- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2024 17:27
|
|
- shackleford
- Sep 4, 2006
-
|
lmao at everything in that filing
smh if you dont know that any given latex doc will only compile with the exact package versions it was written for
i'm sure he has plenty of experience with \LaTeX let me just take a big sip of water and google his PhD thesis
https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459
https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wrights-llm-dissertation-is-full-of-plagiarism-f21439ea8a47
lol apparently both his PhD thesis and his law degree dissertation were massively plagiarized
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2024 04:21
|
|
- Paladinus
- Jan 11, 2014
-
heyHEYYYY!!!
|
The question is by whom?
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2024 04:32
|
|
- Weatherman
- Jul 30, 2003
-
WARBLEKLONK
|
buttcoin: craig wright hosed around with this whitepaper at 11:42 on Jan 11, 2024
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2024 10:22
|
|
- Alan Smithee
- Jan 4, 2005
-
A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.
Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...
|
whitepaper for your buttcoins
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2024 12:46
|
|
- JAnon
- Jul 16, 2023
-
|
fuckin' lmao so craig wright, the guy pretending to be satoshi, just got completely corncobbed in some lawsuit
https://www.opencrypto.org/2024-01-23_Schedule_of_Dr_Wrights_Further_Forgeries-COPAvWright.pdf
...
This file is a LaTeX source file, taken from a folder on Dr Wright’s Overleaf account. Dr Wright
has stated that, as Satoshi Nakamoto, he wrote the Bitcoin White Paper using LaTeX. He has also
stated that this document “uniquely codes for the Bitcoin White Paper”, and that when compiled
in Overleaf, produce a copy of the Bitcoin White Paper “in the same form as” and “materially
identical to” that published by Satoshi Nakamoto. [Wright 6 {E/21/3}; Field 1 at 27 {P3/13/10}]
The Bitcoin White Paper was not written in LaTeX. It was written and produced in OpenOffice
2.4. Its metadata record that it was produced by that means. Examination by both parties’ experts
has led them both to conclude, and agree, that it was produced by that means based on every level
of the pdf from the fine details of its typographical presentation, down to the binary digits of the
PDF. [Rosendahl 1 at 66-68 {G/7/23}] [Rosendahl 1 at 191 {G/7/58}] [Lynch 1 at 117-120 and
122.c-d {I/5/36}] [Rosendahl / Lynch 1 at 2 {Q/5/1}].
Dr Wright’s LaTeX files from the TC folder are not original to 2008 or 2009. Using LaTeX
software that is up to date for 2009, none of them compiles properly, instead producing errors
and warnings. The files L and C could not be compiled at all. In order to compile them at all, it is
necessary to fix the files or use a much more modern version of LaTeX software [Rosendahl 1 at
106-112 {G/7/38}]. This is because Dr Wright’s LaTeX files include software packages and options
which could not have been used in 2009 [Rosendahl 1 at 158 {G/7/50}].
...
The original BDO Image was created from a computer running Windows XP. Windows XP does
not record Transaction Log metadata, which was introduced in later operating system. However,
BDOPC.raw does include Transaction Log data, indicating that it was used with a later version of
Windows. Those Transaction logs contains extensive records editing of BDOPC.raw on 17
September 2023. Further, those Transaction Logs indicate other irregularities, such as files being
backdated to appear as if created after they were last modified and accessed. [Madden 4 at 84, -
85 {G/6/28}] [Lynch 1 at 73-75 {I/5/19}]
Windows NTFS file systems record an identifier, the Security ID or “SID”, connected with the
user that edits the files. Of the user documents present on BDOPC.raw, over 99% (over
165,000 files) were apparently created with the correct Security IDs for the original BDO PC
from which the original image was captured in 2007. By contrast, 71 of Dr Wright’s New
Reliance documents were added later, using a different user account with a different SID (the
“Manipulation User”) [Madden 4 at 93-98 {G/6/30}] [Madden / Lynch 1 at 12 {Q/6/5}].
These include all the documents among the New Reliance Documents which actually support
Dr Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
There are multiple iterations of the drive image stored on the same Samsung Drive. Mr Madden
has recovered two more which were deleted in September 2023, but which he has managed to
recover: InfoDef09.raw and Image.raw. These are identical in content to 99.5% of
BDOPC.raw. The remaining 0.5% is made up of data pertaining to New Reliance Documents, and
previous edits of New Reliance Documents. These drive images are among hundreds of GB of data
deleted from the Samsung Drive in September 2023. [Madden 4 at 13.d-e, {G/6/8}]
...
