|
Dean of Swing posted:I feel like I am reading an alien text. Nock, Avro, Urbit Tertius
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2014 05:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 8, 2024 08:52 |
|
|
"The reasonable guess is that black people are inherently dumber than white people, and you can't prove me wrong" -- a non-racist
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2015 23:53
|
|
|
This was pretty okay for the first paragraph or so before I realized it wasn't about the confederate flag.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2015 10:48
|
|
|
KonvexKonkav posted:Didn't all this cucking poo poo start in GBS? I'm not keeping tabs on memes but this was where I saw it first. Robin Hanson has been obsessed with cucking for longer than GBS. For like a decade now he's been making his students write papers on how cucking should be illegal and having them argue exactly how many years in prison it should be punishable by.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 09:18
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:Should expressing neoreactionary thoughts becomes illegal? Civil in this context means "polite", not "related to the government". For example, "I think we should avoid willful misinterpretation of every anti-NRx post as a pro-facist sentiment, or constant just-asking-questions about how maybe NRxers are merely misunderstood" qualifies as civil, but "Cingulate is a loving awful poster and his bullshit makes this thread unreadable" is not. I hope that clears up any confusion 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2015 16:27
|
|
|
For a guy who's totally not a racist neoreactionary you sure spend a lot of time talking about how anyone who thinks darkies aren't biologically inferior is delusional.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
Count Chocula posted:I still want to be frozen. Even .00000000000000001 chance of survival is better than none at all. Have you tried following the word of the one true lord and savior Jesus Christ, who will resurrect the faithful on judgment day and grant them life everlasting? Unlike cryonics, it hasn't been proved not to work.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2016 07:34
|
|
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:While we're doing this what happened to Eggplant Wizard? I always liked her but she seems to have been completely erased from the history of the forums. She was doxxed and harassed in real life. Also, turned out to be an author of incest porn.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2016 04:58
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:I actually have no intuitions on women. Behold my feigned surprise.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
Goon Danton posted:So what is "America is a communist country" actually supposed to mean when you run it through your moldbug decoder ring? It obviously can't mean what it says in normal English. He spends most of his time arguing not why America is a communist country but rather why you can't say America isn't a communist country, essentially turning the issue into a probatio diabolica. For a long time the closest Moldbug comes to explaining what the hell he actually means is a suggestion that America is somehow the Typhoid Mary of communism: Unqualified Reservations posted:The basic problem with the outside agitator Commie subversion narrative is that it's way too optimistic. Were communism some exotic pest, it would be easy to eradicate. Perhaps we could find some kind of microscopic wasp that kept it in check in its strange foreign homeland. Indeed, the usual pattern with an invasive species is that resistance to it is strongest in its actual homeland. If "Russia and Mexico both had revolutions, therefore America is communist" doesn't convince you, then you're obviously a dirty communist yourself. Thousands of words later, he gets around to making his own argument: Unqualified Reservations posted:And what is communism? As a political formula? Perhaps we can define it, with a nice 20th-century social-science jargon edge, as nonempathic altruism. Or for a sharper pejorative edge, callous altruism. Unqualified Reservations posted:So, for example, in classic Bolshevik communism, who is the revolution for? The workers and peasants. But... in classic Bolshevik communism... who actually makes the revolution? Nobles (Lenin) and Jews (Trotsky), basically. To wit, the groups in Russian society who are in fact most distant - emotionally, culturally, socially - from actual workers and peasants. Unqualified Reservations posted:Once you learn to recognize the distinction between empathic and nonempathic altruism, you'll see it everywhere. Empathic altruism - charity - is simply good. Nonempathic altruism - communism - is simply evil. There's not a whole lot of gray area between good and evil. Evil motivations can certainly, by coincidence, produce good results - but this is an accident, which has little or nothing to do with the supposed "good intentions." The Ultimate Proof That America Is Communist: white people callously deigned to let black people vote
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2016 19:33
|
|
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Like can anyone confirm that Moldbug has ever actually seen a black person before, maybe to him they're just weird vaguely bad abstract ideas. Freedom is Slavery posted:The fear that someone, somewhere, is exercising power over someone else, is one of the most basic cues of the callous-altruist mentality. Let me kill the master and free the slave. Out of altruism! Not sadism or ambition, of course. My hands are pure.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
