(Thread IKs:
loquacius)
|
https://x.com/ettingermentum/status/1779210129692311878?s=46
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 19:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 05:42 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Trying to target people who will vote for Biden isn't unreasonable. The goal of a political campaign is to win, so it makes perfect sense that you would want to direct your money and volunteer time as much as possible to people who will vote for your guy, and not the other guy. It would be stupid to purposely not focus your efforts and end up helping your opponent. A very common criticism of the Hillary campaign is that she didn't even try to turn out potential Democratic voters in states she needed, and instead pursued a goal unrelated to trying to actually win (running up the popular vote in California so she could claim her surely-inevitable presidency had a huge mandate) if they really wanted to pre-screen new registrations by affiliations, the volunteers would be wearing those obama t-shirts this year, bc I guarantee that those would filter out non-democrats, unlike in 2012. but since the democrats are also trying to woo indy voters & never-trumpers that prolly wouldn't work.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:01 |
|
good day for a cafecito
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:04 |
|
oye como va mi ritmo
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:05 |
|
fits my needs posted:good day for a cafecito
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:08 |
|
fits my needs posted:good day for a cafecito
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:14 |
|
fits my needs posted:oye como va mi ritmo I'm appreciating you for blasting this through your backpack speaker, thank you
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:19 |
|
Willa Rogers posted:speaking of Saving Democracy, this story is a couple weeks old but it made me lol. internal memos about democrat voter-reg initiatives warn that they--get this!--might be helping the wrong kind of voters save democracy Dems: "Vote!" Young conservative-leaning guy who considered himself apolitical and never voted: "Ok, I'm going to vote for the guy you hate."
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:20 |
|
"For the first time". Uh huh.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:22 |
|
F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:"For the first time". Uh huh. She was really moved by Biden's backing of a genocide
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:29 |
|
The DCCC is such an incredibly foul organization.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:30 |
|
lmao I cannot imagine giving the democrats 260 let alone 260k holy crap haha
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:33 |
|
Don't cry for her, alexandria; she has plenty of money on hand.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:37 |
|
she already has the ghoulish pelosi smile
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:37 |
|
Willa Rogers posted:Don't cry for her, alexandria; she has plenty of money on hand. Nice work if you can get it. Making money doing nothing, exempting yourself from warrantless surveillance requirements....life must be great for elites in congress.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:38 |
|
the courage to change... into a lizard member of congress
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:38 |
|
Gunshow Poophole posted:Richard Richard dick salad colton durbo
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:39 |
|
https://twitter.com/axios/status/1779149560801059008
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 20:59 |
yes i assume that's what any candidate would say in any election thank you for your wisdom sir
|
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:01 |
|
lol
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:02 |
|
"But TWUMP!"
F_Shit_Fitzgerald has issued a correction as of 21:10 on Apr 13, 2024 |
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:02 |
|
If inflation would be worse with Trump as president that implies the President has the ability to influence inflation. Thus the terrible inflation we are enduring under Biden is a choice on his part not something out of his hands.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:04 |
|
Shageletic posted:Prepare to get depressed thanks!
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:06 |
|
"MAGAnomics is inflation-feeding welfare for the rich that raises taxes," White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates writes in a new memo to Biden allies, out this morning. yeah, sure, go with that since touting bidenomics has worked out so well, and since inflation has gone up 30 percent since genocide joe took office.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:08 |
|
wait I thought the economy was good unless you were too stupid to know how good you had it. did that message stop? seemed flawless, not sure why you’d ever want to pivot from that
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:10 |
|
Look I carry around this rock and i call it the anti bad inflation rock and if I didnt have this rock the inflation would be way worse.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:11 |
|
if they're gonna be the republican party from 20 years ago then they might as well adopt their campaign tactics
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:24 |
|
insane clown pussy posted:if they're gonna be the republican party from 20 years ago then they might as well adopt their campaign tactics They'll still be the opposition, complaining about how Republican president BloodsniperAK47's username contains a Russian gun.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:28 |
|
Best Friends posted:wait I thought the economy was good unless you were too stupid to know how good you had it. did that message stop? seemed flawless, not sure why you’d ever want to pivot from that Once again we have the mainstream media lazily trying to continue a narrative that the economy is a problem for Biden. If there are weak economic numbers, it’s bad for Biden. If there are strong economic numbers, it’s bad for Biden. The latest example is the pathetic front page headline in today’s Washington Post: The economy, and inflation, are revving up at a terrible time for Biden. The article starts by pointing out that there are “unexpectedly strong job growth, wages and consumer spending” right now. Sounds good, right? But no, WaPo cries that these numbers come at a “terrible time” for Biden and are “bad luck” for him. WaPo’s key point for trying to explain that these numbers are “terrible” for Biden is that they prevent inflation from dropping. Yes, inflation went up by a small 0.3% in March, but WaPo describes this blip with overblown language like “inflation revving up” and “ inflation heating back up.” Nevermind that inflation is down from 9.1% in June 2022. Nevermind that inflation was higher at similar points in President Bill Clinton’s and President Ronald Reagan’s tenures, when year-on-year inflation was at 3.6% and 4.8%, respectively, and both went on to win reelection. Nevermind that, as WaPo points out, that “so far Americans have been more than happy to splurge on services like dining out, travel and hotel stays, despite inflation.” Nevermind that, as WaPo also points out, “big-ticket items like cars, furniture and appliances, have actually gotten cheaper in the past year.” Still, the newspaper decided to cast all of this in an extremely negative framing for Biden. That’s an intentional and manipulative choice, imho. The key data point the article uses to show the problem with inflation is that gasoline prices have been “creeping up” over the past two months. Well, the current average is $3.633, up from $3.396 a month ago — up a small $0.237. Nevermind that it’s down from $3.645 one year ago. Nevermind that gasoline prices increase every year leading into summer. Yet WaPo opines that Biden is “struggling” on his economic messaging. It’s no wonder, when you have the corporate media determined to beat to death its lazy narrative that the economy is a problem for Biden and always will be forever and a day. We all know that if consumer spending or job growth or wages were to drop, WaPo would jump on that as also being “terrible” for Biden. Thanks for allowing me to rant.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:29 |
|
The cope is strong with that one. There's long been a maxim in politics: if you're explaining, you're losing. No one cares what the YoY inflation numbers were under Reagan or Clinton; they care what's happening with their pocketbooks in the here and now.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:30 |
|
their latest response to inflation is to once again claim it would be worse under trump. that is the entirety of their plan.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 21:53 |
|
All Trump has to do is promise to revert prices to what they used to be five years ago and he'll win with a supermajority.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:02 |
|
I'm so glad that we elected President Biden in 2020, now the adults are back in charge. Trump almost certainly would've started WW3 in his 2nd term.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:05 |
|
there is like a 2% chance that some prices would deflate just because business owners are chuds who like trump
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1214267892482469888?t=JOcZ0I711Gs_HogbLYXHaQ&s=19
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:21 |
|
You think Biden would be worse than Trump? Trump would start WW4!
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/ettingermentum/status/1779238564909215911 Blinken isn't just a complete bloodthirsty psycho, he's also astoundingly incompetent
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:38 |
|
Malleum posted:if the cost of democracy is 50,000 dead children maybe it deserves to die
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:42 |
|
fits my needs posted:good day for a cafecito
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 05:42 |
|
theCalamity posted:You think Biden would be worse than Trump? Trump would start WW4!
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 22:51 |