17.2.When asked for the password. Dr Wright stated that “he was hacked in 2020 and his
password files were lost” [Shoosmiths’ letter of 11 January 2024]. That is implausible.
17.3.When asked for details of the alleged hack, Dr Wright stated that he had actually been hacked
at least 10 times [Shoosmiths’ letter of 15 January 2024]. That is at least 10 times more
implausible.
...
4. These documents have been created with the Pandoc document conversion software. Pandoc is
an open-source piece of software that can convert documents between different formats. It can
generate LaTeX documents automatically [Macfarlane 1 at 3 {C/19/1}]. In particular:
4.1. {ID_004687} contains a line which states that it was created as LaTeX via Pandoc, which is
characteristic of the use of Pandoc. [Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}]. Although {ID_004648}
does not include that line “LaTeX via Pandoc”, it includes the other code from the same
October template.
4.2. The template for conversion to LaTeX was not introduced into Pandoc at all until 2010
[Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}].
5. The documents have been created during the course of these proceedings:
5.1. Inspection of the (open-source) source code of Pandoc allows for more precise dating. The
document was created after October 2022. The version of Pandoc used for creation of this
document uses code that was not committed to Pandoc until October 2022. [Macfarlane 1 at
9 {C/19/2}].
...
The document has been backdated. It is a Rich Text File created with the editor version
Riched20.dll v10.0.19041. That version of Riched20 is the version associated with the May 2020
update of Windows 10. [Madden 3 at 86-91 {G/5/34}]
...
3. These documents have been backdated. They refer to the use of C++ elements that were not in
existence at their purported date of October 2007. In particular,
3.1 They call on the use of the libraries “<chrono>”, <thread>” and “<random”. These
libraries are part of the C++11 standard, first released in 2011. [Stroustrup 1 at [4]
{C/23/1}]
3.2 <chrono> was not first proposed until 11 June 2008. [Hinnant 1 at 4 {C/18/1}]
3.3 The first discussion of what became <chrono> was not published until 19 January 2008,
and was not at that time called <chrono>. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]
3.4 Within <chrono>, these documents call for the use of the function “sleep_for”. By 19
January 2008, the function was referred to as ‘sleep’ (not yet ‘sleep_for’). [Hinnant 1 at 5
{C/18/2}]
3.5 By that time, neither <chrono> nor “sleep_for” yet existed, even on the personal
computer of its developer. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]
...
5.1. A deleted file containing part of the content of {ID_004715} was recovered from
InfoDef09.raw. The file was named “Section7.tex”: [PM46 at 92-99 {H/278/25}]. The
content of the deleted “Section7.tex” begins with the words:
“Certainly, here’s the LaTeX code for Section 7, which covers
Recommendations.
``` latex
5.2. The content of the deleted “Section7.tex” ends with the words:
This section presents a set of recommendations based on the research
findings, targeting both practitioners and academic researchers. The
citations are…
5.3. That content is entirely consistent with and indicative of responses provided by an
unconditioned ChatGPT to the question “Are you able to output some template latex code for
section 7 which relates to recommendations?” including the structure, length of response, the
use of “Certainly”, and the use of syntax “``` latex” to introduce LaTeX code. [PM46 at
92-99 {H/278/25}]
5.4. That content was deleted from the version of the equivalent document disclosed within
BDOPC.raw. {ID_004715} however does include the proposed code generated by ChatGPT
within the body of the document.
5.5. ChatGPT did not exist in 2007.
...
5. Hash Based Shadowing.TIF contains metadata with the following information [PM46 at 126-128
{H/278/44}]:
a. it was created on 12 March 2018;
b. it was created with MS Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.14393.0, software associated with
Windows 10 version 1607, which was released in August 2016; and
c. it was scanned with a Xerox DocuMate 5540 scanner.
6. The Xerox DocuMate 5540 model of scanner was not produced until 18 February 2015 [Sherrell
19 at 12 {P1/19/3}].
...
8.3. References to the font Calibri Light [PM46 at 18 {H/278/6}], a font which had not yet been
designed in 2007.
guy who forges an entire document to prove that he's another guy who probably didn't even exist
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 03:44
|
|
- born to shill
- Feb 19, 2024
-
by Pragmatica
|
Zzz.
