|
Wheany posted:here's hoping they teach some relatively recent version of java and not like java 1.5. j2ee
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2024 11:12 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 09:22 |
|
Sapozhnik posted:dynamic linking is so great they had to invent docker to deal with all of the problems that it causes if dynamic linking were so bad, why would everyone dynamically link their applications over HTTP?
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2024 02:16 |
|
Zlodo posted:Here's a vastly better awk tutorial that takes only 5 seconds: shouldnt you use alternatives and xargs to get all of them?
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2024 18:01 |
|
mystes posted:Maybe they could just add top and bottom modifiers? curly_fry + ZWJ + (
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2024 14:55 |
|
Carthag Tuek posted:i would be surprised if vi doesnt have a thousand plugins for editing xml vim has had support for xml for over a decade. noun phrase is `t` for tag. as in, dit (delete inside tag), yat (yank around tag) etc
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2024 18:57 |
|
Sagacity posted:tbf this does sound like it might take longer to learn than the time it would take to create a completely bespoke XML preprocessing dialect sure no one should learn vi today who hasnt already been ruined by it
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2024 19:05 |
|
Ocean of Milk posted:Also re xml as markup: i think markdown's idea that markup text should be readable as source is good, though honestly I don't know whether that can be made unambigous. markdown is also clownshoes. asciidoc predates it and is better in every way other than adoption (its also supported by github though)
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2024 13:53 |
|
Shaggar posted:this is the worst idea of all, probably at least its one thing, unlike erlang where theres a bunch of different ways to terminate a line depending on context that could be trivially inferred
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2024 15:06 |
|
Internet Janitor posted:need to save user preferences? Bloody posted:that implies that you provide source code which suggests it may be open source which is as we all know “bad” see also rotors manifesto . therefore use the registry if they care enough they can binary patch it. no need for recompiling, providing source, or using the registry.
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2024 11:58 |
|
prisoner of waffles posted:most advances in IDE features were in proprietary s/w back in the day huh, just learned that VS Code is MIT licensed
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2024 14:39 |
|
mystes posted:But some of Microsoft's extensions, like the current python one, are licensed in a way that says you can only use them in the official version of vs code lol
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2024 14:45 |
|
prisoner of waffles posted:as a vim sicko, I am curious to know if neovim and its scripting situation are good/bad/okay/atrocious modern actual vim is better than neovim
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2024 19:19 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:neovim solved a bunch of unambiguous actual problems in vim, but also just sorta changed a bunch of things and isn't just a drop-in better vim replacement. vim 8 then fixed most of the same problems but in sorta different ways, leaving neovim as more of vim-but-different than vim-with-improvements. neovim is architecturally better, but the actual benefits of that are still potential benefits. for example, neovim should enable writing a much better gui text editor with vim editing, but in practice the neovim guis that exist are worse than macvim. vim8 also added some nice features that dont exist in neovim, i think `:terminal` is one of these unless neovim since added it
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2024 00:31 |
|
theres also some features i think they dropped amd never added. like xxd and encrypted buffers
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2024 00:38 |
|
minidracula posted:TIL about NestedText so now you have to too: https://nestedtext.org/ ill stick to xml thanks
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2024 11:53 |
|
Athas posted:BLISS is one of those languages that I've heard people (mostly the VMS diaspora) lament the death of, claiming it was a better C. I never understood why it was supposed to be better. (Not saying C is good.) C is good
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 13:43 |
|
Athas posted:Not saying this. i get that you arent, but i am
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 14:00 |
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:what is kind of weird is that pascal looked to be winning out for quite some time, but c then returned to relevance. eh. most of the security issues that aren't also problems in other languages have warnings available yes there are flags you should enable in 2024CE. but there's heinous poo poo you can do in all languages if you ignore recommendations
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 17:23 |
|
Subjunctive posted:are there warnings for data races or use-after-free in C in modern compilers? I haven’t honestly written pure C in a long time use after free yes. not sure about data races, but may have been added after C11's thread support
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 19:46 |
|
Athas posted:I'm surprised C++ people are that loyal to C++ itself. I can sort of see it happen for something like Lisp or Prolog or Haskell or similar highly opinionated or puritanical languages, but C++ always seemed intended as a pragmatic craftsman's tool for some times and places. Leaving aside my snarky C++ dislike for just this sentence, I can accept that C++ is sometimes a good and practical choice, but does anyone really love the language and want to make C++ specifically better, rather than just having access to zero-cost abstractions, metaprogramming, or similar notable C++ features for their programming? C++ people are the most cliqueish group i can think of in programming more than people extremely deep into FOSS
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2024 18:37 |
|
eschaton posted:hey now, don’t mix C in with that C++ nonsense C is my favorite C++ replacement language
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2024 04:00 |
|
Subjunctive posted:you’re why we can’t remove it no need to remove it, just only use it for fixed width strings as intended.
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2024 23:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 09:22 |
|
bob dobbs is dead posted:if its been his opinion for 25 straight years it isnt a gimmick anymore, is it? dedication to the gimmick doesnt make it not a gimmick
|
# ¿ May 7, 2024 14:18 |