Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Tha_Joker_GAmer
Aug 16, 2006

Gort posted:

Your objections are dumb and come across as straw-clutching in defense of Nazis. The anti-Nazi laws work perfectly fine in Germany, and your objection of "well maybe Trump will make a law that says good people are bad and lock them up" is infantile. If you only made laws that could not be altered to be bad laws, you would make no laws.

And the far right is in power. You have a rapist for a president.

If comparisons to other countries worked on Americans they wouldn't have dogshit healthcare and education, so this tactic just isn't going to work

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

OddObserver posted:

I think it helps that Germany has a parliamentary system in which the crazies go for something like AfD --- in shockingly high numbers, but it means the CDU doesn't have them as their base the way GOP does.

That is a good point. If they can win 2 or 3 insignificant seats in parliament from which to howl at the moon, that could be the outlet for racist shits over there. Over here, the racists who aren't satisfied with being winked and nodded at can march while waving swastika flags as their "hear us, we matter, white power!" outlet.

edit: and yes, Nazi bans would never be tolerated here. That would ironically be un-American.

Koalas March
May 21, 2007




BigBallChunkyTime
Nov 25, 2011

Kyle Schwarber: World Series hero, Beefy Lad, better than you.

Illegal Hen

I didn't think there would be consequences for being a Nazi in public!

Old Kentucky Shark
May 25, 2012

If you think you're gonna get sympathy from the shark, well then, you won't.


Groovelord Neato posted:

i am correct and he would be incorrect.

We don't construct governmental institutions that only work properly when people with correct views are in charge. That's kind of a lot of the problems we've been running into with the current administration.

Everything you correctly think applies to nazis Jeff Sessions incorrectly thinks applies to BLM.

Casey Finnigan
Apr 30, 2009

Dumb ✔
So goddamn crazy ✔

Yeah so when this is the official response when neo Nazis literally kill innocents then Nazis no longer need anyone to go to bat for their rights to organize and speak

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Gort posted:

And the far right is in power. You have a rapist for a president.

Which is why your argument of "we shouldn't care what the far-right does with these laws" is bad.

Yes, they're going to pull poo poo with existing laws. But setting up a framework specifically designed to let the government decide that certain symbols/names/phrases can be outlawed seems really loving disastrous when most Americans would nod silently when BLM or antifa organizations are added to the list.

Shouting "but the system already is against them" is not an answer to "don't give the system more power over them".

This is not a legislative fight. This is about education and awareness, and as long as most Americans are happy to say "both sides are bad" about antifa and fa, laws won't help.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Old Kentucky Shark posted:

Everything you correctly think applies to nazis Jeff Sessions incorrectly thinks applies to BLM.

no, he knows it doesn't. he just hates black people.

when they say blm is just as bad as nazis they are lying to justify their hatred. they know it isn't true.

do you think the nazis really thought the jews were secretly ultrapowerful?

Drifter
Oct 22, 2000

Belated Bear Witness
Soiled Meat

JawKnee posted:

there is no chance I'm reading that huge screed at 1am
If you're talking about Paracaidas's post above, then perhaps it's too late to be here at all. I hope you at least come back to it and read what they wrote, since it seems rational and well thought out.

p.s. gently caress this thread moves incredibly fast.

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



Old Kentucky Shark posted:

We don't construct governmental institutions that only work properly when people with correct views are in charge. That's kind of a lot of the problems we've been running into with the current administration.

Everything you correctly think applies to nazis Jeff Sessions incorrectly thinks applies to BLM.

Sessions doesn't "incorrectly think" anything. He wants to hurt black people, he just can't explicitly say he does. Southern strategy, friend of the family friend of the family niggers etc.

Someone post the quote please.

Bicyclops
Aug 27, 2004


For whatever reason, this was the morning I woke up and checked the PPJ tweet summary and just cried. I guess it had to happen eventually.

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

skeleton warrior posted:

Which is why your argument of "we shouldn't care what the far-right does with these laws" is bad.

Yes, they're going to pull poo poo with existing laws. But setting up a framework specifically designed to let the government decide that certain symbols/names/phrases can be outlawed seems really loving disastrous when most Americans would nod silently when BLM or antifa organizations are added to the list.

Shouting "but the system already is against them" is not an answer to "don't give the system more power over them".

This is not a legislative fight. This is about education and awareness, and as long as most Americans are happy to say "both sides are bad" about antifa and fa, laws won't help.

I strongly encourage Nazis to proudly wear their swastikas in public. Makes it much easier for police (and employers) to keep an eye on them.