Somebody fucked around with this message at 00:10 on Feb 26, 2024
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 06:31
|
|
- Shumagorath
- Jun 6, 2001
-
|
fuckin' lmao so craig wright, the guy pretending to be satoshi, just got completely corncobbed in some lawsuit
https://www.opencrypto.org/2024-01-23_Schedule_of_Dr_Wrights_Further_Forgeries-COPAvWright.pdf
...
This file is a LaTeX source file, taken from a folder on Dr Wright’s Overleaf account. Dr Wright
has stated that, as Satoshi Nakamoto, he wrote the Bitcoin White Paper using LaTeX. He has also
stated that this document “uniquely codes for the Bitcoin White Paper”, and that when compiled
in Overleaf, produce a copy of the Bitcoin White Paper “in the same form as” and “materially
identical to” that published by Satoshi Nakamoto. [Wright 6 {E/21/3}; Field 1 at 27 {P3/13/10}]
The Bitcoin White Paper was not written in LaTeX. It was written and produced in OpenOffice
2.4. Its metadata record that it was produced by that means. Examination by both parties’ experts
has led them both to conclude, and agree, that it was produced by that means based on every level
of the pdf from the fine details of its typographical presentation, down to the binary digits of the
PDF. [Rosendahl 1 at 66-68 {G/7/23}] [Rosendahl 1 at 191 {G/7/58}] [Lynch 1 at 117-120 and
122.c-d {I/5/36}] [Rosendahl / Lynch 1 at 2 {Q/5/1}].
Dr Wright’s LaTeX files from the TC folder are not original to 2008 or 2009. Using LaTeX
software that is up to date for 2009, none of them compiles properly, instead producing errors
and warnings. The files L and C could not be compiled at all. In order to compile them at all, it is
necessary to fix the files or use a much more modern version of LaTeX software [Rosendahl 1 at
106-112 {G/7/38}]. This is because Dr Wright’s LaTeX files include software packages and options
which could not have been used in 2009 [Rosendahl 1 at 158 {G/7/50}].
...
The original BDO Image was created from a computer running Windows XP. Windows XP does
not record Transaction Log metadata, which was introduced in later operating system. However,
BDOPC.raw does include Transaction Log data, indicating that it was used with a later version of
Windows. Those Transaction logs contains extensive records editing of BDOPC.raw on 17
September 2023. Further, those Transaction Logs indicate other irregularities, such as files being
backdated to appear as if created after they were last modified and accessed. [Madden 4 at 84, -
85 {G/6/28}] [Lynch 1 at 73-75 {I/5/19}]
Windows NTFS file systems record an identifier, the Security ID or “SID”, connected with the
user that edits the files. Of the user documents present on BDOPC.raw, over 99% (over
165,000 files) were apparently created with the correct Security IDs for the original BDO PC
from which the original image was captured in 2007. By contrast, 71 of Dr Wright’s New
Reliance documents were added later, using a different user account with a different SID (the
“Manipulation User”) [Madden 4 at 93-98 {G/6/30}] [Madden / Lynch 1 at 12 {Q/6/5}].
These include all the documents among the New Reliance Documents which actually support
Dr Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
There are multiple iterations of the drive image stored on the same Samsung Drive. Mr Madden
has recovered two more which were deleted in September 2023, but which he has managed to
recover: InfoDef09.raw and Image.raw. These are identical in content to 99.5% of
BDOPC.raw. The remaining 0.5% is made up of data pertaining to New Reliance Documents, and
previous edits of New Reliance Documents. These drive images are among hundreds of GB of data
deleted from the Samsung Drive in September 2023. [Madden 4 at 13.d-e, {G/6/8}]
...
17.2.When asked for the password. Dr Wright stated that “he was hacked in 2020 and his
password files were lost” [Shoosmiths’ letter of 11 January 2024]. That is implausible.
17.3.When asked for details of the alleged hack, Dr Wright stated that he had actually been hacked
at least 10 times [Shoosmiths’ letter of 15 January 2024]. That is at least 10 times more
implausible.
...
