Quantum Mechanic posted:Nope. Suffer, brief mortals. Also, I am allergic to democracy sausages (No, seriously. A lot of manufacturers stuff them with onion powder and garlic, which cause me no end of digestive strife).
|
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2015 18:04 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 21:27 |
Last month we had a pretty good thread for the most part. Interesting things were discussed, the shitposting was at tolerable levels, etc. Even some lurkers felt confident enough to come out of the woodwork and post, or resume posting again. What could have change- Oh, hi Fruity. Guess that explains that. Seriously, don't you lot have a chat thread somewhere else on the forums to get your more egregious shitposting out of your systems? Anyway, content: Coalition bounces back in poll, despite leadership doubts (Check the URL to see what the article was originally named). quote:...But as leadership discussions continued within the Coalition, Julie Bishop was being touted as the “safe” Liberal leadership candidate who would deliver minimal frontbench upheaval and greater party unity, as more conservative Liberals conclude Tony Abbott cannot save his prime ministership. You may all breathe a small sigh of relief. Pickled Tink fucked around with this message at 14:40 on Mar 1, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2015 14:38 |
Splode posted:Mate you came back and just posted first dog. Go back to where you came from.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 07:21 |
New first dog:
|
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 06:12 |
thatfatkid posted:Targetting one consumer product because it's bad for the consumers health but not targetting other far more pervasive ones is in my opinion cynical. Tobacco is explicitly harmful not only to the user but to everyone around them. There's no safe dose, and some people like myself who have been plagued by respiratory illnesses (in my case, mostly because I grew up and spent 18 years around a parent who smoked like a chimney) have horrible reactions to even whiffs of the stuff. Plus, junk food seldom causes bushfires when you toss it out of a car or bung it over a fence. Also, I am totally up for banning alcohol. Maybe if Australians weren't in a perpetual drunken stupor they'd see the horrible poo poo going on in their name and do something about it.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 14:29 |
thatfatkid posted:I don't smoke. 1: Calling what dominoes serves "Pizza" is like calling plankton "beef". 2: Being a lardy fucker doesn't harm anyone but yourself. Smoking harms not only the user, but everyone around them. I thought I covered that, but you seem to be locked into a "Me VS Them" mentality and just lashing out without applying your thinking-brain.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 14:37 |
First Dog tackling the issues of today:
|
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 05:15 |
New first dog.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 06:38 |
hiddenmovement posted:He's veering into first dog territory on this one
|
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 11:53 |
Mithranderp posted:our PM, everybody. Also, Image leeching is bad. Pickled Tink fucked around with this message at 12:50 on Mar 10, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 12:23 |
A few things to say before I put up the new first dog that I know you all so love. Those who simply cannot contain themselves can skip to the end. Firstly: Given the stated rationale of stopping the boats is to prevent deaths at sea, boats can only be considered stopped when they stop actually departing for Australia. The very fact that we are buying newer, cheaper returnboats puts lie to both claims. On the other hand, if it is just a racist dogwhistle then sending people back or taking them to your pet hell on earth is a perfectly acceptable win condition. However, that is not what they are claiming it is. Secondly: I did a stint of 5-6 months working for a "small business owner". I was regularly paid a week or two late, he never documented what I was paid exactly, hours were irregular and with little warning, and the conditions sucked balls. I was sent doing junk mail stuff in the pouring rain, but I needed the money and I hadn't yet been utterly broken by that point so I didn't tell the fucker to go shove the clipboard up his arse. And now, without further ado, I present your dose of first dog:
|
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2015 06:44 |
starkebn posted:Isn't it simply semantic bullshit? As I said in my last post, the stated motivation directly decides which of the two in your post is meant. That stated goal, as they keep pointing out, is "preventing deaths at sea". Of course, the only true way to prevent deaths at sea would be to ban the use of boats entirely within Australian waters, but from context we can narrow it down to asylum seekers. Since we have, in fact, had occurrences where asylum seeker boats have sunk inside Indonesian and international waters (This being why the government uses the claim of "preventing deaths at sea") the only way to prevent deaths at sea and thereby accomplish the stated goal of stopping the boats, is to prevent them from departing Indonesia. Naturally this also precludes the use of drone submarines, mines, and gunships, all of which would cause further "deaths at sea". Thus, from the claimed justification of the government for its policy, the boats have not stopped. HOWEVER: We all know that claimed justifications and real justifications are almost never the same thing. As such, we can work to determine what the actual goal of the government is from its repeated statements that it has stopped the boats (Assuming that they are not, in fact, just lying for political gain. Sadly this is a very real possibility that this government has a definite track record of doing). Historically, the objection to boats have been exclusively racist. Stopping the brown hordes from invading. No more