Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012
From this depressing blog post regarding what Portugal is like at the moment.



quote:

Germany getting ready to face the sanctions laid on her by the Troika of Versailles. This shocking cartoon featured in one of the Universal History encyclopedias available at my home when I was a child. Today the actors are different but the plot is essentially the same.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012

Saint Celestine posted:

So really, because of France, who pulled out of NATO regardless, we ended up with the Vietnam war, and a hostile Vietnam, and POW John McCain, and a Sarah Palin.

When really, given hindsight, we could have just told the French to gently caress right off and possibly avoided that entire loving mess and would now have a Southeast Asian ally and a check against the rise of China.

Thanks France.

Edit: China would be overjoyed at a US Naval base at Haiphong.


I'm reading this, and from what it says, once France pulled out after Dien Bien Phu, they became increasingly annoyed as US interference in the Geneva agreement - interference that made it impossible for the two sides to exist peacefully and reunite in their own time, which the book also says Ho Chi Mihn was supportive of. From what I'm reading, after defeat, France wanted to leave it all alone, establish peaceful relations, and warned the US that they'd get mired in war if they didn't leave well enough alone, and the US ignored it all.

Asylum seekers drowning:

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012

Chantilly Say posted:

In short: Don't blame soldiers for following orders. Blame the people at the top for making bad decisions.

It's that old adage though, isn't it? "You always have a choice"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xq831b2tPg

First Aid Kit singing a cover of Buffy Sainte Marie's 'Universal Soldier' (slightly altered lyrics)

code:
He’s 5 foot 2 and he’s 6 feet 4
And he fights with missiles and with spears
He’s all of 31 and he’s only 17
And he’s been a soldier for a thousand years

He’s a Christian, a Hindu, an atheist, a Jane
A Buddhist, and a Muslim and a Jew
And he knows he shouldn’t kill
And he knows he always will
Kill you for me, my friend and me for you

And he’s fighting for Palestine
He’s fighting for Israel
And he’s fighting for the USA
And he’s fighting for the Russians
And he’s fighting for Iraq
And he thinks we’ll put an end to war this way

And he’s fighting for democracy
He’s fighting for his soil
He says it’s for the peace of all
He’s the one who must decide
who’s to live and who’s to die
And he never sees the writing on the wall

But without him
how would Hitler have condemned him at Dachau?
Without him Caesar would have stood alone
He’s the one who gives is body
as a weapon of the war
And without him all this killing can’t go on

He’s the universal soldier
And he really is to blame
His orders comes from
far away no more

They come from here and there
And you and me
Oh, brother can’t you see
This is not the way we put an end to war

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012
Tables dude!

I would be among many who make a choice, just like in Vietnam.

http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com.au/2008/12/soldiers-revolt.html
https://historyplanet.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/forgotten-heroes-of-the-vietnam-war/

Murder of officers by GIs was widespread, as an extreme example.

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012

Frosted Flake posted:

Nobody wanted this war, but it's part of the job and we have a duty.

If it's a job, then as with all jobs, you have the right to question the directives of your employer, and to refuse to undertake unreasonable acts that they direct you to do. Your duty to use your own judgement does not end when your duty to the military begins.

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012
It's cognitive dissonance, isn't it?

Random Google image for the term:


(note the bottom line of text)

From here:

http://lifeinisrael.blogspot.com.au/2010/12/hamodias-dissonance.html

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012

Geokinesis posted:

Cats are poo poo.


Cats kill things, but they are predators and prey species have some capacity to be subject to predators.

Cats receive undue attention when it comes to invasive species. Many plants, for example, engender wholesale habitat conversion, which can render habitats incapable of supporting whatever it is that cats might kill.

This seems like a good brochure on it: http://www.mipn.org/InvasivesBrochure.pdf

I can heartily recommend this book if you want to know more: http://www.timlow.com/books/feral-future




All from http://dnr.state.il.us/stewardship/cd/species/2425.html

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012

Kit Walker posted:

I hate myself for contributing to spreadchat, but I do think there is some validity in discussing even minor things like this as it pertains to the discussion of the patriarchy as a whole. It's obvious that social conditioning is in play here.

Isn't this just a case of being inconsiderate of others? It's more comfortable to have your legs spread open a bit, and guys that do it value their own comfort more than the personal space of others, male or female. Does it not fall into the same category of issues as people with loud ipods, people talking loudly on the phone, people sneezing/coughing without covering their mouth, etc? Just inconsiderate assholes being inconsiderate assholes on public transport.

Personally I prefer when seating goes male-female-male-female because of this:



and because of shoulder width (which I can't find a picture of). All men sitting together are cramped at the shoulder, all women together are often cramped at the hip - but when we all sit together there's room for everyone.

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012

advokat posted:

Doesn't Jared Diamond also think that agriculture is a terrible mistake, despite it being why most of us are alive? He seems pretty dubious to me, though I agree that his books brought up (or rather, popularised) some interesting points. It is pretty fair to say that he is a geographical determinist, though, so I'm not sure what you people are so worked up about - as usual.

Have some Lloyd George election posters: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-20963100

The reason most of us are alive today is thanks to us converting fossil fuels into food, and when fossil fuels become harder to procure on that scale, so food becomes harder to create on that scale. There are billions more people alive who are going to die than there would have been without it. More people is not an unmitigated good.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ronald Nixon
Mar 18, 2012
I would suggest you read Craig Dilworth's 'Too Smart for Our Own Good', which makes the point that technological progress is a response to population pressure that temporarily alleviates that pressure. In this way, technological progress is a sign of a society in distress. Why would you take up farming if you could harvest enough from the surrounding wilds? Why would you design diabetes treatments etc if people weren't suffering lifestyle diseases?

  • Locked thread