4. These documents have been created with the Pandoc document conversion software. Pandoc is
an open-source piece of software that can convert documents between different formats. It can
generate LaTeX documents automatically [Macfarlane 1 at 3 {C/19/1}]. In particular:
4.1. {ID_004687} contains a line which states that it was created as LaTeX via Pandoc, which is
characteristic of the use of Pandoc. [Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}]. Although {ID_004648}
does not include that line “LaTeX via Pandoc”, it includes the other code from the same
October template.
4.2. The template for conversion to LaTeX was not introduced into Pandoc at all until 2010
[Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}].
5. The documents have been created during the course of these proceedings:
5.1. Inspection of the (open-source) source code of Pandoc allows for more precise dating. The
document was created after October 2022. The version of Pandoc used for creation of this
document uses code that was not committed to Pandoc until October 2022. [Macfarlane 1 at
9 {C/19/2}].
...
The document has been backdated. It is a Rich Text File created with the editor version
Riched20.dll v10.0.19041. That version of Riched20 is the version associated with the May 2020
update of Windows 10. [Madden 3 at 86-91 {G/5/34}]
...
3. These documents have been backdated. They refer to the use of C++ elements that were not in
existence at their purported date of October 2007. In particular,
3.1 They call on the use of the libraries “<chrono>”, <thread>” and “<random”. These
libraries are part of the C++11 standard, first released in 2011. [Stroustrup 1 at [4]
{C/23/1}]
3.2 <chrono> was not first proposed until 11 June 2008. [Hinnant 1 at 4 {C/18/1}]
3.3 The first discussion of what became <chrono> was not published until 19 January 2008,
and was not at that time called <chrono>. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]
3.4 Within <chrono>, these documents call for the use of the function “sleep_for”. By 19
January 2008, the function was referred to as ‘sleep’ (not yet ‘sleep_for’). [Hinnant 1 at 5
{C/18/2}]
3.5 By that time, neither <chrono> nor “sleep_for” yet existed, even on the personal
computer of its developer. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]
...
5.1. A deleted file containing part of the content of {ID_004715} was recovered from
InfoDef09.raw. The file was named “Section7.tex”: [PM46 at 92-99 {H/278/25}]. The
content of the deleted “Section7.tex” begins with the words:
“Certainly, here’s the LaTeX code for Section 7, which covers
Recommendations.
``` latex
5.2. The content of the deleted “Section7.tex” ends with the words:
This section presents a set of recommendations based on the research
findings, targeting both practitioners and academic researchers. The
citations are…
5.3. That content is entirely consistent with and indicative of responses provided by an
unconditioned ChatGPT to the question “Are you able to output some template latex code for
section 7 which relates to recommendations?” including the structure, length of response, the
use of “Certainly”, and the use of syntax “``` latex” to introduce LaTeX code. [PM46 at
92-99 {H/278/25}]
5.4. That content was deleted from the version of the equivalent document disclosed within
BDOPC.raw. {ID_004715} however does include the proposed code generated by ChatGPT
within the body of the document.
5.5. ChatGPT did not exist in 2007.
...
5. Hash Based Shadowing.TIF contains metadata with the following information [PM46 at 126-128
{H/278/44}]:
a. it was created on 12 March 2018;
b. it was created with MS Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.14393.0, software associated with
Windows 10 version 1607, which was released in August 2016; and
c. it was scanned with a Xerox DocuMate 5540 scanner.
6. The Xerox DocuMate 5540 model of scanner was not produced until 18 February 2015 [Sherrell
19 at 12 {P1/19/3}].
...
8.3. References to the font Calibri Light [PM46 at 18 {H/278/6}], a font which had not yet been
designed in 2007.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 06:35
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
lomarf
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 07:41
|
|
- Improbable Lobster
- Jan 6, 2012
-
"From each according to his ability" said Ares. It sounded like a quotation.
-
Buglord
|
fuckin' lmao so craig wright, the guy pretending to be satoshi, just got completely corncobbed in some lawsuit
https://www.opencrypto.org/2024-01-23_Schedule_of_Dr_Wrights_Further_Forgeries-COPAvWright.pdf
...
