|
muscles like this? posted:The last gasp of that would probably be the Episode One teaser they attached to Wing Commander. After that pretty much everything went online. Actually the last gasp of it was when Last Flight of the Osiris (from the Animatrix) was exclusively previewed attached to Dreamcatcher. Otherwise, yeah. Odd fact: the first movie to have its own official website was Stargate.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 07:52 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:40 |
|
exquisite tea posted:One movie that always comes to mind when thinking about trailers is Cellular, a pretty stupid and forgettable semi-comedic thriller that was re-cut to look super dramatic and suspenseful. The Ryan Phillipe movie "Way of the Gun" went in the exact opposite direction - the trailer made it out to be a fairly light buddy action movie, when in fact it was quite dark.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 23:01 |
|
Robert Denby posted:To keep this on topic for recent trailers on upcoming releases, let's talk about "Cosmopolis", David Cronenberg's new film starring Robert Pattinson, which is premiering at Cannes soon. I think this thing's either going to be a phenomenal piece of satire… or the next "Southland Tales". Judge for yourself. Looks like someone doesn't want to be remembered as Edward Cullen.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2012 11:01 |
|
qntm posted:Trailer music isn't usually by the same artist as the movie's score Trailer music is usually Lux Aeterna by the Kronos Quartet, or some other piece taken from another movie's score.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2012 19:38 |
|
Mierenneuker posted:Speaking of Two Steps from Hell: if there's any song that comes close to being used as much as Lux Aeterna, it's this one. I've never heard either of those two songs in a trailer that I recall. Link/name a few examples?
|
# ¿ May 25, 2012 19:58 |
|
I was at the cinema last night to see The Raid (which is loving awesome, by the way) and they had the cardbard marquee for Rock of Ages in the lobby. When I saw the "pick up the cardboard guitar and have a friend take a photo of you being a rock star!" thing on the front, I knew without looking at the cast that the movie was going be complete and utter poo poo. I don't care who's in it or what it's about - merely purchasing a ticket is going to be enough to shrivel your brain with psychic herpes. Don't do it.
|
# ¿ May 30, 2012 23:12 |
|
LesterGroans posted:One of the strangest, funniest audience reactions to a trailer I've seen was the full-body groan/laughs when "From The Mind of M Night Shyamalan", or whatever, appears during the trailer for Devil. ... he said, admitting he had not seen Lady In The Water or The Village. Nothing strange about people groaning at the thought of a movie from the arse of M Night Shyamalan. The guy's a good director, but he needs to do a couple of work for hire projects to remind people of the fact while he takes longer on his own scripts. Tarsem Singh has the same problem.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2012 08:22 |
|
zenintrude posted:It's available here: http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00051600.html "Judgement time". The rest of it doesn't look too bad, though. I'll give it a chance.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2012 00:27 |
|
Golden Bee posted:I'm not too excited for another Depp/Bonham movie about trains What was the last one?
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2012 11:06 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:Well aren't all fairy tales really dark stories that have been lighten up in the past century? The last couple of centuries now, but yes. They're still meant for children aged five to ten, though, as they were originally told as much to instruct and to warn as to entertain. Take Little Red Riding Hood, for example: a girl talks to a strange man in the woods and tells him where she's going. The stranger then murders her grandmother and lies in wait for the girl. When she arrives, he rapes and murders her. The lesson for the child: never talk to strangers. If you're only familiar with the Disneyfied versions, let me tell you, the originals are more like the Saw movies. The stepsisters in Cinderella cut off pieces of their feet so the slipper will fit - and the slipper itself was a sexual innuendo that has been lost in translation - and the prince who wakes Sleeping Beauty did a hell of a lot more than just kiss her.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2012 20:28 |
|
ProfessorProf posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNVaEoQMarg This one's already out on DVD in the UK. It is basically Alien in a warehouse, but it's not bad.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2012 21:41 |
|
PriorMarcus posted:To be fair video uploads are hard! Uploads are easy. Three million simultaneous downloads are hard.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2012 01:37 |
|
teagone posted:Those fighter jets seemed like they were doing jack poo poo and offered up little more than a tickle, and I'm sure dropping nuclear bombs on the monsters would cause too much collateral damage than anyone would like. Enter Jaegers. I still don't think it's a good plan. They're Jaegers, and they don't have hats.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2012 13:41 |
|
Deadpool posted:Probably not safe to watch at work. Any chance of telling us what it is?