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Groovelord Neato posted:

no, he knows it doesn't. he just hates black people.

when they say blm is just as bad as nazis they are lying to justify their hatred. they know it isn't true.

do you think the nazis really thought the jews were secretly ultrapowerful?

JEsus, yes, some did. Lots in the rank and file did. Lots of Americans don't pay attention to politics as anything more than a tv in the background on Fox News or their friend who's a ditto head and have fully swallowed some idea that BLM is a terrorist organization because they're only in the news when cops get shot and also they're filled with colored people and we all know how THEY are. Does Rush Limbaugh really believe BLM is a terrorist organization? I don't know, but most of his audience truly does.

Dr. VooDoo
May 4, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 8 minutes!

WhiteHouse literally will not denounce actual Nazis, including the one that ran people over with a car. The Nazis know this is a wink and nod at them, even their newsletter the DailyStormer is pointing out how Trump is on their side because of the coded words he is using

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

The Failing New York Times.

Drifter
Oct 22, 2000

Belated Bear Witness
Soiled Meat

Koalas March posted:

Sessions doesn't "incorrectly think" anything. He wants to hurt black people, he just can't explicitly say he does. Southern strategy, friend of the family friend of the family niggers etc.

Someone post the quote please.

Lee Atwater posted:

…you start out in 1954 by saying friend of the family, friend of the family, friend of the family. By 1968 you can’t say friend of the family, that hurts, there’s a backlash, so you say stuff like forced busing, states rights and all that stuff. And you’re getting so abstract now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all of these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it, I’m not saying it.
… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “friend of the family, friend of the family.”

Drifter fucked around with this message at 17:00 on Aug 13, 2017

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



Old Kentucky Shark posted:

We don't construct governmental institutions that only work properly when people with correct views are in charge. That's kind of a lot of the problems we've been running into with the current administration.

Everything you correctly think applies to nazis Jeff Sessions incorrectly thinks applies to BLM.

I would also like to add, poo poo like this is another reason to listen to minority voices. We been saying Sessions knows what he does and is racist af, but no one listens and you've got people out here in the year of our dread lord 2017, who (seem to) genuinely think that Sessions guy is just wrong or misguided.

skeleton warrior
Nov 12, 2016


Koalas March posted:

Sessions doesn't "incorrectly think" anything. He wants to hurt black people, he just can't explicitly say he does. Southern strategy, friend of the family friend of the family niggers etc.

Someone post the quote please.

You should be a D&D mod, dammit.

Lee Atwater posted:

You start out in 1954 by saying, “friend of the family, friend of the family, friend of the family.” By 1968 you can't say “friend of the family” — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “friend of the family, friend of the family.”

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


"Slippery slope, slippery slope!" i continue to insist as i slowly shrink and transform into a mound of ashes

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012

Rigel posted:

I strongly encourage Nazis to proudly wear their swastikas in public. Makes it much easier for police (and employers) to keep an eye on them.

Problem is that you then realize that it's fair number of police and employers wearing those swastikas.

Koalas March
May 21, 2007



skeleton warrior posted:

You should be a D&D mod, dammit.

Start a write in campaign!

please don't do this the admins have enough to deal with

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea

skeleton warrior posted:

Which is why your argument of "we shouldn't care what the far-right does with these laws" is bad.

"We shouldn't make any laws because what if the far-right gets in power and changes them to be bad" is a stick you can use to beat any good law with. "What if Trump flips income tax so the rich pay 10% and the poor pay 90%" is not a good argument against progressive taxation, and "What if Trump flips anti-Nazi laws so they ban those who oppose Nazis" is not a good argument against hate-speech legislation.

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

https://twitter.com/LOLGOP/status/896500535183933441

Casey Finnigan
Apr 30, 2009

Dumb ✔
So goddamn crazy ✔

Sephyr posted:

Problem is that you then realize that it's fair number of police and employers wearing those swastikas.

It'll let police keep an eye on them so they can pat them on the back when they brutalize a minority

WeAreTheRomans
Feb 23, 2010

by R. Guyovich

Just imagine being him at any point in his life. Would literally rather just be dead

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


skeleton warrior posted:

JEsus, yes, some did. Lots in the rank and file did. Lots of Americans don't pay attention to politics as anything more than a tv in the background on Fox News or their friend who's a ditto head and have fully swallowed some idea that BLM is a terrorist organization because they're only in the news when cops get shot and also they're filled with colored people and we all know how THEY are. Does Rush Limbaugh really believe BLM is a terrorist organization? I don't know, but most of his audience truly does.

they think this because rush et all tell them so.