Curvature of Earth posted:Holy poo poo. You see, newfag, when a daddy fucks a mommy, and he doesn’t use a condom and she isn’t on the pill, he gives her a recombinated sample of half his genes, excluding the non-recombinated y-chromosome parts, and she uses that and her mitochondria to form a baby, just like you! Consequently the baby will look and act like the parents and relatives. Awwww. Humanity is a social construct. The definition of species was always just a proxy for what was really wanted, the collection of individuals that fit in an ecological niche. That is the definition of a subspecies. In nature, there are only individuals, families, nations, and subspecies. Upon which are socially constructed species, families, orders, and phyla of subspecies. When the daddies of a society are prohibited from having more than one mommy, the most capable daddies have babies only with the most beautiful mommies, who thus face intense selective pressure causing endometriosis and D-cups, and the society over time becomes White. When they rut like the beasts of the jungle they never emerged from, they end up looking and acting like niggers, and completing their development four years earlier, making putting them in the same cage with humans or cats completely inappropriate.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
Jack Gladney posted:What do these people do to make money? Does this thing have a job? I can't imagine him having a conversation with a healthy human. no, because that means that Neanderthals and Denisovans are also humans, and as Irving keeps pointing out, humans are humans and therefore humans are humans, IMAGO DEI, amen. Are cows buffalo? are niggers human? are mosquitoes wasps? are bats mice? are polar bears grizzly bears? are horses asses? are lions tigers? are orcas dolphins? are peacocks chickens? are coyotes wolves? If you deny the primacy of race, you’re forced to memorize which of these are interfertile. Interfertility was chosen as the definition despite being retarded because it was known that breeding was important, but breeding wasn’t really understood, and at any rate we didn’t have the tools to study ethology and ecology the way we now do but wanted something observable. There is no way to split Neanderthals from humans that doesn’t also split niggers from humans. People used to think there was. Now we know differently, and nothing has changed in the world but the species definitions, which is why species was always a stupid definition. If Neanderthals had always been described as a different race, discovering that they had interbred with humans would not have changed the fact that they are a different race. The difference between barred and spotted owls is the same as the difference between French and German. They fill the same ecological niche, but look slightly different and don’t usually interbreed. Individuals, families, nations and races exist. Species, genuses, etc. are for our bookkeeping purposes.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Curvature of Earth posted:Does this mean I can keep loving my horse? White women are particularly beautiful. Everyone knows this; since some people pretend not to, let’s look at what nips draw when they want to draw the most beautiful woman possible: 
Monogamy puts women under extreme evolutionary pressure to be beautiful, since women who can’t get a good man can’t reproduce. Under the various polygamous plans practised by every variety of shitskin, women who aren’t beautiful enough to be someone’s first wife or a great man’s second wife can still be someone’s maidservant and still have their baby looked after. But the important part is what monogamy does to the men. A monogamous married man is not in competition with other men for access to women, but in fact has an incentive to help other men be the best that they can, so they can pay his social security and marry his daughters. A nonmonogamous man encountering that situation responds ‘ficki ficki allahu ackbar, gringo’. In a nonmonogamous society, caring about anything other than yourself and your immediate family means being a I AM A loving MORON. There’s a reason larger armies of nonmonogamous people are routinely defeated by Whites, and that reason is biological. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 01:10
|
|
|
BobHoward posted:Yep. Whole lotta just-world fallacy. Whites are the Master Race from a purely objective POV. It is so evident it should be considered axiomatic. Eaually evident is that Jews are an inferior conglomerate of subhuman leeches. See, going from “I have some reservations about the Enlightenment” to full-on “Hitler made some really valid points actually” was difficult for someone from my background. But I am glad for going through this journey, it was educational and very fun. Had plenty of cherishable moments and almost no regrettable ones. Ultimately though, even though it has been demonstrated conclusively that Jews belong inside ovens, I feel most at ease around fellow lampshade-kins. For although I make the most compelling WN ever, producing some very articulate arguments in favor of rational anti-Semitism, my inner shekel-counter can only be shut so much before he bursts in screams of a Judaic tone. Anyway, to paraphrase some friend of the family from somewhere: “to each his own, but I’m gonna keep Jewing.”