This file is a LaTeX source file, taken from a folder on Dr Wright’s Overleaf account. Dr Wright
has stated that, as Satoshi Nakamoto, he wrote the Bitcoin White Paper using LaTeX. He has also
stated that this document “uniquely codes for the Bitcoin White Paper”, and that when compiled
in Overleaf, produce a copy of the Bitcoin White Paper “in the same form as” and “materially
identical to” that published by Satoshi Nakamoto. [Wright 6 {E/21/3}; Field 1 at 27 {P3/13/10}]
The Bitcoin White Paper was not written in LaTeX. It was written and produced in OpenOffice
2.4. Its metadata record that it was produced by that means. Examination by both parties’ experts
has led them both to conclude, and agree, that it was produced by that means based on every level
of the pdf from the fine details of its typographical presentation, down to the binary digits of the
PDF. [Rosendahl 1 at 66-68 {G/7/23}] [Rosendahl 1 at 191 {G/7/58}] [Lynch 1 at 117-120 and
122.c-d {I/5/36}] [Rosendahl / Lynch 1 at 2 {Q/5/1}].
Dr Wright’s LaTeX files from the TC folder are not original to 2008 or 2009. Using LaTeX
software that is up to date for 2009, none of them compiles properly, instead producing errors
and warnings. The files L and C could not be compiled at all. In order to compile them at all, it is
necessary to fix the files or use a much more modern version of LaTeX software [Rosendahl 1 at
106-112 {G/7/38}]. This is because Dr Wright’s LaTeX files include software packages and options
which could not have been used in 2009 [Rosendahl 1 at 158 {G/7/50}].
...
The original BDO Image was created from a computer running Windows XP. Windows XP does
not record Transaction Log metadata, which was introduced in later operating system. However,
BDOPC.raw does include Transaction Log data, indicating that it was used with a later version of
Windows. Those Transaction logs contains extensive records editing of BDOPC.raw on 17
September 2023. Further, those Transaction Logs indicate other irregularities, such as files being
backdated to appear as if created after they were last modified and accessed. [Madden 4 at 84, -
85 {G/6/28}] [Lynch 1 at 73-75 {I/5/19}]
Windows NTFS file systems record an identifier, the Security ID or “SID”, connected with the
user that edits the files. Of the user documents present on BDOPC.raw, over 99% (over
165,000 files) were apparently created with the correct Security IDs for the original BDO PC
from which the original image was captured in 2007. By contrast, 71 of Dr Wright’s New
Reliance documents were added later, using a different user account with a different SID (the
“Manipulation User”) [Madden 4 at 93-98 {G/6/30}] [Madden / Lynch 1 at 12 {Q/6/5}].
These include all the documents among the New Reliance Documents which actually support
Dr Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
There are multiple iterations of the drive image stored on the same Samsung Drive. Mr Madden
has recovered two more which were deleted in September 2023, but which he has managed to
recover: InfoDef09.raw and Image.raw. These are identical in content to 99.5% of
BDOPC.raw. The remaining 0.5% is made up of data pertaining to New Reliance Documents, and
previous edits of New Reliance Documents. These drive images are among hundreds of GB of data
deleted from the Samsung Drive in September 2023. [Madden 4 at 13.d-e, {G/6/8}]
...
17.2.When asked for the password. Dr Wright stated that “he was hacked in 2020 and his
password files were lost” [Shoosmiths’ letter of 11 January 2024]. That is implausible.
17.3.When asked for details of the alleged hack, Dr Wright stated that he had actually been hacked
at least 10 times [Shoosmiths’ letter of 15 January 2024]. That is at least 10 times more
implausible.
...
4. These documents have been created with the Pandoc document conversion software. Pandoc is
an open-source piece of software that can convert documents between different formats. It can
generate LaTeX documents automatically [Macfarlane 1 at 3 {C/19/1}]. In particular:
4.1. {ID_004687} contains a line which states that it was created as LaTeX via Pandoc, which is
characteristic of the use of Pandoc. [Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}]. Although {ID_004648}
does not include that line “LaTeX via Pandoc”, it includes the other code from the same
October template.
4.2. The template for conversion to LaTeX was not introduced into Pandoc at all until 2010
[Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}].
5. The documents have been created during the course of these proceedings:
5.1. Inspection of the (open-source) source code of Pandoc allows for more precise dating. The
document was created after October 2022. The version of Pandoc used for creation of this
document uses code that was not committed to Pandoc until October 2022. [Macfarlane 1 at
9 {C/19/2}].
...
The document has been backdated. It is a Rich Text File created with the editor version
Riched20.dll v10.0.19041. That version of Riched20 is the version associated with the May 2020
update of Windows 10. [Madden 3 at 86-91 {G/5/34}]
...
