From this depressing blog post regarding what Portugal is like at the moment.quote:Germany getting ready to face the sanctions laid on her by the Troika of Versailles. This shocking cartoon featured in one of the Universal History encyclopedias available at my home when I was a child. Today the actors are different but the plot is essentially the same.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2012 15:45 |
|
|
# ¿ May 18, 2024 02:00 |
Saint Celestine posted:So really, because of France, who pulled out of NATO regardless, we ended up with the Vietnam war, and a hostile Vietnam, and POW John McCain, and a Sarah Palin. I'm reading this, and from what it says, once France pulled out after Dien Bien Phu, they became increasingly annoyed as US interference in the Geneva agreement - interference that made it impossible for the two sides to exist peacefully and reunite in their own time, which the book also says Ho Chi Mihn was supportive of. From what I'm reading, after defeat, France wanted to leave it all alone, establish peaceful relations, and warned the US that they'd get mired in war if they didn't leave well enough alone, and the US ignored it all. Asylum seekers drowning:
|
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2012 15:40 |
Chantilly Say posted:In short: Don't blame soldiers for following orders. Blame the people at the top for making bad decisions. It's that old adage though, isn't it? "You always have a choice" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xq831b2tPg First Aid Kit singing a cover of Buffy Sainte Marie's 'Universal Soldier' (slightly altered lyrics) code:
|
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2012 12:50 |
Tables dude! I would be among many who make a choice, just like in Vietnam. http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com.au/2008/12/soldiers-revolt.html https://historyplanet.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/forgotten-heroes-of-the-vietnam-war/ Murder of officers by GIs was widespread, as an extreme example.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2012 13:27 |
Frosted Flake posted:Nobody wanted this war, but it's part of the job and we have a duty. If it's a job, then as with all jobs, you have the right to question the directives of your employer, and to refuse to undertake unreasonable acts that they direct you to do. Your duty to use your own judgement does not end when your duty to the military begins.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2012 15:59 |
It's cognitive dissonance, isn't it? Random Google image for the term: (note the bottom line of text) From here: http://lifeinisrael.blogspot.com.au/2010/12/hamodias-dissonance.html
|
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2012 08:33 |
Geokinesis posted:Cats are poo poo. Cats kill things, but they are predators and prey species have some capacity to be subject to predators. Cats receive undue attention when it comes to invasive species. Many plants, for example, engender wholesale habitat conversion, which can render habitats incapable of supporting whatever it is that cats might kill. This seems like a good brochure on it: http://www.mipn.org/InvasivesBrochure.pdf I can heartily recommend this book if you want to know more: http://www.timlow.com/books/feral-future All from http://dnr.state.il.us/stewardship/cd/species/2425.html
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2013 13:35 |
Kit Walker posted:I hate myself for contributing to spreadchat, but I do think there is some validity in discussing even minor things like this as it pertains to the discussion of the patriarchy as a whole. It's obvious that social conditioning is in play here. Isn't this just a case of being inconsiderate of others? It's more comfortable to have your legs spread open a bit, and guys that do it value their own comfort more than the personal space of others, male or female. Does it not fall into the same category of issues as people with loud ipods, people talking loudly on the phone, people sneezing/coughing without covering their mouth, etc? Just inconsiderate assholes being inconsiderate assholes on public transport. Personally I prefer when seating goes male-female-male-female because of this: and because of shoulder width (which I can't find a picture of). All men sitting together are cramped at the shoulder, all women together are often cramped at the hip - but when we all sit together there's room for everyone.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2013 04:44 |
advokat posted:Doesn't Jared Diamond also think that agriculture is a terrible mistake, despite it being why most of us are alive? He seems pretty dubious to me, though I agree that his books brought up (or rather, popularised) some interesting points. It is pretty fair to say that he is a geographical determinist, though, so I'm not sure what you people are so worked up about - as usual. The reason most of us are alive today is thanks to us converting fossil fuels into food, and when fossil fuels become harder to procure on that scale, so food becomes harder to create on that scale. There are billions more people alive who are going to die than there would have been without it. More people is not an unmitigated good.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2013 13:32 |
|
|
# ¿ May 18, 2024 02:00 |
I would suggest you read Craig Dilworth's 'Too Smart for Our Own Good', which makes the point that technological progress is a response to population pressure that temporarily alleviates that pressure. In this way, technological progress is a sign of a society in distress. Why would you take up farming if you could harvest enough from the surrounding wilds? Why would you design diabetes treatments etc if people weren't suffering lifestyle diseases?
|
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2013 13:54 |