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
The Vosgian Beast posted:Pax Dickinson must be kicking himself for abandoning the Duck Enlightenment thing right now Yeah im kind of a natural libertarian fascist reactionary alpha sure i read and like rand but never got into the lib thing other than the economists as a “conservative” but when i found most libertarians wanted open borders i was astounded wtf property rights ? i guess they dont get what a state is they see it as a backdrop to a market i see it as a market participent its the property of the citizens and its contracted out to capitalists to use its infrastructure, criminal and civil justice structure and its labor etc. as such the capitalist can choose not to do business here as opposed to say mogadishu or they may choose to pay the dane gold for market access. they do not however have the option of importing cheaper labor or break any of the other contractual clauses. BTW Jim please go kick Lands rear end Well observed,as for the biochain i just use friend of the family now to denote all the types of friend of the family;s sand friend of the familys prairie friend of the familys brown friend of the familys etc, obviously theres a inner hierarchy but frankly i cant be bothered
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:Source your quotes. NEVER JOIN THE MILITARY Do you really want to defend this multicultural system? The military is intended to promote larger global alliances; while a militia is organized to promote the local security of particular citizens. Armed conflicts are always manipulated to expand multinational control, not to ensure the survival of unique ethic groups. The military exists to expand diversity. Do you want to be part of some grotesque social experiment? Whenever some liberal wants to inflict some cultural change upon society, the humanitarian will try it upon the soldiers first. Whether it is gay marriage or transsexuals in the shower stalls, the altruists will force it upon the military first. The American army has become just some Marxist laboratory.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Milo Yiannopoulos is my favorite 'Dark Enlightenment' thinker, personally. I recently got in a heated debate with my father. He asked me if me and my girlfriend had been to the newly reopened bushmeat supermarket in dindustan. I replied that I wouldn’t take my girlfriend into dindustan. He said that that was too bad because I had walked across dindustan many times a decade ago. I replied that that was before the media decided to whip the dindus into a frenzy of anti-White hatred, and also before the minority mortgage meltdown and immivasion displaced all the dindus from the regular economy except if they had jobs in the anti-White apparatus as e.g. informers in companies. He said that he had head about race relations being just fine before the outside agitators showed up before, and in fact Jimmy Carter had broken Nixon’s Southern Strategy by running a populist campaign that resonated with Blacks and Whites in the South; that Reagan had run a campaign of racial grievances talking about welfare queens driving welfare cadillacs and how he was going to end affirmative action; that Carter was the first Southerner since the War between the States and the first evangelical president ever but that somehow Reagan had managed to turn Southerners and evangelicals; that Reagan had turned evangelicals against abortion even though anti-abortion was a Catholic issue at the time and even though the Old Testament kike “laws” say that causing a miscarriage doesn’t carry the same penalty as murder; that even with all that Reagan only managed to win due to his secret arms-for-hostages deal with the Ayatollah that you’re still not supposed to talk about in polite company; that even though Reagan had made a deal with the Ayatollah and had taken a stance against West Bank settlements, after Reagan all Republicans have to support Israel. I replied that he just wants to sit in his middle class neighborhood, commute for hours every day while listening to NPR, and act like we can all just get along; that it was funny when the Bomb Brothers carjacked that human being with a coexist bumper sticker but I wish they had succeeded at hitting MIT; that the Paris attacks are great because they allow us to scapegoat the rapugees as terrorists even though the actual problem with them is that they are in our countries taking our women; and asked him about, while it would obviously have been good for the US if the urban areas had been cleansed with nuclear fire in the late ’80s, whether it was necessary for the USSR to collapse on its own terms rather than through a nuclear exchange with the US to demonstrate to people that communism is a bad idea. That was the end of the debate. 
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Pope Guilty posted:So can this inane slapfight go someplace else instead of my having to pick the posts that aren't slapfight posts out of the tidal wave of slapfight posts? Ten years before the CRA, the Commies purged “White chauvism”, as evidenced by microaggressions. The CRA was passed by a Congress that either agreed or was afraid of disagreeing. CRA style terror had already been imposed on educators and police for some time, and of course the MSM was completely on board with it. And then a court of WASPs legalized miscegenation on the grounds that marriage is about love, i.e. giney tingles. But Roe v. Wade was good, because abortion is an important tool of the patriarchy, not to control women’s sexuality, but more importantly to control their reproduction. If Roe v. Wade had been decided the other way, we would have TV promoting cuckoldry as normal and feminists everywhere talking about how liberating their one night stand that got them their first pregnancy was while their beta husband tries to act like he approves. CRA was passed by sliding down a slippery slope, but it wasn’t tipping like a pendulum from segregation to CRA, it was Christcucks Chtistcucking at larger and larger scales. Literally The Worst posted:I'll fight you It had been said that when fascism comes to America, it will wear the flag and carry the cross. In fact, the reason it’s taken so long for fascism to come to America is Christians coopting and subverting any king of populist uprising and turning it away from the heresy of race idolatry towards saving the dindus and their fetuses, not to mention simply suppressing populism in rhetoric and in deed. The seeds of feminism and anti-Whiteism are the totally unjustifiable view of women as pur moral equals or superiors as demonstrated by them having souls and being meek, and the totally unjustifiable view of dindus as our moral equals who we must not say that horrible word of lest we be damned. Today, some Christians think they’re using the alt-right to destroy the progressive Christians and then rebuild the flag and cross Americanism. We need to make sure nothing survives of the old order, not the progressive Christianity, nor the conservative Christianity. The reason this backlash was just barely possible now is that Christianity had been weakened to the point at which the fetuses and Israel candidate lost to the populist candidate. If Christianity had been able to hold us back for another decade, it would be much more horrifying for us, by not necessarily for them. History is about forces, and strength is always better than weakness, there is no sense in the Christian delusion that the meek shall inherit the Earth. Winners win and losers lose.