|
Jel Shaker posted:that thing is practically turning right angles, is that even possible? It was possible to render!
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 12:16 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 15:56 |
|
DancingShade posted:I'm going to sell the US army hyper advanced smart bullets for their marksmen rifles. Each will cost 100 times more than usual per individual cartridge but comes with some silicon bits from a genuine Nvidia GPU ground up and embedded in the round. Or in the powder. Wherever we can sprinkle them really. Wi-fi enabled bullets. (The bullets need a connection to check back to the company servers that there's a valid subscription to the service when they're fired. If they can't find one, or there's no wireless signal, the propellant cuts out, and the bullet plops to the ground.)
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 12:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/hasanthehun/status/1748211611956056482 since we're relitigating this, I went back to "Desert Mirage: The True Story of the Gulf War", by Martin D. Yant, to see what I could find:
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:06 |
|
Jel Shaker posted:that thing is practically turning right angles, is that even possible? I remember seeing stuff like this in the ‘90s being proposed for small arms, like the Zorg X-1 was within the grasp of the grift.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:10 |
|
On the other hand, the Iraqi war sent Chinese military and US MIC development to two opposite directions. The Chinese probably didn't hear about the Iraqi generals being brought off until much later.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:23 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:https://twitter.com/hasanthehun/status/1748211611956056482 They really poisoned the poo poo out of their brains by believing that lie of their own making didn't they? Just 35 years and counting of completely idiotic thinking based on this poo poo.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:24 |
|
Orange Devil posted:The first time in history a field army was defeated by air power. Yep
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:31 |
|
it is unfair if they shoot back, use antiair weapons, or move in a formation other than a column
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:33 |
|
“It’s pretty clear that Britain’s arms merchants did a great deal to fan periodic outbreaks of hysteria over the “dreadnought gap” – for example, Vickers leaking the absurdly false claim that the Krupp Works had over 100 heavy guns and the turrets for them ready to emplace on new German dreadnoughts. When politicians or journalists suggested that the Royal Navy buy into service the dreadnoughts under construction in British yards for foreign navies, suddenly either the ships became unsuitable for British use, or the urgency became less, or both. The arms makers wanted it both ways – to take in foreign purchase orders, with their padded budgets and inflated profits, yet still receive the massive flow of government orders with their guaranteed financing. And pretty much, they got their way.” Simpler times
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:37 |
|
Yeah, the Persian Gulf conflict was basically the real life equivalent of the Battle of Fort Springfield.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:37 |
|
Skaffen-Amtiskaw posted:I remember seeing stuff like this in the ‘90s being proposed for small arms, like the Zorg X-1 was within the grasp of the grift. The Zorg X-1 is the dream grift gun.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:51 |
|
bedpan posted:it is unfair if they shoot back, use antiair weapons, or move in a formation other than a column Look, if the entire enemy is in a giant disordered column on a single highway in a flat desert and has no intention or means of fighting then air power can really do a number on them I tell you hwhat. Somebody give Schwarzkopf another medal for his strategic brilliance. Best western general of the 20th century.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:55 |
|
Orange Devil posted:Somebody give Schwarzkopf another medal for his strategic brilliance. "hey diddle-diddle, right up the middle"
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 13:59 |
|
idk what kind of brain worms causes you to look at that picture and think, 'superior military. Victory. '
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 14:07 |
|
Orange Devil posted:The first time in history a field army was defeated by air power. You don't get it, they've been wanting this for years. Finally, low casualty lopsided technowars of total annihilation. The USSR is gone, the world is at our feet, we have the secret formula to dominate everything, don't fret when little glitches or mistakes in the formula pop up every now and again, we just have to stick to it. Forever. Forever. Forever.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 14:24 |
|
skooma512 posted:I've noticed all the pictures coming from the Red Sea are of F/A-18s launching, no F-35s. Are they just not using them or are they using them and not depicting them in the media? The Navy is slowest to field F-35s, between USAF, USMC, and USN. There is only one active navy F-35 squadron, another currently in transition to F-35. Those have been deploying to the Pacific rather than off the eastern seaboard. So the Eisenhower has F/A-18E/Fs for strike fighters, not any F-35s.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 14:49 |
|
double nine posted:that Superiority short story by Clarke is burrowing into my brain.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 14:49 |
|
WW3 goal: Embed Hassan as the only war reporter
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 15:57 |
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMwWQktNlPk Oh cool it's been a while since I've seen a Dahir Insaat video. These are always good for a laugh.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:17 |
|
Any word on when the military will be adopting the semi truck quadcopter system? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnbl9CZ9tOI
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:22 |
|
Lol the highway of death post got community noted Just the worst loving people
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:30 |
|
Halfway shocked the note doesn't correct it and atrritube it to Russia using COD as a source.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:34 |
