skeleton warrior posted:

it still makes Biden's tweet aspirational about his effectiveness, not a lie which was your original, intentionally incendiary statement.

VitalSigns posted:

It wasn't a statement, it was a question to examine what you were saying. You're jumping on someone for simply saying what the president said and when this is pointed out, doing a bunch of gymnastics to add imaginary caveats to reconcile Biden's words with what you think they ought to be.

Nobody thinks about the presidency the way you're scolding people to, not even the president himself who routinely makes promises to pass an agenda, not to simply wait around and hope someone else does something that he can then support, because that is not the the role of the president who is a political leader not simply a functionary with a rubber stamp.

VitalSigns posted:

Phlegmish posted:

I was going to say something about the appropriateness of C-SPAM being depicted as a child

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

3

4

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

5

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

7

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

2

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

5

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

7

Alexander Grab posted:

Napoleon encouraged the population to get immunized, although he never proclaimed it mandatory. In May 1811, the Emperor ordered Henri-Marie Husson, one of the chief physicians of France, to vaccinate his son shortly after his birth. The well-publicized event intended to show an example to the French people. Aside from Napoleon, vaccination enjoyed the strong support of other top officials, including Lucien Bonaparte, and Maurice de Talleyrand. In 1800, the government organized the Comité central de vaccine, consisting of medical and administrative personnel, to combat smallpox nationwide.

In the last five years of the Empire, one out of two newborns was vaccinated in half the departments, and the number of smallpox cases declined to about one-quarter of the pre-revolutionary number.

Payne posted:

VitalSigns posted:

How is he still bitching about Whitmer it's been 4 years, how can you be that traumatized from not getting to go to Applebee's for a few months.

Murdstone posted:

Why is there a child alone at the bar?

Ben Garrison posted:

It seems to me the Democrats should start beating the drum for Hillary to enter the race. After all, the Clintons had sway over their party for a long time. They got pushed aside by Barack and his operatives, but who does Obama have to offer right now? That’s right, Big Mike. That’s it. Many want her to run, but she won’t because she will be a disaster and he/she knows it. It has nothing to do with whether or not she’s a ’[slur]’ )and that’s “OK” according to the late Joan Rivers), it has to do with her lack of experience and, well, she hated America until Barry got in. It would be fun to see her debate Trump, but no, she won’t run.

Barack’s Vice President has flopped miserably. He has the lowest rating of any modern president. America is being invaded. Inflation is still high, and everyone aside from Baby Boomers cannot afford a house and can barely make ends meet. Biden is a war monger and a completely corrupt, hair-sniffing pedophile.

Kamala has a lower rating than Joe. She’s a joke and incompetent. A laughing hyena in high heels.

Gavin Newsom? Many Democrats want him to jump in and replace Biden, but he’s simply a younger version of Joe. Despite Gavin’s slick talking and slicked-back hairdo, he has destroyed California. They act like that’s an accomplishment, but Americans aren’t that stupid. Besides, he’s another white male.

Therefore, don’t be surprised if they trot out Hillary once more during the Democrat Convention. They’ll say she’s the most experienced. She certainly is seasoned and she looks it, but she’s a year younger than Trump. Joe is on tilt and then can’t roll back his odometer…so don’t be surprised if Hillary is one again thrown into the breach. She wants so very badly to defeat Trump, and she will lose. Again!

Another Hillary loss will be glorious.

Pants Donkey posted:

Vib Rib posted:

"Stop talking about Trump, lady!" cries man still talking about Hillary Clinton

VitalSigns posted:

How is he still bitching about Whitmer it's been 4 years, how can you be that traumatized from not getting to go to Applebee's for a few months.

Pants Donkey posted:

Pants Donkey posted:

I don’t know if the cancer has spread to his brain, or if he realized he likely won’t live to see Hilary die, so he felt the need to make an obit cartoon? Like, he’s also back to the same 2020 “SHE’LL RUN ANY DAY NOW” nonsense and the cartoon has nothing to do with anything.

skeleton warrior posted:

Selachian posted:

11

Selachian posted:

3

Selachian posted:

5

I just like the design of Insecurity.

idonotlikepeas posted:

Jeff Danziger

idonotlikepeas posted:

Robert (R.J.) Matson

Drakyn posted:

Colourist Errors, Corrected

idonotlikepeas posted:

NEMØ

1

Kellies Nomination: Laziest Non-Gorrell. (Taking your previous cartoon, enlarging part of it, and writing "ignore" under it is not much of a day's work.)

2

It's the one on the left. Do I win a prize?