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:I've just been putting them on ignore, but that was a new one, and I thought we may have moved past "idiot children rage at a dude who mostly pats them on the head and says 'that's nice dear'", and back to laughing at idiot children raging at feminism. I was a tad exasperated with a new idiot child throwing his helmet in the ring. I’d say gas the kikes race war now, but the race war has already started; there have been organized mass rapes of White girls by pocs going on for decades, and Whites are starting to fight back with arson attacks against rapugee centers, most recently and spectacularly, against the Calais rapugee camp in retaliation for the Paris attack. So, I’ll just end this article with some of my favorite quotes from Ben Garrison, which have unfortunately been misappropriated by others; I’ve marked the words the plagiarists changed with brackets: Garrison: The idea is that it is possible to separate [Jewishness] from [parisitism], and it is not. There can be not [Jew] race without [parasitism]. Treason to [Jewishness] is loyalty to [??? humanity is a social construct, Ben]… We need to make it impossible for the legacy of [Jews] to reproduce itself. Interviewer: And your views are popular in academia? Garrison: Yes, I’d say my views are well recieved, not everybody agrees, but they’re well recieved. “Is it the duty of every good [reactionary] to kill every newborn [Jew] baby?” “You’re on the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving. In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more [kikes] around.” “[Freud], [Marx], [Boasian anthropology], [Spielberg], [mass media democracy], [brutalist housing projects], [Saul Alinsky], the emancipation of women, [Susan Sontag], [interracial porn], et al. can’t redeem what this particular [race] has wrought upon the world. The [Jew] race is the cancer of human history.” And a quote from Adolf Hitler, quoted by Ben Garrison in an interview: “I’m going to kill all the Blacks, I’m going to kill Jewish children, and I’m just going to mass murder people based on their race or religion”  By the way, biotech startup idea. Chromosomes get scrambled as part of creating gametes. It should be possible to take any non-gamete cell and identify which parent each chromosome came from. There are a lot of half-human abominations in the world who would pay a lot of money to have children with only their human parent’s DNA.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:You gonna give us a source for any of these hilarious rants? Sexual orientation is a scientific theory, but when you say out loud what it entails, you laugh out loud. While I’m interested in the reasons for the lies of feminism and race-doesnt-exist-ism, sexual orientation is to me pretty clearly not a remotely serious proposition but just a Schilling point for the proggies. It appears barely believable when you sever your views about human sexuality from both reproduction and ethology. The next generation grows up watching The Discovery Channel, and will think more clearly by and large about ethological issues including the Jewish parasite. So I’m not here to say that sexual orientation is retarded, but to give pointers to where to look to be actually informed about the other choices humans have beyond marriage. Marriage is good for humans. It is also good for penguins and snowy owls, who go back to the same partners every breeding season. Peacocks, meanwhile, put on as much bling as they can afford, so they can get a hook up. Duck women can either get married, have steady boyfriends, hook up, or get raped. They have specially designed vaginas – vaginas, not cloacas – so they can have some control over whether they actually get inseminated by their rapists. Of course, we’re not supposed to talk about the fact that human women also can be raped and want to be raped by the most impressive man. Even progressives who own cats know that cats always reproduce through rape. Giraffes headbutt their women, then lick their urine, to determine if they are in season. Some human men can sense whether better than other human men whether women are in season. Bear men sometimes infanticide children so the women will go into estrus sooner. Zebra men will infanticide the new children of their new sex slaves, which is a pretty common and not very talked about occurrence in humans, especially with Black men infanticiding stepchildren. Left unsaid by the ethologists making the video I watched about the zebras is how zebra women ended up following around the strongest man as a harem. I think it’s pretty clear that they do it to avoid infanticide. Some species of goats like to separate into separate herds. So do the Ents – as Fangorn sadly tells the tale, the Entwives wanted to make nice gardens and the Ents weren’t interested, so they separated, and then they lost track of each other, and there haven’t been any Entings in an age. Anyway, that’s all about rape and infanticide. My purpose here was transgenderism and sexual orientation. Salmen like to find a good woman and fertilize her egg pile. Weak salmen, who aren’t able to compete, like to not wear the bright colors salmen are supposed to wear, but instead pretend to be women and skulk around egg piles guarded by salmen who are obeying their gender role. The other salmen probably think that faggots are disgusting and should be fed to the bears, but, it’s an equilibrium. In one species of goats, that separates into separate herds, there are transwomen. They get the advantage of if a woman enters estrus begins before the herds recombine they get to nail her first. Human transwomen who want to access female safe spaces don’t even promise that they’re only interested in “having sex with” men. That’s it for transgenderism. But what of sexual orientation? Everyone hears about the bonobos that love to have lots of sex, including homosexual oral sex and sodomy. (Funny story about the baboons, sexual strategies, and speciation – http://youtu.be/4LTWi13_jjk?t=17m30s – of course, it’s nothing we haven’t seen before). No one ever accuses them of being gay. No one ever talks about how they use man-on-man action to rank themselves, either. Human men who are in prison are notorious for using sodomy to rank themselves. But wait, why would Anal Turing and Oscar Wild have been interested in buggery, when they were pretty popular guys? Well, I don’t have answers for everything. Also, what’s the deal with humans, in particular the Muzzies, using 12 year old boys for Greek sex? At some point, you’re not ranking yourself, you’re just a pervert, right? The Muzzies may be responding to a culture in which the strongest men have four wives and most men must content themselves with buggering each other, and showing off their strength by buggering the choicest of men. But that doesn’t explain the Greeks like Plato. Anyway, it’s pretty clear that buggery is a show you put on to impress women, that transwomanism is an attempt to circumvent social mores to access women, and that humans should only be allowed to reproduce in one man : one women marriages. At least until we figure out how to build perfect comrades in tanks.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 00:53
|
|
|
Immortan posted:A progressive calling someone else self-hating is pretty Rednecks have guns. SWPLs have gun control. That war isn’t going to last long. If the SWPLs hire mercenaries to go kill the rednecks, the mercenaries might turn around and rob the SWPLs instead. SWPLs live in cities. In WW2 it took hundreds of bombers to set one city on fire. Today one computer hacker could burn down hundreds of cities by disabling the EBT cards.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 22:24
|
|
, no?