mussies, etc. Racism has become much more overt and pronounced since Pauline Hanson came onto the scene and John Howard mainstreamed her views in order to snatch votes (For this sin alone, John Howard deserves to die with a whole durian shoved up his arse). Likewise, crime figures have repeatedly demonstrated that they are not as much of a threat as, say, a man with a southern cross tattoo (This has not stopped every single example of asylum seeker crime from being reported on the front page though). Finally, these policies are exclusively aimed at maritime arrivals, who are predominantly brown, as opposed to the much larger number of people who overstay visas and come in by plane, many of whom are white. Thus, from the governments statements, we can conclude that it is not, in fact, about preventing deaths at sea. That such a goal is in fact simply a smokescreen to disguise an openly racist policy to keep brown people from arriving in Australia. Which side of the issue you come down on is a fairly good barometer of how racist you are.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2015 09:24 |
Well, here's something that is probably unimportant because responding to trolling is the most pressing issue of today, yesterday, and the forecast says tomorrow as well. Of three remote communities here, why are only the two Aboriginal ones under threat? The whole article is worth a read, but I'll just quote a few bits of it: quote:There are three small communities within 30km of each other in the Kimberley, the isolated north-western corner of Australia. I now return this thread to its endless parade of being trolled by a transparently obvious troll because telling someone to go kill themselves is easy and discussing actual issues is hard, and only the former supports this threads culture of shitposting. Besides, it's just Aboriginal people. Who gives a gently caress about them anyway?
|
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2015 13:18 |
Murodese posted:What's interesting is the logical fault present: he's an eloquent writer and places great stock in logic, yet while proclaiming that the people are oppressed and governments kill innocents, he never actually justifies or reconciles this with his own slaughter of innocents. "Society is corrupt because people believe they are free when the government only allows them the illusion of this and often kills innocents" is a hilarious logical disconnect from "I must kill innocents". It's almost as if he's mentally ill Wisdom Suppository posted:Definite mental illness. Perceived or adopted persecution complex is not a indicator of mental stability. There are Australians who seriously believe that asylum seekers are illegal immigrants and should be shot to keep them away. That doesn't make them mentally ill. This thread is full of people who tell others to go kill themselves for disagreements ranging from large to petty, but if the people here are mentally ill it is definitely not the cause of that behaviour. It is absolutely lazy to disregard this kind of thing as mental illness. It not help in the slightest, because you are not even considering the positions these people start out from and thereby not treating the problems (Disenfranchisement, persecution, etc) that cause radicalisation of these people. Not only that, but you work further to stigmatise mental illness because you are synonymizing it with it "dangerous people who should be feared" thus preventing people with mental illnesses from seeking help from fear of the stigma. It is also a step towards bringing back the reasoning we managed to, at long last, ditch regarding the mentally ill: "Why should we help people who are dangerous? Why don't we just lock them up where they can't harm us?" It is lazy thought I would expect from members of the liberal party, not alleged greens.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2015 07:25 |
Murodese posted:Sorry, are you trying to argue that psychopathy is not a form of mental illness? I mean, sweet strawman, but if you think that somebody saying "extremists are mentally ill" means they mean "mentally ill people are extremist", you're suffering from lazier thinking than you're accusing others of. Please try to read in future instead of reacting as though any criticism is a personal attack. I know this is Auspol, but sheesh.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2015 09:44 |
Murodese posted:I agree, and we actually have a classification for people that act in an extreme anti-social manner (e.g. blowing themselves + innocents up) due to pervasive environmental conditions, often during adolescence: sociopathy. Sociopathy is, of course, either a subclassification of or synonymous with psychopathy depending on who you ask, but is still classified as a mental illness. Murodese. You have literally no idea what you are talking about. That is not entirely your fault because the terms are misused a fair amount and the definitions are not exactly what you'd assume. Psychopathy and Sociopathy are not about violence, though violence is a potential manifestation of these conditions. They are defined by "enduring anti-social behaviour", low empathy, lack of remorse and/inhibition. In this way, a person who meets all these criteria and systematically bashes his wife each night is no more nor less of a psycho/sociopath than a person who demonstrates all these symptoms and manifests it by being an arsehole around the office, maliciously undercutting and/or slandering coworkers. How dangerous they are to the public is not a defining matter. Indeed, I have read that a fair few CEO's and executives are diagnosed psychopaths. Such is an environment they thrive in. Politics is another such environment where they would do well. Someone wandering into a crowd and blowing themselves up does, indeed, demonstrate an anti-social behaviour. No argument there. But it does so from only one perspective: That of the crowd. From the perspective of the individuals group such an act would be portrayed as a selfless act of sacrifice. This is why I