|
Real Name Grover posted:I knew we were wearing alternate unis tomorrow but somehow missed/forgot about the helmet: That's giving me a headache.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 16:00 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 02:40 |
|
Real Name Grover posted:I knew we were wearing alternate unis tomorrow but somehow missed/forgot about the helmet: Looks like a kind of tard helmet. So I suppose Nebraska wearing it makes sense.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 16:04 |
|
Thoguh posted:Normally I'm all for alternative uniforms but those look real bad. It makes Nebraska fans mad, which is what everything should aspire to do.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 16:11 |
|
Those uniforms look like the 2012 ones for the Wisconsin game, which were pretty ugly. I don't know why Adidas can't seem to make a good looking alternate uniform.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 16:20 |
|
The department probably made the right call in breaking these out for Illinois which screams LETDOWN GAME to me, coming in between Miami and Michigan State as opposed to Miami or ... well, our home conference schedule is kind of lame.wa27 posted:Those uniforms look like the 2012 ones for the Wisconsin game, which were pretty ugly. I don't know why Adidas can't seem to make a good looking alternate uniform. I think these are slightly better in that they have the #s on the front instead of a big dumb N
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 16:22 |
MindlessHavok posted:Probably won't make much of a difference but we do have a RD Junior DT coming back from injury. He was supposed to be a starter but got hurt in camp before the season started. The defense has actually been startlingly competent. They were really good on third down against Oklahoma, and if they don't turn the ball over in the red zone twice that game could have been a much closer score. Oklahoma only scored on offense once in the 2nd half (early) and you can't say it was because they took their foot off the gas. Biggest issue if the Vols oline appears to have no answer for speed coming at it from anywhere. They should still lose to Georgia, but the Vols are unlikely to be an utter doormat against a team that had defensive secondary issues like GA did against USCe.
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 17:20 |
|
Real Name Grover posted:I knew we were wearing alternate unis tomorrow but somehow missed/forgot about the helmet: Between the matte red and the weird red/black split, that just kind of looks cheap. Like it was supposed to have some kind of neat transition between the colors or maybe some more touches on the N but they said "Nah gently caress it, that's fine" halfway through the design process. Rick posted:I was box score watching as the game was going early and for a while it seemed ASU was actually controlling that game, then I stopped until the end and somehow that final score happened. It was a pretty fun, close game for the first ~20 minutes, and then we went on a 42-3 run in the middle of the game that visibly broke ASU and completely deflated their fans.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 17:24 |
|
Everyone is trying to copy those awesome Navy helmets from a couple years back and everyone is failing at it.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 17:26 |
|
Edit: wrong thread
Ty1990 fucked around with this message at 18:03 on Sep 26, 2014 |
# ? Sep 26, 2014 17:35 |
|
Sash! posted:Everyone is trying to copy those awesome Navy helmets from a couple years back and everyone is failing at it. Those were the best uniforms I have ever seen.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 17:56 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Those were the best uniforms I have ever seen. Anyone got a pic to refresh my memory
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 17:59 |
|
These I'm assuming.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 18:12 |
|
VDay posted:These I'm assuming. These are legit my favorite helmet ever
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 18:23 |
|
So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago?
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 18:42 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago? If Mixon and DGB were playing for the Sooners? Yeah, I'd probably pull for the horns there, provided none of them do anything horrid. Edit: Just against OU, just so we're clear. Spiritus Nox fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Sep 26, 2014 |
# ? Sep 26, 2014 18:45 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago?
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 18:52 |
|
TBH to root for the Longhorns they'd either need to play a team I actively hate (there aren't any West of the Mississippi) or lose their status as the most generously funded sports program on the planet. So if Red McCombs jumps ship to Oklahoma and buys them a new stadium and they start talking constantly about how they're the best job in sports and get their own network and yadda yadda I might root for y'all. PS Mack Brown was on Finebaum yesterday and he was just the sweetest guy.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 18:53 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago? Never
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 19:03 |
|
Even against a team like Alabama I'd be cheering for 'Bama to lose, not for a Texas win.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 19:15 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago? I might root for them against OU this year. Stoops is riding just a little too high these days.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 19:27 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago? I'm expecting a video of an upcoming coin toss where they hiss "You inspire no trepidation within us, gentlemen."
