron Desanctimonius. This guy was only 39. Working for the dark side ages you prematurely.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:09
|
|
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:Being IK of this thread can drive one mad.......... What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:11
|
|
|
Barometer posted:What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct. Incel King.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:11
|
|
|
Barometer posted:What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct. Idiot King; you're not a mod, you're an IK.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:11
|
|
|
Barometer posted:What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct. Internet Killer
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:12
|
|
|
Barometer posted:What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct. https://forums.somethingawful.com/dictionary.php?act=3&topicid=66
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:12
|
|
|
Common Brushtail Possum
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:13
|
|
|
Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:16
|
|
|
Data Graham posted:Common Brushtail Possum David Mitchell
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:17
|
|
|
Barometer posted:What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:18
|
|
|
I was actually confused by the pictures of Nikki Haley and was wondering why Michelle Bachman was back in the news. They both do that deranged look really well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:19
|
|
|
Steadiman posted:yes you could...you're doing it right now even Yes, but I’m nearly there now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:21
|
|
|
SlurredSpeech609 posted:The easy way out is to say that its up to congress to enforce who can be disqualified not states. That would invalidate the state’s own constitutions and their supreme courts and laws. They can’t do that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:24
|
|
|
SCOTUS will say Trump smells like poo poo and ketchup and can't be president and then he will spend the rest of the year going to trial and then be in prison for the rest of his life.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:26
|
|
|
You know who in Trump's orbit I'm glad is no longer really around? Kellyanne. She was so god dang obnoxious. Every time she opened her mouth, you could practically smell through your monitor the mountain of pure lies that would then pour out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:30
|
|
|
Barometer posted:What does the IK stand for? I must be the only person who doesn't know and google gives me some weird answers that don't seem correct. the gamefaqs spinoff luelinks 'eti'
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:32
|
|
|
Catastrophe posted:You know who in Trump's orbit I'm glad is no longer really around? Kellyanne. She was so god dang obnoxious. Every time she opened her mouth, you could practically smell through your monitor the mountain of pure lies that would then pour out. She's still doing the Right Wing Propaganda circuit, spreading lies and hate.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:33
|
|
|
The most likely outcome is the court lays out exactly what they consider to be an "insurrection" for the sake of disqualifying a candidate. They come up with some test to apply and my guess is Trump doesn't quite fit by their standard with a qualifier that this might not be true later. It'll put all of the states on the same page with the fourteenth, which is the major legal issue they have to resolve, while abdicating as much responsibility as they can, doesn't make the president a dictator, and gives them the political outcome they want.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:34
|
|
|
Toxic Mental posted:That would invalidate the state’s own constitutions and their supreme courts and laws. They can’t do that. I agree, but it's what they're going to argue in Feb and it seems like a pretty easy out. quote:The state courts should have regarded congressional enforcement legislation as the exclusive means for enforcing section 3, as Chief Justice Chase held in In re Griffin, 11 F. Cas. 7, 26 (C.C.D. Va.1869) (Griffin’s Case). In addition, section 3 cannot be used to deny President Trump (or anyone else) access to the ballot, as section 3 prohibits individuals only from holding office, not from seeking or winning election to office.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:37
|
|
|
Agents are GO! posted:David Mitchell
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:38
|
|
|
Trump had diarrhea dripping down his pant leg while he cheered for his vice president to be executed. Many such cases.
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:38
|
|
|
redshirt posted:She's still doing the Right Wing Propaganda circuit, spreading lies and hate. Oh. I hadn't seen her around in a while... 
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:38
|
|
|
He posting about Carroll again
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:40
|
|
|
kazil posted:He posting about Carroll again turns out he never even met her??
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 18:24 |
|
|
InsertPotPun posted:turns out he never even met her?? Celebrity lines don't count!
|
|
#
?
Jan 19, 2024 18:41
|
|