most nazis hated jews, they didn't think they secretly ran the world. saying that poo poo is cover for hatred because you need some kind of "genuine" excuse.

actionjackson
Jan 12, 2003

Orange Devil posted:

The Failing New York Times.

gently caress I may have to cancel my sub. But I'm still going to pay for the crossword :colbert:

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Randler posted:

The Nazis (as in the actual National Socialist Party) weren't much of a unified movement in the beginning either. But there were other movements in the general right-wing area, so ultimately they could all join forces and become unified because they weren't challenged enough at a time while they were still weak and unorganized. (It probably didn't help that the far-left back in Weimar was extremely happy to sabotage the Weimar republic as well and considered the SPD a more important fascist target than the nazis.)

In case anyone is doing some reading on nazis history and is confused why the far-left might consider the SPD a more important target than the nazis, it's because the SPD murdered the far-left leadership about 10 years prior.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

McMaster might be the one dude who is capable of standing up to Trump so I can't poo poo on him too hard.

Mattis also exists.

And conceivably Kelly, although he's a shitbag in other ways and also is likely to get fired if he threatens Donnie's twitter phone gets too uppity. :v:

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

Reportedly the last words written on facebook by that woman who was murdered by the nazi were: "If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention."

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


mattis is a war criminal and kelly is a racist fucktard i don't care if they can stand up to trump. i'm not trading one pile of garbage for another.

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

Similarly, the Wall Street Journal also came out with an embarrassing editorial this weekend about how liberals are obsessed with identity politics.

Drifter
Oct 22, 2000

Belated Bear Witness
Soiled Meat

Groovelord Neato posted:

mattis is a war criminal and kelly is a racist fucktard i don't care if they can stand up to trump. i'm not trading one pile of garbage for another.

Trading one pile of garbage for another is literally what success looks like at the moment, however.

Casey Finnigan
Apr 30, 2009

Dumb ✔
So goddamn crazy ✔

Groovelord Neato posted:

they think this because rush et all tell them so.

most nazis hated jews, they didn't think they secretly ran the world. saying that poo poo is cover for hatred because you need some kind of "genuine" excuse.

I think some of the dumber ones actually believe the poo poo they spew, and a lot of the "smarter" ones kind of half-believe it, like they realize it's all bullshit but they hate the Jews or blacks anyway so they'll let the idea they're globalist overlords or violent brutal protesting criminals or whatever stew in the back of their minds. Alex Jones is dumb as hell, for example, and basically spews anti-Semitic poo poo nonstop but it seems like he kinda does actually think the Jewish mafia runs the NWO or whatever. I think these people surround themselves with so much bullshit that even their dumb logically inconsistent views become earnestly held

Count Roland
Oct 6, 2013

Pembroke Fuse posted:

The two most notable I can remember are:
- The capture and murder of Rosa Luxemburg, member of the KPD and all-around extremely capable revolutionary who criticized both the Leninists and the SPD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_Luxemburg
- The assassination of Foreign Minister Walther Rathenau by two ultra-nationalists in 1922 (no link, but you can find it all history books on the period)

I'm sure other research about street battles has been done though.

Thanks.

boner confessor
Apr 25, 2013

by R. Guyovich

DaveWoo posted:

Similarly, the Wall Street Journal also came out with an embarrassing editorial this weekend about how liberals are obsessed with identity politics.

ah weird i didn't know the gbs hivemind wrote for the WSJ, neat

F_Shit_Fitzgerald
Feb 2, 2017



Arrgytehpirate posted:

Nazi's ruin everything. I was supposed to work from like, 9-3 today, now I'll be working like 2-10 because I have to cover a vigil tonight for the girl that died in Charlottesville. I had plans. God dammit nazis.

Some of my high school friends organized that, and I was seriously giving a lot of thought to going myself.

To answer someone else's question (I know this was several pages ago): yes, it's in town right next to the downtown pedestrian mall.

F_Shit_Fitzgerald fucked around with this message at 17:11 on Aug 13, 2017

Calibanibal
Aug 25, 2015

well i tell u what anytime i show up anywhere im lookin for trouble w/ nazis TBQH

BarbarianElephant
Feb 12, 2015
The fairy of forgiveness has removed your red text.


I imagine his sales went through the roof, so he's probably happy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Mattis also exists.

And conceivably Kelly, although he's a shitbag in other ways and also is likely to get fired if he threatens Donnie's twitter phone gets too uppity. :v:

The events of yesterday have proven that Kelly is absolutely worthless; he's either unable or unwilling to control Trump's worst instincts.

  • Locked thread