|
Smudgie Buggler posted:He's exactly as big a wanker as he looks. Yep. No wonder he could afford to shout everyone bottles of Moet! Funnily enough, Obiter (for the uneducated, it's the UQLS' satirical publication, mostly full of poo poo, George Brandis was once an editor) was censored to prevent them even alluding to the UQLS having money troubles last year. The Before Times fucked around with this message at 14:32 on Mar 12, 2015 |
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 05:20 |
|
I have lawn but I never Moet
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:31 |
|
Any other politicians in Brisbane you feel like visiting?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:31 |
|
Shadeoses posted:Any other politicians in Brisbane you feel like visiting? I'd need a heads up like this one.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:36 |
|
How about Dr Bill Glasson
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:40 |
|
I don't think that's a good idea.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:41 |
|
Anidav posted:I don't think that's a good idea. "Hey Bill, I outed your QUT lecturer mate as a political hack, wanna come to dinner?"
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:42 |
|
Anidav posted:I don't think that's a good idea. I think it's an awesome idea. We can ask him what he thinks about political voting campaigns.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:44 |
|
"You ruined my liiiife!" *tears off shirt and spear tackles me to the ground*
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:45 |
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:45 |
|
Popes been off his game for a week or so, maybe it's true that Abbott is beyond parody.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:52 |
|
I swear he is copy pasting that loving Abbott face.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:53 |
|
It looks like he's experimenting with autofellatio.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:54 |
|
Mithranderp posted:No wonder he could afford to shout everyone bottles of Moet! HA! I don't remember you being there that night. Then again, I did drink an awful lot of someone's Moet.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:56 |
|
Anidav posted:I swear he is copy pasting that loving Abbott face. Like an Anidav job application?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:57 |
|
Yeah, it's in that briefcase.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:58 |
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:HA! I don't remember you being there that night. Then again, I did drink an awful lot of someone's Moet. Lol, not sure which night you're referring to--he basically bought bottles of Moet at every possible occasion.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 14:59 |
|
Mithranderp posted:"Hey Bill, I outed your QUT lecturer mate as a political hack, wanna come to dinner?" What's the story behind this?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:01 |
|
Mithranderp posted:Lol, not sure which night you're referring to--he basically bought bottles of Moet at every possible occasion. That figures. I was thinking specifically when he turned up to the 2013 Reform victory party uninvited with a case of it.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:03 |
|
Mithranderp posted:It looks like he's experimenting with autofellatio. Huffing farts imo.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:05 |
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:That figures. I was thinking specifically when he turned up to the 2013 Reform victory party uninvited with a case of it. Aaaah. I can't remember if I went to that. I know I was at Red Room during the waiting-for-results period, and I THINK I went to a party at Josh's after that, but tbh it was waaaay too long ago for me to remember. But yeah, he splashed out for Moet on several occasions. I heard at one point that there might be a criminal investigation into everything he did? But I don't think anything came of that.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:09 |
|
Zenithe posted:Huffing farts imo. Perfect fart-huffing position.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:19 |
Ket posted:What's the story behind this? Anime David studied at a university that held a class that Bill Glasson used for free ideas on an election campaign. He went to the media (crikey I think) about this, there was a story about it and it hurt Glassons election, which he then lost. Auspol nearly had a collective orgasm. It was tops.
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:29 |
|
Nice timing on this: http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2015/03/court-overturns-dutch-data-retention-law-privacy-more-important/
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:30 |
|
Frogmanv2 posted:Anime David studied at a university that held a class that Bill Glasson used for free ideas on an election campaign. He went to the media (crikey I think) about this, there was a story about it and it hurt Glassons election, which he then lost. Auspol nearly had a collective orgasm. It was tops. And right as it was happening Raptorfag was on a pony spree in the thread, meaning anybody searching for it got a load of cartoon horse dick.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:31 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:And right as it was happening Raptorfag was on a pony spree in the thread, meaning anybody searching for it got a load of cartoon horse dick. The perfect storm.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:35 |
Doctor Spaceman posted:And right as it was happening Raptorfag was on a pony spree in the thread, meaning anybody searching for it got a load of cartoon horse dick. Maybe that's why auspol had the collective orgasm, I get confused on the details.
