|
LtKenFrankenstein posted:I find most 'posters' in this style pretty stupid and obnoxious, but this one really takes the cake. The problem with posters like these is that they take one small part of a film and capitalize on it as if its some sort of defining and hyper important trait that the poster just has to reference. Some of them are quite nice and imply a proper theme of the movie but most are just really silly references.
|
#
¿
Jan 22, 2012 07:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 22:48 |
|
|
Blindeye posted:Jeffrey Coombs Question I love this movie and thats poster I want sitting on my wall. I love the dollar bill flag.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2012 18:08
|
|
.
|
What the hell, Emma Thompson was in that?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2012 07:19
|
|
|
Is there any possibility of Men in Black 3 NOT being terrible and awful like Men in Black 2?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2012 17:35
|
|
|
fenix down posted:That is awesome. Such attention to detail. As much as computers have made this a thousand times easier and more detailed, theres something amazing about old practical techniques that computers will just never replicate.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2012 18:15
|
|
|
oldpainless posted:Yeah but its not very good. I watched it not too long ago and it was... decent. Far more of a monster movie then a dramatic tragedy like the first one but not a terrible movie. Its a far inferior sequel though, The Fly is really an excellent film.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2012 15:17
|
|
|
Actually he is completely right. A DVD being involved is completely inconsequential to the scene and utterly pointless as a design point for the film packaging. Maybe you should stop defending a lovely design choice?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2012 19:36
|
|
|
TetsuoTW posted:Yeah, Torque kind of fell victim to Poe's Law. Coming in the wake of the first two Fast & Furious movies, which are already loving ridiculous, a lot of people thought Torque was supposed to be serious. Well, the producers and Ice Cube certainly did. I dunno about anyone else on set though.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2012 07:55
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:I can think of two instances where studios actually said "this sucks". I think it basically comes down to risk assessment. Considering both movies cost a shitload to make it was going to be a massive gamble on any further movies when critical reception was just that poor. This doesn't always happen, Transformers is just poo poo but still makes bank regardless. Interestingly the third one made less money in America but made a shitload more overseas. Dunno what it is about robots shooting each other that makes people love these movies. Vagabundo posted:You know what didn't make the studios go "this sucks" and can the franchise? Didnt these all cost only tens of thousands to make? You could poo poo out a hundred terrible sequels and still wheel home barrelfuls of money. *edit, the original was like 15000 but the sequels were 3 and 5 millions respectively. I guess actors actually want to get paid for these ones.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2012 19:18
|
|
|
Pesky Splinter posted:Remember that Atlas Shrugged 2, a while back. Well it was apprently released this month. Here's the poster: And the fee market decides... Yet again!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2012 19:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 22:48 |
|
|
Coffee And Pie posted:Who's no Harrison Ford. Who is no Tommy Flanagan either.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2012 19:22
|
|