|
Immortan posted:Victorian England still placed high social value on feminine “purity”; Then why were the slut and adulteress Queen Caroline, and the whore Florence Nightingale, sainted? If anything, women got away with worse stuff in Victorian England than today. One cannot imagine Michelle Obama dancing with younger men while naked from the waist up. To recollect Victorian women as under control is like future generations seeing our city streets through the eyes of the “Black lives Matter” movement rather than through the eyes of white males who have to step aside for black males and whites forced to abandon homes they have built and paid for due to ethnic cleansing carried out by gangs of back males. The end of corporal punishment led to wild exuberant sexual excess along the lines of spring break in Cancun. Victorians were paralyzed and in denial about what they had unleashed, and did not have any alternative means in their social arsenal to restrain women. Since then we have been developing ways of restricting the sexual behavior of women without beating them, and have perhaps gotten better at it. But even if many women, perhaps most women, can be restrained without beatings, we really have to reintroduce beatings for at least some women.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:
You win a war by cooperation and coordination. Pretty sure that rednecks can cooperate with rednecks and obey orders better than swipples can cooperate with swipples and take orders. This would not have been true back in the days when swipples were smart and rednecks were stupid, but this has now become considerably less true than it was. Immortan posted:Hatred of capitalism doesn't make one a communist. Priests versus warriors: Soldiers, cops, rentacops, and the like are rednecks. Swipples are priests. Occupy versus rentacops was swipples versus rednecks. Occupy’s cooperation and coordination was incompetent, absolutely hopeless and hilariously ludicrous. Rentacop cooperation and coordination was iron discipline. You cannot get more swipple than Occupy. Occupy was probably smarter than the redneck rentacops they faced, and certainly more self sacrificing, but they could not cooperate and coordinate to save their lives. Rentacops had them for breakfast.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 23:13
|
|
There are actually people who don't have Immortan on ignore.
|
Immortan posted:The claim is that the alt-right are nazis. Nazis hated capitalism. jim, I’m pretty sure that swipples can cooperate and coordinate better than rednecks. I’m pretty sure swipples are still considerably smarter than rednecks. And I’m pretty sure they are more self-sacrificing than rednecks. They would probably also have more physical courage if it became necessary. I don’t know why you would think otherwise. Swipples are more like East Asians; Rednecks are more like blacks. People think swipples are soft and teat, therefore, they would make poor soldiers. They thought the same thing about silver-spooners versus street toughs. They were wrong. The idea that life makes people soft in a way that matters when the chips are down is as much bullshit as the idea that poverty is the cause of crime.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Immortan posted:National Socialism is still a form of socialism. The Nazis even put those words in the name of their party for the mentally handicapped, such as forums poster Parallel Paraplegic. I was born a swipple, my immediate family are all swipples, my girlfriend’s immediate family are all swipples, I know maybe two rednecks through Facebook. But swipples have destroyed themselves with decadence and cucking. Abraham Lincoln said that to determine what a man’s character is, give him power, and see what he does with it. Swipples have used their power to destroy themselves and their children: decadence isn’t not doing pullups. Decadence is being a gayfag, teaching your kids all kinds of nonsense and avoiding teaching them real stuff in school, cutting your titties off and being a transfag, never reproducing, and letting mud people take over all your systems. We know the time for decadence is running short. Most younger swipples thus turn to delusional techno-milennialist fantasies, while the older swipples say that the US today can turn into Sweden 20 years ago. Some Obama voters are saying today that the US is better off today that it was eight years ago. Swipples need to drop the spiritualism and face biological facts. They need to drop the universalism and realize that they are the loving WHITE MALEs that they rage about. Then they will be nazis, and the ones that lack any useful skills from school but have years of indoctrination into terror, incuriosity, and passivity, will need to unlearn that to compete with other nazis. Hipsters also rack disciprine and carry coffee cups riterarry everywhere shamefurry.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2016 23:33
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:Please learn a little self-control stop starting drama. Thank you. PS leftists probably once had a hivemind capable of strategic thought or at least total media control to gaslight everyone into thinking they won every time. I thought leftists would undercharge Zimmerman, then sue him for a lower standard of evidence and force more training and insurance requirements on neighborhood watch and rentacops, and restrict the ability of the rich to privately obtain services that the government provides. I told them that at the time and they accused me of disloyalty and not caring about Blacks. To this day, leftists seem to think Zimmerman was guilty of 2nd degree murder. If you think leftists have any training or inclination for strategic thought, look at what the proggies are saying on DailyKos. Yesterday on the front page some idiot said that Trump was wrong about Ferguson being the most dangerous US city and racist, and helpfully listed the top three most dangerous, which we can guess at easily. Did you see the recent photo of the HuffPo editors meeting? They’ve signaled themselves into gibbering insanity.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