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2013 11:54 |
|
Aatrek posted:Okay, I've never seen the original 'Evil Dead', but I always assumed it was a horror-comedy-hybrid type film because of Bruce Campbell's usual on-screen personality and that he plays a dude with a chainsaw for a hand? Am I just totally, completely wrong, or is the trailer for the new version is a different take on the story completely? Not a different take so much as a different style. The original Evil Dead was played straight, but it's still obvious that they were having fun making it. This remake is just po-faced by the numbers splatter flick #264. I've discussed the red band trailer before on other forums, and the near universal consensus was that it killed any desire anyone had to see the movie. I'm amazed it's getting a positive response here.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2013 11:22 |
|
bathhouse posted:But what do your other forums say about this new redband trailer? Oh, this is a new trailer? *watches* I can't speak for anyone else as my PC died and I don't have forum access, but my opinion hasn't changed at all. There wasn't a single thing in that trailer that was even remotely scary, and it didn't even manage to gross me out. The thus far perfect record of remakes of 70s/80s horror movies being irredeemable poo poo is in no danger of being sullied.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2013 17:39 |
|
GonSmithe posted:Congratulations. Just because you don't find a woman slicing her own tongue in half, then snowballing it with another woman scary or disgusting doesn't mean that the rest of the world doesn't. I didn't say that, I just stated my opinion that this movie is not good. I've been freaked out by things far less gruesome than the tongue slicing scene before now, when they were done well. Admittedly it's not easy to build suspense in a two minute trailer, but these people just seem to be throwing as much blood at the wall as they can and seeing what sticks. The original movie did the same, of course, but it was made on the weekends by a bunch of amateurs with no money and lots of imagination. This is a professional studio production with lots of money and no imagination.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2013 21:43 |
|
Deadpool posted:Your opinion that this movie is not good means less than nothing since you've not seen it. I agree that we can only judge by what we've seen. But trailers usually include a representative sample where they don't just crowbar in all the best bits, and what's in that trailer isn't good. So either the best bits of this movie are bad, the movie in general is bad, or they made a trailer out of stuff cribbed from the original and they managed to do all of it worse. None of these possibilities bode well for the film's quality. Could I be wrong? Of course. And even if I'm not there's no reason why you shouldn't go see it if you want and make up your own mind. But when we've seen remakes of Halloween, The Fog, Nightmare on Elm Street, Black Christmas, and many other classics of the period and each and every one of them has been an apocalyptic turd, and when the trailer for Evil Dead looks no better, I don't think it's unfair to presume.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2013 23:25 |
|
Deadpool posted:That tends to happen when the original is insanely overhyped and incredibly mediocre. Next week, on People With No Taste... Seriously, Ringu has fallen foul of the large number of identikit J-Horror films that followed it. It doesn't feel as original now as it did ten years ago. (It's also a movie that is much better watched on VHS than DVD, for obvious reasons. The first time I watched it the phone rang just as I stopped the tape. )
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2013 13:23 |
|
Looks like Carruth is the next Richard Kelly.
|
# ¿ Jan 15, 2013 21:28 |
|
The Slippery Nipple posted:Was that supposed to leave us with no idea what the hell this film is about or am I just retarded? You're not retarded. I don't know how anyone could be even slightly inspired to see that movie by the trailer. I'm not, and I thought Primer was great.
|
# ¿ Jan 15, 2013 23:57 |
|
qntm posted:Primer's trailer for those who haven't seen it. A more mainstream trailer for Primer could explain there was a device and show a bit of the fallout resulting from its use without giving away what it did.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2013 19:09 |
|
The MSJ posted:In Avengers 2, he will just lift up a rock in the middle of the savannah where a secret fingerprint sensor verifies his identity and a new suit of armor will come flying out of a nearby trashcan. Much like in the tokusatsu series Cybercop. If Iron Man 3 is in any way based on Extremis, that would be a backstep. Stark ends up carrying the armour as liquid nano-machinery in the hollows of his bones.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2013 19:01 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:The trailer story seems to follow the comic pretty closely except for a thing here and there. So aside from the really horrible poo poo, I think they're just going to go where the comic went. Yeah. The first movie diverged only because Mark Millar hadn't finished writing the scripts for the book yet. He says the second movie is pretty much dead on to the Hit-Girl mini and Kick-rear end 2 the book.