am so irritated at you simply pulling this amateur hour armchair psychologist crap. From your perspective they must hate hate hate, but from theirs they may be selflessly sacrificing themselves for a cause greater than themselves. Frankly, a psychopath is more likely to engage in activities that let them get away to kill again, or grant them some kind of gain, or encourage others to do the self destruction. There's actually a body of research on this subject, and simply labelling these people as mentally ill does everyone, including mentally ill people a disservice. Question: Do you likewise consider, say, Australian soldiers to be mentally ill for fighting, and maybe dying for what they believe in? I am afraid it boils down to exactly the same thing. Seriously, I suggest you do the reading on the subject before you mouth off on this subject in future. You are doing yourself a disservice, and you are actively, though unintentionally, harming everyone out there with a mental illness by being so hasty to declare that that people whom you see as dangerous or threatening or engage in behaviours you cannot easily empathise with are mentally ill (I have already explained how. Twice). For the record, this is my second draft. The first draft of this post read "RAAAAAAAARGH", only bigger and with more "ARGH".
|
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2015 11:19 |
Time for First Dog: Also, snatching a link from his twitter feed: Barnaby Joyce accused of pushing Leadbeater's possum towards extinction quote:Barnaby Joyce, the agriculture minister, has been accused of pushing Victoria’s animal emblem, the Leadbeater’s possum, closer towards extinction by personally intervening to ensure his department uses paper sourced from its habitat.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2015 07:02 |
Look, i know making ratbag dance like a puppet is fun, but there are actual important things going on, like taps leaking and birds stealing chips. Oh, and this: Labor to reject new push for firearms trafficking mandatory sentencing quote:Labor will oppose “urgent” legislation to be introduced by the Abbott government this week to impose mandatory minimum sentences for firearms trafficking, paving the way for Coalition claims that the ALP is soft on national security. I'm sure Cartoon would have something to say about this. Oh yes, here it is: Cartoon posted:Muppet Government.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2015 02:01 |
Birdstrike posted:Where's First Dog?
|
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2015 09:51 |
Ultra-rich people are utterly insufferable, what with demanding special treatment, Thatcherism, $2 wages for workers, removal of penalty rates, higher taxes on poors, and shitloads of welfare and tax concessions. Anyone who kidnaps one as matters stand would require the patience of a saint and professional trauma counselling to keep from killing them in under 24 hours. Frankly, they should welcome anything that entices people to trade them back alive for money.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2015 02:07 |
Time for some cutting commentary on the issues of today from First Dog:
|
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2015 06:43 |
CrazyTolradi posted:They are Pickled Tink, Cartoon, Fruity, Avs and Gough Suppressant. It has come to my attention that life may be incredibly stressful due to having to deal with the unending circus of incompetence and pain that is our government. If you are feeling stressed out at all, please accept a complementary kitten picture.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2015 16:55 |
I would be remiss in my duty as a shitposteer if I did not give you your dose of First Dog: Pickled Tink fucked around with this message at 04:26 on Mar 20, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2015 03:50 |
my stepdads beer posted:Labor came around on the weekend and tore down all the Greens posters in my area. They left the weirdo 'no land tax' posters though?? I have to say that thus far I am very disappointed in the Greens efforts in Macquarie Park. The only contact thus far is a leaflet left in my letterbox a couple of weeks ago (To be fair, it wasn't a terrible leaflet, but still). It is, in fact, the first marketing material I recall seeing from the Greens outside of a polling booth since I moved back to Australia a decade ago. Why do the Greens hate Ryde? I mean, besides all the other good reasons to hate it. We have Echidnas, Possums, Fruit bats, and as of at least a week ago, a Powerful Owl (The hooting... the hooting!). All these things should spur greater investment by the Greens, but instead we are ignored and left to the tender mercies of the Liberals. It is such a shame.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2015 06:18 |
And now for your First Dog:
|
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2015 07:20 |
HookShot posted:The onion thing is true, there's a hot dog place here that just has a giant grill full of onions cooking literally all day outside and there is always a lineup there. I would love to be able to eat something other than biscuits, baked beans, and steamed broccoli at home. I hate you all. Full disclosure: I just got back from a shopping trip so I am more pissed about this than usual at present.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2015 23:24 |
Kommando posted:However its really rare that this happens suddenly at 30. So my Dr is sending my poo to pathology to check if i am a meat hotel for parasites like Giardia I only recognised my allergy a bit more than a year ago. In hindsight I was showing symptoms for about three years before I realised and my tolerance dropped and I was able to see what was going on. The hardest part was convincing my parents that I was, in fact, allergic to something new. They didn't believe you could develop allergies later in life. It took my brother asking a doctor in front of my mother to convince her. Family lunches kinda sucked until that point "oh, you still think you are allergic...".