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 15:36 |
|
The Brick with Eyes is leaving Palmer
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 16:24 |
|
and then there was 1.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 16:31 |
|
dr_rat posted:and then there was 1. I don't think Jeff can hold his seat after that little whole 'being on fire' incident.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 17:46 |
|
tithin posted:Ewe2,thank you for the updates. From pages back, but there's no court today. Honestly, I think it might come down to the summing-up. The defence seems to be riding on the letter of the law, that they meant that access to Hockey was being sold, not Hockey himself. The prosecution has attacked this defence but curiously has taken the defamation as read: they haven't pressed the standard attack that a reasonable person would take a particular inference and cited evidence. Instead they've taken a conspiracy theory approach and claimed the article was motivated by spite and spent a lot of time trying to prove a top-down direction to "get" Hockey. Hockey's brief could tie all this up in an appropriate package for the judge of course, but I'm also expecting the defence to use their very attack as reason to drop the case. For me, there was too much irrelevant argument about who might have texted what to who and a view of Fairfax that appears to assume much that one might expect from a News Corp editor, which may not have bearing on the case, but is a really telling light on their attitude. And dragging ICAC into it also seems opportunistic and a bit dumb. The defence case has highlighted that they took reasonable steps to engage with Hockey in not just the cited article but the previous one also (which the prosecution took so much time on), that they took legal advice on it is also important. In fact the cross-examination by Hockey's brief brought up much material that was more useful to the defence it seems to me. I don't think the prosecution established the motive they wanted successfully, but defamation hinges on what the defence can prove, so it comes down more to whether their answers were sufficient. So for me the actual charge of imputing corruption to Hockey is not proven, but I can't say he won't get away with having his "pain" acknowledged. It's going to come down on the best light each brief can put on their evidence. I would give it to the defence but unfortunately defamation law tends to give the free prize to the plaintiff too often.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 20:31 |
|
Frogmanv2 posted:Don't get me wrong here, I'm happy to laugh at a joke, but when your joke is the same tired poo poo that has been a meme on this site for nearly a decade, it's probably time to stop thinking it's comedy genius. Sorry for upsetting your enjoyment of Auspol by posting "the same poo poo we always hear" you tiresome idiot
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 22:15 |
|
Sarkeesian at the opera house https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhgEuY64ECw
|
# ? Mar 12, 2015 22:15 |
|
Birb Katter posted:Sarkeesian at the opera house So they'll let her speak at the Opera House but Julien Blanc gets run out of the country. Nice misandry Australia.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:01 |
|
lmao
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:03 |
|
that's all very interesting but i think you'll find a more pressing matter is
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:10 |
|
quote:Internet service provider TPG is planning to buy its rival iiNet for $1.4 billion. Worst ISP to buy best ISP. What could possibly go wrong?!
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:11 |
Ragingsheep posted:http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/vietnamese-boats-unseaworthy-government-sources-say-20150311-1411bi.html garish ˈɡɛːrɪʃ/ adjective obtrusively bright and showy; lurid. A lifeboat thats supposed to be seen by rescuers... garish. What an interesting choice of words. fiery_valkyrie posted:If they really have to be sent back (they dont) just put them on a loving plane. Jetstar flights from Darwin to Indonesia are as cheap as $150 per person. I'm sure the government can find some
|
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:18 |
|
Anidav posted:Worst ISP to buy best ISP. People always say TPG is crap, and in the 6 years I've been with them I can't say I've ever experienced that. I've always been able to pull down about what I should according to sync speed. Also, when I used to work for another provider with third party equipment and we visited our equipment in exchanges for port testing, Internode's cabling was probably the worst I've seen there. That might have changed since then, but it didn't really inspire confidence. EDIT: It's also funny considering a few years ago everyone was speculating iiNet would buy out TPG. TPG has a lot more assets than people think, i.e PIPE. CrazyTolradi fucked around with this message at 00:24 on Mar 13, 2015 |
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:22 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 05:20 |
|
Anidav posted:Worst ISP to buy best ISP. And iiNet owns Internode too, right? Seems like bad news for competition. Looking around for NBN plans at the moment, and it's difficult to choose.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2015 00:24 |