|
Retromancer posted:Any word on when the military will be adopting the semi truck quadcopter system? The AC-130, but with extra steps. Sure glad AA isn’t a thing.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:41 |
|
Pistol_Pete posted:Wi-fi enabled bullets. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tOsucpdD7Y
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:44 |
Digital Jedi posted:Halfway shocked the note doesn't correct it and atrritube it to Russia using COD as a source. thats how you know it was a bad shoot, america gently caress ya media shamefully misattributes it to the ruskies
|
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:52 |
|
Digital Jedi posted:Halfway shocked the note doesn't correct it and atrritube it to Russia using COD as a source. It's only one NAFO wikipedia editor away these days. Just has to be laundered through some website that's named something like Secret Putler Crimes just launched in fiscal year 2024.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 16:56 |
|
hubris.height posted:idk what kind of brain worms causes you to look at that picture and think, 'superior military. Victory. ' White supremacy
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 17:29 |
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMwWQktNlPk *gunner on surface warshipishly* ooooo im just a baby, im just a little guy, its my birthday and i cant hit a moving speedboat, oooo cmon dont target my ship i cant hit ya
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 17:56 |
|
Since the topic of new arctic shipping route came up in this thread, I just thought of something. What if Yemen's harassment to Red Sea shipping doesn't stop in the near future? What if this is not a temporary issue that the US can take care of in the next x months? Is it that big of a deal that the shipping cost via Suez will be doubled from now on? It doesn't concern Asia-US shipping, it only concern Asia-Europe shipping, and you can supplement it with tran-eurasian railway and the new Arctic shipping to Northern Europe. Maybe we can frame this geopolitical event as another milestone of the continental powers taking more control of global trade route away from the oceanic powers? Also those loving 737 Max planes, just turn them into Temu shipping cargo planes. It's safer to everybody.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 18:12 |
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMwWQktNlPk same voice actor as Dyson Sphere Program
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 18:56 |
|
So this shell the size of like a monster energy drink can contains a seeker head, a computer, and some kind of non-fin control surfaces that aren't in the render and it isn't getting target data from the gun or ship via data link or anything like that, it's all supposed to be onboard So it's got to be like optical/ir imaging and then fairy dust to steer it? I wonder what the unit cost on these is going to be lol
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 19:13 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:same voice actor as Dyson Sphere Program holy poo poo lmao
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 19:18 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:Since the topic of new arctic shipping route came up in this thread, I just thought of something. depends on what you mean with tran-eurasian railway. Natoland isn't going to normalize russia-nato train transport of any sort, even once russia wraps up the ukraine war (whenever that happens) russia-rest of asia train transport is getting enormous amounts of investments though.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 19:23 |
|
The Oldest Man posted:So this shell the size of like a monster energy drink can contains a seeker head, a computer, and some kind of non-fin control surfaces that aren't in the render and it isn't getting target data from the gun or ship via data link or anything like that, it's all supposed to be onboard
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 19:26 |
|
cat botherer posted:Is there like a gyro in there or something? That's the only thing I can think of. That or some sort of active surface flap that can actuate really fast, given the size it's actually a good question how the hell they're doing it if not just lying. You'd have to operate at a really high frequency to accommodate the spin of the projectile The effect on target must be pathetic though since you're basically chucking a cell phone's worth of poo poo at someone crammed in a tiny package
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 19:29 |
|
mlmp08 posted:The Navy is slowest to field F-35s, between USAF, USMC, and USN. There is only one active navy F-35 squadron, another currently in transition to F-35. Those have been deploying to the Pacific rather than off the eastern seaboard. So the Eisenhower has F/A-18E/Fs for strike fighters, not any F-35s. There's like 5 declassified f35 navy squadrons, and between usmc/navy at least 3 active on carriers. The planes cost a small fortune to repaint, they're not gonna operate them in corrosive environments (salt water) where the "enemy" has no air power and virtually no anti air capability. The F35 is a popular internet hate target, but the amount of power this engine generate (electricity) is insane. The US believes modern air power is about electronics and information, not agility and speed.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 19:34 |
|
BillsPhoenix posted:There's like 5 declassified f35 navy squadrons, and between usmc/navy at least 3 active on carriers. How useful is all those EW systems and datalinks if that thing is sitting below decks? The criticisms that the F-35 gets are greatly warranted, and I don't think the reports on their combat readiness are just to lull the enemy either. As for a guided 57mm shell, I guess the target is suppose to be drones and small water craft but even then both are not easy to tag especially if you are doing it with a small warhead. You pretty much need direct hits.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 20:01 |
|
The Oldest Man posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMwWQktNlPk
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 20:03 |
|
lmao
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 20:16 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 15:56 |
|
That was exactly what I was thinking, 00 era prime Angelina approves.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2024 20:27 |