|
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2015 00:10 |
tomkash posted:Pickled Tink are you able to have asafoetida? On topic: I'd love to get involved with the Greens but I'm too much of an injury riddled depression-wreck to do the face to face and phone stuff. Is there anything that can be done, besides joining officially? What I am asking is if there is anything they can offer for the more antisocial socialists to do.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2015 00:20 |
There, it is done. From now on, your first dog will be delivered by a member of the greens. Now when do I get my cybernetic implants to plug me into the leftist hive mind? Oh gods. I just got a call from a lady claiming to be Kylie Turner about my joining and when I mentioned my mental health as a reason I wouldn't be able to help out at this election, she suggested homeopathy as something that could help. I told her off for trying to peddle complete and utter bunkum and explained how it did not, in fact, do anything. Still, I am already regretting joining the party. gently caress. Pickled Tink fucked around with this message at 01:13 on Mar 25, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2015 01:05 |
Today First Dog sums up the NSW election:
|
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2015 05:46 |
Great Barrier Reef: Nationals MP says environmentalists are guilty of treasonquote:Conservation groups are guilty of treason for lobbying the Unesco world heritage committee on the Great Barrier Reef, Coalition backbencher George Christensen has said. I thought this article was worth posting because it demonstrates yet another data point in an increasing shift towards US style political discourse in this country from the right wing. Also, Uber sucks. But I found this funny.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2015 19:46 |
Ragingsheep posted:SMH endorses the LNP. Thanks for that, Murdoch.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2015 01:14 |
Someone needs to go broke in the Australian iron ore industry, says analystquote:The Australian iron ore industry is poised for a huge shake-up as the global glut worsens and margins continue to tighten.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2015 09:06 |
I'll be headed up to vote after breakfast. I have mostly decided on my preference distribution. 1 and 2 are Greens and Labor respectively. Last place is Fred Nile's party. I'm probably going to put No Land Tax in 3 because as much as I hate whiny single issue parties, I hate the Libs more.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2015 22:16 |
Just got back from voting. Five libs, 1 Nile-ist, 1 Labor, and 1 elderly Greens person doing HTV at my local polling station. I saw a depressing number of people with the Nile HTV card (More than 0). There were no sausages, not that I could eat them anyway. I had a bacon, egg, and hash brown sandwich instead at a local sandwich shop.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 01:19 |
NSW election: full list of candidates signing St James Ethics Centre pledge quote:Listed by party, find every candidate for the New South Wales election on 28 March who has signed a pledge to abide by a moral code as an MP. A total of 215 candidates have committed to the pledge: 111 from Labor, 3 Liberals, 33 Greens, 19 Christian Democratic Party, 21 from the Australian Cyclists party, 2 from the No Land Tax party and 15 independents. This represents 23% of candidates in this election
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 02:34 |
Lid posted:Democracy sausage should have never been privatised, it is a common belonging to the people and now look at private industry trying to make a profit at the loss of the people. Government subsidise the democracy sausage, it should be free for all people (and have onions because a sausage without barbeque onions is just a meat tube.) Not content with ruining a perfectly good sausage by filling it with onion powder and garlic, you must now slather it in the wretched stuff. You are worse than people who think pineapple belongs on pizza. ON TOPIC: Gillian Triggs says Coalition chose to challenge Basikbasik report via media quote:Gillian Triggs, the president of the Australian Human Rights Commission, has said the government has rarely challenged her findings and recommendations, while facing heavy questioning from Coalition senators.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 04:39 |
I'd totally gift that to tithin were it in my power.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2015 01:19 |
Sorry for being late with your latest edition of First Dog, but I was busy playing computer games instead of getting a real job.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 10:11 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 21:27 |
School in Nauru detention centre to be closedquote:The school for asylum seeker children inside the detention centre on Nauru is set to close.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 22:28 |