Prism Mirror Lens posted:That guy made an entire new category in the bullshit alpha-beta-omega hierarchy, just for people like him who are too smart to get dates actually The idea of a CoAlpha Brotherhood is based on my idea of the co-alpha male. Traditionally, biologists have categorized males into a hierarchy with an alpha male at the top, beta males just under the alpha as his allies, and omega males at the bottom. Chimpanzee males are well described by this structure. The alpha male has mating rights with any female he chooses, whether she approves or not. Betas have similar rights as long the alpha and other betas don't object. Omegas have no mating rights at all. So how do they reproduce? They are forced to use the miserable procedure of having to seduce females to get sex. Unlike alphas and betas, omegas must be skilled at the art of seduction. Females will only mate with omegas when they prove their seductive skills. I believe that human males developed a third mating strategy, namely for a group of men to cooperate to prevent one dominant alpha male from monopolizing the females, and to protect females from lower ranking males. A reasonable name for this third category of males is "co-alpha males" because they dominate females as a cooperative group. This third mating strategy is the basis of civilization. I reached these conclusions after reading Jane Goodall's books "In the Shadow of Man" and "Through a Window" where she describes her experiences observing Chimpanzees. Chimpanzees are promiscuous, like bonobos, the difference being that the males are dominant. Chimpanzees have a clear hierarchy with the alpha male on top. Access to females is determined by rank. Male chimps form alliances for power, so a beta male in the right alliance can rise and get decent access to females. Those males of low rank get little access to females. Inside the group, females are shared by males of high rank. But sometime pairs leave the group to mate in seclusion for significant periods of time. This is an alternate strategy where a male basically drags a female away from the group and keeps her for himself while she is in heat in order to have exclusive access to her. This is clearly a first step towards monogamy. The way lower ranking omega males usually get access to females is by sneaking copulations. Basically, they need to copulate while higher ranking males aren't looking. If the lower ranking male is caught, he will get a beating. If a lower ranking males tries to drag a female off for exclusive access, the female will likely scream and a higher ranking male will come and put an end to it. This description clearly fits the scientific alpha/beta/omega male concept. Humans don't fit into this scheme so well. But I can see a clear transition path from chimps to humans. As the social skills of humans grew and the groups got larger, the male alliances probably got larger and more complicated. These groups could more effectively guard females from omegas, putting omegas at a disadvantage. Old style alphas who gained power merely by bullying lost to more sophisticated alliances of males. As these alliances grew, the key to male success was cooperation. But cooperation depended on keeping all of the males in the alliance satisfied. The simple group sharing of females was less likely to satisfy the lower males in the alliance since they would get less. So the pairing strategy probably gained among successful alliances, allowing all members of the alliance reasonable access to females. This eventually evolved into monogamy. This human male mating strategy is co-alpha, because men in the alliance effectively form a cooperative, collective alpha-male that dominates and guards the females. This mating strategy explains the basis for our relatively egalitarian civilizations. Obviously, this is currently falling apart. What about the female mating strategy? Females want to mate with males who are successful with other females, so that their sons will spread the mother's genes. Females do not care about what mating strategy males choose, females only care that the males are successful. So when co-alpha males cooperate and enforce monogamy, they are respected by women because of their success. But when co-alpha males fail to cooperate to enforce monogamy, they/we are genetic losers and women will not respect us. Feminism is rebellion against co-alpha enforced monogamy. It benefits omegas most at the expense of co-alphas. And so it destroys civilization. The CoAlpha Brotherhood is a small attempt to reverse this.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
Whenever we run into an issue that seems confusing, we ask "What cognitive process is executing inside our minds that feels from the inside like this confusion?" This process terminates when the issue no longer feels confusing, not when a position sounds very persuasive.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2016 21:22
|
|
|