3. These documents have been backdated. They refer to the use of C++ elements that were not in
existence at their purported date of October 2007. In particular,
3.1 They call on the use of the libraries “<chrono>”, <thread>” and “<random”. These
libraries are part of the C++11 standard, first released in 2011. [Stroustrup 1 at [4]
{C/23/1}]
3.2 <chrono> was not first proposed until 11 June 2008. [Hinnant 1 at 4 {C/18/1}]
3.3 The first discussion of what became <chrono> was not published until 19 January 2008,
and was not at that time called <chrono>. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]
3.4 Within <chrono>, these documents call for the use of the function “sleep_for”. By 19
January 2008, the function was referred to as ‘sleep’ (not yet ‘sleep_for’). [Hinnant 1 at 5
{C/18/2}]
3.5 By that time, neither <chrono> nor “sleep_for” yet existed, even on the personal
computer of its developer. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]
...
5.1. A deleted file containing part of the content of {ID_004715} was recovered from
InfoDef09.raw. The file was named “Section7.tex”: [PM46 at 92-99 {H/278/25}]. The
content of the deleted “Section7.tex” begins with the words:
“Certainly, here’s the LaTeX code for Section 7, which covers
Recommendations.
``` latex
5.2. The content of the deleted “Section7.tex” ends with the words:
This section presents a set of recommendations based on the research
findings, targeting both practitioners and academic researchers. The
citations are…
5.3. That content is entirely consistent with and indicative of responses provided by an
unconditioned ChatGPT to the question “Are you able to output some template latex code for
section 7 which relates to recommendations?” including the structure, length of response, the
use of “Certainly”, and the use of syntax “``` latex” to introduce LaTeX code. [PM46 at
92-99 {H/278/25}]
5.4. That content was deleted from the version of the equivalent document disclosed within
BDOPC.raw. {ID_004715} however does include the proposed code generated by ChatGPT
within the body of the document.
5.5. ChatGPT did not exist in 2007.
...
5. Hash Based Shadowing.TIF contains metadata with the following information [PM46 at 126-128
{H/278/44}]:
a. it was created on 12 March 2018;
b. it was created with MS Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.14393.0, software associated with
Windows 10 version 1607, which was released in August 2016; and
c. it was scanned with a Xerox DocuMate 5540 scanner.
6. The Xerox DocuMate 5540 model of scanner was not produced until 18 February 2015 [Sherrell
19 at 12 {P1/19/3}].
...
8.3. References to the font Calibri Light [PM46 at 18 {H/278/6}], a font which had not yet been
designed in 2007.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 07:59
|
|
- Mr. Nice!
- Oct 13, 2005
-
bone shaking.
soul baking.
|
guy who forges an entire document to prove that he's another guy who probably didn't even exist
nah. satoshi is real. his goes by dorian and made bitcoin to help facilitate the purchase of model trains from the uk.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 13:45
|
|
- Hammerite
- Mar 9, 2007
-
And you don't remember what I said here, either, but it was pompous and stupid.
-
Jade Ear Joe
|
just checked wikipedia
quote:Dorian Nakamoto
In a high-profile 6 March 2014 article in the magazine Newsweek,
we're coming up on the 10 year anniversary of the Free Lunch
hell, I think Dorian should get another Free Lunch for old time's sake.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 14:10
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
dont torget the car chase
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2024 15:57
|
|
- FMguru
- Sep 10, 2003
-
peed on;
sexually
|
smol sam thinks spending a zillion years in prison isnt fair, would rather spend just five
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/02/sbf-asks-for-5-year-prison-sentence-calls-100-year-recommendation-grotesque/
quote:SBF asks for 5-year prison sentence, calls 100-year recommendation “grotesque”
Bankman-Fried argues for 63 to 78 months, says he "is already being punished."
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2024 23:45
|
|
- ...!
- Oct 5, 2003
-
I SHOULD KEEP MY DUMB MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SPEWING HORSESHIT ABOUT THE ORBITAL MECHANICS OF THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE.
