|
District Selectman posted:The more I read, the more I wonder if this is the next Watergate. You're cute.
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2014 14:37
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 16:34 |
|
|
He should just read it all out on the floor of the house. Pesky constitution.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2014 21:06
|
|
|
They should ask how murder is an interrogation technique.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2014 03:03
|
|
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:This was all over the internet this morning Too bad the CIA is pretty terrible at identifying terrorists.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2014 14:55
|
|
|
If the utility is zero then our values are negative.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2014 20:43
|
|
|
euphronius posted:It's also a moot point because the necessity defense is available in the US. This would only work on the individual that was ordered to carry it out.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2014 20:56
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Well, ok but the Idea of someone ordering someone to torture someone is monstrous. Why would that ever be legal. We hanged the officers that ordered war crimes after WWII, not the men that did them (they'd have been shot if they refused after all).
|
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
Vermain posted:Do you believe that prison guards at Nazi concentration camps deserved to be prosecuted? Why or why not? The majority were not prosecuted. Those that were prosecuted went "above and beyond"
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
Goatse Master posted:http://www.thenation.com/article/tortures-dirty-secret-it-works CIA looks up to the stasi I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2014 03:31
|
|
|
While Canada facilitated torture its judicial system did rule it was wrong. More than the US can say.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2014 04:28
|
|
|
TACD posted:Is it safe to say at this point that the US has the most well-funded and expansive torture program that has ever existed? No. As horrific as it is we "only" tortured about a hundred people. Ancient Romans would think we were cute. I mean look at this poo poo: http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-worst-ways-to-die-torture-practices-of-the-ancient-world-a-625172.html hobbesmaster fucked around with this message at 16:19 on Dec 12, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2014 16:15
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:What I don't understand is why the CIA was paying these huge sums of money, like what could possibly justify it in their mind to spend that much money on someone who's job just seemed like middle management skills. When you think there is one person in the world that can do a thing, you tend to pay a large sum of money for that thing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2014 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 16:34 |
|
|
Feral Integral posted:I thought it was spelled like: Khrushchev ? Хрущёв actually. Kh is more common but there's other transliteration systems, wikipedia has a big table: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanization_of_Russian
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2014 03:43
|
|