pookel posted:WTF does "based" mean in this context, anyway? Me: I seem to recall a pre pubertal child born male but said to be identifying as a girl who was … SJW: Totally holy and sacred. Obviously someone who knows he is a girl before puberty and can choose sex change treatment before puberty can know and prefer his sexual preference before puberty but … um … ah … er … people like me would never do anything that is not holy and sacred. SJW: But I can definitely positively absolutely tell you that pedophilia still an abomination and absolutely the worst thing ever, and if a twenty four year old hot female teacher should have sex with a handsome high school football star who is big enough and strong enough to pick her up, toss her on the bed, and give her a spanking this is totally shocking, indescribably disgusting, and she needs to go to jail for the terrible terrible terrible harm she has inflicted on the poor victimized high school football star. SJW: still an abomination and absolutely the worst thing ever.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Thats not what he was arguing for. Have you seen the video? It's some disturbing poo poo. Obama is a filthy friend of the family and needs to go back to Africa because America is a White nation. Ethiopians are mulattos and probably aren’t even the same as the people who derived Ge’ez in the fifth century BC from the same system begotten from Egyptian heiroglyphics that begat Greek and Latin, certainly today’s Egyptians have significant genetic differences from the Egyptians of the fifth century BC; them being mulatto is significant because Africa is full of full-blood friend of the familys. You’re a lying intellectual cuckold desperate to justify your love of black cock that ironically is only because you know deep down inside that friend of the familys aren’t human. What is forbidden is sexy to women and transsexual cucks. Try preaching about how wonderful friend of the familys are on a college campus instead, they will be much more receptive and less interested in checking your facts. You might even find some black cocks to suck.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
Immortan posted:I really hope that loser isn't one of your role models. only when you drop the H. Sapiens x friend of the family designation arguing that it’s too confusing and refer to the strain you build the civilization with incorrectly as H. friend of the family. If Ethiopia was the only country in the world, we would need to call them H. Aethiopes, formed by the merger of H. Sapiens with H. friend of the family, where H. Sapiens was formed by the merger of some prehistoric race and H. Neanderthalensis. It is not useful to select crossbreeds, declare them to be H. friend of the family, and then ascribe their traits to H. friend of the family, except rhetorically.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Use quotes without the n-bomb my friend! User loses posting privileges for 6 hours. so, to reiterate, H. friend of the family is equal to H. Sapiens in civilizational ability, * because H. Aetheopes (a race bred from H. friend of the family x Sapiens) maintained a city built by their king who had the holy city of Jerusalem rebuilt in his lands with an unknown number of refugees from the fall of Jerusalem, and had a writing system developed from the writing systems of surrounding peoples * A few writers that are consequential enough to mention may have been H. Sapiens x friend of the family * cruel H. Sapiens did the jim crow slavery colonialism apartheid on H. friend of the family resulting in the lack of any further evidence of H. friend of the family’s civilizational ability You think you’re helping H. friend of the family by forcing them into the same places with H. Sapiens and trying to treat them the same. If you actually knew some individuals of H. friend of the family, or paid attention to statistics on quality of life, you would know that they like integration less than we do.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
Immortan posted:The 'alt-right' doesn't exist either. It's a bogus talking point just like 'cultural marxism'. Dyke Feminists are everywhere pushing to raise the “age of consent” from whatever it is to 18, or even 21. If you you’re a 24 year old (heterosexual white) male and have sex with your 17 year old girlfriend, they’ll call you a “rapist” and throw you in jail, where you’ll actually be raped by friend of the familys and fart cum every day for a decade. No worries though: our brave MRA defenders (faggots) will make sure that the law applies EQUALLY to 24 year old women who sleep with 17 year old men. That will show those Feminists! I’m sure the Feminists are very terrified of such a development & it certainly wasn’t their plan all along as part of their “agender agenda”. human being pedophiles and friend of the familys and Mohammedans can still violate your kids, though. That’s Progress. But having heterosexual normal sex with your wife will be outlawed by these witches, so you better hope trannies don’t all decide unanimously to sew their anuses, because tranny anuses are soon going to be the only legal sexual outlet for heterosexual white males. Because some women have cock and balls, bigot. Gas the dykes, clitoral war now.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
Parallel Paraplegic posted:Thanks for kinda indirectly saving the thread I used to wonder how Germans ended up greeting each other saying heil Hitler with that raised right arm thing. Now I have to suppress the urge to raise my right arm every time I see a White man on the street in my city. o/
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2016 04:39