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHAT A LAGRANGE POINT IS?
|
just saw that article lol
tbf that particular prison is a gigantic shithole even by us standards. it should be demolished. but lol at wanting his sentence reduced
lmao at this poo poo in particular
quote:
Although Bankman-Fried was convicted on all charges and was FTX's founder and leader, his sentencing request argued that his culpability is low. The court filing has sections titled, "Sam's Philosophy And Philanthropy," "Sam Is Not Motivated By Greed," "Sam's Caring For Individuals," "Sam's Work Ethic," "Sam's Remorse," "Sam's Low-Level Culpability," and "Sam's Condition."
quote:
In the "Sam Is Already Being Punished" section, the filing cited the "disgusting" and "inhuman" conditions at Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where he's been incarcerated since August 2023. It also cited "shocking and unspeakable harassment online and through the mail" directed at Bankman-Fried and his parents.
Additionally, Bankman-Fried "will likely lose the right to vote, to hold office, to sit on a jury and perhaps to obtain professional licenses." A few paragraphs later, the filing says:
"There is more. Sam's personal assets are gone. Insufficient funds remain even for payment of a fine. Legal proceedings will follow him for the rest of his life. The ability to obtain employment, bank, borrow, travel, and adopt, among other things, may be implicated. More painful for Sam is that the companies he built and loved—and which had so much lawful success and even more potential—are gone. And Sam is utterly heartbroken that he may have caused collateral damage to the philanthropic community that he so loved."
Bankman-Fried's sentencing submission was accompanied by letters of support from his parents and others. His mother, Barbara Fried, wrote that "Sam is the first person we would call if we needed an angel of mercy in a pinch," and that he "lived an exemplary life in every way prior to the events that brought FTX down."
"I would gladly change places with him if I could," Fried wrote.
💩
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 00:03
|
|
- Paladinus
- Jan 11, 2014
-
heyHEYYYY!!!
|
When we asked our son to illegally give us his customers' money, he never once said no to us. This is how generous he is!
But, when/if he's out of prison, we will not pay him back in kind, he will be destitute and homeless forever.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 00:09
|
|
- FMguru
- Sep 10, 2003
-
peed on;
sexually
|
lol
he lived an exemplary life right up until the moment that he stole $10bn of money that was entrusted to him
he is utterly heartbroken that he may have caused collateral damage to the philanthropic community that he so loved, ie his fellow techlords hate him for blowing up their bullshit "effective altruism" racket
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 00:15
|
|
- Paladinus
- Jan 11, 2014
-
heyHEYYYY!!!
|
Now, to be fair, I think his punishment should be something like 10 years + never to be allowed to handle sums of money over 10k or touch a computer. But also, realistically, he will likely be pardoned in about 10 years anyway, without any further restrictions.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 00:19
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
this is really impacting his presidential campaign guys...
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:13
|
|
- Officer Sandvich
- Feb 14, 2010
-
|
His mother, Barbara Fried, wrote that "Sam is the first person we would call if we needed an angel of mercy in a pinch,"
What does this mean?
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:31
|
|
- SubG
- Aug 19, 2004
-
It's a hard world for little things.
|
he's got a lot of prescription meds
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:33
|
|
- qirex
- Feb 15, 2001
-
|
"my son is a real good boy, promise" - prestigious legal scholar barbara freid, in an official filing
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:35
|
|
- Paladinus
- Jan 11, 2014
-
heyHEYYYY!!!
|
An angel of mercy or angel of death is a type of criminal offender (often a type of serial killer) who is usually employed as a medical practitioner or a caregiver and intentionally harms or kills people under their care.[1][2][3] The angel of mercy is often in a position of power and may decide the victim would be better off if they no longer suffered from whatever severe illness is plaguing them. This person then uses their knowledge to kill the victim. In some cases, as time goes on, this behavior escalates to encompass the healthy and the easily treated.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:35
|
|
- Trillhouse
- Dec 31, 2000
-
|
"Sam's Remorse" gave me a good laugh. So remorseful he never admitted any wrongdoing and lied on the stand literally hundreds of times.
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:42
|
|
- Boxturret
- Oct 3, 2013
-
Don't ask me about Sonic the Hedgehog diaper fetish
|
i mean he is in fact already being punished, correct
so he's complaining that they should stop punishing him because the punishment he is serving is already punishing him............?
did they sneak some shrimp soaked in amphetamines to him or something
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 01:54
|
|
- Escape From Noise
- Jul 27, 2004
-
|
I got 100 years and it's Sam's remorse!
I lost my beautiful company and it's now a corpse!
|
|
#
?
Feb 29, 2024 02:07
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2024 17:27
|
|
#
?
Feb 24, 2024 02:38