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 19:32 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:So just as a fun thought experiment, how much misery would Charlie Strong's Eagle Scouts have to endure before they could theoretically come in to a game wearing Texas uniforms and still be seen as the good guys? Like say next season Texas goes up against a heavily favored Oklahoma team that's starting Joe Mixon among other noted assholes. Could you root for a bunch of squeaky clean woman-respecting underdogs in burnt orange? Or did we pass the point of no return long ago? I always root for Texas over Oklahoma because my grandparents are UT alumni, but man are you making it hard with this.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 20:14 |
|
we own
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 20:27 |
|
Post full list. I wanna laugh at how far ahead of No. 2 we are. Edit: Only 15% PostNouveau fucked around with this message at 20:36 on Sep 26, 2014 |
# ? Sep 26, 2014 20:32 |
|
PostNouveau posted:Post full list. I wanna laugh at how far ahead of No. 2 we are. In terms of raw money, or in terms of net profits? Cuz if it's profits, K-State generally tops that list.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 20:34 |
|
Jeez, Rutgers is funded 60% by subsidy.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 20:39 |
|
Probably Magic posted:I always root for Texas over Oklahoma because my grandparents are UT alumni, but man are you making it hard with this. I'm not even pushing for one answer over the other. It's just that with all the talk of being a "clean program" the idea of Texas not being the villain crossed my mind, and it was so novel that I thought I'd put it out there.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 20:57 |
|
Pretty sure Iowa's athletic's department by design and practice is designed to fund itself so every year it breaks even by default. I think the only time they don't is when they have some sort of capital development when the schools general fund kicks in the shortfall, it's generally not much in comparison. I'd imagine this is from a year ago when they were upgrading the North endzone. On another note, goddamn Iowa at number 11 above schools like Penn State and Auburn.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:00 |
|
Texas will always be the villain. There is no universe in which this isn't true.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:08 |
|
Pook Good Mook posted:Pretty sure Iowa's athletic's department by design and practice is designed to fund itself so every year it breaks even by default. I think the only time they don't is when they have some sort of capital development when the schools general fund kicks in the shortfall, it's generally not much in comparison. I'd imagine this is from a year ago when they were upgrading the North endzone. New practice facility I think, but yeah aside from that (and not having to pay taxes, obviously), they're completely self-sufficient. Football also funds more or less the entire department, although I think Basketball turned a tiny profit last year too. The State Board of Regents was making noise about UNI and ISU being self sufficent eventually too, which would be hilarious. They'd have to cut basically everything. MourningView fucked around with this message at 21:16 on Sep 26, 2014 |
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:14 |
|
Strobe posted:In terms of raw money, or in terms of net profits? Net, minus subsidy. All programs who are net contributors: tOSU - 23m Bama - 21m OU - 21m UT - 19m Florida - 19m Oregon - 18m Michigan - 12m LSU - 12m Kansas - 11m KSU - 9m A&M - 8m UDubs - 6m Neb - 5m Ark - 5m Mizzou - 4m TTU - 2m Mississippi State - 2m Sparty - 2m Kentucky - 1m Indiana - 1m e: some analysis: Kansas is the lowest revenue net contributor. TTU is the 2nd and Missouri just edges out Indiana as the 3rd. 'Bama's profit margin is by far the widest, but they are pulled back by their nearly 6 million subsidy. Note: all these are very rough, done in head numbers. kayakyakr fucked around with this message at 21:24 on Sep 26, 2014 |
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:19 |
|
Anybody gonna be in Athens this weekend? I'll be in town but not at the game, so if anybody wants to find a bar to watch the game at or something I'd be down.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:22 |
|
MourningView posted:New practice facility I think, but yeah aside from that (and not having to pay taxes, obviously), they're completely self-sufficient. Football also funds more or less the entire department, although I think Basketball turned a tiny profit last year too. ISU either already is or is really close. UNI would basically have to fold up its AD.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:37 |
MindlessHavok posted:Do not do this to me. I can't take it. One thing is for sure: tenn will at least beat the spread. Put yo bets in.
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:54 |
|
I wish the private schools released numbers, I'm kind of curious about Stanford and USC.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 21:58 |
Quandary posted:Texas will always be the villain. There is no universe in which this isn't true. Really never get tired of seeing texas fail
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 22:11 |
|
I honestly don't give a drat about Texas either way.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 22:25 |
|
People pay a lot of money to watch lovely qb's at Florida.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 22:42 |
|
vyst posted:People pay a lot of money to watch lovely qb's at Florida. That's for sure. I paid enough to watch us lose to the Cocks at home in November. Of course, their secondary may be lovely enough to gift Driskel his first 300 yard game. Yes. His first.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 22:54 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 02:40 |
LeeMajors posted:That's for sure. I paid enough to watch us lose to the Cocks at home in November. Florida gon win the east A tall glass of mark richt's pee
|
|
# ? Sep 26, 2014 22:57 |