|
Yeah, Gatiss has said on a couple occasions that he has no interest in being a full-time showrunner.
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 14:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 18:46 |
|
|
Everyone forgets CGI Snake 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:Simm isn't the only Master whose back. Though you're eventual appreciation of this fact will depend on how you felt about Tarkin in Rogue One. Oh god; I hope they aren't making CGI doubles of Ainley and Delgado. Tarkin was barely out of the uncanny valley, and the BBC Mill doesn't have nearly the experience that ILM does.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
Burkion posted:Episode 9 is primed to annoy the hell out of me. It's a Gatiss episode, so hopefully it's a bit more nuanced than the synopsis suggests.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
I mean...Forest of the Night wasn't horrible....up until the "Hey kids, don't take medications!!" moral.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:The one girl's sister randomly showing up at the end was weird. That's kinda par for NuWho, I've found. Every so often we just get a really saccharine moment like that.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2017 23:50
|
|
|
That's a bit more than a "slight misstep"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
It'll be a puzzlebox. Thing back into cracks, silence, etc
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 11:51
|
|
|
If they don't cast a woman, that's fine....but saying that doing so would be confusing to kids....that's just insulting.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 16:41
|
|
|
Except we totally knew about Tom's cameo, cause Tom gave an interview where he said "they told me not to tell anyone. But I'm Tom Baker and I do what I want. I'm in the 50th"
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 04:18
|
|
|
Bicyclops posted:I remember thinking "I should dislike him for this, because the cast and crew have worked really hard not leak spoilers so it will be a surprise for people," but that was literally what he literally just said "I'm not supposed to tell anyone, but I'm doing it anyway," and I only was excited about it. Yeah, it's hard to be mad about cameo spoilers when the spoiler is the subject of the cameo
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
Guy A. Person posted:That's fair I guess, I thought the reference to visiting the companions like 10 did at the end of RTD's run implied that he was talking specifically about companions/recurring supporting cast. I don't remember him visiting many people outside of the core companions.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 17:05
|
|
|
I don't want the Curator to show up in the lineup anywhere near the current incarnation. Like...he should be the 84th Doctor, not merely two regenerations removed from when he and 11 met in the Gallery. I'm on board with the idea of a nostalgia trip for Christmas, up to and including explaining Capaldi's presence at "no sir...all THIRTEEN!" and David Bradley cameoing as the 1st Doctor...but I really hope Moffat can resist the urge to do any of the other crazy stuff suggested here.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 12:28
|
|
|
Yeah, look at the pointer finger of the actor's right (our left) hand; definitely gloves.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2017 12:11
|
|
|
It would absolutely be a Master-like thing to do to mess with the Master's redemption.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
"And so it came to pass, that on Christmas Day, the human race did cease to exist"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
Having the 1st Doctor show up is so very very Moffat, and I am all for it. How many different actors have played 1 now?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Nah, Cushing was Doctor Who, along with Michelle Gomez 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
I wonder if Big Finish will ever try to bring Bradley in as the 1st Doctor, or if they'll keep on with the impressions of Purves and Russel and all. There's at least precedent with Treloar as 3. Edit: also I find it interesting the Big Finish just recently put out a story dealing with the 1st Doctor's reluctance to regenerate in the second 1st Doctor Companion Chronicle set jivjov fucked around with this message at 12:44 on Jul 2, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2017 12:39
|
|
|
On set photo:
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2017 03:12
|
|
|
Riptor posted:It really is incredible how horrendous that first promo picture of Matt Smith was given how incredible he ended up being Yeah, that reveal image was completely unlike the style and tone of 11's run (especially the first season). That's why I'm not gonna put too much stock in however they introduce 13.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2017 04:07
|
|
|
Possible exception being the Matt Smith cameo
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2017 14:28
|
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:No that's still fictional. It's Hartnell the actor seeing his legacy carried forward 50 years. It's touching. Not a hint that Hartnell really was a Timelord. I'm not saying he was a time lord. But was he seeing Matt Smith on set? Or seeing the 11th Doctor?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2017 14:36
|
|
|
Burkion posted:Matt Smith. Because that scene already breaks the bounds of realism.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2017 15:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 18:46 |
|
|
Astroman posted:No War, No 12, not canon. They did a No sir, All 13! Set I think. I know for sure there's one with War.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2017 03:10
|
|