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2013 22:15 |
|
Ror posted:Game over man, GAME OVER!! And True Lies, Tombstone and Apollo 13 were almost 20. Frailty was more recent. To be fair, though, Paxton has been working on Big Love for the last five years and hasn't made many movies of any quality.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2013 09:57 |
|
Jewmanji posted:I think there's pretty much consensus on the fact that Crash is the worst movie to ever win Best Picture. Only among people who have not seen Chicago.
|
# ¿ May 13, 2013 19:01 |
|
TTBF posted:That's the big twist, but not the ending. The ending is all the footage (of the found footage film, in other words the footage you are watching) was either destroyed or rendered unrecoverable. There is absolutely no possible way for that footage to have made its way to Earth and be assembled into a movie. Who's to say that it did? We could be watching the aliens' holiday video. "Look, here's that nice couple we met in the Sea of Tranquility ... how did we kill them again, G'hrarg?"
|
# ¿ May 20, 2013 21:29 |
|
kiimo posted:Receiving lots of flack for the look of Smaug. I personally think too many people wanted him to look like the feline dragon in the Rankin-Bass cartoon. I'm more annoyed that they showed Smaug at all. That should have been a "Whoa, gently caress" moment for the moviegoer. You work in the business, kiimo - why is it acceptable for trailer makers to do the cinematic equivalent of premature ejaculation?
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2013 22:36 |
|
PaganGoatPants posted:To get the people in seats. You can do that without blowing your entire wad, though. This kind of thing has been an ever increasing trend since The Phantom Menace trailer showed Darth Maul whipping out his double-ender, and it's annoying.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2013 22:52 |
|
PaganGoatPants posted:KICK-rear end 2: TRAILER 2 Nice use of Dredd movie score there. Not so fond of the choice of content, though. There's much better stuff for trailers in the material.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2013 19:41 |
|
kiimo posted:For the past two weeks I've heard this being cut down the hall and it just sounded like Sandra Bullock having an orgasm over and over. Do you plan to see it two or three times, kiimo?
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2013 20:05 |
|
Ror posted:Here's one of the press blurbs: So basically, it's Around The World in 80 Days with a bootstrapping American instead of a wealthy Englishman?
|
# ¿ Aug 3, 2013 16:30 |
|
DivisionPost posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS8zOLOcPMQ I agree, "average" is something he can only aspire to.
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2013 18:32 |
|
BonoMan posted:the gently caress? I don't like his movies, I don't think they're good. YMMV. I do think Jonze is a good actor, though - he was certainly on par with Clooney in Three Kings.
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2013 19:14 |
|
It's not exactly trailer stuff, but Danny Trejo has said that the mooted title for a final film in the Machete trilogy is Machete Kills Again ... In Space! If they go with that, I am in.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2013 11:24 |
|
PaganGoatPants posted:I hope so. Who doesn't like live action Saints Row 3/4? I hated Saints Row 3. I have no idea why anyone likes it, either, it's a pitiful excuse for a game.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2013 15:09 |
|
PaganGoatPants posted:It looks ok. I thought the trailer would be much worse. Hope they bring his badass car back. That's all I wanted as a kid. There are few four door cars that are less badass than a Ford Taurus.
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2013 10:35 |
|
kiimo posted:You know that Robocop trailer really did kill any discussion of Gravity. But it's okay because the ED-209 made an appearance. Except ED-209 was literally the first thing from the movie we saw, in viral marketing - what, a year ago now?
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2013 18:14 |
|
zenintrude posted:The inclusion of "From the Producers of Underworld" didn't tip you off first? I don't know - the new Sleepy Hollow series is from the writers of Transformers and the director of Underworld, and it's well worth watching in its own silly little way.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2013 18:12 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:40 |
|
Steve Yun posted:Yay, Redford playing a CIA spook It's a fairly grim story. I think they've got the Winter Soldier dead on, though.
|
# ¿ Oct 24, 2013 21:33 |