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:Careful. There are some severely lovely people in this thread that flip out if you use autistic as an insult. There’s this TV show that’s popular right now, Broad City, about a half-jew and a half-friend of the family who run around New York City acting comically irresponsible, just like the friend of the family heroes of the stories that our commie scumbag teachers used to read to us in elementary school. I know about it because my gf and her friends like it. I know a half friend of the family who’s moving into a sweet apartment on a housing voucher and I have to pretend to be happy for her. I’m a pretty good actor, but it’s tough. I know a bunch of older men who are out of work who think it’s still the ’70s and they must be doing something wrong on their applications or whatever. They get mad at me when I point to the labor force participation and tell them there aren’t jobs for White men. Younger White men know that they need to keep their heads down, work twice as hard as their mud “co-workers”, show up whenever they’re told on a moment’s notice, and smile. If you’re a mud person, or a woman, or a human being, there are organizations looking out for you. If you’re White, there’s only one organization that kkkares. We can do this the easy way, with Trump legalizing a non-paramilitary KKK organization and generally liberalizing the laws regulating what kinds of freedom of association are permitted to allow Whites to compete, or the hard way, starting by lynching everyone who was involved in primary education 20 years ago. You can’t just tell people that they’re White and they deserve to be cucked because of what their ancestors did. Helping us tell Whites that we’re White is the dumbest thing the Jews ever did, even worse than ruining cuckstainty.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2016 23:05
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:And I can't imagine how it could have been handled a thousand times better than it was, or how I find it interesting that no one was jumping on anyone else just using "autistic" as an insult. Feel free to use me as a wall to throw your hate at, though. Gotta get those negative emotions out somehow, right? Nazis are socialists, socialists are stupid. Nazis are, however, a lot smarter than Bernie’s fans, and would damage America far less. Bernie would do a high IQ Chavez. And if you think a high IQ Chavez is better than a low IQ Chavez, reflect on what happened to Haiti ruled by NGOs and Russia ruled by Jewish socialists. You might think a low IQ black Haitian thug is dumber than a high IQ Harvard educated NGO functionary, but a low IQ black thug knows that milk comes from farmers and houses come from carpenters, while high IQ Harvard educated NGO functionary thinks “you did not build that”.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
Hermetic posted:Your bit is stale. Please find a new troll persona before they stop probating you and just drop a permaban. Thank you and god bless. Hermetic, ARE YOU KIDDING ME? It’s the current year, loving WHITE MALEs know what who are, and if it comes to a race war, loving WHITE MALEs have a pretty good track record. Ridiculous that you first deny that race exists, then offer to acknowledge that our nations exist as long as your sand hundred rule over them; this is more brazen than the disingenuousness Hitler mentioned in Mein Kampf. If you’re really so desperate, you have nuclear weapons in Israel, so take your people and go home before we decide that if we can’t have a home neither can you. loving WHITE MALEs know who is a loving WHITE MALE just as surely as you do, and yes, I choose loving WHITE MALEs over mud people every time, because loving WHITE MALEs have been shown for the past 70 years, i.e. for the entire lifetimes of every loving WHITE MALE in the country, that if loving WHITE MALEs don’t hang together, they will surely be cucked or beaten to death separately. But this is retarded. There’s no point in arguing with the shadow of cuckstainty that is lolbergtarianism. The simple answer is that I love my people.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
pookel posted:Aside: what term is being filtered to loving WHITE MALE? Because that is glorious.   AJP’s Klan didn’t think White ethnics counted as Americans, but Moonman’s triple-K understands the principle of ORION. There are all manner of organizations that take care of all manner of mud people or women, cripples, and queers, but if you’re a loving WHITE MALE, there’s only one Klan that cares if you live or die; support it or be a cuck.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 8, 2024 08:52 |
|
|
Hermetic posted:Nah, I said sorry once, and some spaz poo poo on that, so now I'm just warning better people of the shitbags in the thread. Must be awful to be angered by something that minor. And I never said anything about "PC Police", just a couple of lovely morons who think that typing on a computer screen should mean that talking civilly about poo poo goes right out the window. q: how did Whites evolve a: winter means White man needs to build a house and invite a woman to live with him. Woman can get a better deal from the next guy than to be second wife of first guy, codified as slut shaming since everyone resents bastards except for the father, including the mother. Monogamy takes hold, leading to selective pressure for cooperativeness because building up the community is the only way to have more children and grandchildren, and extreme selective pressure for beauty. q: why didn’t this happen to other groups in harsh climates a: feather indians, mongols, eskimos never developed houses. rice friend of the familys became polygamous due to the collective farming required to grow rice, meaning rice friend of the family men turned into pathetic betas and rice friend of the family women turned into sluts trying to get nailed by the alpha and stay beautiful until menopause to keep the alpha’s attention to get resources for the rice friendlets. q: why do Whites fill continents a: because Whites like to cooperate and build q: why do Whites win race wars a: because when Whites like to cooperate, then go and each take one woman. White stories are full of evil men who deceive good men to their deaths so they can marry some relative; sand friend of the family stories are full of evil men who deceive good men to their deaths so they can take their wives into their harems. q: why can anonymous Internet racists get it right when Harvard academics get it wrong a: because Harvard academics are namefagging, which is why universities are obsolete
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2016 04:47
|
|